Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories  (Read 34763 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #30 on: April 09, 2016, 01:02:32 AM »
Tom
She is running nice and steady !!

you mentioned the power draw when there is no Oil in the system is 3.7 or so amps ??
and even tho you are not yet seeing the temps which are needed you are seeing less input while pumping oil ??

would seem your thoughts on this are starting to be validated !!

      run up with no oil 3.7 amps
run while Pumping oil 3.6 amps and dropping as it runs ! [I believe I saw in the High 2 Amp towards the end....
and with Frigid Oil ??


I truly Hope you've done it , you have been at this a long long time !!

Vid here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juTqdkJVt9w

Chet






TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #31 on: April 09, 2016, 02:16:43 AM »
Hi Chet,

These are the numbers while running for a few minutes in the cold.

First test without pumping fluid
Motor/pump test : 114.5V * 3.6A  = 412.2 W

Second test pumping fluid into the upper centrifugal pump.
Motor/pump load: 115.7V * 2.89A = 334.4w

Extra energy gain of :412.2W -- 334.4W =77.8W due to centrifugal force implosion effect.

I believe while the energy input will decrease with this data as the heat builds due to cavitation, the energy will increase and become OVERUNITY!

The rpm is about 3:1, so the rpms of the motor is about 3,400/3 =1133,3 rpm's of the implosion motor.

Will need to increase rpm's above 2,200 rpms, this will really show some energy output.

Tom

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #32 on: April 09, 2016, 04:04:13 AM »
Hi All,

Update on whats next with this motor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IprMfdv2F6M

Tom

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #33 on: April 09, 2016, 12:10:32 PM »
That tire thing is pretty dam crappy.

You could have a flywheel getting hit by that stuff.

I like this concept actually, it just makes everything simpler to have a fluid hit stuff.

.

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #34 on: April 09, 2016, 01:10:31 PM »
Hi Armcortex,

Prototypes can be very expensive, the tire is simple and does the job and it was also free.

Most people would go with expensive parts and design and find out it's a pretty nothing at the end.

My cost is pennies due to the fact using everyday stuff around the house like wood or recycle aluminum.

I spent enough money in the past to know simple is better to prove any theory.

Tom;-)

 

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #35 on: April 09, 2016, 02:46:15 PM »
Tom

I think the tire Idea is amazing ,you solved a huge problem  A uniquely shaped  high temperature oil resistant and leak proof collector and at the same time added a steel belted scatter shield.
and did it for Pennies.

I smile every time I think about it ..A true KISS  .....


KISS = Keep It Simple Solution

very Cool indeed.

well actually you have yet to get to the really Hot part ..the Phase or density change which will really need a scatter shield
the fact that your already seeing substantially diminished input with increased load is quite inspiring

Bring On the heat !!

fingers crossed that this thing runs away..... 8)

Maybe you should make yourself a fireproof Michelin man safety suit...... :o

Chet K

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #36 on: April 10, 2016, 04:49:27 PM »
Hi All,

This is a break down of my motor where it's clear a vacuum is causing the drop in input power.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnoXCr2lG0w

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #37 on: April 10, 2016, 10:30:14 PM »
Hi All,

I found more information on the Clem engine today.

http://ultralightamerica.com/Docs/Writings/WR071807.pdf

also someone sent this to me:

"This is interesting. I'll take a look as soon as I get a chance. I talked to Richard on the phone back in...hmm. Can't remember exactly now, but it was probably in the early 80s. I'd heard an interview with him on the radio (KRLD, Dallas?) and he was fine to talk to anyone who believed in what he was doing. He was mostly looking for investors, but talked to me anyway. A lot of things have changed with me since then, but I never forgot him."

Tom

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #38 on: April 10, 2016, 10:56:36 PM »
Hi all,

More information.

http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clem3.htm

There might be a real patent on the Clem engine.

Tom

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #39 on: April 14, 2016, 04:58:03 PM »
Hi All,

After doing more the on the Clem engine experiment, I need to change the design due to not enough vacuum.

For now on, my videos won't be copy in any way, some are posting them without my ok.

So, I closed down my account again.

Now on the Clem engine project I have some redesigning to do, and this new design that will cost more time and money but it will also be one of the best Clem engine that would prove or dis prove the theory.

TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #40 on: April 15, 2016, 01:32:24 PM »
Hi All,

Many question about the reason I keep closing my accounts on YouTube.

Let me explain that I love what I do, it's the best job that anyone could ever have.

Yes it's a none paying job in the sense of money, but the skills you learn are the real benefit then money.

I have no problem posting on forums like this, it's like posting my work and so on.

But when sites not to name them post my work and keep them in there past files without asking me and to make a library of research where other make a profit is just wrong!

This also makes me to take action to close my youtube account so they won't have any videos to pop up, I have a few people who I really trust like Smartscarecrow show, as for anyone else no way.

They profit off other people work in some way or another, personally that is wrong.

I hope you all can understand where I'm coming from.

My new YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCZx6KDp4PkrPQMJT-OceCw

Tom

Cherryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #41 on: April 15, 2016, 05:29:28 PM »
Hi Tommy as long as you have fun in what you are doing and learn.. its good fun I agree !


As you are aware i am traveling along the same paths with this Schauberger and related stuff. ( I just make less noise ; ) 


Here is one of my previous prototypes,  Which spunn nicely.. But not on its own yet ..  But Im working on an improved model


The whole thing is suspended by opposite magnetic poles to reduce friction and wear. I use a tesla turbine for converting the vacuum into rotation.   Althoug it works..  the finetuning is not very easy..  I should design a small scal CVT to tune it : )


Keep up the good work !








NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #42 on: April 15, 2016, 05:46:37 PM »
Hi Tom:

I think these are the Clem Patents.. Please check if this is correct. Hope you find this useful.

http://www.google.co.in/patents/US3975914

https://www.google.com/patents/US4037415

Regards,

Ramaswami


TommeyLReed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #43 on: April 15, 2016, 07:50:08 PM »
Hay thanks Npamaswami,

Good patents, but did not see Richard Claim on them but to thanks.

Cherryman, looks good and hats off for someone else will to research these claims.

CR2 forums don't respect  inventors, and even kick me off their site after I call them lots of names after they try to bully me, To bad  they could have learn to get their hands dirty.

Tom

NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Building the Clem Engine With Vicktor Schauberger Implosion Theories
« Reply #44 on: April 16, 2016, 02:27:46 AM »
Hay thanks Npamaswami,

Good patents, but did not see Richard Claim on them but to thanks.

Cherryman, looks good and hats off for someone else will to research these claims.

CR2 forums don't respect  inventors, and even kick me off their site after I call them lots of names after they try to bully me, To bad  they could have learn to get their hands dirty.

Tom



Tom

I am Ramaswami not pamaswami..just call me Rams if you wish..

Pse go through the keelynet link you gave above where Richard Clems daughter says patents were filed in the name of other people for security reasons.

These are the Clem patents. The filing date matches and how to produce sufficient vaccum is indicated clearly. The subject matter matches

Rams