DareDiamond..Sir..My apologies I have not clearly shown the circuit..
Let me restate it once more.
Dare Diamond..Sir..
A multifilar Primary wire on one Electromagnet has to be connected in serial first to make the single primary coil. Let us say it is P1.
You wind separate P1, P2.P3 etc..These primaries are connected in parallel. I think you would need four Primaries. Try to see that the following is ensured.
Four Primaries
Three secondaries.
Secondaries are 2/3rd the length and diameter of the primary. Secondary wire is wound just to cover the core of the primary.
Magnetism in Each Primary core must be in the region of 0.3 to 0.4 Tesla. Not more. Secondary will have higher Magnetism.
Do not put any wire under the Primary coil. Let us check the Figuera design first.
Each Primary has double the Weight of the core of the secondary.
In Each Primary Current either moves towards the central secondary placed in between or moves away simultanously.
The arrangment will be like this..
P1----->S1<------P2<----S2----->P3------>S3<--------P4
followed by
P1<-----S1------>P2----->S2<-----P3<------S3-------->P4
Here S2 is placed in between the poles of the P2 and P3. S2 is the bonus secondary coil..
Secondaries are connected in series.
Primary turns are same.. We have seen best output is produced in the secondary when both the primaries are equal in power.
You can put coils under the primary and above the primary as well. Then we can consider the secondary coils under the primary as a step down transformer. Therefore the output of P1S (secondary coil wound in P1 core) is about 90% of the input.
All primaries are connected in parallel
All secondaries are in series..Lenz law is applicable only in P1 coil and P4 coil.
In the rest of the primaries the output of Secondary is higher than the input of Primary and so Lenz law does not apply in P2,P3 and P4 when current goes in one direction from P1 and when reverses direction it is applicable only in P4 and it is not applicable for P3,P2 and P1 for the secondary coil carries more output than the input of the coil.
Do not allow the iron core to reach saturation. Lenz Law is not applicable when Iron core reaches saturation. But the iron becomes such a powerful magnet that the coil shows strange properties and there is an intense heat and it is neither safe nor sustainable for a long time.
If yo
u are not able to spend for the multifilar wires, then use a small wire 1 sq mm wire but allow 200 to 400 watts of lamps to burn as resistors before the wire goes to the primaries. Let there be adequate number of turns of the wire to ensure that the Magnetism in the primary is about 0.3 to 0.4 Tesla.
There is nothing more to it. It is a simple device. Many variations are possible.
Core:
I saw your comment again..
Best Answer is provided here..
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Intro.htmlMy thanks to My Mentor Patrick J Kelly..
See this to answer your comment..
"The Wright brothers were told that it was impossible for aeroplanes to fly because they were heavier than air. That was a commonly believed view. The Wright brothers watched birds flying and since, without question, birds are considerably heavier than air, it was clear that the commonly held view was plain wrong. Working from that realisation, they developed aeroplanes which flew perfectly well.
The years passed, and the technology started by the Wright brothers and their careful scientific measurements and well-reasoned theory, advanced to become the “science” of aeronautics. This science was used extensively to design and build very successful aircraft and “aeronautics” gained the aura of being a “law”.
Unfortunately, somebody applied aeronautic calculations to the flight of bumblebees and discovered that according to aeronautics, bumblebees couldn’t possibly fly as their wings could not generate enough lift to get them off the ground. This was a problem, as it was perfectly possible to watch bees flying in a very competent manner. So, the “laws” of aeronautics said that bees can’t fly, but bees actually do fly.
Does that mean that the laws of aeronautics were no use? Certainly not - those “laws” had been used for years and proved their worth by producing excellent aircraft. What it did show was that the “laws” of aeronautics did not yet cover every case and needed to be extended to cover the way that bees fly, which is through lift generated by turbulent airflow.
It is very important to realise that what are described as scientific “laws” are just the best working theories at the present time and it is virtually certain that those “laws” will have to be upgraded and extended as further scientific observations are made and further facts discovered. Let’s hope those four elephants don’t get restless before we have a chance to learn a bit more!"