To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!  (Read 13818 times)

Offline Dansway

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« on: February 10, 2006, 04:24:38 AM »
Hi All,

Robert Nelson of has posted patents of Roy Meyers Absorber tech!

Time to get your magnets and iron wire out....!



Offline Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2009, 08:45:29 AM »
Magnets you say ...

Why not!

Offline gauschor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2010, 01:46:09 AM »
I tried to do a miniature replication of Meyers device which can be seen in the picture in the attachment: On the top left you see the Voltmeter which is connected to a rectifier. The rectifier is on the bottom left and consists of 4 Silicium Diodes. The miniature device is on the right side and also correctly attached to the rectifier. The magnets are strong neodyms (lift 4kg) and the zinc plates are in fact steel plates and zinc only on the outside (pure zinc cannot be bend, they would break! I still wonder how Meyers did them). The Voltmeter on the top left shows 0 Millivolt, but later on I got a constant voltage of about 0.6 milliVolt in general (which is almost nothing though...).

The result is far away from the claimed 4-8 Volts from Meyers. Roy Meyers though claimed: the device should be elevated about 50 or 60 feet high. Sounds like an antenna somehow. Could it be that Roy Meyer only caught electromagnetic waves from radio stations?
For experimentation purpose, I wanted to know how much voltage I could catch from radio waves. I removed my device from the rectifier and attached 2 cables on it (which were the same length as the cables from the „device“ extending to the rectifier) loosely hanging in the air. The result was an exact same 0.6 milliVolt as before. Interesting... it shows, that my „device“ with the zinc plates and magnets was absolutely useless...
Now let's take another experiment: I connected a 3 meter long cable to the rectifier with the following result: 150 milliVolts! Much better that way - caught by a simple cable.

Now remember that if Roy Meyers put a cable some 50-60 feet above ground, he would certainly have measured much more milliVolts, most certainly some full Voltages, simply because of catching electromagnetic-waves from radio stations. He also claimed it did not matter if he put the magnets North to North or South or the magnets South to North/South. Could it be that he had some Radiostation North or South to him and therefore he got better results?

If we look again at his own pictures you can also say, that his "antenna" consists of 2 sections: a vertical section (the cable leading from ground to 50 feet above ground and also doing most of the EMW-catching) and a horizontal section (magnets, zinc plates). Now if you would rotate this horizontal section it is clear that if you catch a radiosignal could be amplified a bit more, depending on the direction it is pointing, preferably a radio station. Nothing uncommon about it, although the magnets/zinc would be obsolete. Some simple steel rod aligned horizontally would have done the same in my opinion (compare to common TV antennaes).

In my view I conclude that Roy Meyers only achieved to catch electromagnetic waves from radio stations and nothing else, which is disappointing. I really hoped to gain some interesting effect.

Of course someone may claim in respect to my "device" that everything is maybe too small (magnets and their distance from each other, zinc plate size), that I didn't use the flatcoils Roy Meyers used in his rectifier,  his mercury vapor lamps, etc. but then I'm asking:
Would it make a difference, if someone could catch the same energy anyways with a simple long cable? Put some 100 cables side by side and you'll receive a 100 Voltage . This energy though is not free. Imagine all radio stations shut down one will end up empty (0 Volt) as well. Sure it would be possible to make a huge net to catch even more voltage ;D but if everyone would do that, it would lead to big "holes". Maybe usefull for a „free“ battery charger ;)

But as Steven has replicated some years ago the „Horseshoe experiment“, with the same result I think there is nothing more to get. Even if there would be something – how would one distinguish the „free EM-waves“ within all these Electric smog from todays technology? No way.

Offline Steven Dufresne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
    • Non-conventional Energy Experiments
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2010, 04:26:09 PM »
Hi @gauschor,
Nice work! Thanks for sharing. Like with you, the use of the magnets are a mystery to me too and I've thought about the wires connecting magnets as EM wave antennas. One other possibility is the mercury vapor rectifiers that Meyers used.

I've been thinking a lot lately about running some sort of fluctuating voltage through a plasma or a heaviliy ionized gas and that perhaps this would create charged particles with a external contribution from vacuum energy. Perhaps this is what went on in the mercury vapor rectifiers and the "antennas" were just there to supply the fluctuations. It may be necessary that the ionization device also be a rectifier.

I've mentioned this theory many times in the past and recently in the radiant_energy yahoogroup, Bruce Perrault reminded me of it (though he has a different theory using the same components.) In the Moray valve this ionization would have been added to with radioactive material. In some of the testatika cylinders this ionization may have been added to by the crystals. See the tall cylinders in the back and the three smaller ones in the front in:
(that's Luzi Cathomen, chief engineer at Methermitha on the right)
And then EV Gray tube has similar possibilities and some work by Aaron Murakami and others in the Energetic Forum (Gray Tube Replication thread) may be working along these lines.

So there are a number of possible correlations here. Instead of mercury vapor recitifiers, I've started researching at other safer gas or vacuum tube rectifiers that work the same way. Though today I'm playing with ionizing air between various meshes.

Offline chuff1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2013, 06:30:15 AM »
Hello all,

I submit to you a theory on the inner workings of Roy Meyers device.  A little background information is needed to fully understand how this
device functions.  According to his patent there are four patents he references. Each one of the patents listed uses thermoelectricity.
While researching an old magazine called "The Electrical Experimenter" (July 1916 pg. 167) I found a interesting article on thermoelectric
generators and magnets.  In the article it talks about the "Peltier Cross" , but the more pertinent part of the article lists a little known
effect called the "Ettingshausen effect".  If you research that term, You will know exactly how meyers created his device.  He mentions
Two dissimilar metals to make his device, the zinc plate and iron wire.  According to the Ettingshausen effect, you have to supply a magnetic
field and a difference of temperature to make current.  Anyone interested in my findings; i would be more than happy to elaborate further.

Offline ken4ward

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2018, 03:08:51 PM »
Has anyone been able to successfully modeled in the real sense of it. Please I need it badly. Presently working on a project that needs energy from air.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Roy J. Meyers: Absorber British Patents posted by Rex Research!
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2018, 05:33:05 PM »
"Presently working on a project that needs
energy from air.
".....     im not the only 1?