Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Was the moon landing for real ???  (Read 68293 times)

gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #120 on: November 09, 2007, 07:59:24 PM »
Well it's clear they didn't want us to see the dark side. That's why it's all dark.

or maybe its: anti gravity + nuclear submarine  1920-1930 about?

What about this? lol

APOLLO 20 legacy - The moon city, the ship wreck on the moon etc

WTF is on the moon?

There is a lot of news about submarines?

http://news.google.com/news?q=%22nuclear+submarine
"nuclear submarine" - Google News

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #121 on: November 11, 2007, 06:32:09 AM »
man o man, some of the stuff i read  ::) , I guess its the real journalistic posts that keep me here.

btw NASA has done research into the logistics of traffic and transportation systems when there are commercial / public / personal antigrav vehicles. I find that very interesting. I guess the feds have a plan on how to setup up and control a traffic system once antigrav vehicles become commercially and personally available. Imagine the hoops one would have to go through to get a license for that, hehehe.

obviously, the first uses would come strictly through high volume commercial applications, freight and passenger travel. Personal antigravs would come only to highly trained personnel and eventually to the rest of the "johny two shoes" after the systems and technology had evolved to allow for dummy-proof travel; meaning artificially controlled travel that would be highly computerized.

pretty complex logistical stuff once u start to think about it. After thinking about this in detail, one can see one good reason why antigrav technology is hidden. The logistics and law enforcement would be a nightmare. There would be a huge problem with country borders, people flying to China, India, Africa, well anywhere and everywhere one wanted without passport enforcement because one wouldn't need a landing strip to land, one could simply land in ones backyard.

One thing such  a technology would do is get rid of borders to the extent of being extinct.

devilzangel
..

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #122 on: November 11, 2007, 06:54:36 AM »
G'day devil.

Quote
One thing such  a technology would do is get rid of borders to the extent of being extinct.

devilzangel

You hope :-(

There is no money in opening borders, there is much more in keeping them closed.

Hans von Lieven

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #123 on: November 11, 2007, 07:40:20 AM »
Well it's clear they didn't want us to see the dark side. That's why it's all dark.

or maybe its: anti gravity + nuclear submarine  1920-1930 about?

What about this? lol

APOLLO 20 legacy - The moon city, the ship wreck on the moon etc

WTF is on the moon?

There is a lot of news about submarines?

http://news.google.com/news?q=%22nuclear+submarine
"nuclear submarine" - Google News


Its well know nazy made flying submarine (using submarine frame) during the end of the WW2. using the VRIL and other technologies

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #124 on: November 11, 2007, 07:58:03 AM »
G'day devil.

You hope :-(

There is no money in opening borders, there is much more in keeping them closed.

Hans von Lieven

exactly, although there are many financial players who want borders, for the benefit of tariffs and monetary foreign exchange, there has been a gradual paradigm shift in the matter of trade.

As u may have noticed, the world is changing to trade free borders; the NAFTA and the EU are prime examples. furthermore, Europe let go of multiple national currencies in favor of one currency, the Euro. The borders are pretty much in name and diplomacy.

if your dont believe me on this paradigm shift, check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amero ; it is the proposal for a North American Currency Union! one common currency for Canada, America, and Mexico. It would be called the "Amero"

ever since the advent of the information age, the world has been getting smaller and smaller. Eventually the borders will be in name. They are merely political imaginary lines; these lines will have no meaning when the majority of the public doesnt care about having borders.

I think the reason why certain technologies are hidden from general public is because the world as we know it is currently incompatible with the change it would bring on.

How would NASA coming out saying, that the moon has alien presence change the world? The changes would be drastic, mostly in terms of how we perform everyday actions. It would be as fundamental as powering homes to transportation. Its even more grandiose than what Steven Greer has postulated.

I would like to one day see NASA (and other even more black ops agencies) revealing the agenda behind their curtain of secrecy.

devilzangel
..

darchorse

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #125 on: November 11, 2007, 08:05:48 AM »
37/38 years and never been back - that's enough for me to know this is a fake. as i said before it will be revealed as were the wmd's and other american bullshit. the usa is truly the land of the idiots - idiots so stupid that that are unable to see what is apparent to anyone with an iq of a police dog.

Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #126 on: November 11, 2007, 05:37:47 PM »
Hans - The American Union is already in the works.  Sounds like no borders to me - and if there were no money in it, then it would not be happening.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #127 on: November 11, 2007, 08:11:18 PM »


Afternoon all.

If the strikingly sincere appearing whistle-blowers on the inside are telling the truth...and they come off a whole lot more credible than what we see before us on TV, then it wood seem darchorse has summed things up pretty accurately...

And it follows that there's more in the works than a north american union - reportedly just the next stage in the global enslavement plans of criminally insane inbreds controlling major world events.

Regards

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #128 on: November 11, 2007, 08:56:46 PM »
 THIS IS "The Replication" OF THE TRUE (?)
http://www.secret.tv/artikel10918/NASAMondlandung

Pese

pese.cjb.net

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #129 on: November 11, 2007, 10:06:23 PM »
Sorry Elvis,

The American Union is a response to the European Union who is set to take the crown from American domination. It is not a question of money in it, it is a question of survival in a power play.

Hans von Lieven

Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #130 on: November 12, 2007, 01:02:17 PM »
guys, there already is something like the European Union in the Americas, it's called the United States of America, it's been there for a while already. ;)

And what does that have to do with the moon landings?

devilzangel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #131 on: November 12, 2007, 05:13:52 PM »
Sorry Elvis,

The American Union is a response to the European Union who is set to take the crown from American domination. It is not a question of money in it, it is a question of survival in a power play.

Hans von Lieven
does it really matter why it is happening? I used to think all this stuff about how every politician is out to get the "people"; it didn't work. America doesn't need a power play, and hasn't needed it for over a century. It has been a world leader in practically everything since WWII. America is much more economically powerful than the EU. Britain has always had a big hand in currency, mainly because it used to be the financial capital of the world for over 300 years; until ofcourse after WWII.

wouldn't it be a great forward step for humanity to function as one for a change? All we have done since we were making weapons is war over retarded material crap. No wonder aliens treat us as they do; with disdain.

guys, there already is something like the European Union in the Americas, it's called the United States of America, it's been there for a while already. ;)

And what does that have to do with the moon landings?


Not the same; Texas cant be called a country. California cant be called a country. No state can ever separate from the "united states", USA had a big bloody civil war over this.

The Govs in my opinion are setting a stage to allow for the proper dissemination of the truth about the Moon and alien technologies. Politics had everything to do with the moon race, and it has everything to do with current secrecy around the whole matter ET. Politics and world economy.

devilzangel
..

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #132 on: November 13, 2007, 02:19:16 AM »

Evening @all

As far as governments go:

People who are deceptive are at worst dangerous - at best patronizing...and ultimately untrustworthy.

engarde

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #133 on: December 30, 2013, 02:37:46 AM »
As I have read today that the new Chinease Yutu  moon rover faces temperatures of over 100 degrees Celsius
(212 °F)
at daylight on the moon and had to be shut down due to these high temperatures and during night they had colder than zero degrees Celsius ( colder than 32 degrees Fahrenheit).

Here is the source:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/video/2013-12/22/c_132986593.htm
Quote:
"On Monday, "Yutu" had to turn itself off to withstand the high temperatures during the day. Data sent back shows that parts that were under direct sunlight reached over 100 degrees Celsius, while parts covered in shadow saw temperatures well below zero."


I wonder how the heat flow and air cooling and heating worked in the Apollo LEM missions ?

I have read that they used glycol ethylen to pump it around the LEM, but the outside mylar
shielding can  only reflect about 40 to 50 % sunrays away, so the LEM would be still heated up
pretty much and during the nights it would be getting freezing cold and they only had Zinc-Silver batteries, that were also not rechargeable, so how did they heat the LEM at night ?

Otherwise they had Missions Apollo 8 and 10 , where astronauts already came very close to the surface of the moon.
If these were also faked, I wonder, if there would have been not too many technicians in the NASA control room, that
have realized this eventual fake already at the Apollo 8 and 10 missions ?

P.S: I also wonder, why they always had different astronauts for each mission, as the astronauts from Apollo 10 had already the experience to almost go to the moon and at Apollo 11 the new astronauts had not such a former experience...Hmm...Wouldn´t you let this job be done from more experienced astronauts and not fresh astronauts, that
had not this prior experience ?

See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apollo_missions

 


infringer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 800
    • mopowah
Re: Was the moon landing for real ???
« Reply #134 on: December 30, 2013, 03:09:43 AM »
Crazy conspiracy about the US moon landing is indeed just that.

It was real and true and if the Chinese rover a machine not a man around enough they will find our flag posted there by real men nearly a half a century ago we must remember while the Chinese are a force the United States is not a push over when it comes to technological achievement and innovation and we owe a lot to those who are free to tinker and make advances and inventions that allow such progress to be made.

There is plenty of evidence the moon landing was real. So keep this in mind finally the moon landing is a once in a lifetime thing. You must meet higher standards than you may be aware of physically, mentally, and credentials as well. The years that lapse between missions are not quick an much happens within the time as an astronaut is required to be able to handle 6G's and has to have also been a jet pilot and there can be no blood pressure issues, bone structure issues and so on. The amount of deterioration that happens in space to the human body in a short period of time would not be healthy for those to consistently man each mission.

People in their prime with all their ducks in a row are needed. You should do some reading about these things not only do you need all this but perfect vision is required as well to be a jet fighter pilot think of this there is probably even much more than I am not aware of.

Following two lightning strikes on the spacecraft during launch, with brief loss of fuel cells and telemetry, Apollo 12 performed the first precise manned landing on the Moon in the Ocean of Storms near the Surveyor 3 probe. In two EVAs, the astronauts recovered portions of Surveyor and returned them to Earth. First controlled LM ascent stage impact after jettison; first use of deployable S-band antenna; lunar TV camera damaged by accidental exposure to sun.

Not the sun damage to the camera due to exposure to the sun supprise.


Age does make a huge difference look at your running backs in the NFL for instance once they hiit the age of 30 many of them decline substantially and this is no secret in fact it is openly talked about.