Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

30+ years, for over 30 years I had been researching and experimenting in "Reciprocal Energy Efficiency Production Systems", a term more accurate to what everyone is attempting to accomplish, not as cool sounding, but less vague also. The term needs to be clarified for the benefit of BOTH the researchers/experimenters in this field, but also and ESPECIALLY the outside world...

Many assumptions are made on both sides about "Overunity", and for many of those on our side, it effects our research and successes (or failures respectively), because we go into our projects with certain ideas, objectives and strategies, leading down a path that may be the wrong one......right train station, wrong track, as for those who don't even want to accept the possibility......well, the vagueness is a weapon that is hard to try to convince a person who doesn't want to listen, to change for just a second.

"Overunity" is commonly defined as a device and/or a system which once initiated, will begin a series of steps that will efficiently reuse energy in a manner that will maintain the progression of the system and/or production of an excess amount of energy necessary to maintain said system.

In a way, that is the "EFFECT" that is the objective. commonly the first words out of most people's mouths is "THERMODYNAMICS !!!", specifically the "first law", extra simplified "energy can NOT be created or destroyed, only changed form", which in EVERY way is absolutely true !!! but has NOTHING to do with Overunity devices/systems.

Too many hopefuls and idealists in our circle spend their whole lives and all their money in trying to find the flaw in Thermodynamics or an undiscovered situational stipulation that provides a "workaround", it is because of their attempting to beat Thermodynamics, they fail, when in fact, it is the laws of Thermodynamics that PROVES the possibility of a device/system that can produce an amount of power that can maintain its own systems, but also provide an amount in excess of that.

I won't go into any PBS Special or anything, but will prove a point.....

define "fuel": a physical substance that is used to provide energy to a device or system, more specifically, a physical substance that is usually ignited to greatly increase the release of potential energy to a device or system.

fuels generally come in gas, liquids & solid, but can come in other forms, like chemical reaction (batteries), even radioactive material, even though is a solid, it is the process of fusion that produces the heat energy, the material itself is not incendiary, then every "Overunitist's" favorite fuel.......Magnets !!!

You might be confused as to why I classify a magnet as a source of "Fuel", because, a magnet is a powerful source of stored potential energy, some less than others, but when utilized in an efficient configuration and system, it is a great weapon in the war of free and efficient energy, it is CHEAP, it is STABLE/(safe) and best of all........PERMANENT !!! (if properly maintained)

You think "but magnets are so bulky plus if all this was true, how come they are not used for energy production more than just, gas or wind powered generators , but they are, water dams power stations, the water turns turbines connected to giant brushless coils/magnet system, even
 nuclear power, the nuclear reaction does NOT create the electricity for the system, it provides the heat to water, the water turns to steam in giant pistons, which in short is very much how the car works, pistons, alternator, powers fuel, fuel powers pistons, pistons power electrical, electrical powers fuel, ect.


Several years ago, I almost gave up the cause, but started thinking "Why are there so many haters ", it lead me to truly understand what "Overunity" really is, and I started theories, designs and experimentations, which led me to the successes and discoveries I have come to over these past few years and am almost ready to release my designs and findings.

"Overunity" objective systems (magnets or not) are about maximizing efficiency and minimizing costs (electrically).

Don't throw the Thermodynamics book out the door, put it on your desk, "Overunity" is real, not magical or a pipe dream.

almost ready? Is that real soon?,
So you don't have anything NOW?

I have created several small fidget spinner for testing out out my specific designs, work out bugs, testing, work in improvements, testing, fixes, testing, ect....

but I HATE (forgive the expletive) "half-assed", and all those creating designs and just putting out designs and/or vids and not even doing the proper work, I can light up series of lights, for 13 hours, non-stop, cool, I can charge my phone in about 7 hours, ok, it proves the possibility, but unless I can scale it up and make a version that produces high amounts of current and remain reliable and most of all SAFE !!! I'll just look like another one of those hacks on YouTube that NO ONE takes seriously, if I can't scale it up, it's worthless.

My intention is to take my designs, have them certified and University of Alabama's EE dept. and dump them on the world, I know a meteorologist at WKRG here and might get someone to look at it, then maybe talk about it on air and publicly release the designs for free to the world all at once.

everyone (big Corps. also) will research and make better designs, but can't truly patent it, so anything they make will HAVE to remain inexpensive, and by proving it can be done, all those who are about to give up, will feel renewed, knowing their time isn't wasted, will create many designs far more effective and  efficient than mine !!!

I'm not out for the money, I'm out to show the world, the impossible future is real and now

but I can't do that if all I present is a scrappy little 4th grade science project looking thing on YouTube

So the real answer is: not yet.
That is no condemnation of you, but a statement.
I am peripherally involved with exceptions to: 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, Newton's Law of Conservation of Momentum and modifying gravity, so I am willing to look at challenges.
I question your statement "a magnet is a powerful source of stored potential energy"; a magnet's energy content is about 10% of the energy used to make it, so it's not very efficient. Moreover, that energy is conserved.

the amount of energy used to magnetize seems costly at first, but as it is a permanent source, the benefits outway the cost, as for the energy being conserved, that is relative to the methods used to  utilize the power, gasoline is pretty conserved in its natural state, but put under high pressure and ***BOOM***, N52 magnets no a days are cheaper to produce and buy than ever before, so the fuel source is successful (trust me), I remind, don't concentrate on just the source, but what things are causing you to be forced to put a higher amount of energy into the device, reducing your energy profits.

Life is about evolution, and evolution is a process of necessity, as a society AND a species, it is necessary to evolve, it's not just about free energy, but clean energy, we need to succeed