Author Topic: Was the moon landing for real ??? (Read 68587 times)

darchorse · « **Reply #45 on:** November 02, 2007, 04:15:58 AM »

I think it was all set up and the whole fiasco was faked. Not just the evidence but the whole NASA/American hubris thing that they are the first , the best, the blah blah blah etc. The usa has to appear to dominate everything and be the big school yard bully - they are still up to it now but thank god for the internet we are a lot better informed. The thing stinks - i am pretty sure hubble can locate the spot. also the astronaut interview on youtube looks like these guys are so uncomfortable with questions. i just hope neil armstrong et al gets the guts up to tell everyone before he dies. america will be even more of a laughing stock that it is now with a brain dead idiot president. imagine the embarrassment lol. IT WILL BE REVEALED IN TIME - what a joke it will be.

TheOne · « **Reply #46 on:** November 02, 2007, 04:45:27 AM »

They go on moon, have base, go on mars, the thing is they dont tell us the thruth because they dont use the old rocket crap technologies anymore, they used NASA (front) to hide what they are really doing, they are using technologies stoled from the german WW2 (saucer technologies) and free energy

shruggedatlas · « **Reply #47 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:00:48 AM »

Quote from: TheOne on November 02, 2007, 04:09:26 AM

they are a tiny atmosphere on the moon, john lear talked about that many time, NASA = disinformation, dont believe any word they say....

Atmosphere on the moon? I see now who I am dealing with. No wonder no one takes you guys seriously.

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #48 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:20:41 AM »

Tsk Tsk shrugged, are you ignorant.

You should read more posts in the overunity forum, obviously you don't, otherwise you would have read this:

Quote from: bowser03 on October 29, 2007, 01:19:17 AM

The actual secret of Free Energy is given as the power of "Vril' which is caused by two rotating magnetic field's interaction. This is what my Father, the real Hitler used to have German Astronauts travel to the Moon and discover cities and life there in the 30's. He used Vril saucers. Vril can be produced by a series of 2 electromechanical disks in a homopolar like, full flux design, or it can be produced by rotating two magnetic fields with field coils in a toriod using a solid state methodology. i have attached a drawing of a successful vrillian free energy circuit which i tested today. Please don't take this lecture i am giving you too lightly, since i have 6 Phd's and 4 Nobel Prizes under alias names and no other human on this earth has ever had more than one Prize per person.

Not only atmosphere, CITIES. By now they are probably run by Nazis. That is why they had to fake the flag on the moon, they could not very well show the swastika flags flying there.

So catch up with the enlightened ones here and study http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3538.0/topicseen.html It will do you good. :-)

Hans von Lieven

gaby de wilde · « **Reply #49 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:36:06 AM »

You should learn to address the topic shruggedatas. Your behaviour strikes me as weird, maybe this is an european thing I don?t know. You come tell us all kinds of lies? haha??? What are you the open source development sadist?

"No wonder no one takes you guys seriously."

This is an Insult!

Why are you posting insults Mr liar?

Is there something wrong with talking like a normal person? That so hard for you?

gaby de wilde · « **Reply #50 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:40:42 AM »

Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 02, 2007, 07:20:41 AM

Tsk Tsk shrugged, are you ignorant.

Hans it's your own account, we all know that by now.

It didn't even have an email address, what was you thinking?

gaby de wilde · « **Reply #51 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:48:29 AM »

The cameras the astronauts used had crosshairs engraved on the lens. NASA claimed, the company that made the camera was most insulted by this lie. They said they made the most expensive camera on the world, NASA even modified it. You only get crosshairs if you want them on the film. The only reason to want them on the film is to be able to do good edits.

The 2001 space odyssey set camera couldn't even go low enough to fake a single chest cam shot.

There is not one photo that could have been made from the chest.

Different locations on the moon have the same hills

Then there are even moon UFO photos where the studio lights are clearly visible.

Big round spotlights.

But I guess you can still argue that's the sun right!

ROFL!!

shruggedatlas · « **Reply #52 on:** November 02, 2007, 08:49:31 AM »

Quote from: darchorse on November 02, 2007, 04:15:58 AM

I think it was all set up and the whole fiasco was faked. Not just the evidence but the whole NASA/American hubris thing that they are the first , the best, the blah blah blah etc. The usa has to appear to dominate everything and be the big school yard bully - they are still up to it now but thank god for the internet we are a lot better informed. The thing stinks - i am pretty sure hubble can locate the spot. also the astronaut interview on youtube looks like these guys are so uncomfortable with questions. i just hope neil armstrong et al gets the guts up to tell everyone before he dies. america will be even more of a laughing stock that it is now with a brain dead idiot president. imagine the embarrassment lol. IT WILL BE REVEALED IN TIME - what a joke it will be.

I think what really makes you mad is that we brought a car. How American!

gaby de wilde · « **Reply #53 on:** November 02, 2007, 11:43:13 AM »

Quote from: shruggedatlas on November 02, 2007, 08:49:31 AM

Quote from: darchorse on November 02, 2007, 04:15:58 AM
I think it was all set up and the whole fiasco was faked. Not just the evidence but the whole NASA/American hubris thing that they are the first , the best, the blah blah blah etc. The usa has to appear to dominate everything and be the big school yard bully - they are still up to it now but thank god for the internet we are a lot better informed. The thing stinks - i am pretty sure hubble can locate the spot. also the astronaut interview on youtube looks like these guys are so uncomfortable with questions. i just hope neil armstrong et al gets the guts up to tell everyone before he dies. america will be even more of a laughing stock that it is now with a brain dead idiot president. imagine the embarrassment lol. IT WILL BE REVEALED IN TIME - what a joke it will be.
I think what really makes you mad is that we brought a car. How American!

Yeah, and what kind of car! I mean look at that enormous structure there far far away at the horizon, that all came out of a small box.

You cant miss it it's brightly lit and right in-front of the light source. hahaha

Look it's easy to debunk the moon landing.

It works just like you debunk most UFO videos. Take this for example

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDidNzQ12ZY

Now this is easy to debunk. Think! You are vdeooing 2 ufo's making a crop circle. Would you allow them to fly out of the picture? Would you make no attempt to follow them of any kind? The dumbest camera man would do a better job as this.

Now the moon footage is all shot in one direction. The camera never shows us around but it's always a straight shot. Any newbie camera man would take shots in all directions, never just one. Sure they patch up stuff that looks like it but it's not close to natural camera work. Everyone inside NASA who should know better responds down right hostile. If you listen to their talk it's as if they got brainwashed.

It's just hilariously stoopid people buy this crap. LOL If you have liek half a working braincell you see it's a one big fake. lolzz

zero · « **Reply #54 on:** November 02, 2007, 01:28:21 PM »

I dont find it hard to believe that they faked the moon landing.

They were under huge pressure to beat the Russians.

Now that China has plans to land on the moon... look at recent events:

They are having competitions for people to build working moon landers.

Geez... Why would they need to have a new lander when they already have existing
lander technology? They could do it back then, but cant now???

utilitarian · « **Reply #55 on:** November 02, 2007, 03:08:11 PM »

I have been lurking for a while and this is a great website with brave people but I have to say this..... Its funny how all you argue about landing on the moon but you are swallowing the whole moon thing like sheeple. lol......

Guys, I hate to break it to you but theres no moon. It is all right here..... http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

So yes the moon landing is fake but lol so is the moon. They just did that so that people would continue to think theres a moon and nasa liers and astronomers could continue to make money.

Funny how you only ever see one side haha! Its cause its flat and its too hard to make it change gradually. And please do not bring up tides, thats funny..........evryone always bring that up first and its so ridicilus. You take a golf ball and put it above a small bowl of water..... does the water rise up? Didnt think so.......

Moab · « **Reply #56 on:** November 02, 2007, 05:06:54 PM »

Put that joint out man, you've had enough. dam near spit out my coffee and ruined my keyboard!

Quote from: utilitarian on November 02, 2007, 03:08:11 PM

I have been lurking for a while and this is a great website with brave people but I have to say this..... Its funny how all you argue about landing on the moon but you are swallowing the whole moon thing like sheeple. lol......

Guys, I hate to break it to you but theres no moon. It is all right here..... http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

So yes the moon landing is fake but lol so is the moon. They just did that so that people would continue to think theres a moon and nasa liers and astronomers could continue to make money.

Funny how you only ever see one side haha! Its cause its flat and its too hard to make it change gradually. And please do not bring up tides, thats funny..........evryone always bring that up first and its so ridicilus. You take a golf ball and put it above a small bowl of water..... does the water rise up? Didnt think so.......

Moab · « **Reply #57 on:** November 02, 2007, 05:25:00 PM »

A quote from the adress you gave.

"A cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed."

LOL! I'd love to see anyone send PHYSICAL anything through via e-mail. Man UPS and Fed-ex are gonna be pissed!

Hmm. i wonder if that $100.000 exist?

I must be bored today.. sorry!!

gaby de wilde · « **Reply #58 on:** November 02, 2007, 05:29:24 PM »

Quote

...I must be bored....

See this :-)

bush on the moon on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

hartiberlin · « **Reply #59 on:** November 02, 2007, 07:29:35 PM »

Quote from: zero on November 02, 2007, 01:28:21 PM

I dont find it hard to believe that they faked the moon landing.

They were under huge pressure to beat the Russians.

Now that China has plans to land on the moon... look at recent events:

They are having competitions for people to build working moon landers.

Geez... Why would they need to have a new lander when they already have existing
lander technology? They could do it back then, but cant now???

Exactly.
Please people, show me a video of the old moon lander, when they tested it successfully
on earth, PLEASE !

I have only seen so far crash videos of it.
This thing never was stable without support lines !

There are just too many convincing arguments, that they just never made it to the moon
and were only in earth orbit and faked all the moon landings...

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Was the moon landing for real ??? (Read 68587 times)

darchorse

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

TheOne

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

shruggedatlas

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

hansvonlieven

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

gaby de wilde

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

gaby de wilde

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

gaby de wilde

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

shruggedatlas

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

gaby de wilde

The moon landing wasn't real you silly

zero

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

utilitarian

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

Moab

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

Moab

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

gaby de wilde

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???

hartiberlin

Re: Was the moon landing for real ???