Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Was the moon landing for real ???  (Read 68296 times)

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2007, 03:56:31 PM »
What i am thinking is the first was a fake, and when they finally go to the moon they always showed faked video and pic, so you cannot see the structure and skull, spaceship that are already in the moon

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2007, 07:43:50 PM »
What i am thinking is the first was a fake, and when they finally go to the moon they always showed faked video and pic, so you cannot see the structure and skull, spaceship that are already in the moon

what skull?

know about the structures that were transposed over, etc., and ofcourse the ship on the moon.

devilzangel
..

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2007, 08:57:02 PM »
some of the nasa photo show skull head on the moon, i don't remember if its on mars or both mars and moon! :)

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2007, 03:44:38 AM »
^^ have any link?

found this http://www.enterprisemission.com/datashead.htm

is that what u r talking about?

devilzangel
..

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #19 on: September 04, 2007, 03:55:00 AM »
yes, also they are some on mars, the mars one are a little different, they talked about it on coasttocoastam

this guys on youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/theduderinok
put all coasttocoastam radio show with image, its really cool

Creaform

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #20 on: October 24, 2007, 11:32:12 AM »
What is more plausable?
That the US hoaxed the moonlanding, and accidnetly leaked these films as opposed to incinerating them.
Or that someone made the videos?

shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2007, 04:37:34 AM »
I forget which "alleged" moon mission astronaut said this, but when confronted by the evidence of faked moon landing, he responded with something like, "that's interesting, but why would we fake it six times?"

Anyway, I am curious, does anyone here believe in a flat earth?  Because if you do, then you absolutely must conclude that the moon landings were fake, because they show a spherical earth.


Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2007, 02:49:06 AM »
I saw the FOX special... and even though some of the photos are obviously not from the moon... and even though the film would not have survived the trip, or the temps on the moon... I STILL thought we went.  I grew up with that story, ya know?  I was about 3 when we went and I one of my earliest memories is of my mom telling me to pay attention because it was something important.

But then I saw a film called "a funny thing happened on the way to the moon."  It shows clips of film from apollo 11 where the astronauts are pretending to be half-way to the moon - while they are in low earth orbit.  But from those clips, it's hard to see what's happening.
But the interviews with the astronauts are what made me see the truth.  Watch the film yourselves.  I will post it online.  You can watch their reaction to the interview and see for yourself that they are lying.  Sweat... stammering... it's obvious.

Anyways... then I saw the entire film from apollo 11.  It's on youtube... so you can watch it yourself.  You can see that they are putting a transparency with continents on it in the window.  then you can see from the blue linght that they are in low earth orbit.

So - here we have filmed evidence of the hoax.  And we have the sweaty stammering astronauts.

Besides that - it started under Nixon and he ended it without reason... so it was all under Nixon... AND Cheney and Rumsfield were right there in the whitehouse guiding him - cause by then, he was really off the deep end. 

And the world is a sphere.  It was the staus-quo that once said it was flat and laughed at those who spoke the truth.  And now - atlas... you are defending the status-quo against the truth.
If the man said the earth was flat... you would purr like a kitten in the lap of the man.

shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2007, 04:42:01 AM »
I saw the FOX special... and even though some of the photos are obviously not from the moon... and even though the film would not have survived the trip, or the temps on the moon... I STILL thought we went.  I grew up with that story, ya know?  I was about 3 when we went and I one of my earliest memories is of my mom telling me to pay attention because it was something important.

But then I saw a film called "a funny thing happened on the way to the moon."  It shows clips of film from apollo 11 where the astronauts are pretending to be half-way to the moon - while they are in low earth orbit.  But from those clips, it's hard to see what's happening.
But the interviews with the astronauts are what made me see the truth.  Watch the film yourselves.  I will post it online.  You can watch their reaction to the interview and see for yourself that they are lying.  Sweat... stammering... it's obvious.

Anyways... then I saw the entire film from apollo 11.  It's on youtube... so you can watch it yourself.  You can see that they are putting a transparency with continents on it in the window.  then you can see from the blue linght that they are in low earth orbit.

So - here we have filmed evidence of the hoax.  And we have the sweaty stammering astronauts.

Besides that - it started under Nixon and he ended it without reason... so it was all under Nixon... AND Cheney and Rumsfield were right there in the whitehouse guiding him - cause by then, he was really off the deep end. 

And the world is a sphere.  It was the staus-quo that once said it was flat and laughed at those who spoke the truth.  And now - atlas... you are defending the status-quo against the truth.
If the man said the earth was flat... you would purr like a kitten in the lap of the man.

I just want to make sure I understand.  Are you saying all six missions were faked?  You must be, because you claim that film could not have survived the trip or the temperatures on the moon, and we have film from all six, I believe.

OK, I watched the Funny Thing video.  All I heard was a theory based on the dark shots of the earth, where you could not see the interior of the cabin.

Here is another video which clearly shows a small earth out the window.  Look at around 7:55.  This is all one continuous shot, and the interior of the cabin is often visible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98

mikestocks2006

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 324
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2007, 05:31:13 AM »
I think this was discussed before.

Here is what happened, listen to what Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger, andRichard  Nixon among others had to say (and did) about that "moon landing"

If you can locate this video, it was on the web last year but appears to have been removed. it's a good one.
The Dark Side of the Moon
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3288261061829859642&q=Dark+side+of+the+moon
Watch and draw your own conclusions. A true eye opener.

Also here:
DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
Sunday November 16, 2003 at 10PM ET/PT
repeating Sunday July 24, 2005 at 10pm ET/PT

How could the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon? During an interview with Stanley Kubrick's widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon.  In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn't afford any expensive public relations failures.  Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn't be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). A subtle blend of facts, fiction and hypothesis around the first landing on the moon, Dark Side Of The Moon illustrates how the truth can be twisted by the manipulation of images.

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunday/feature_161103.html

.

Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2007, 07:13:19 PM »
Atlas - if the camera was in the window filming the earth, then whose arm gets in the way?
Regardless of that - this was edited before broadcast.
The uncut video of the apollo astronauts - with time stamp - shows them faking the shot of being halfway to the moon.
You can see them shoot some with the earth shaped like an egg... then they try again and do a better job.  Then you see that they are far away from the window and that the "blue" color of the earth is actually light shining in the window.  There's one point on the film where the window is visible for an instant - you can plainly see the light shining in.  It's BLUE light... and that means it's the earth's atmosphere.

Sorry - but an edited broadcast does not trump video with timestamp that shows them faking the shot and then plainly showing bright blue sky outside the window.

Apollo 11 was fake.  The proof is there.  I take the reaction of the others has proof that their missions were fake as well.  And why not fake all of them?

How many people needed to be involved?  Not many.  The signal from the missions came to earth and was recorded by one of three stations - and then it was broadcast to another government facility before it was relayed to mission control.
Only the astronauts, and whoever was monitoring the signal to catch any giveaways would have to know.

Nixon shut it all down.  They had stolen $$ from the taxpayers and given them nothing.

It's no secret that Nixon was Prescott Bush's boy... and that Prescott was part of a plot to overthrow our government here and institute fascism.  He helped Hitler during WWII.
Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex.  Do you think he was a nut too?  Who do you think he was talking about?
He was talking about Prescott Bush and others... and I'm sure he knew Nixon was part of it.

So would they kill JFK... steal money by faking the moon landing... fake the cold war and the war on terror to steal more money and to erase the constitution?
Damn right they would.

And it's the same people. The Bush Krime Family. 

Cheney and Rumsfield and Kissinger and Bill and Hillary and GHWB and GWB - all thugs, all nazis, all new world order scum.


shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2007, 10:39:24 PM »
Atlas - if the camera was in the window filming the earth, then whose arm gets in the way?
Regardless of that - this was edited before broadcast.
The uncut video of the apollo astronauts - with time stamp - shows them faking the shot of being halfway to the moon.
You can see them shoot some with the earth shaped like an egg... then they try again and do a better job.  Then you see that they are far away from the window and that the "blue" color of the earth is actually light shining in the window.  There's one point on the film where the window is visible for an instant - you can plainly see the light shining in.  It's BLUE light... and that means it's the earth's atmosphere.

Sorry - but an edited broadcast does not trump video with timestamp that shows them faking the shot and then plainly showing bright blue sky outside the window.

Apollo 11 was fake.  The proof is there.  I take the reaction of the others has proof that their missions were fake as well.  And why not fake all of them?

How many people needed to be involved?  Not many.  The signal from the missions came to earth and was recorded by one of three stations - and then it was broadcast to another government facility before it was relayed to mission control.
Only the astronauts, and whoever was monitoring the signal to catch any giveaways would have to know.

Nixon shut it all down.  They had stolen $$ from the taxpayers and given them nothing.

It's no secret that Nixon was Prescott Bush's boy... and that Prescott was part of a plot to overthrow our government here and institute fascism.  He helped Hitler during WWII.
Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex.  Do you think he was a nut too?  Who do you think he was talking about?
He was talking about Prescott Bush and others... and I'm sure he knew Nixon was part of it.

So would they kill JFK... steal money by faking the moon landing... fake the cold war and the war on terror to steal more money and to erase the constitution?
Damn right they would.

And it's the same people. The Bush Krime Family. 

Cheney and Rumsfield and Kissinger and Bill and Hillary and GHWB and GWB - all thugs, all nazis, all new world order scum.



You forgot to mention the part about how Truman's administration lied about the Holocaust and how NASA is still lying to us about the Earth being round.  Dude, you are beyond help - you'll believe anything as long as it makes the government look bad.  Go on and believe whatever you want.  Good luck making your way in the world, and get some good tinfoil - you'll need it.

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2007, 01:47:05 AM »
There is obvious evidence man has been on the moon; but there is no definite evidence this occurred on the first trip. In fact there is evidence to the contrary; that the first trip was a fake. Trips afterwards (maybe not all of them) to the moon are real; because, by then secret orgs within the govt already knew of antigrav and had already reverse engineered the dang things; shoot, there is a good chance the govt had went to the moon even before the Apollo missions. It is a definite fact that NASA (along with its contractors) has been doctoring images available to the public for decades. No point in pretending when NASA and secret govt orgs are already doing this for us.I don't have a long neck and I hate playing ostrich. NASA and other collaborators cant hide or lie anymore when so many insiders are coming out and spilling the beans.

@ shruggedatlas, i dont think any serious reliable insider or researcher has ever said that ALL moon missions were faked. Remote viewing was also used to map out and confirm alien presence and structures on the moon. There is a good chance that these "aliens" have been on the Moon and Earth for a very long time. Who knows .. only time will tell.

devilzangel
..

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2007, 06:52:18 AM »
So,
was the Van Allan belt still so strong, that the radiation would
have killed every astronaut over there going through it ?

What about the Mars probes which went through the Van Allan belt ?
Were they better protected against the radiation ?

Okay, no human on board there,
so what is the latest word on the
Van Allan belt ?
Could it be passed in 1969 already with the small
thickness steel ? capsules of the Saturn rockets ?
without killing the astronauts ?

I still believe that all moon landings were faked.

The moon landing capsules was much too unstable to land
at all on the moon.
This was already shown earlier with tests on earth...
it tilted back and forth and never made a stable landing...
had to be hold on strings to get it back safely to the gound...

shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2007, 06:18:22 PM »
So,
was the Van Allan belt still so strong, that the radiation would
have killed every astronaut over there going through it ?

What about the Mars probes which went through the Van Allan belt ?
Were they better protected against the radiation ?

Okay, no human on board there,
so what is the latest word on the
Van Allan belt ?
Could it be passed in 1969 already with the small
thickness steel ? capsules of the Saturn rockets ?
without killing the astronauts ?

I still believe that all moon landings were faked.

The moon landing capsules was much too unstable to land
at all on the moon.
This was already shown earlier with tests on earth...
it tilted back and forth and never made a stable landing...
had to be hold on strings to get it back safely to the gound...

Regarding the Van Allen Belt, here is what the Wikipedia has to say:

"Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. In 1962, the Van Allen belts were temporarily amplified by a high-altitude nuclear explosion (the Starfish Prime test) and several satellites ceased operation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as incoming ions may be as large as the circuit's charge. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation."

It seems like the Van Allen belts can cause harm to certain electronics under certain circumstances.  Why do you believe it is fatal to human beings?

On the moon landings, why would they fake it six times?  On one hand we have tons evidence from six separate moon missions - video transmissions, photographs, audio recordings, moon rocks, and of course the testimony of hundreds.  On the other hand we have your opinion that NASA's best engineers were never able to solve the landing problem.  How do you know they never solved it?  Just because we have videos of failures does not mean success was never achieved.