Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Was the moon landing for real ???  (Read 68307 times)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Was the moon landing for real ???
« on: October 16, 2006, 06:29:15 PM »

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2006, 07:29:32 PM »
well everything from NAZA related to the moon is hoax

they are probably base on the moon but its not related to the naza :)

Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2006, 01:52:13 AM »
Here's a link to some film of the apollo 11 astronauts faking being half-way to the moon.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-73731341583788062&q=moon+landing+hoax

The guy who discovered it in the nasa archives featured this in a film called "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon."  You might find it online too.

After making that movie... he went and interviewed astronauts and confronted them with the truth... those interviews are in a film called "Astronauts Gone Wild"   -   Even without the shadows that are from more than one light source... and even without the van allen belts... and without this discovered film of Armstrong faking the shot from half-way to the moon... all you have to do is watch the look on the faces of these guys when they are confronted to know that the whole thing was fake.

It's interesting to note that Cheney and Rumsfield were advisors to Nixon... so you see there are the same cast of shady characters involved in all of this.

It's also funny that the program started under Nixon... and that he ended it abruptly before he left office.

Some people laugh and say - "well is EVERYTHING a conspiracy?"  and I suppose that everything can't be... and the odds against so many things being "not what they appear" are slim... UNTIL you see that these are the same people, the same gang of thugs involved in every one of these things:

JFK... Moon hoax... Watergate... MKULTRA... abducted children... Iran/Contra drug running operation... pedophile rings... NAFTA and the American Union...  9/11... PATRIOT ACT... bio-terrorism... Invasion and occupation of Iraq... and the civil unrest in Iraq - all the same people.  The Bush Krime Family.
Google Prescott Bush and discover how he profited off of concentration camp labor while supporting the nazis in WWII
and then research Operation Paper Clip... and see how the CIA was infiltrated by nazis
and then research what the CIA did in Iran in the '50s... Operation Ajax.

And then tell me we are not seeing the fourth reich emerging

And for our friends in the UK... you should examine 7/7 - that was british intelligence.

 

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2006, 02:04:29 AM »
I was told the first U.S. landing was faked, but the remaining U.S. landings were real.

Paul Lowrance

Dellemann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2006, 08:48:07 PM »
I saw a dokumenar film about this things.
They make a intervie with Rumsfield and he really said on TV that the film and photos are maked in a film-studio !!! 
Because they needed it for the promotion . And so they maked this film and photos what are in every school-book.
Very creacy !  And whats also (not) funny, the most of the people which maked this fake films and photos are died on mystery way. I don't know how many of these 5 or more people how make the film were killed, but Rumsfield (he was the chef of this nice films & photos) life and make other really films in other countrys like Irak.

The landing was thrue, said Rumsfeld !  But I can't believe it really !!
Was another state (Russia) every time on the moon landing ??? I don't know, if not, than all of the moon projekt is a nice fake.

In the internet you can also read, that most of the astronauts saws "UFO"s and that we are not bewelcome on the moon. And I also read that they (Armstrong and other) have saw big ships on the moon. Perhaps it's thrue.

At the last Nasa mission (Atlanta) they must change the landing for 2 days because the astronauts saw also UFOs.

The Nasa think it was only some thing of the Atlanta shuttle or a simple plastic bag !!! - really plastic bag - I must laught !!! But perhaps really a plastic bag of Hofer or Wall marked.
 


 

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com

Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2007, 01:04:10 PM »
I saw a dokumenar film about this things.
They make a intervie with Rumsfield and he really said on TV that the film and photos are maked in a film-studio !!! 
Because they needed it for the promotion . And so they maked this film and photos what are in every school-book.
Very creacy !  And whats also (not) funny, the most of the people which maked this fake films and photos are died on mystery way. I don't know how many of these 5 or more people how make the film were killed, but Rumsfield (he was the chef of this nice films & photos) life and make other really films in other countrys like Irak.

The landing was thrue, said Rumsfeld !  But I can't believe it really !!
Was another state (Russia) every time on the moon landing ??? I don't know, if not, than all of the moon projekt is a nice fake.

In the internet you can also read, that most of the astronauts saws "UFO"s and that we are not bewelcome on the moon. And I also read that they (Armstrong and other) have saw big ships on the moon. Perhaps it's thrue.

At the last Nasa mission (Atlanta) they must change the landing for 2 days because the astronauts saw also UFOs.

The Nasa think it was only some thing of the Atlanta shuttle or a simple plastic bag !!! - really plastic bag - I must laught !!! But perhaps really a plastic bag of Hofer or Wall marked.
 


 

That film was a mocumentary which was actually making fun the the whole idea that the moon landing were faked, by stanley kubrik.

Man went to the moon.  We monitored aliens along the way, or more accurately they monitored us.  They have bases on the moon, which lie on the back side.  We had to edit footage and photos which is why some of it looks faked.  NASA has been editing their images ever since...NASA isn't the U.S's link to space exploration, its a technology capped, public relations solution.  What better way to hide aliens and ufos, then by having control of a mock space program, and secretly study them in the background.  NASA can't possibly yeild break-though technology since its public, and of which technologies would be compromised.  NASA is one big disinformation giant.  They make planets look dead, then 20 years later releasing a picture with streams of water flows :D  They have released images in earlier decades with interesting anomolies, only later to release the same image with those anomolies gone.  I think if theres bases on the moon, they are going to be mostly underground.  Ill never trust anthing NASA tells us.

infringer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 800
    • mopowah
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2007, 02:43:00 AM »
Some of this sounds so far fetched.

Though we have passed the age of reason.

I think this is the age of drama and conspiracy.

Oddly if you do look to the night sky you see nothing but stars oddly in many pictures where you should see stars you do not it is completely black.

This is one of the other conspiracy theories linked to the smoking gun secret nasa transmissions  or something like that also you have the other dr. hosting a project called the disclosure project or something along them lines.

Anyhow I somehow wonder just exactly why so many people see things that are not explainable and record things unexplainable.... Every single recording has an alternate explanantion even credible witnesses may not be creidible they are after all only human.

Where am I going with this.

The age of drama and conspiracy breeds the age of possibility which is we are entering skeptical views are acceptable but keep an open mind.

Topguner2

  • Guest
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2007, 06:26:06 PM »
Some nice pics here.
Enjoy.

http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/index.html


Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2007, 09:38:58 PM »
Anyone notice something wrong in this photo?

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/stennis/images/content/68449main_AS11-40-5903.jpg

This image shows that the single lightsource is too close to be the sun.  The angle of the reflective rock to the left of the astronaut, the high specular region on the ground floor..


devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2007, 03:11:30 AM »
^^ could u please explain; i stared at the image (which is pretty high res) for a few minutes and couldn't figure out what you were getting at.

devilzangel
..

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2007, 07:27:09 AM »
look how bright it is right by the space man .. now look out in the distance, how come its not bright out there in the distance just past the space man ? ( there is a VERY powerfull light right above and just behind the space man , and it sure as hell is not the sun)

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2007, 08:55:35 AM »
well .. true, but there could be many things that can be causing this.

The reflection (white) can be due to upheal of the "soil" from the module landing, possible artificial compacting due to that also. His foot prints provide more evidence that the compacting of the soil in a certain angle is creating the uniform reflection.

looking at the legs, the astronauts left leg is lighted in the inner side due to the reflection from his right leg. some would think that there was light coming in from the astronauts right side. keep in mind that the suit is colored white, it gives very good exposure even when not in favorable lighting.

also when looking at the reflection pic on the helmet, it gives a very wideangle view showing that the surrounding area shows even exposure.

unfortunately, i dont see how this can be confirmed one way or another without going to the moon and testing it.

i do have to admit, it does look weird to have a bright area and then a surrounding matte type area.

devilzangel
..

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2007, 09:30:07 AM »
k maybe this might help .. if your standing in a BIG wide open parking lot..with no cars in it , and your pic is taken during the day(when the sun is out.).....is there a bright light around just you ? ...or is the light consistand all the way acoss the parking lot ? .......now.....if it was dusk and some one set up a light just above you and behind , youll get the same look as in the spaceman pic /cough , i mean the earthman pic :).
« Last Edit: September 07, 2007, 12:21:13 PM by b0rg13 »

magnusx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2007, 10:08:10 AM »
I don't know about the photos etc. but for me it's simply a matter of expedience: America simply had to beat the Russians to the moon - it would have been cheaper, safer and guaranteed success if they faked the first one.
What I find remarkable is that so many people really want to believe it really happenned.
What I'd REALLY like to see is telescope photos of the landing sites from an independent source that show the LEM base section, flag etc. etc. : That would at least prove they really went there from some source other than NASA.
Any takers?