And you are still deceiving yourself.  The nonsensical "Edison electric car" does not exist but you won't acknowledge that.  Now you are saying "apparently now voltage leads current in charging a capacitance" with respect to me which is not what I said at all.  I said to you that when you charge a capacitor with a pulse then the concept of current leading or lagging voltage does not apply.  The fact that you would mention the bloody JFET for the 30th time is both sad and comical.  Stop deceiving yourself and others like some hapless spin doctor trapped in a vortex.

and I saw Robert Murry-Smith doing something wrong and I had the conviction to state it.

I yanked you out of your electronics stupor
Get over it.  It turns out that you have been more or less deceiving yourself for years and I brought some reality into the picture for you.  You are benefiting from that, and the more you spin, the more you ultimately hurt yourself.

I am no troll and you should retract your statement.

Quote wiki"
In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion,[3] often for their own amusement.

MH
This is you to a T
Im glad i looked that up--cheers

Brad:











MileHigh

Actually Brad, the JFET business is just an example of your irrational response to stress and your intellectual weakness.

  And on top of that you are never in a million years going to develop your own circuit around a JFET to get a Joule Thief that works at very low voltages.

On the other hand, making a technically and intellectually dishonest clip where you completely fail to measure the energy in a capacitor, fail to make a conversion to equivalent Lithium-Ion ampere-hours, and grossly exaggerate the amount of energy in your device is a serious issue.  Especially when you represent a company that is pitching higher energy density capacitors.

If you can't make a distinction between the two then you have serious problems.

No, what i am saying is absolutely true.  I woke you up out of your electronics stupor.  For the last six years you have been building pulse motors and watching them spin and you weren't really progressing at all.  It was more or less stagnation, doing the same or similar things over and over and barely leaning anything new.

The pen is indeed mightier than the bench.

Here, Brad, here is what I said to you on your YouTube channel 10 months ago:

<<<
Brad, supercapacitors are a fascinating subject and I looked at a few of Robert Murray-Smith's clips and I only looked at this only one clip of yours about supercaps.  I am going to discuss measurement issues, and I know that I am flying mostly blind here so I am asking you to be understanding because of that.

You are building caps so measurements are king here.  You put "2600 Farads" in your clip title, but in this clip you say you still haven't measured the actual capacity.  You need to be conservative by only claiming a capacitance value for what you have actually measured.

Just doing some preliminary paper napkin calculations that are not 100% legit and over simplified the numbers don't seem to add up.

1.7 volts at 2600 farads is 3757 Joules of energy stored in the cap. You talk about three minutes charging time in your clip.  3757 Joules over 180 seconds gives you an average of 20.9 watts to charge a 2600 farad cap to 1.7 volts in three minutes.  (I am really cheating here almost pretending the cap is like a resistor)

However, you say the cap is limited to 100 mA charging current.  If you have a voltage source of 1.7 volts supplying 100 mA that's 0.17 watts average charging power.  (Again, for a cap this does not truly make sense, it's just for illustrative purposes.)

I will put it this way:  If you have a discharged cap, and you set your power supply to 1.7 volts, and you measure 100 mA when the charging process starts, and it takes approximately 3 minutes to see the charging current drop to nearly zero telling you that the supercap is fully charged, then there is no way that your supercap is even close to 2600 farads.

Does this all make sense to you?  If the cap was truly 2600 farads you would have to be putting an average of 20 watts into the cap for three minutes to charge it, and your charging power starts at 0.17 watts and ends at nearly zero watts three minutes later.  So if I am more or less on track, then you can see there is a major problem.

And that suggests a challenge for you:  Develop a way to make a serious measurement of the capacitance of the supercapacitors you are making. You have to go beyond anecdotal "measurements" where you quote how long the supercap can run a motor.

I think it's great what you are doing, but you need to develop a serious measurement protocol that actually measures the capacitance properly.
>>>

You did not respond to my posting.  Your capacitor claim is just fantasy BSing.  You can do better than that.