Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513966
  • *Total Topics: 15294
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Moon Walkers.  (Read 46619 times)

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5240
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #210 on: February 01, 2016, 02:36:16 PM »
Today is a good day for you MH,as i may have a video where the astronauts them self test out your moon quake theory.. Below is the video in question,where i have found an astronaut taking a couple of big jumps near the flag. As you will see,he is jumping much higher than the astronaut in the flag wavering video  ;) ;). We should defiantly see some flag waving action due to the moon quake theory here--lets see. at 11:10 in the video,we get two big jumps from our astronaut near the flag.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xc61kv4aH0

Now there is something else that is very odd in the video.
I have screen shot a couple of pictures from the video.
The first one shows the astronauts on a hill close to the lunar lander. The second shot is the astronauts on a hill 4km's away,that they visited the following day  ???
See anything wrong with the pictures MH,that are suppose to be of two different locations 4km's away from each other?. Video time index is in the screen grab's.


Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #210 on: February 01, 2016, 02:36:16 PM »

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #211 on: February 01, 2016, 05:37:12 PM »
Quote
We are going to have this argument for some time- arnt we MH. You simply will not accept the fact that you got it wrong,and continually try to reverse the mistake onto me. Weight is not a measure of mass MH-weight is the measure  of the gravitational pull between two objects--you need to understand or learn that MH-->weight is not a measure of mass-weight is a measure of the gravitational pull between two objects. The only place where weight is directly related to mass is here on earth MH--not the bloody moon. The only time weight can be used to determine mass amount,is on earth-or any other planet or moon that has a gravitational acceleration of 9.8m/sec Squared. You clearly quoted weight when referring to the astronauts and there suits on the moon--first in LB's,and then in KG's.
Weight is !!NOT!! mass MH--it is the gravitational pull between two objects<--do you understand this?. So when you stated that the astronaut and his suit had a combines !!weight!! of 290-pounds,and i corrected you,and gave you the correct !weight! of 47.85 pounds--you got your knickers in a twist. We are on the moon MH-not earth. Weight is not mass MH-weight is the gravitational pull between two objects. Please go and learn what weight is,before incorrectly saying it is mass. I will help you out some.

What is making you believe that I don't understand the difference between weight and mass?

Quote
So when you stated that the astronaut and his suit had a combines !!weight!! of 290-pounds,and i corrected you,and gave you the correct !weight! of 47.85 pounds

This is probably at least the third time I am going to tell you this:  I meant "290 pounds of mass."  I told you that I said that sentence in a colloquial sense and that English units are wishy-washy and can sometimes mean weight and sometimes mean mass.  I could just as easily have said "a combined mass of 130 kilograms."  I told you that after that I switched to metric units to avoid any possible misunderstandings.

Yes, the correct weight of the astronaut and his space suit on the moon would be 47.85 pounds.  What would be more appropriate for estimating the energy in the impact on the moon of the "thumps," the mass of 130 kilograms or the weight of 47.85 pounds?

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5240
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #212 on: February 02, 2016, 12:02:24 AM »
so what do you think about the two pictures associated with the video i posted in my last post MH?. One supposedly taken 4 km south of the other the following day :o

Now,we can clearly see that it is in fact the same location,but NASA says one is 4 km south of the other. So it is clear that we have now found lie number two(lie number one being the damage done to the astronauts hands by the gloves) from NASA. You can also cross check this with the original NASA video,and time/place index.

Now,if this was some one claiming to have an OU device,and we found just one lie-one hidden wire,battery,power source,then we would be calling hoax. Dose the same go for the moon landing's MH?, or dose the !need to believe! just make all the lie's disappear ?.

Oh,and did you see that the flag never moved when the !ground thumping! astronaut was jumping straight up and down next to the flag ;)
Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #212 on: February 02, 2016, 12:02:24 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #213 on: February 02, 2016, 04:22:01 AM »
so what do you think about the two pictures associated with the video i posted in my last post MH?. One supposedly taken 4 km south of the other the following day :o

Now,we can clearly see that it is in fact the same location,but NASA says one is 4 km south of the other. So it is clear that we have now found lie number two(lie number one being the damage done to the astronauts hands by the gloves) from NASA. You can also cross check this with the original NASA video,and time/place index.

Now,if this was some one claiming to have an OU device,and we found just one lie-one hidden wire,battery,power source,then we would be calling hoax. Dose the same go for the moon landing's MH?, or dose the !need to believe! just make all the lie's disappear ?.

Oh,and did you see that the flag never moved when the !ground thumping! astronaut was jumping straight up and down next to the flag ;)
Brad

The answer is that the people in the NASA Marketing and Promotions department made an unwitting mistake, or they simply used footage that did not fit into the narrative for expediency and they were aware of it.  This happens all the time in films and filmmakers do it all the time because they know that the vast majority of the audience will not spot it.  Have you ever read the "goofs" section for a movie on the Internet Movie Database?  So your point means nothing.

Did you read the comments on the YouTube clip about the damage to the astronaut's hands?

Quote
Oh,and did you see that the flag never moved when the !ground thumping! astronaut was jumping straight up and down next to the flag

You do this kind of foolishness all the time:

Joe is an Old Salt
Salt dissolves in water
Therefore Joe dissolves in water

Just because the flag wavered in the first shot we discussed, and presumably you are then looking at an astronaut jumping up and down in a different shot that was taken on a different moon mission, then it doesn't necessarily follow that the flag is "supposed" or "not supposed" to waver in the second shot.

It's just like you asking me for an explanation for the flag possibly wavering from the ice sublimation from the astronaut's cooling system.  It can't possibly be answered because it would almost certainly require a full computer simulation.

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5240
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #214 on: February 02, 2016, 05:07:04 AM »
The answer is that the people in the NASA Marketing and Promotions department made an unwitting mistake, or they simply used footage that did not fit into the narrative for expediency and they were aware of it.  This happens all the time in films and filmmakers do it all the time because they know that the vast majority of the audience will not spot it.  Have you ever read the "goofs" section for a movie on the Internet Movie Database?  So your point means nothing.

Did you read the comments on the YouTube clip about the damage to the astronaut's hands?

You do this kind of foolishness all the time:

Joe is an Old Salt
Salt dissolves in water
Therefore Joe dissolves in water

Just because the flag wavered in the first shot we discussed, and presumably you are then looking at an astronaut jumping up and down in a different shot that was taken on a different moon mission, then it doesn't necessarily follow that the flag is "supposed" or "not supposed" to waver in the second shot.

It's just like you asking me for an explanation for the flag possibly wavering from the ice sublimation from the astronaut's cooling system.  It can't possibly be answered because it would almost certainly require a full computer simulation.

Ah-ofcourse they made a mistake MH. In fact, every bit of evidence presented that show the possibility of the moon landings being a hoax, will all turn out to be just a mistake in your eyes MH. The astronauts claiming to have knuckles covered in blisters, but no evidence of such in the clear pictures, the flag waving away as the astronaut passes by, the same scenery in what is suppose to be two sepperate places-the list will go on. But to you-because it is something you must believe in, everything that cannot be explained, will simply be an error.

I have not seen the comment about the astronauts hands self repairing within hours, but cant wait to read what they have come up with for that one. I will check it out when I get home-should be a hoot.

Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #214 on: February 02, 2016, 05:07:04 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Moon Walkers.
« Reply #215 on: February 02, 2016, 11:18:01 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw

It's all just a conspiracy to sell DVDs and pulp pseudoscience fiction books and to pay for fake-ass lecture tours by fake-ass speakers.  The fake moon landings is just another cottage industry just like the pseudoscience free energy cottage industry.

Don't let yourself get sucked in.

 

OneLink