Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.  (Read 26698 times)

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2016, 07:14:55 PM »


 Meta,
       why not try asking UFO Politics? He's made a video supporting Theoria, trouble
 is the title includes "magnetic particles" and Theo adamantly denies the existence of
 particles.
    If you get a chance ask Theo "How does drain cleaner work?",or "How does the
 photo-electric effect work?", or "How does a fuel cell work?".
            John.

I will contact him if necessary.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2016, 09:08:17 PM »
I have an idea based upon Tom Beardens overunity circuit

Well you have failed before you even began, as Tom Bearden never had an overunity circuit. (http://overunity.com/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)


Brad


100% correct.
 
Bill

Bearden's MEG

http://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm

Patented US Patent 6,362,718: Motionless Electromagnetic Generator

Inventors: Patrick Stephen L; Bearden Thomas E.; Hayes James C.; Moore Kenneth D.; Kenny James L.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beardens Over Unity circuit

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tbfrenrg.htm

Seems you two are a couple of lying dogs.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2016, 12:27:31 AM »
I have an idea based upon Tom Beardens overunity circuit

Well you have failed before you even began, as Tom Bearden never had an overunity circuit. (http://overunity.com/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)


Brad

Bearden's MEG

http://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm

Patented US Patent 6,362,718: Motionless Electromagnetic Generator

Inventors: Patrick Stephen L; Bearden Thomas E.; Hayes James C.; Moore Kenneth D.; Kenny James L.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beardens Over Unity circuit

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tbfrenrg.htm

Seems you two are a couple of lying dogs.


Lying dogs?
 
More like dealing with what we like to call...reality.  There has NEVER been a documented and third party verified overunity device...ever...period.  Therefore, Bearden does not have one and NEVER did.
 
If you don't/can't understand this that is fine but because you do not understand the truth does not make me a lying dog...Tinman either.
 
Bill

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2016, 12:51:47 AM »
Meta,

Maybe you should try reading what you post links to.  Here is a quote directly from your link to Beardin's Overunity circuit:

I hope that, with this short description, I have been able to clarify a bit the Tom Bearden's " Final Secret of Free Energy ". Now, only a real working device will prove if his claim can be more than a simple overunity dream...


Then that page links to another page where we find this quote:

The HEP/TEP device is not yet a true overunity device is energy term, but it is able to produce a highly efficient mechanical work by converting motion of charges which has created itself than any conventional solid state device.

So your links do not match up with your claims.   I have also studied overunity claims for many years and have even seen what I am convinced was actual overunity so I am not saying I don't believe it is possible.  But no where have I found any evidence the device you are promoting has ever worked as claimed.
When someone says it doesn't work that does not make them lying dogs or any other derogatory name you want to call them.  They are telling the truth and until you or someone else shows a working Meg or whatever you want to call it their claims are still true.


verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2016, 09:03:09 AM »
Get off my thread, presumptuous assholes.
Name calling is the result of reading all these books?
No, he resorts to profanities when he runs out of substantial arguments.
See below:

You condescending, arrogant, dismissive asshole. Fuck you.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2016, 09:15:18 AM »
Your accusation was......

"Well you have failed before you even began, as Tom Bearden never had an overunity circuit."

------------------------------------------------------------------

I showed you the circuit. You are still lying dogs.

My offer still stands, for anyone.

Which of you losers wants to build it and prove Bearden and myself wrong...its your perfect opportunity....Do you realize its not Beardens circuit any more? Its Bearden with a twist.......or do you fall under my warning as quoted in my original offer.....

"Remember, to criticize, before through research, is the height of stupidity."  .....

Which is exactly what you're doing.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2016, 02:10:56 PM »
Atem
sorry I meant
Meta...
*we have a rude fellow named Atom comes thru every now and then to cause confusion here.
he was shown the door ...he changes his handle and sneaks back in  but likes to use Atom as some part of it.

AnyHoo
You keep bragging about all the Books you read , seems you imply its a path to your unique understanding.

I am a terrible speller and sentence writer so I usually can't throw a stone in this department

But your the potty mouth  bragger here , and since you reposted it now twice ,,,

its spelled

thor·ough.


[ˈTHərō]
ADJECTIVE
1.complete with regard to every detail; not superficial or partial:
"planners need a thorough understanding of the subject"


-------------
perhaps you should read a bit slower ...more thoroughly
you might actually absorb more useful info.

I think your fibbin about all them books ,unless they were in Chinese ??




tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2016, 03:53:48 PM »
Your accusation was......

"Well you have failed before you even began, as Tom Bearden never had an overunity circuit."

------------------------------------------------------------------

I showed you the circuit. You are still lying dogs.

My offer still stands, for anyone.

Which of you losers wants to build it and prove Bearden and myself wrong...its your perfect opportunity....Do you realize its not Beardens circuit any more? Its Bearden with a twist.......or do you fall under my warning as quoted in my original offer.....

"Remember, to criticize, before through research, is the height of stupidity."  .....

Which is exactly what you're doing.

The height of stupidity is not knowing the people you are dealing with,and not knowing what they have and have not done.

I see you pride your self in metaphysics.
I can see that clearly-->an abstract theory with no basis in reality.
Suits you well.


Brad

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2016, 04:45:39 PM »
Your accusation was......

"Well you have failed before you even began, as Tom Bearden never had an overunity circuit."

------------------------------------------------------------------

I showed you the circuit. You are still lying dogs.

My offer still stands, for anyone.

Which of you losers wants to build it and prove Bearden and myself wrong...its your perfect opportunity....Do you realize its not Beardens circuit any more? Its Bearden with a twist.......or do you fall under my warning as quoted in my original offer.....

"Remember, to criticize, before through research, is the height of stupidity."  .....

Which is exactly what you're doing.

Well, you have once again proven to everyone that you have very little grasp or understanding of reality.  Next time you read 39,000 books, (which is total BS, the math does not support this remote possibility unless you are 150 years old) try reading at least one or two that are non-fiction and based upon science.
 
Bill

derricka

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 156
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2016, 11:31:17 PM »
Quote
Incorporated in the switch are the two single pole/double throw switches. This one Fast Switch chip must be rated at the Relaxation time of the electron. This is far faster than 1ms as designated. It should be in the GHz or nano/picosecond range.


I am afraid there is nothing I can do to help you.


TK will NEVER give away the secret of DPDT. It is the secret of secrets. Even members of MJ-12 don't have the required level of clearance, and are sent packing if they dare ask about it.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #25 on: April 07, 2016, 03:16:04 AM »
So far none of you have any skin in the game, you just like to hear yourselves mouth off.

You have no standing since you refuse to build.... shut up and leave my thread.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #26 on: April 07, 2016, 03:28:51 AM »
You may have started this thread, but you don't OWN it. What 'skin' do you have in the game?

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #27 on: April 07, 2016, 09:21:38 AM »
Calm down Meta   your sounding just like that Atom guy, Go back and read your reply to each comment you have I'm sure it says much about you!

life is for learning and control is Satanic demonic even.

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #28 on: April 07, 2016, 12:40:27 PM »
So far none of you have any skin in the game, you just like to hear yourselves mouth off.

You have no standing since you refuse to build.... shut up and leave my thread.

Meta,

You really don't seem to understand how to work with people.  Most of the people on here you keep telling to get off YOUR thread are serious researchers that have been building for years.  If you want someone to build based on your ideas then YOU have to build first and show some results.  Then other researchers MAY choose to build and help you verify your claims.  If you don't believe in your idea enough to build it first then why should anyone else spend time and money to do it?

Every week on this and other forums like this people like you show up making unsubstantiated claims.  Most of us don't have the time or money to go chasing every wild idea someone else has.  So we concentrate on ideas that have ALREADY shown some promise.

Build it your self and show us what you have.  Then MAYBE someone will decide to try your ideas.

Respectfully,
Carroll

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2016, 12:54:31 PM »
So far none of you have any skin in the game, you just like to hear yourselves mouth off.

You have no standing since you refuse to build.... shut up and leave my thread.

If all here that refuse to build your -um-twisted up Bearden what ever it is,then the thread would be empty,and you would be talking to your self.

Now-first thing you need to do,is build the device,and show your OU result's--just as Bearden didnt :D
Then maybe--just maybe,some one will have the time to waste,as they did not see the mistake in your measurement's on the device you are yet to build. ;)

So ,you have made the claim,and so,it must be you that back's up this claim.
We are not here to bow down to your demand's,so best get use to that fast-hey ;)


Brad