Author Topic: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more (Read 52285 times)

MeGaFaRR · « **Reply #15 on:** February 18, 2016, 12:58:17 AM »

Gotta love the Naysayers even on this site. Love it. LOL
ok it took better part of this day to upload the file "Mister doesn't like to read" lol
Now i have pics and videos to upload and if you would like to come down here and help me with that, you could check out the working model and do something positive instead.
Thank you come again
Frank

MeGaFaRR · « **Reply #16 on:** February 18, 2016, 01:10:34 AM »

Wow again stupid Apple crap!!! I am on this website (now with the laptop that i borrowed from a friend to post this and i cant find any programs Im used to) and i cannot find the "Reply" button on there and this is where all my videos and pics are. so i will be spending the next part of the day emailing myself again with all that. Have i mentioned i hate these stupid Apple products.
Pardon me for ranting but some things which might seem simple to others might not be as simple for some.
"I WILL BE BACK" as Arnold would say
Thanks for your patience
Frank

Temporal Visitor · « **Reply #17 on:** February 18, 2016, 01:24:20 AM »

Quote from: MeGaFaRR on February 18, 2016, 12:51:57 AM

As far as Getting the next flywheel in motion, it usually doesn't take that for one thing. And as far as i can tell that the biggest problem most people have with flywheel technology is disconnecting from motor. And if you read the whole paper, as i don't think you have because as stated in the paper, you NEVER EVER disconnect the motor from "the machine". "The Machine" will always produce more energy then you need to keep this motor Energized thus overunity. So read the complete paper and then:

Do the numbers: then please feel free to add more comments:

If you read the complete paper, you would find that what you are in fact doing is increasing the output of the combined flywheels to reach way over the requirements to keep motor energized and because
1) a motor with flywheels at full speed is not under much load.
2) flywheels rotating at full speed of the motor have approximately usually over 80% in reserved energy from getting it up to speed which is always way more than is required to get the next flywheel in motion and to full speed.
3) "The Machine" is always returning the energy required faster than you lose adding each flywheel.

Hi Frank,

I invite you to check out my like mindedness evidenced by my website: http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/
if you have not already found it yourself.

I read your paper and completely understand what you wrote. How: because I also have already done much of what you write about, and dozens of different ways, proving out each of the underlying concepts with real "spinning devices", photo's and videos. Also design calculators for each of the different styles to automate the design process.

I would enjoy chatting privately with you.

http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/contact.html

Michael

TinselKoala · « **Reply #18 on:** February 18, 2016, 01:52:53 AM »

Quote

I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

No, you are looking for people who will agree with you, because the "people who know more" will immediately see the flaws in your "theory"... and you will immediately reject what they have to say, as you have already proven in this thread.

Yes, I downloaded and read, carefully, your document... then moved it to the Trash, because that's what it is. It's in the "not even wrong" category. You think there is some "overunity magic" in the Phi ratio... you think that you have "proven" something but you provide no measurements and of course you have nothing that runs itself without outside power. So go ahead and continue to insult your critics, because that's the only proof of anything you'll provide, and it's clear what you are proving when you do that. EAT THAT.

If you have really wasted 10 thousand dollars on this... I'm sorry for you. Yes, you and "Temporal Visitor" should definitely get together and have lots of fun in private, proving each other right. Meanwhile... Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of Energy are laughing at you both.

MeGaFaRR · « **Reply #19 on:** February 18, 2016, 05:27:55 AM »

i think this is my first video i shot when i was putting it together as i cannot view MOV files with this laptop as it is not mine and Ive emailed all of them to myself from my iPad, I do not know which is which?
so enjoy

Dog-One · « **Reply #20 on:** February 18, 2016, 10:51:10 AM »

Quote from: MeGaFaRR on February 18, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

i think this is my first video i shot when i was putting it together as i cannot view MOV files with this laptop as it is not mine and Ive emailed all of them to myself from my iPad, I do not know which is which?
so enjoy

Converted to MP4.

conradelektro · « **Reply #21 on:** February 18, 2016, 01:02:20 PM »

Quote from: MeGaFaRR on February 18, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

i think this is my first video i shot when i was putting it together as i cannot view MOV files with this laptop as it is not mine and Ive emailed all of them to myself from my iPad, I do not know which is which?
so enjoy

I like the video, it proves everything I was afraid of.

I was not polite, but I should have been, because you need help.

Over and out,

Conrad

Temporal Visitor · « **Reply #22 on:** February 18, 2016, 03:52:56 PM »

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 18, 2016, 01:52:53 AM

Meanwhile... Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of Energy are laughing at you both.

Dearest Tinsel Koala,

It has been a while since we swapped words, seems to me we left off with you not answering the few "simple" questions I left you with. That's OK because honestly I did not expect you to know the answers.

Today you insult me and that is OK also, because it serves as proof of the self imposed limits of your mind.

You wrote: "Meanwhile... Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of Energy are laughing at you both."

Now perhaps you can show off how much you know about both by applying both to: MULTIPLE OPEN SYSTEMS, ACCELERATING MATTER, FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MATTER IN DIFFERENT FRAMES OF REFERENCE, ON MULTIPLE PLANES, DURING INELASTIC COLLISIONS.

If that is too much work for you to do for "FREE" without getting your "consulting fee" then just explain to everyone what you "know" about how you and or your "laws" are going to inhibit Nature's manifestation of Kinetic energy in all matter in motion in accord with Ek=1/2mv2 for starters.

You just never know: I might be freindly and buy you a cheeseburger, and we both can laugh at how little we both "know" about each others WORK experience.

I dare to invite you again: http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/contact.html

Michael Frost

conradelektro · « **Reply #23 on:** February 18, 2016, 04:57:27 PM »

Quote from: Temporal Visitor on February 18, 2016, 03:52:56 PM

I dare to invite you again: http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/contact.html

Temporal Visitor and MeGaFaRR should talk to each other about who got the strange idea first.

The contents of this page http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/evidence.html sound a lot like the "document" from MeGaFaRR.

But I think that MeGaFaRR is more of a world saviour than Temporal Visitor. Temporal Visitor just throws his "gift" at the world and does not really want to save it.

On the other hand, Temporal Visitor has a physics teacher lay vocation.

Greetings, Conrad

e2matrix · « **Reply #24 on:** February 18, 2016, 07:06:16 PM »

Quote from: MeGaFaRR on February 18, 2016, 01:10:34 AM

Wow again stupid Apple crap!!! I am on this website (now with the laptop that i borrowed from a friend to post this and i cant find any programs Im used to) and i cannot find the "Reply" button on there and this is where all my videos and pics are. so i will be spending the next part of the day emailing myself again with all that. Have i mentioned i hate these stupid Apple products.
Pardon me for ranting but some things which might seem simple to others might not be as simple for some.
"I WILL BE BACK" as Arnold would say
Thanks for your patience
Frank

Even having been a computer / network tech for a very long while I was often frustrated with Apple products and do sympathize - I agree they are crap. You have now met the number one naysayer on overunity.com - initials TK. While he is often right don't let it discourage you or even annoy you. Ignore is what works best.
Sorry I forgot they aren't taking any new registrations at overunityresearch.com. Energeticforum.com will welcome you though. Just make sure you get the .com after the name as gyulasun mentioned.
So now I have one question for you and don't want to be looked on as one of the naysayers but it is important to clarify where things are at here and depending on the answer may help get a lot more positive folks in here for you. The questions is : Do you have a current working model that is self running or can be disconnected from the grid power and keep running? It seems you have stated you have that and to clearly state whether this is true will likely move things in a positive direction. If you do have such a model working then please post a picture of video if possible. If you don't yet have that but expect to soon then that's okay with me but please clarify this for everyone here. Thanks for all you effort in sharing this. You appear to have some very good craftwork abilities and I wish you luck.

Nink · « **Reply #25 on:** February 18, 2016, 10:18:15 PM »

Thanks for the paper and the video of the model you want to build. Do you have a model you built because I think the only thing you have proven so far is you haven't proven anything.

MeGaFaRR · « **Reply #26 on:** February 19, 2016, 01:08:48 AM »

Yes many more videos are coming but it's taking me longer to put all this together and share it with everyone then it did for me to built this machine. Keep watching YouTube as I will be posting as I get this videos ready. It's very hard for me not to smash the crap out of my iPad or my friends laptop. Which is last thing I want to do

AlienGrey · « **Reply #27 on:** February 19, 2016, 01:50:32 AM »

Err Frank just a quick one, whats that thing your leang against in your profile youtube picture ?

wattsup · « **Reply #28 on:** February 19, 2016, 02:36:49 PM »

What I don't get is why there is a second thread opened on the same subject?

The first thread ended here......
http://overunity.com/16427/here-is-my-claim-to-the-prize-mother-natures-power-supply/msg474655/#msg474655

I am 58 as well, born 1958 so this is indeed a special year for us, hahahahahaha.

Look, this type of gearing is not easy. The more gears you use, the more friction you have to overcome, flywheel or not and as I said before, the gears you showed are not the best type because they are thin, the teeth get mashed up, easy to misalign, require lots of force for one gear to turn the next gear. That's why pulleys are so much better because you do not have a total of 1000 gear teeth or more chewing away at your input energy.

This again is not being critical, only based on experience and good money. hahahaha

wattsup

Dog-One · « **Reply #29 on:** February 19, 2016, 02:58:28 PM »

Yes, you may want to consider a magnetic gearing system similar to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-6nFJfjhj0

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more (Read 52285 times)

MeGaFaRR

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

MeGaFaRR

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

Temporal Visitor

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

TinselKoala

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

MeGaFaRR

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

Dog-One

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

conradelektro

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

Temporal Visitor

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

conradelektro

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

e2matrix

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

Nink

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

MeGaFaRR

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

AlienGrey

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

wattsup

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

Dog-One

Re: I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more