Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: simple OU proof  (Read 11887 times)

Floor

  • Guest
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2020, 10:45:49 PM »
Two questions.  Does anyone know the answer to these ?

1. Is hho production by electrolysis more efficient (requires less electrical power) when it is done at a some low pressure within the production vessel (high altitude), as compared to, when it is done at some higher pressure (low altitude) within the production vessel ?

2. Is the combustion of hho less efficient (produce less power) when it is done at a some low atmospheric pressure (high altitude), than when it is done at some higher atmospheric pressure
(low altitude) ?

    Floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2020, 06:33:28 PM »
Two questions.  Does anyone know the answer to these ?

1. Is hho production by electrolysis more efficient (requires less electrical power) when it is done at a some low pressure within the production vessel (high altitude), as compared to, when it is done at some higher pressure (low altitude) within the production vessel ?

2. Is the combustion of hho less efficient (produce less power) when it is done at a some low atmospheric pressure (high altitude), than when it is done at some higher atmospheric pressure
(low altitude) ?

    Floor

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2020, 09:43:52 PM »
Two questions.  Does anyone know the answer to these ?
1. Is hho production by electrolysis more efficient (requires less electrical power) when it is done at a some low pressure within the production vessel (high altitude), as compared to, when it is done at some higher pressure (low altitude) within the production vessel ?
Surprisingly it is more efficient at high pressures and lower voltages.
This data comes from an experiment with electrolysis at the bottom of the ocean.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2020, 12:05:56 AM »
Thanks for the reply Verpies.

Do you know off hand, where I could access some data on that ?

   regards


     

Floor

  • Guest
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2020, 12:32:53 AM »
Some discussion here at O.U. forum

https://overunity.com/6028/h20-and-bouyancy/msg137038/#msg137038

   floor

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2020, 09:14:11 AM »
Do you know off hand, where I could access some data on that ?   
In the book "Hydrogen Production: by Electrolysis" by Agata Godula-Jopek but I saw pressure vs. efficiency curves in another paper.

Depending on voltage, electrolysis can be endothermic or exothermic, so precise voltage control is important, too.
Temperature is another important factor. Any water temperature increase due to the electric current flow represents wasted energy.
Besides the obvious potential energy of the HHO bubbles buoyancy, the absorption of heat from the surrounding water as the bubbles rise in it, decompress and cool down (as any decompressing gas does) represents another flow of energy - heat energy transfer from water to HHO bubbles. Note the direction of this transfer.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #21 on: June 25, 2020, 06:42:30 PM »
Thanks