Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

OverUnity Prize => Devices applied for the OU prize => Topic started by: Roach69 on September 17, 2015, 03:19:59 AM

Title: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on September 17, 2015, 03:19:59 AM
I do have a working Solid State System Extends the Battery watt hour run time of 2.7 watt hours to 8.12 watt hours !
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: FatBird on September 20, 2015, 02:02:49 AM
Please post a diagram or schematic.


Thanks.
                                                                                                                   .
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: SoManyWires on September 20, 2015, 05:12:01 AM
I do have a working Solid State System Extends the Battery watt hour run time of 2.7 watt hours to 8.12 watt hours !

of course you do.
that's why an email is posted as an image.

you better be prepared to start receiving tons of cash sent to that email.
have you considered which bank or form of currency you would like, in order to keep track of your billions of incoming dollars?

eventually you will get so rich, you will probably start wanting to just give away your working devices, much like witt's does.
they are said to be giving away 100's of working devices each month. go ahead, ask them yourself.

in all the years of months and still not one working demonstration.
you will want to use donations as the form of 'charitable income'.
if you step beyond that, there is risk of being arrested.
unless you can prove the device actually works.
we know it doesn't though, including you.

on another note, its somewhat rude how so many charities do not contribute any more than the 33% of their total earnings, towards the actual people and causes they claim to represent.
many people are unaware of that.
so that means only 1/3rd of the cash you think is going to help the poor, actually helps the poor beyond helping those that seem more interested in helping themselves first. somehow its legal, and still a rude slap in the public face.

Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: TinselKoala on September 20, 2015, 07:33:02 AM
Did I miss the part where the load on the motor is given? Simply citing a run time, without any reference to the load, or actual work done by the motor, is pretty meaningless. It's certainly not proof of overunity as stated.
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on September 21, 2015, 04:01:27 PM
Obviously you do not understand overunity designs or how to build them I did this for no gain but to give so if you do not understand this device it is your Loss,i can do no more,more than 35 years in this design !!
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: SoManyWires on September 21, 2015, 05:38:13 PM
Obviously you do not understand overunity designs or how to build them I did this for no gain but to give so if you do not understand this device it is your Loss,i can do no more,more than 35 years in this design !!

ah well, it must be our loss then if you say so.

35 years into it, and you expect people to just believe your claim, if you say so.

telling someone they do not understand overunity designs or how to build them.
you left out the part where you are supposed to show running proof, didn't you?

35 years into your design process, and all you can provide is a self sent email with a few paragraphs of your typing?
you claim to 'understand overunity designs and how to build them',  and you have to be reminded on procedure for verification.
brilliant.

you appear to want applause, for what?
its like trying to watch a kite fly on the other side of the world, using a radio station.

perhaps you are completely honest. yes or no?
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: TinselKoala on September 21, 2015, 07:44:31 PM
Obviously you do not understand overunity designs or how to build them I did this for no gain but to give so if you do not understand this device it is your Loss,i can do no more,more than 35 years in this design !!

Hilarious !!

Let's see.... you post the run-on paragraph with your faulty description in the "Overunity Prize" category but you say you did this for no gain. 

And you say you have spent more than 35 years in this design... but you can't show a working prototype or provide actual power output measurements... your only claim appears to be an extended runtime but you don't give any torque or even simple RPM measurements. 

You must think that Joule Thiefs are massively Overunity then, since they extend battery lifetime by a great deal when running LEDs or even motors.

I think that it is YOUR LOSS, your loss of 35 years of fiddling about, without YOUR understanding of basic power measurements or even how to communicate your findings and claims properly.

Feel free to support your claims with a full and proper description, proper measurements, or even a simple YT video of your apparatus and your measurement technique.

Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on September 21, 2015, 09:37:34 PM
I was not trying to make enemies , but it appears I have by my success,and I do have a physical prototype,the 35 years you seem to think was wasted was wasted on minds like yours who continued to condemn the design ideas i developed if this is your picture of the way I present my findings I do feel it is your loss and I am sorry for you because I will never post after this message,and i will make this known to you that you will never do what i have done because of the way you think so narrowly about me and my prototype will never be known to you,I have achieved what others will NEVER DO, If the sequence of construction is not in proper order you will fail every time I will give you one more chance to find out but you have to talk with me person to person and no arguing will be tolerated you will listen to what I have to say and may ask a question if you so desire !  630-859-2887 ( Be Civil and Polite )
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: TinselKoala on September 21, 2015, 10:20:14 PM
I was not trying to make enemies , but it appears I have by my success,and I do have a physical prototype,the 35 years you seem to think was wasted was wasted on minds like yours who continued to condemn the design ideas i developed if this is your picture of the way I present my findings I do feel it is your loss and I am sorry for you because I will never post after this message,and i will make this known to you that you will never do what i have done because of the way you think so narrowly about me and my prototype will never be known to you,I have achieved what others will NEVER DO, If the sequence of construction is not in proper order you will fail every time I will give you one more chance to find out but you have to talk with me person to person and no arguing will be tolerated you will listen to what I have to say and may ask a question if you so desire !  630-859-2887 ( Be Civil and Polite )

The English language uses periods to set off sentences. Each sentence expresses an idea or complete thought. A paragraph is composed of a set of complete sentences that are set off by periods, and which together explain or complete a sequence of thoughts.

I'm sorry that a simple request for _proof_ of your claims meets with such disapproval from you. It's not that hard to show a diagram, or a YT video, of your construction, is it? Nor is it too hard for you to read and understand the rules for applying for the Overunity Prize, is it?  No, I won't be calling you on the phone, and you might want to reconsider posting your phone number in public, because all kinds of crazy people will wind up calling you if you aren't careful.

As I've pointed out, a simple Joule Thief can increase the usable run time from batteries powering a motor, or LEDs. Since all you appear to be claiming is increased run-time, I am saying to you that that is _not enough_ to convince people who have been working in this field for a long time. You need to provide some measurement of +power output+, which in the case of motor loads, means that you need to provide RPM, and torque, measurements, so that we can see whether your increased runtime is at the expense of real power output. If your motor runs much slower, or if it can't provide the same torque as before, then your increased runtime is meaningless and is no proof of OU performance at all.

Now, if you don't want to engage in a reasonable and public discussion of your claims and why they are inadequate, that is certainly up to you. But if you don't, then it looks like you may be just another blowhard false claimant who "knows" he's right and that everybody else is wrong, but who cannot provide actual evidence of his claims. It's all up to you.

And... a good way to avoid making enemies is to avoid insulting them with your initial comments. Your "success" is just a claim, but your statement that people reading and posting here don't know what they are talking about, is rather insulting.
Quote
Obviously you do not understand overunity designs or how to build them...
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: TinselKoala on September 22, 2015, 02:50:15 AM
Obviously.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPt7xbmHXfY
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on October 26, 2015, 03:19:11 AM
I do have a working Solid State System Extends the Battery watt hour run time of 2.7 watt hours to 8.12 watt hours !
THE LINK : http://youtu.beAiGThPz3Fqo > to see the video of this demonstration which is 1 hour and 40 minutes long run time to prove this without a doubt !!
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on October 26, 2015, 03:33:11 AM
THE LINK : http://youtu.be/AiGThPz3Fqo > to see the video of this demonstration which is 1 hour and 40 minutes long run time to prove this without a doubt !!
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on October 26, 2015, 03:35:41 AM
THE LINK : http://youtu.be/AiGThPz3Fqo > to see the video of this demonstration which is 1 hour and 40 minutes long run time to prove this without a doubt !!
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on October 26, 2015, 03:40:11 AM
THE LINK : http://youtu.be/AiGThPz3Fqo > to see the video of this demonstration which is 1 hour and 40 minutes long run time to prove this without a doubt !!
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: TinselKoala on October 26, 2015, 08:44:07 AM
Does posting the same thing four times in a row make it any less of a mistake?
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: crazycut06 on October 28, 2015, 03:21:20 PM
Hi Roach69

Is your device a joulethief? connected to a step down transformer driving a 12 volt motor?
can you draw a schematic of your setup for clarity.

regards
Cc
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: Roach69 on October 29, 2015, 04:12:19 AM
Hi Roach69

Is your device a joulethief? connected to a step down transformer driving a 12 volt motor?
can you draw a schematic of your setup for clarity.

regards
Cc
This system is constructed in an untried sequence never to have been done this way, this took me 40 plus years to reason out ! I cannot at this point reveal this sequence as I am in the process of negotiations with 2 company`s on leasing this concept ! Thanks for asking ! will keep you in touch on the matter !  Roach !
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: crazycut06 on October 29, 2015, 12:38:58 PM
Hi Roach69

That's fine with me...good luck on your journey,
thanks for sharing anyways...

Regards
Cc
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: NdaClouDzzz on August 23, 2020, 11:45:06 AM
Greetings, Roach69.
This thread seems to explain and verify the workings of your Quantum Generator. Cheers!
https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/msg535148/#msg535148 (https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/msg535148/#msg535148)
Title: Re: Quantum Generator
Post by: NdaClouDzzz on October 20, 2020, 08:33:59 AM
Ken THE REAL DEAL Fairbanks!!!!!!  https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q (https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q)