Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar  (Read 186851 times)

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Thanks Skywatcher for the feedback. There is the updated graph below

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Thanks Skywatcher for the feedback. There is the updated graph below

Down we go.  Pretty soon, there will be negative light, whatever that might be, ha ha.

Bill

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
To see the results measured by Skywatcher (and confirmed by Arman Gevorkyan, Martin Berger​, DEDcolorado @ Youtube, and Stuart Campell @ PESN) in the global context of all his tests, I compiled and plotted his results, together with LED and battery consumption curves, into the graphs below. I also wrote a very detailed analysis of the tests, with the interpretation of the results, conclusions, and the accompanying evidence. You can read it at Metabunk.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Update:

18.02.16    00:00:00    260       
               
                                     t=30sec    t=60sec    t=90sec
18.02.16    19:00:00    1280         1090         963
19.02.16    19:00:00    1770         1460        1260
20.02.16    19:00:00    1520         1280        1115
21.02.16    19:00:00    1480         1230        1070
22.02.16    19:00:00    1060         895          795

The value for 'fully charged' would be > 28000.

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Wow, this time there is not even any rebouncing. The discharging is even quicker than I anticipated. Thanks for sharing, Skywatcher!

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Today the lamp had been stored in horizontal orientation (the last days it was vertical) and today it was some degrees warmer than the previous days.
Don't know if this had any influence... for the test tomorrow i will put it back to the other (slightly colder) place, and vertical again.

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Updated graph

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Today the lamp had been stored in horizontal orientation (the last days it was vertical) and today it was some degrees warmer than the previous days.
Don't know if this had any influence... for the test tomorrow i will put it back to the other (slightly colder) place, and vertical again.
Yes, there is always certain margin of error due to different factors. Additionally, the first values are taken at 30s each time, and seeing the very steep discharge curve, the initial value at 0s would be significantly higher - fully consistent with the Battery Relaxation Phenomena. The continuing discharging is apparent. We can tell beyond any doubt that we cannot observe any self-recharging at all. After 115 hours of rest, the batteries would have to be already significantly charged (when not fully) if there was any truth on ADGEX's claims. Instead, the illumination values decrease below 3% of the maximum flux.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Obviously, the whole world, except of some small areas in Australia and Russia, seems to be a 'dead zone'.   :P

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Today also TheCell's test of the ELFE flashlight is due, after 14 days of rest. The LED should come on with the full force and continue lighting with high intensity for 10+ hours like during his first test (according to ADGEX). Unfortunately, TheCell did not measure the light intensity in any way, and AFAIK did not use any reference light and photos, so we have to rely on his subjective opinion. I do not remember whether he did only one single 10+ hours test, or more of them previously. If only one test was performed, we can expect that the light will shine very strongly at the beginning, but should lose its intensity considerably within ~30 minutes, even when watched with the naked eye. I hope The Cell will report back here soon too.

Kahrlo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
I would suggest to have a 48 hours rest in between so that nobody can argue that there is not enough "recharge" time. If then the descending curve will continue like before that argument would also be debunked.

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Obviously, the whole world, except of some small areas in Australia and Russia, seems to be a 'dead zone'.   :P
Unfortunately, Russia is probably also filled with dead zones - the first evidence of it comes from the YT videos of the Russian customers that I posted here a few weeks ago.

On the other hand Schumann resonances seem to be so strong in New Zealand or perhaps also in Australia, that the "self-recharging effect" works even in the ordinary cheap NZ$10 flashlight bought in a supermarket, as the PESN moderator Stuart Campbell demonstrated in his own failed attempt to prove skeptics wrong. :D

TheCell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
And here the results of my ELFE Flashlight
Only to remember :
2weeks ago ; I drained to the possible lowest light intensity with an test one day after to check out it's capability to recover
Now it lay on the table, switched off and untouched for 2weeks and yesterday I ran the test again and it was dissapointing:
Because it doesn't seem whether you let it recover for one day or for 2 weeks, the result is pretty much the same:
The lamps brightness when switched on is medium bright and it's intensity decreases pretty fast: after 15minutes it is on a fairly low level and after a total duration of 23minutes it is on a far more low level it will probably stay on for the next 2 hours.
When I first tested the lamp it ran for 2 hours with allmost no decrease in intensity at a far more brightness compared to the switched on state after 2 weeks.
Here the pics: the first link is the intensity at start of the test after the 2 weeks.
http://overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/608/
http://overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/607/
http://overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/606/

The results are so clear , that I don't need exact measurement do draw the conclusion , that it did not fullfill the expactations of a 'free energy self charging flashlight'

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Thank you, The Cell, for the reporting, despite your disappointment!

txt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Anyone who has been scammed by ADGEX, and would like to help stopping the crooks continuing their fraud, and also preventing their much more serious suspected multi-million investment fraud, can contact me through the Private Message here (an icon near the alias name), and share some information that I could pass to the authorities.

If you prefer doing it alone, the ADGEX company is registered in Australia, with the registration number ACN 156 556 035 - you can use for example one of the following links, or contacting you local authorities, or an association for protecting consumers' rights.

https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/contact-us/how-to-complain/report-misconduct-to-asic/
https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/report-a-scam
https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/scams/report-a-scam

You can also use the information collected about the scam on the Metabunk website:
https://www.metabunk.org/claim-harvesting-energy-from-schumann-resonances-and-earths-em-field-adgex.t7285