Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Mechanical free energy devices => Reactive Power usage => Topic started by: synchro1 on August 05, 2015, 02:20:49 PM

Title: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 05, 2015, 02:20:49 PM
The secret "Orgone Generator" of Wilhelm Reich: Magnets and copper plates!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OTvzsAupVk
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 05, 2015, 03:48:50 PM
hi synchro

do you know how to replicate this?

@Madama,

I tried to build a Cook battery. I wraped 3/4" dielectric conduit with thin magnet wire serial bifilar. Cook explains you can use magnets or ferrite for a core in his battery. I positioned 8 linked 3/4" diametric magnets in the core. The coil ends went to a diode and cap like Stiffler's set up. Voila, the cap spontaneously charges then abruptly stops. Try snugly placing a powerfull diametric neo-cylinder in the air core of a bifilar solenoid coil with ends attached to rectifying diodes and high voltage capacitor. Stiffler scavenged one from a disposable flash camera. The magnets and copper generate A.C. current.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: tinman on August 05, 2015, 04:03:55 PM
Take the magnets away,and i bet the cap will still charge up-been there,done that.
Nothing like mains signal traversing the workshop,and coupled to two good size plates(acting as collectors) to i see.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 05, 2015, 05:49:18 PM
Take the magnets away,and i bet the cap will still charge up-been there,done that.
Nothing like mains signal traversing the workshop,and coupled to two good size plates(acting as collectors) to i see.

@Tinman,

Dr. Stiffler disconnects the capacitor from the Quantum Receiver and compares the unattached "Cap Bounce" to the connected magnet charge. Big difference!

Stiffler has the negative capacitor electrode attached to the south end of one magnet stack, and the positive capacitor electrode attached to the copper seperator plates between the magnet stacks, through a FWBR.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: ALVARO_CS on August 05, 2015, 09:21:01 PM
Stiffler has the negative capacitor electrode attached to the south end of one magnet stack, and the positive capacitor electrode attached to the copper seperator plates between the magnet stacks, through a FWBR.


Sorry to disagree Synchro !
No positive nor negative leads as he clearly states that the FBR is needed to rectify the AC going to cap.
Nothing attached to the south end of magnet stack !
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 05, 2015, 10:30:15 PM

Sorry to disagree Synchro !
No positive nor negative leads as he clearly states that the FBR is needed to rectify the AC going to cap.
Nothing attached to the south end of magnet stack !

@ALVARO,

Thanks for that. Stiffler has a prior video with a large washer attached to the end of a magnet stack.

Here's part 3 posted a few hours ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awda7cHwF9g
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: ALVARO_CS on August 06, 2015, 12:56:02 AM
"the negative capacitor electrode attached to the south end of one magnet stack"

Sorry but no, no electrode attached to the washer as can be seen in the frame I posted. (the washer was there at the beginning of the vid, but at the end he removes it, and the voltmeter keeps on showing the charge in progress.
I chose this frame at the end of the first vid, because it shows where the electrodes are.  :-[
see the arrows
cheers
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 12:56:33 AM
The secret "Orgone Generator" of Wilhelm Reich: Magnets and copper plates!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OTvzsAupVk
That demonstration can be replicated using piezo electric material.  Apply magnets stressing the piezo electric material and it develops voltage.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 06, 2015, 07:24:04 AM
That demonstration can be replicated using piezo electric material.  Apply magnets stressing the piezo electric material and it develops voltage.

@MarkE,

             Stiffler mentions the possibility that there's a "Frequency" between the magnet stacks. The "Oscillating Frequency" of magnetisem has been placed at 174.9 KHz. "Ferromagnetic Resonant Frequency as being around 174.9 KHz". (Wootan&McLain)
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 08:16:42 AM
@MarkE,

             Stiffler mentions the possibility that there's a "Frequency" between the magnet stacks. The "Oscillating Frequency" of magnetisem has been placed at 174.9 KHz. "Ferromagnetic Resonant Frequency as being around 174.9 KHz". (Wootan&McLain)
Frequency is an adjective.  Substitute:  "green" or "high" or "left" and see if the statement makes any less sense. 
Stiffler shows an arrangement of parts that charges a capacitor from a sandwich of materials connected through a FWB to the capacitor when the sandwich is compressed between two magnet stacks. 

There is no such thing as a resonant frequency of magnetism.  Wootan and McLain built an apparatus that exhibited a resonant frequency of about 175kHz.  Theirs was a machine that they actively drove with the output of a power oscillator.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Rfacts on August 06, 2015, 08:59:53 AM
That demonstration can be replicated using piezo electric material.  Apply magnets stressing the piezo electric material and it develops voltage.

MarkE:
It is important to critically consider claims and assertions.  The capacitor is initially shorted and there is continuous
magnetic compression on the plates throughout the first video, when the jumper is removed it is allowed to charge
up to 6V.  The capacitor is shorted again for a while, when the jumper is removed the second time it charges up to
3V by the end of this video.  Is there piezo electric material that would fit inside the plates that are shown in this
video which would charge a 100uF capacitor to 9V in less than 10 minutes?

Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 10:43:44 AM
MarkE:
It is important to critically consider claims and assertions.  The capacitor is initially shorted and there is continuous
magnetic compression on the plates throughout the first video, when the jumper is removed it is allowed to charge
up to 6V.  The capacitor is shorted again for a while, when the jumper is removed the second time it charges up to
3V by the end of this video.  Is there piezo electric material that would fit inside the plates that are shown in this
video which would charge a 100uF capacitor to 9V in less than 10 minutes?
The total charge is 900uC.  The average current is 1.5uA.  The total energy is: 2.3mJ.  The average power is less than 4uW.  Those are modest values.  A sandwich of PVDF could probably manage that.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Tito L. Oracion on August 06, 2015, 11:29:31 AM
What I believe is,
The copper receive any signal from everywhere and that is ac, the magnet then amplifies it then rectified in the diode bridge.

That's how simply it is. ;) 8)

Therefore then the bigger the metal and the higher you position it above and off course slanted
it according to Tesla said. 8)

Actually a more better arrangement will give more better result.

I believe we can do it.  :)

Otits ;D
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Jimboot on August 06, 2015, 01:08:45 PM
Just looked like an electro smog collector / radiant energy collector etc  to me.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 01:12:15 PM
Just looked like an electro smog collector / radiant energy collector etc  to me.
It could be an RF receiver.  But to get to 6V the field would have to be very intense.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 06, 2015, 01:21:55 PM
Need to see oscilloscope traces of input to the diodes. 1n4148s aren't ultra fast so the supposedly AC output from the cell should be visible on a scope that can handle UHF. At the moment it looks like a short dipole picking up random noise in the room.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 02:16:40 PM
Need to see oscilloscope traces of input to the diodes. 1n4148s aren't ultra fast so the supposedly AC output from the cell should be visible on a scope that can handle UHF. At the moment it looks like a short dipole picking up random noise in the room.
Do we know the diodes are 1N4148s?  The Trr on those is around 4ns.  It could be that this is an RF set-up.  But, 6V is a mighty big signal.  And, ignoring leakage current in the capacitor, the source impedance appears to be in the 1 MegOhm range. 

It is going to be difficult to come up with a scope probe active or passive that won't heavily load such a high impedance.  A 10X passive probe looks like around 1K Ohm at 100MHz.  A 100X probe won't quite get you to 10k Ohms. An active FET probe is only going to get you up to around 25k - 100k Ohms depending on the vendor.   
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 06, 2015, 02:57:24 PM
It could be an RF receiver.  But to get to 6V the field would have to be very intense.

I experimented with "Stiffler's Spontaineous Charge" effect for months and uploaded hundreds of posts about it. I got the same effect by snugly positionng two coupled diametric neo tube magnets inside the air core of a series bifilar solenoid coil. I drove 125 miles into the wilderness to test the "Electronic Smog" theory, which failed. It showed the same charging effect way out in the woods. Stiffler goes on to say the charging stops abruptly. I reported this abrupt stop in my past posts, so we know we're dealing with the same effect.

I used only one fast switching Shottky Diode in series between the coil lead and the high voltage capacitor.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 03:10:48 PM
I experimented with "Stiffler's Spontaineous Charge" effect for months and uploaded hundreds of posts about it. I got the same effect by snugly positionng two coupled diametric neo tube magnets inside the air core of a series bifilar solenoid coil. I drove 125 miles into the wilderness to test the "Electronic Smog" theory, which failed. It showed the same charging effect way out in the woods. Stiffler goes on to say the charging stops abruptly. I reported this abrupt stop in my past posts, so we know we're dealing with the same effect.

I used only one fast switching Shottky Diode in series between the coil lead and the high voltage capacitor.
If one has:  A coil => rectifier => capacitor, and one adds to this a strong magnet, then moving the magnet into place with the motion in one direction generates a voltage impulse that will charge the capacitor through the diode.  If the capacitor and diode each exhibit low leakage, then the capacitor can retain the charge for a long time.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 06, 2015, 04:25:50 PM
If one has:  A coil => rectifier => capacitor, and one adds to this a strong magnet, then moving the magnet into place with the motion in one direction generates a voltage impulse that will charge the capacitor through the diode.  If the capacitor and diode each exhibit low leakage, then the capacitor can retain the charge for a long time.

@MarkE,

Flashlight shaker circuit! I'd bet any amount of money that a section of thin walled copper water pipe with a diametrically polarized tube magnet positioned snugly inside would generate the same kind of current as Stiffler's setup! It's important that the field's at 90 degrees to the conductor face. The connections would probably both attach to the copper pipe.   
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: tak22 on August 06, 2015, 05:15:15 PM
The  QER (Quantum Energy Receiver) appears to be a further development of Stiffler's earlier work with what at that time he called the TMB - (Thermal Magnetic Battery (http://pvb.pavlabor.net/SE/FreeEnergy_27.01.08/%D0%A1%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5/%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%20Dr_%20Ronald/Dr_%20Ronald%20Stiffler%203.files/tmb.htm)).


tak
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: e2matrix on August 06, 2015, 07:44:01 PM
Frequency is an adjective.  Substitute:  "green" or "high" or "left" and see if the statement makes any less sense. 
Stiffler shows an arrangement of parts that charges a capacitor from a sandwich of materials connected through a FWB to the capacitor when the sandwich is compressed between two magnet stacks. 

There is no such thing as a resonant frequency of magnetism.  Wootan and McLain built an apparatus that exhibited a resonant frequency of about 175kHz.  Theirs was a machine that they actively drove with the output of a power oscillator.
I guess English is not your forte.  Frequency is a noun.   
I've noticed in many experiments with a scope that there is a peak around 175 KHz.   The experiment shown seems easy enough to replicate.   We know he has copper and aluminum but what else is in the middle beside a very thin piece of plastic?  I don't see that plastic he showed by itself being able to create any measureable piezo effect. 


fre·quen·cy/ˈfrēkwənsē/
noun
the rate at which something occurs or is repeated over a particular period of time or in a given sample.
the rate at which a vibration occurs that constitutes a wave, either in a material (as in sound waves), or in an electromagnetic field (as in radio waves and light), usually measured per second.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: tak22 on August 06, 2015, 07:58:52 PM
From the link in my previous post you can see the plate composition of the TMB, which may be the same as the QER:
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Rfacts on August 06, 2015, 08:10:59 PM
The  QER (Quantum Energy Receiver) appears to be a further development of Stiffler's earlier work with what at that time he called the TMB - (Thermal Magnetic Battery (http://pvb.pavlabor.net/SE/FreeEnergy_27.01.08/%D0%A1%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5/%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%20Dr_%20Ronald/Dr_%20Ronald%20Stiffler%203.files/tmb.htm)). 
tak

tak:
Please confirm your posted TMB link, receiving "This page can't be displayed." message.  Thanks for following up with additional TMB info.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Rfacts on August 06, 2015, 08:32:41 PM
The total charge is 900uC.  The average current is 1.5uA.  The total energy is: 2.3mJ.  The average power is less than 4uW.  Those are modest values.  A sandwich of PVDF could probably manage that.

MarkE:
Thanks for calcs, will have to see if additional technical info is provided.  BTW, first video does specify 4x 1N4148s for FWBR (additional voltage drop there).
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: tak22 on August 06, 2015, 09:08:24 PM
Rfacts,


The link still works for me but is slow at about 20 seconds to load. I've converted it to PDF and attached it:
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 06, 2015, 10:44:00 PM
@MarkE,

Flashlight shaker circuit! I'd bet any amount of money that a section of thin walled copper water pipe with a diametrically polarized tube magnet positioned snugly inside would generate the same kind of current as Stiffler's setup! It's important that the field's at 90 degrees to the conductor face. The connections would probably both attach to the copper pipe.   
You need to make sure that the secondary is not shorted as a contiguous copper pipe would be.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 07, 2015, 02:01:41 AM
You need to make sure that the secondary is not shorted as a contiguous copper pipe would be.

@MarkE,

Danial McFarland Cook recommended "Spiral Copper Ribbon" up to two feet wide, to replace the copper wire in his battery. This copper ribbon wraped directly over the dielectric tube housing the magnet core in place of the wire coil.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 07, 2015, 05:01:50 AM
Rfacts,


The link still works for me but is slow at about 20 seconds to load. I've converted it to PDF and attached it:

Thanks for the PDF, very interesting.  Someone here should try to  replicate the continuous LED driving system.

 If a plastic insulator is between the metal plates as shown, and the plates are also separated by a thin plastic sheet from the magnets, then the magnets can't act as short dipole antennae, picking up stray signals.

All wiring must be kept ultra short and magnets must not in any way be prone to movement as this could generate a small voltage as the capacitance between the plates changes with pressure.

Then, if it can be shown to work in different environments, we could say that something special probably happening.

 
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 10:42:16 AM
Stephan selected this for a show case video: Stiffler shows how a ceramic capacitor works in place of the copper plates!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLC7684829E98CAD74&t=22&v=JBqSEEGGBWE

Tesla explains how his "Serial Bifilar" acts as a capacitor in his patent. Now we see the same two components as the diametric tube neo magnet inside the bifilar solenoid bore hole (Fields on the perpendicular).

Magnet fields at 90 degrees to a capacitor face. The conditions are identical!

 
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 08, 2015, 11:05:33 AM
Stephan selected this for a show case video: Stiffler shows how a ceramic capacitor works!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLC7684829E98CAD74&t=22&v=JBqSEEGGBWE

Tesla explains how his "Serial Bifilar" acts as a capacitor in his patent. Now we see the same two components as the diametric tube neo magnet inside the bifilar solenoid bore hole (Field on the perpendicular).

Magnet field at 90 degrees to a capacitor face. The conditions are identical!
Why don't you write down in bullet points what you think was demonstrated and what you think it means?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 08, 2015, 11:50:29 AM
I still don't like the long magnets. He needs to show it with just 2, not a long string that can act as a UHF dipole and easily couple through the few pFs  of the capacitor plastic coating. Not saying he's BS, but be careful.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Hoppy on August 08, 2015, 11:51:59 AM
I gave the Dr. Stiffler setup a try but with no similar result. Just a reading of a few millivolts.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 11:53:59 AM
Why don't you write down in bullet points what you think was demonstrated and what you think it means?

@MarkE,

I'm an experimentor, not an "Ivory Tower Egghead" like Mr. Know-it-all with more of your extra assignment material. Conrad-Electro built a magnet core bifilar for me and concealed his spontaneous charge results for Mile High.

How many worthless, hum drum posts about Faraday's Law did you help upload on this subject along with Mile High? Your obnoxious "No O.U." click failed.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 08, 2015, 01:12:47 PM
I gave the Dr. Stiffler setup a try but with no similar result. Just a reading of a few millivolts.
As should be expected for the components as identified.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 08, 2015, 01:13:39 PM
@MarkE,

I'm an experimentor, not an "Ivory Tower Egghead" like Mr. Know-it-all with more of your extra assignment material. Conrad-Electro built a magnet core bifilar for me and concealed his spontaneous charge results for Mile High.

How many worthless, hum drum posts about Faraday's Law did you help upload on this subject along with Mile High? Your obnoxious "No O.U." click failed.
You posted the link.  I am just asking what you think you saw and why you found it noteworthy.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 01:33:55 PM
You posted the link.  I am just asking what you think you saw and why you found it noteworthy.

@MarkE,

Here's one of my videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XMfCpUzq_g
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 08, 2015, 01:34:16 PM
BTW anyone know what the verdict on Stifflers Space Energy Coherence from a few years ago is? There was so much going on with oscillators and strings of LEDs but then all that interest seemed to have halted very abruptly. He even had a gizmo with 3 coils and nothing else seemingly oscillating on their own accord. What happened to all of these older OU inventions by the Doc?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 08, 2015, 01:48:23 PM
BTW anyone know what the verdict on Stifflers Space Energy Coherence from a few years ago is? There was so much going on with oscillators and strings of LEDs but then all that interest seemed to have halted very abruptly. He even had a gizmo with 3 coils and nothing else seemingly oscillating on their own accord. What happened to all of these older OU inventions by the Doc?
I am afraid that I was not following him at the time.  TK would probably know.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 02:12:07 PM
BTW anyone know what the verdict on Stifflers Space Energy Coherence from a few years ago is? There was so much going on with oscillators and strings of LEDs but then all that interest seemed to have halted very abruptly. He even had a gizmo with 3 coils and nothing else seemingly oscillating on their own accord. What happened to all of these older OU inventions by the Doc?

@Pomodoro,

K4zep tried 3 coils of equal resistance. He failed because 2 coils have to be tailored to the first, and all 3 coils need different wire lengths to achieve "Mutual Ground Resonance". Failure to replicate caused a loss of interest. Even a really stupid person could replicate Stiffler's "Capacitor Magnet Sandwich".
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 08, 2015, 03:18:06 PM
@Pomodoro,

K4zep tried 3 coils of equal resistance. He failed because 2 coils have to be tailored to the first, and all 3 coils need different wire lengths to achieve "Mutual Ground Resonance". Failure to replicate caused a loss of interest. Even a really stupid person could replicate Stiffler's "Capacitor Magnet Sandwich".
.

Absolutely, hopefully we will get a handful of replicators. I don't have those magnets and I'm focusing all my efforts on a Chernetskii device replication, so I will sit back and see what comes up.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 06:08:46 PM
I gave the Dr. Stiffler setup a try but with no similar result. Just a reading of a few millivolts.

@Hoppy,

How many farads is your electrolytic storage capacitor? What are the part numbers for the diodes you used? You can see the glass diode I got to work in my video. My storage capacitor is merely 2.2 micro farads! Are you on the A.C. voltage scale reading off the ceramic generating capacitor?

The output's low ripple A.C., so one "Germanium Diode" in series with let's say a 10 micro-farad electrolytic capacitor can do the work of the 4 diode bridge.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 08, 2015, 07:15:24 PM
How would a stack of "Bifilar Pancake Coils" (Skycollection Type) react in place of the ceramic capacitor when compressed between powerful stacks of neo disks? The "Pancake Stack" would substitute cleanly for a capacitor.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Hoppy on August 08, 2015, 09:05:38 PM
@Hoppy,

How many farads is your electrolytic storage capacitor? What are the part numbers for the diodes you used? You can see the glass diode I got to work in my video. My storage capacitor is merely 2.2 micro farads! Are you on the A.C. voltage scale reading off the ceramic generating capacitor?

The output's low ripple A.C., so one "Germanium Diode" in series with let's say a 10 micro-farad electrolytic capacitor can do the work of the 4 diode bridge.

@ synchro1,

I'm using 4x 1N4148 diodes and tried 10uF and 2uF. Reading is DC off the FWBR as per Dr. Stifflers demo. Same type and value cap as on demo.

I would like to see Dr. Stiffler repeat the experiment using a hand-held DVM.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 09, 2015, 01:57:21 AM
@ synchro1,

I'm using 4x 1N4148 diodes and tried 10uF and 2uF. Reading is DC off the FWBR as per Dr. Stifflers demo. Same type and value cap as on demo.

I would like to see Dr. Stiffler repeat the experiment using a hand-held DVM.

@Hoppy,

Try a Tesla bifilar pancake coil in place of the generator capacitor. Everything else checks out.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Jimboot on August 09, 2015, 03:17:06 AM
@Hoppy,

Try a Tesla bifilar pancake coil in place of the generator capacitor. Everything else checks out.
I may give that a go today. I tired the copper plates plastic and neos yesterday. Before hooking up the fbr I put the scope on AC and measured the plates directly. Adding the magnets definitely increased the voltage I was measuring. Only a few millivolts though. I left it charging a cap overnight. I'll change the fbr I'm using today for some signal diodes. Nothing too exciting for me though. May try a cap today too. My setup still feels like a smog collector though. My bench is in a converted shipping container with flouro lighting. So it makes a good faraday cage but I did have lighting and electric heating running at the time.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MileHigh on August 09, 2015, 12:11:21 PM
@MarkE,

I'm an experimentor, not an "Ivory Tower Egghead" like Mr. Know-it-all with more of your extra assignment material. Conrad-Electro built a magnet core bifilar for me and concealed his spontaneous charge results for Mile High.

How many worthless, hum drum posts about Faraday's Law did you help upload on this subject along with Mile High? Your obnoxious "No O.U." click failed.

No, ConradElectro did not "conceal his spontaneous charge results" for me.  He built a "series bifilar" coil and I gave him some simple guidance on comparing the magnetic field strength produced by a "series bifilar" coil and a regular coil of the same number of turns using a simple compass setup that was aligned with the magnetic north-south.  Contrary to your claims that the "series bifilar" coil would produce a stronger magnetic field, that in fact did not happen.  What happened was normal and expected - the strength of the magnetic field was related to the number of turns of each coil, irregardless if it was "series bifilar" or not.

You made all sorts of claims about the "series bifilar" coil so when Conrad had his setup and was doing his testing, I posted on at least two separate occasions inviting you to ask Conrad to do some tests for you.  Those could have been tests to check for special high voltage generation or "spontaneous charge" or extra energy storage capabilities because of the increased inter-winding capacitance or whatever other fantastic claims you had been making about a "series bifilar" coil for months.  You did not respond.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 09, 2015, 11:29:25 PM
Lidmotor's first attempt:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7aUdZ3hAY
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: TinselKoala on August 10, 2015, 12:38:26 AM
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 10, 2015, 01:15:51 AM
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?

@Tinselkoala,

No, I have yet to see one. Stiffler says something in video #4 about his unusual capacitor being designed for "Underwater" use?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Jimboot on August 10, 2015, 02:14:43 AM
Well my cap doubled over night from 20mv to 40mv using the copper plates. So no flouros. SHipping container is a great faraday cage. I'll be putting this one aside for now, not sure where the 20mv came from but not that exciting compared to other devices . I probably doing something wrong .
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 03:11:58 AM
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 10, 2015, 08:08:24 AM
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.

The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 08:16:01 AM
The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .
Well then one should expect more than just fluorescent lights to be big emitters in his home.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 10, 2015, 12:37:25 PM
Everyone knows I got great results with two powerful 3/4" diametric tubes seated inside the aircore of a 26 gauge Tesla wraped bifilar 1 1/2" spool. I live in the great north woods and tried this miles from nowhere with equal success. There's really something else aside from RF going on here with what I'm calling the (Cook Battery Effect).
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 02:03:39 PM
Everyone knows I got great results with two powerful 3/4" diametric tubes seated inside the aircore of a 30 gauge Tesla wraped bifilar 1 1/2" spool. I live in the great north woods and tried this miles from nowhere with equal success. There's really something else aside from RF going on here with what I'm calling the (Cook Battery Effect).
Did you use a spectrum analyzer or other tunable receiver to determine what the background RF was at your test location?  Did you alternately place the experiment in a Faraday cage?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 10, 2015, 05:13:27 PM
Did you use a spectrum analyzer or other tunable receiver to determine what the background RF was at your test location?  Did you alternately place the experiment in a Faraday cage?

@MarkE,

Dr. Stiffler asked for a week to iron some legal issues out. He promised to run those kinds of tests soon, and upload the videos. Stiffler needs to break one of his capacitors open to determine the internal construction. Paper and oil capacitors would react differently to the magnet field's than rolled up foil. What are they really?

It should take only a few minutes to fully charge the capacitor this way. Overnight time spans signal a serious problem!
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 07:46:08 PM
@MarkE,

Dr. Stiffler asked for a week to iron some legal issues out. He promised to run those kinds of tests soon, and upload the videos. Stiffler needs to break one of his capacitors open to determine the internal construction. Paper and oil capacitors would react differently to the magnet field's than rolled up foil. What are they really?

It should take only a few minutes to fully charge the capacitor this way. Overnight time spans signal a serious problem!
The construction of his 15kV 2200pF disc capacitor is self evident without removing the insulating cover.  The 15kV rating dictates one dielectric layer sandwiched between two metalization layers each bonded to one of the leads.

Here is an illustration of such construction:  http://electrical4u.com/electrical/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ceramic-capacitor.jpg

For 15kV the diectric type is probably Class 1.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 10, 2015, 10:42:05 PM
The construction of his 15kV 2200pF disc capacitor is self evident without removing the insulating cover.  The 15kV rating dictates one dielectric layer sandwiched between two metalization layers each bonded to one of the leads.

Here is an illustration of such construction:  http://electrical4u.com/electrical/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ceramic-capacitor.jpg

For 15kV the diectric type is probably Class 1.

@MarkE,

Thanks. Two circular metal charge plates the same diameter as the magnet disks, seperated by a di-electric, looks best. Increasing the diameter of the disk magnets along with the charging plates would be the best scale up approach. Hockey pucks!

Lidmotor tried using the wrong kind of capacitor and too few magnets.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 11, 2015, 02:34:27 AM
I think he is using a high voltage cap from http://www.amazing1.com/capacitors.html. I have several like it, but that specific capacitor is no longer available. There are several similar cap.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 11, 2015, 02:13:57 PM
I think he is using a high voltage cap from http://www.amazing1.com/capacitors.html. I have several like it, but that specific capacitor is no longer available. There are several similar cap.

@Xee2,

Thanks! This is the kind! It should make a big difference to replicators to use the correct part:

01 µfd 40 kv 8 Joules Large Capacitor with Radial Leads, 1.3” OD x 0.55” with heavy #16 leads. This “beefy” capacitor can be used for many high voltage applications such as potted CR multipliers, Marx Impulse Generators, Shockers and many other high voltage applications requiring low inductance medium/fast high- voltage discharges. This is a real beauty of a brand new capacitor.


 - .01µfd 40KV 8J Ceramic Disk Capacitor ... $24.95   (10-24@ $22.95ea.   25-49@ $20.95ea.   50-99@ $19.95ea.   100+@ $18.95ea.)
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 11, 2015, 02:24:16 PM
Dimensions: 1 1/2" dia. x 1/4" thick
Tolerances: ±0.004" x ±0.004"
Material: NdFeB, Grade N52
Plating/Coating: Ni-Cu-Ni (Nickel)
Magnetization Direction: Axial (Poles on Flat Ends)
Weight: 1.92 oz. (54.3 g)
Pull Force, Case 1: 42.10 lbs
Pull Force, Case 2: 147.8 lbs
Surface Field: 2340 Gauss
Max Operating Temp: 176ºF (80ºC)
Brmax: 14,800 Gauss
BHmax: 52 MGOe
The DX84-N52 is an incredibly powerful disc magnet.  These discs pack an incredible amount of holding power.  Two of them stuck together will be *very* difficult to separate.  These mighty, magnetic discs are no joke.  Be sure you understand the manner in which large neodymium magnets behave around metal objects and other magnets before ordering by reading our Neodymium Magnet Safety Page.

 This size is also available in Grade N42 as part number DX84.

Price: $16.36

Nearly $320 for the 18 magnets and capacitor. The cap would need protective compression bushings.

These magnet are so extremely powerful, it may only take two! That's $58. for the 2 magnets and capacitor!

 
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 11, 2015, 03:07:26 PM
You could start with just the capacitor and a vise.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 11, 2015, 04:14:24 PM
You could start with just the capacitor and a vise.

@MarkE,

No physical pressure what-so-ever needs to be applied to the capacitor. Two play token "Dominos" one on each side of the capacitor can entirely transfer all the uneeded pressure away from it and keep it completely protected. The pressure is an unwanted side effect. The Gauss on the collector plates remains intact without any physical pressure on the capacitor. Alternately, the capacitor may be hard to crush.

The diisc capacitor's 1 1/3'  in diameter and the disc magnet 1 1/2"'. That leaves 1/6 " for a pressure collar around the rim to protect the capacitor. A snug fit would work best.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 11, 2015, 04:31:58 PM
Just did a quick test using a 10nF 30kV ceramic disk capacitor, similar to the type Dr. Stiffler
shows in his fourth video, and I only got a few mV across a 47uF electrolytic output capacitor.
I tried using a power bridge rectifier module and I also tried using four UF4007 fast diodes
as the bridge rectifier, and still only got low mV at a very slow charge rate. However for the magnets I was
just using a few ceramic block magnets that I have, but they are fairly strong.  It would be very helpful
if Dr. Stiffler would show the difference in charge rate with the magnets present compared to the charge rate
with the magnets removed, and also show the charge rates when starting with no magnets and step by step
adding a pair of magnets at a time, and showing the charge rate after each additional pair of magnets is added.
I suppose my test setup may have failed if having a very strong magnetic field of some minimum strength is required
to start seeing the higher charge results. Another possible explanation is Dr. Stiffler may have something like a
cell phone tower very close by. If Dr. Stiffler could do the charge rate comparison tests that I suggest here
by starting with no magnets and then adding a pair of magnets at a time and comparing the charge rate
after each pair of magnets is added, that could help clear some things up.
All the best...
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 11, 2015, 04:34:41 PM
@MarkE,

No physical pressure what-so-ever needs to be applied to the capacitor. Two play token "Dominos" one on each side of the capacitor can entirely transfer all the uneeded pressure away from it and keep it completely protected. The pressure is an unwanted side effect. The Gauss on the collector plates remains intact without any physical pressure on the capacitor. Alternately, the capacitor may be hard to crush.

The diisc capacitor's 1 1/3'  in diameter and the disc magnet 1 1/2"'. That leaves 1/6 " for a pressure collar around the rim to protect the capacitor. A snug fit would work best.
If you have not reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results then I assert it is premature to state what is and is not required to do so.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 11, 2015, 04:45:09 PM
@MarkE,

You haven't been paying attention. We can drill two holes in the side of a plastic pill bottle cap for the electrodes, remove the top and seat the capacitor inside the rim. A thousand pounds of pressure would go unfelt by the capacitor. Ceramic magnets just won't make the cut.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: DrStiffler on August 11, 2015, 06:29:19 PM
So everyone does not go off in Left Field on this presentation, the center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup. What is going on here is totally magnetic as far as the signal pickup. Think a moment can a magnetic field be modulated? Do all magnetic fields intertwine (assuming field lines can attach). Could plain old permanent magnets be used to intercept fluctuations from other varying (including earth) fields and combine (amplify?) them in such a way that energy can be extracted?

No this is far from simple, yet it is not all that complex once on looks in the right direction.

In a week or two I hope to post a new video which goes into detain and also includes charging of a 3F cap.

Take Care and stay reasonable.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Hoppy on August 11, 2015, 07:33:05 PM
Further experimentation reveals that if I attach a croc clip lead to either of the capacitor leads and hold the metal clip at the other end of the lead, then I can see the same steadily rising voltage as shown in Dr. Stiffler's video, up to around 3V. Connecting the clip directly to my house earth will slowly discharge the capacitor. I suspect that my body is acting as an antenna, receiving EM smog.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 11, 2015, 07:38:51 PM
So everyone does not go off in Left Field on this presentation, the center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup. What is going on here is totally magnetic as far as the signal pickup. Think a moment can a magnetic field be modulated? Do all magnetic fields intertwine (assuming field lines can attach). Could plain old permanent magnets be used to intercept fluctuations from other varying (including earth) fields and combine (amplify?) them in such a way that energy can be extracted?
No this is far from simple, yet it is not all that complex once on looks in the right direction.
In a week or two I hope to post a new video which goes into detain and also includes charging of a 3F cap.
Take Care and stay reasonable.


Hi Dr. Stiffler. Regarding what I mentioned above:
Quote
"It would be very helpful if Dr. Stiffler would show the difference in charge rate with the magnets present compared to the charge rate
with the magnets removed, and also show the charge rates when starting with no magnets and step by step
adding a pair of magnets at a time, and showing the charge rate after each additional pair of magnets is added. "

Since you seem to be saying that the permanent magnets are important to getting the charging results you have shown, doing the above
suggested test steps would help to demonstrate this in a simple way. Will you be willing to demonstrate this? Until you or someone else can show
how much the charge rate varies with and without the magnets present, then it is still not clear at all to viewers of your videos how much effect the
permanent magnets are actually having in your setup.
All the best...
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 11, 2015, 07:50:23 PM
Further experimentation reveals that if I attach a croc clip lead to either of the capacitor leads and hold the metal clip at the other end of the lead, then I can see the same steadily rising voltage as shown in Dr. Stiffler's video, up to around 3V. Connecting the clip directly to my house earth will slowly discharge the capacitor. I suspect that my body is acting as an antenna, receiving EM smog.

Hi Hoppy. In my case connecting the mains earth ground wire to the negative terminal on the output eletrolytic capacitor
causes it to charge much faster and to a higher voltage, or also if I touch my finger to some of the connection points in the
circuit, but the electrolytic capacitor is of course most probably just charging primarily from AC mains field pickup in such a case, and
those are expected results when touching circuit points with a finger or connecting the mains ground wire in. I think we really need to see
how the charge rate compares when Dr. Stiffler removes the magnets and then adds the magnets back in, one pair at a time. The chances
of at least some of the capacitor charging being due to EM fields such as from the mains and other EM radiation sources like nearby cell phone towers
and WIFI access points, etc., are pretty high without steps being taken to show that such things are not a significant factor in Dr. Stiffler's setup.
All the best...

Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Hoppy on August 11, 2015, 08:05:53 PM

Hi Void,

I see very little effect when connecting a ground earth to the cap neg lead. As I mentioned in my first post, I would also like to see Dr. Stiffler comparing performance by using a hand held meter.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: gotoluc on August 11, 2015, 08:18:00 PM
In a week or two I hope to post a new video which goes into detain and also includes charging of a 3F cap.

Take Care and stay reasonable.

Charging a 3F capacitor would be quite a feat!

I'll be  8) out for that

Luc
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 11, 2015, 08:18:28 PM
As I mentioned in my first post, I would also like to see Dr. Stiffler comparing performance by using a hand held meter.

Hi Hoppy. Yes, a hand held battery powered DVM would also be very helpful, as a mains connected
bench DVM (if that was the case) may possibly not have its leads fully isolated from the mains, or may at least be
bringing the mains EM field in closer proximity to the circuit under test through mains field pickup in its wiring.
Between these two things of comparing the charge rate with no magnets in place and adding them back in a
pair at a time, and using a battery powered hand held type DVM preferably out in a back yard or park some
distance away from any mains connected equipment or mains wiring would be very obvious things that need to be tried.
The setup could also be placed in a microwave oven with the microwave unplugged and the door closed, and the output cap
voltage could be measured just before placing it in the microwave oven and then immediately after opening the microwave
oven door again, after leaving it in the oven with the door closed for a couple of minutes or so.

All the best...

Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 11, 2015, 08:59:50 PM
So everyone does not go off in Left Field on this presentation, the center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup. What is going on here is totally magnetic as far as the signal pickup. Think a moment can a magnetic field be modulated? Do all magnetic fields intertwine (assuming field lines can attach). Could plain old permanent magnets be used to intercept fluctuations from other varying (including earth) fields and combine (amplify?) them in such a way that energy can be extracted?

No this is far from simple, yet it is not all that complex once on looks in the right direction.

In a week or two I hope to post a new video which goes into detain and also includes charging of a 3F cap.

Take Care and stay reasonable.

@ Dr. Stiffler,

Quote:
                           " The center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup".

 That puts the "Tesla Bifilar Pancake Coil" high on the list of good potential pickups, right? That's the one I hit "Paydirt" with!
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: DrStiffler on August 11, 2015, 09:20:05 PM
I just lost a very good post for some reason, I'll try again.

The magnets are required. The 'Reach Out and Touch Someone' holds true here. A small field is only coupled to very close or NF fields or those that are very strong.

Remember this is a Receiver as stated in the very first video. This is NOT a Generator.

WiFi, Cell, Mains etc will only be of value if they have created a magnetic field in a close mass, although the Earths Field also contributes as a Conduit for other fields. Remember above I asked, Can a Magnetic Field be Modulated and in addition when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

A small field depends on stronger field to couple with it and the stronger the detector the farther it reaches out for coupling, therein is the reason for the magnets. The cap, plates, cored coil or whatever is used only to FEEL the field difference (AC) and apply it to the bridge.

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.

I do not intend to get back into INET rhetoric and only am offering some advice to save a lot of false direction and effort.  If I can solve some issues I will fully explain and illustrate what is going on here. If not, maybe some work by others will get it and then the cat will be out of the box by someone else.

I will jump in only if I see something totally left field or a big waste of time, hang in for a few weeks if you still do not see a direction or the whole point of it all.

Oh! Charging 3F, that is nothing with the right scale setup.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 11, 2015, 09:57:10 PM
when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

Normal physics says they stay the same. The reason they pull harder when close is that each has more field lines going though each perpendicular surface area when close. This is a result of the fact that the field lines spread out (and thus become less dense) as the distance from magnet increases.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 11, 2015, 10:25:04 PM
However, in "soft" iron the magnetic strength of the iron does increase when a magnet is brought close. This is because the magnet causes the magnetic domains in the iron to line up in one direction thus increasing the strength of the magnetic field in that direction.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Hoppy on August 11, 2015, 10:30:11 PM

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.


Dr. Stiffler,

Have you used a hand held battery meter with short probe / clip leads?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 11, 2015, 10:44:37 PM
Hi Dr. Stiffler. To conduct a more convincing demonstration, you should at the very least bring your setup out to
your back patio or back yard, or to a park or similar and use a battery powered DVM, and show that when you are at least 10 or 20 feet away
or so from any mains connected equipment and the mains power lines and wiring that you are still seeing the same cap charging rates.
With your setup right on your work bench with what appears to be various mains connected bench equipment nearby, there
is no way to tell if you are not picking up a strong EM field from some mains connected equipment or mains wiring. Normally it wouldn't
be expected that just the field from some transformers or whatever in your nearby bench equipment could cause the cap to charge up
that high and that fast without at least having a virtual or real ground or short antenna wire connection as well, but for all we know
one or more of your pieces of mains connected bench equipment may have a very strong EM field around it. As mentioned previously, it
would also be very helpful if you showed the cap charge rate with and without the magnets in place for comparison. This should demonstrate
that the magnets are an important part of the setup as you are claiming. In my own replication attempt described a few posts back, the
permanent magnets I used had no noticeable impact on the output cap charging rate at all. Using a microwave oven as a faraday shield
out in your back yard or maybe even just in the center of your living room would be very helpful as well. :)
All the best...
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 12:36:32 AM
Look at these 4" neo disks and the copper disks above and below the coil. A simple plastic magnet seperator disk, sandwiched between the copper disks and disk magnets turns the unit into a large cap charging power plant. These are the largest and most powerful magnets in the consumer market place. The bifilar coil generates a spontaneous charge between the magnets too.

I didn't record the self charging, through the diode and capacitor because I couldn't believe the very healthy readings were accurate at that point. These are the kinds of magnets and capacitor plates it takes to succeed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgcZMojb_-I&list=FLGj-eKaG5_tMGNr_yuLePkA&index=2
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 01:00:01 AM
@MarkE,

You haven't been paying attention. We can drill two holes in the side of a plastic pill bottle cap for the electrodes, remove the top and seat the capacitor inside the rim. A thousand pounds of pressure would go unfelt by the capacitor. Ceramic magnets just won't make the cut.
Are you speculating, or have you done this and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 01:05:31 AM
@ Dr. Stiffler,

Quote:
                           " The center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup".

 That puts the "Tesla Bifilar Pancake Coil" high on the list of good potential pickups, right? That's the one I hit "Paydirt" with!
Why?  You already know the construction of the capacitor:  on each side there is a wire lead bonded to a metal disc and between the two metal disks is a larger diameter dielectric disk.  The mutual inductance between the leads is tiny.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 01:15:21 AM
Are you speculating, or have you done this and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results?

That last video's over 5 years old. You just showed up. This is all "Old Hat" for the rest of us pal! We can see the "Cook Battery" componants here and in the Stiffler set ups.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 01:28:50 AM
That last video's over 5 years old. You just showed up. This is all "Old Hat" for the rest of us pal!
Then you shouldn't have any difficulty answering the question of whether you used the arrangement you proposed and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 01:34:44 AM
Then you shouldn't have any difficulty answering the question of whether you used the arrangement you proposed and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results.

My first "Cook battery" attempt produced his results. The Magnet Pump is third atage. All my magnet coils perform the same way. Dr. Stiffler emphasized the importance of "Powerful Magnets" as an essential necessity.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 12, 2015, 01:48:22 AM
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 02:44:26 AM
My first "Cook battery" attempt produced his results. The Magnet Pump is third atage. All my magnet coils perform the same way. Dr. Stiffler emphasized the importance of "Powerful Magnets" as an essential necessity.
So would you please provide links to your experiments where you developed voltages in the range of 3V - >6V as Dr. Stiffler has shown?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 12, 2015, 03:27:23 AM
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.

Good point, but don't forget that Dr. Stiffler has stated that we do not know all the details of his setup.
We may still be missing some important considerations here yet. Dr. Stiffler says he will expand more on this
setup in a couple of weeks or so however.
All the best...
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 12, 2015, 03:36:28 AM
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.

Xc decreases as frequency increases, so will have smaller value at higher frequencies.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 03:48:17 AM
So would you please provide links to your experiments where you developed voltages in the range of 3V - >6V as Dr. Stiffler has shown?

@MarkE,

Unfortunatly I encountered camera trouble. Where's your video channel?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 12, 2015, 03:52:16 AM
Xc decreases as frequency increases, so will have smaller value at higher frequencies.

Right, so the 'input cap' will look more and more like a short at higher and higher frequencies,
and thus less and less likely to develop higher voltages across it at very high frequencies,
assuming we are stilll not missing something important in the way everything is connected up.
A 60Hz mains EM field could still very much potentially be a factor if it is strong enough however.
All the best...
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 12, 2015, 04:06:35 AM
Right, so the 'input cap' will look more and more like a short at higher and higher frequencies,

Yes, capacitor and its leads will look like loop of wire at higher frequencies (loop antenna). Does not need voltage to get current - only a changing magnetic field strength.

EDIT:  A voltage is produced in the loop according to Faraday's Law.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 04:39:50 AM
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.
There is a lot of loop area and inductance in the wiring.  It has yet to be shown that the magnets have much if anything to do with the harvested energy.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 04:42:22 AM
@MarkE,

Unfortunatly I encountered camera trouble. Where's your video channel?
That's too bad about the video.  Did you document your set-up and experiments?
I don't publish YT videos.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Jimboot on August 12, 2015, 10:31:51 AM
this guy got quantum energy too? or just a battery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: hoptoad on August 12, 2015, 10:56:51 AM
this guy got quantum energy too? or just a battery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0)


Or perhaps lidmotor has the secret answer ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7aUdZ3hAY   :P

Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 01:20:36 PM

Or perhaps lidmotor has the secret answer ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7aUdZ3hAY   :P

+Lidmotor:  "Understand this is not a replication due to different high voltage capacitor and smaller/less magnets",
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 01:28:15 PM
this guy got quantum energy too? or just a battery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0

@Jimboot,

Thanks! That video's outrageous. Those magnets he's using are extremely powerful. He's got one glass diode between the legs of the LED; That's all I use. Apparenttly sufficient to rectify enough A.C. to light the LED? This video is cooler than Stifflers, but who is this guy? He has zero credibility. This looks more like a hoax to me. Here's a new one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Void on August 12, 2015, 02:01:30 PM
@Jimboot,
Thanks! That video's outrageous. Those magnets he's using are extremely powerful. He's got one glass diode between the legs of the LED; That's all I use. Apparenttly sufficient to rectify enough A.C. to light the LED? This video is cooler than Stifflers, but who is this guy? He has zero credibility. This looks more like a hoax to me. Here's a new one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu7j2zYnpH0

I wouldn't put much faith in that video. In another video the same guy is doing a magic trick
making a toothpick appear and disappear in his hand, and he has other magic trick videos as well ;)
For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4w06RbW_qU


Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 12, 2015, 02:11:16 PM
I think those trying to understand Dr. Stiffler's device should look at Faraday's law. Faraday's Law simplified: when the strength of a magnetic field going through the center of a coil changes - then a voltage is produced across the coil's leads. As I pointed out in previous post, the capacitor and its leads form a loop (one turn coil) at high frequencies.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 02:27:19 PM
I think those trying to understand Dr. Stiffler's device should look at Faraday's law. Faraday's Law simplified: when the strength of a magnetic field going through the center of a coil changes - then a voltage is produced across the coil's leads.

@Xee2,

How does Faraday's law help explain the Leedskalnin locking effect? Faraday's law dosen't cover every event we need Lorentz to help understand.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 02:39:17 PM
@Xee2,

How does Faraday's law help explain the Leedskalnin locking effect? Faraday's law dosen't cover every event we need Lorentz to help understand.
Leedskalnin's effect is simply residual magnetization.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 12, 2015, 02:45:42 PM
Replicators, assume that the powerful magnetic field is being modulated by some unknown force, the plates of the capacitor pick up this modulation and the diode bridge rectifies the AC into DC.

Obviously, an oscilloscope attached to the wires before the bridge will see some kind of alternating voltage not of high frequency (the 0.01uF will short out high frequencies). Without the electrolytic,  this voltage will be quite large.  In fact, the rate of charging was quite high on the Doc's videos, so either this voltage is huge and the impedance of the source high, or it a voltage of a few volts with a modest impedance. There has to be a peak voltage of at least what the electrolytic levels out to. The oscilloscope earth clip should not be attached directly, but use a high value resistor in between, to avoid unbalancing the 'generator' and turning the other half into a pickup antenna for low frequency noise. If you do this, at least you can see if the modulation is the 6oHz in your house, or something unexplainable.
I guess I'm getting too carried away here, first we need a working replication. Hopefully the Doc will provide us with some oscillograms soon.

 
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: xee2 on August 12, 2015, 03:35:55 PM
In Faraday's law:
(voltage produced across the coil's leads) = (change in magnetic field strength) dived by (time it takes for strength to change)

Thus a small strength change in a very short time can produce as much voltage as a large strength change over a longer time.

In Dr. Stiffler's device the question is what is causing the magnetic field strength to change and is that really what is creating the voltage he is measuring.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 12, 2015, 04:18:29 PM
Replicators, assume that the powerful magnetic field is being modulated by some unknown force, the plates of the capacitor pick up this modulation and the diode bridge rectifies the AC into DC.

Obviously, an oscilloscope attached to the wires before the bridge will see some kind of alternating voltage not of high frequency (the 0.01uF will short out high frequencies).
This is where one of Professor Lewin's lectures at MIT is instructive.  We can induce voltage across a wire that at DC would have zero or very little voltage drop.  If we interrupt that wire with a capacitor we can induce voltage across the wire in one direction until the capacitor charges and then we can do the same in the opposite direction.  The assumption that has not been established is what is the voltage potential versus time seen right across the capacitor as this could be quite different as what is seen across the FWB input about a foot away.
Quote
Without the electrolytic,  this voltage will be quite large.  In fact, the rate of charging was quite high on the Doc's videos, so either this voltage is huge and the impedance of the source high, or it a voltage of a few volts with a modest impedance. There has to be a peak voltage of at least what the electrolytic levels out to.
Agreed.
Quote
The oscilloscope earth clip should not be attached directly, but use a high value resistor in between, to avoid unbalancing the 'generator' and turning the other half into a pickup antenna for low frequency noise. If you do this, at least you can see if the modulation is the 6oHz in your house, or something unexplainable.
The impedances could be high enough that any ordinary oscilloscope probe will load the circuit under test excessively.
Quote
I guess I'm getting too carried away here, first we need a working replication. Hopefully the Doc will provide us with some oscillograms soon.
I would like to see a spectrum analyzer sweep using a loop antenna oriented in the same plane as the disc capacitor to FWB wire loop.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 12, 2015, 05:35:18 PM
Here's another "Magnet Reciever" video from the archives:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGOFNrlVm1Q
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 13, 2015, 12:28:43 AM
This video looks legitimate. He generates power in the coil positioning the magnet field on the perpendicular. Nothing in line with the axis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoRLuhdZnEs
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MarkE on August 13, 2015, 01:08:14 AM
This video looks legitimate. He generates power in the coil positioning the magnet field on the perpendicular. Nothing in line with the axis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoRLuhdZnEs
At about 20 seconds in the oscilloscope displays a high amplitude distorted sine wave.  The caption and DMM read 25V.  You are not going to get that from typical electro-smog.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: TinselKoala on August 13, 2015, 01:52:42 AM
At about 20 seconds in the oscilloscope displays a high amplitude distorted sine wave.  The caption and DMM read 25V.  You are not going to get that from typical electro-smog.

The video shows a little magnet being spun by a small motor, and the resulting voltage outputs from a couple of coils in various orientations wrt the spinning magnet. There isn't anything unusual being demonstrated in that video, nor anything relevant to the Stiffler claims.  Unless somebody wants to postulate that Stiffler has some huge magnet spinning off-camera at some high rate of rotation.

But Stiffler's secret is much simpler than that.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 13, 2015, 12:08:42 PM
The video shows a little magnet being spun by a small motor, and the resulting voltage outputs from a couple of coils in various orientations wrt the spinning magnet. There isn't anything unusual being demonstrated in that video, nor anything relevant to the Stiffler claims.  Unless somebody wants to postulate that Stiffler has some huge magnet spinning off-camera at some high rate of rotation.

But Stiffler's secret is much simpler than that.

@Tinselkoala,

An axially polarized magnet is inert in line with the coil while stationary or spinning. The capacitor receiver will not charge if magnets are positioned on the wrong sides, along with all the wound coils. Placing a magnet polarized end to end in the bore hole of a solenoid bifilar coil will yield zero, while a powerful diametric will generate current, just sitting there.

Pushing the end of a bifilar output coil with diametric magnets lodged snugly in the coil core, towards a diametric spinning tube magnet, will speed the rotor up and generate OU output. The coil needs to wire to a HV capacitor through a FWBR just like Dr. Stifflers. The magnets increase the impedence of the coil and lower critical minimum frequency for Lenz propulsion of the A.C. rotor.

I discovered this effect by accident with my cook battery on the same test bench with a large diametric tube rotor bearingless Bedini. I just ran some clips from the output coil storage capacitor to the source battery and it accepted the charge and stored power while running. Let's say we attached a neutralizing electro-magnet to the inside of each end of Stiffler's magnet stacks and pulsed them. What effect would that have on the HV capacitor charge? How would a bifilar pancake coil react to the fluctuating magnet field as a receiver?



Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: conradelektro on August 13, 2015, 02:37:39 PM
I did a few tests. The circuit was built as demonstrated by Siffler and Lidmotor.

I used a 10 µF capacitor (not an electrolytic capacitor) after the full bridge rectifier (4 Diodes 1N4148) and three different capacitors with two different sets of Neodymium magnets.

Unfortunately my tests showed no charging of the 10 µF capacitor.

If a lamp (even a incandescent lamp) is moved very close to the capacitor with the magnets some charging (up to 100 mV) can be observed. This also works without magnets. It seems to be heat which cause a chemical reaction in the capacitor charging it a bit.

I hope other experimenters have more luck.

Greetings, Conrad
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 13, 2015, 02:45:49 PM
I did a few tests. The circuit was built as demonstrated by Siffler and Lidmotor.

I used a 10 µF capacitor (not an electrolytic capacitor) after the full bridge rectifier (4 Diodes 1N4148) and three different capacitors with two different sets of Neodymium magnets.

Unfortunately my tests showed no charging of the 10 µF capacitor.

If a lamp (even a incandescent lamp) is moved very close to the capacitor with the magnets some charging (up to 100 mV) can be observed. This also works without magnets. It seems to be heat which cause a chemical reaction in the capacitor charging it a bit.

I hope other experimenters have more luck.

Greetings, Conrad

@Conradelectro,

Too few magnets! Stiffler uses 18. Connect the FWBR and capacitor to the magnet core bifilar coil you helped construct for me, and check for spontaneous charging of the capacitor. The HV capacitor and fast switching diodes are what I asked you to please use to test with all along. This combination is bound to deliver good results.

A direct short across the coil leads would equal infinite capacitance. A saturated magnet, infinite resistance. What good would it do to wire resistors to Dr. Stiffler's disk capacitor electodes, to measure ouput, like you and Milehigh did to the Tesla magnet core bifilar? You failed to rectify, and measure the charge on the capacitor. Retry the test now that you've assembled the correct componants.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: pomodoro on August 13, 2015, 04:33:42 PM
Nice, Conradelectro, thanks for sharing the results with us. Yes Stiffler has more magnets, so one could say that there might be a threshold that needs to be crossed, however, Stiffler's capacitor is way thicker, so one could argue that yours experiences a stronger field differential anyway.


Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 15, 2015, 10:31:11 AM
Nice, Conradelectro, thanks for sharing the results with us. Yes Stiffler has more magnets, so one could say that there might be a threshold that needs to be crossed, however, Stiffler's capacitor is way thicker, so one could argue that yours experiences a stronger field differential anyway.

@Pomodoro,

Reducing the capacitor size by around five times is not going to help increase anything. I wouldn't waste time uploading a "failed" experiment video. All that monkey business does is shed poor light on Stiffler's original.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: MileHigh on August 15, 2015, 07:34:37 PM
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h89IrTvceqc
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 17, 2015, 01:17:20 AM
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h89IrTvceqc

It's preposterous to alledge Dr. Stiffler is a cheap hoaxter. He's fully credentialed and above reproach. Anyone who's experimented with the Flynn magnet amplifier knows a field can stay hidden until magnified by a tiny coil.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Rfacts on August 17, 2015, 01:38:28 AM
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."  At end of video #4 DrStiffler states that if he can get some
issues resolved in a couple of weeks he will do a couple of videos showing what can be seen with oscilloscope and
spectrum analyzer.  We'll have to wait and see if these technical details are provided along with the charging of a 3F cap.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 26, 2015, 04:45:31 PM
At 20 minutes into this "Tinman video" Stiffler's "Quantum Energy Receiver's" results are successfully replicated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLO6FJVqlxatfTY0QlElqDZNK4yE4jU3z8&t=1221&v=SHfdgbo8FTA
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 26, 2015, 04:46:23 PM
Tinman demonstrates the super fast charging power of his "Quantum Energy Receiver along with his native building skills and uncanny savy. Two reciprocating Tinman "Super Capacitors" could run the D.C. motor "In Perpetuity"!

Two sensitive shape transforming electrode reeds could run the reciprocating circuit cost free, like two heat switches.

Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 26, 2015, 05:31:59 PM
Tinman hints at "Rochelle Salts" as part of his Triphene mix in this video:

zeropointfuel:
 
"if you're using some kind of crystalline structure it could be a piezoelectric effect I did some experimenting using sodium silicate and Rochelle salts that were similar but not as strong. well done thanks for sharing".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2SX5gQXemw

Another important thing to take note of is the 2 to 1 (Microwave Receiver Antenna) proportion, the possible source of it's self charging. A measure of Dr. Stiffler's magnet stack may uncover a background Microwave fractional length. The "Big Bang" echro from deep space broadcasts the free energy.!

Aluminum foil and wax paper, cut to receive Microwaves, will self charge the same way! Magnets help increase the self charging a lot.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 26, 2015, 06:21:55 PM
@Tinman,

Have you tried to hook your "Triphene" capacitors up in series for higher voltage?
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 27, 2015, 01:29:58 PM
2600 Farads at 1.7 volts would formerly require a bank of large capacitors. Dr. Stiffler's charging tiny uF capacitors while Tinman's doing substantial work from a storage capacitor half the size of a credit card! What?

What kind of work would Stiffler's measely 3 Farads do compared to Tinman's "Crystal Graphene hybrid"? Tinman maintains that the storage cap's self charging power is growing stronger with use. This looks to good to be true.
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 29, 2015, 10:35:16 PM
Liidmotor's latest "self charging"' video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puNU1SIxnEE
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on August 31, 2015, 01:16:50 AM
Lidmotor: Rechargeable cell ---- solar charged:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFdy4RmY7Gs
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: Rfacts on September 01, 2015, 12:56:37 AM
At 20 minutes into this "Tinman video" Stiffler's "Quantum Energy Receiver's" results are successfully replicated:

synchro1:
You are making a claim that experimenters doing the work, like Tinman and Lidmotor, are not making and in the process are
distorting DrStiffler's video and posted information on this thread.  In their latest videos, Tinman demonstrates his effect
without the use of magnets by applying pressure with a plastic clamp.  And Lidmotor states it is the magnetic attraction which
holds the cups tightly together that helps the rechargeable cell effect he is demonstrating. 

"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are.  If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's
wrong."  Richard Feynman
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on September 01, 2015, 05:04:14 PM
synchro1:
You are making a claim that experimenters doing the work, like Tinman and Lidmotor, are not making and in the process are
distorting DrStiffler's video and posted information on this thread.  In their latest videos, Tinman demonstrates his effect
without the use of magnets by applying pressure with a plastic clamp.  And Lidmotor states it is the magnetic attraction which
holds the cups tightly together that helps the rechargeable cell effect he is demonstrating. 

"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are.  If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's
wrong."  Richard Feynman

There's ten thousand ways to do something wrong and only one way to do it right!

Here's the new Tinman video he's taking about:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLOkV5qIOgs
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: synchro1 on September 02, 2015, 12:02:35 PM
Lidmotor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ieEtO7ycAY
Title: Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
Post by: electronican on September 24, 2015, 12:40:18 PM
I found some information here
http://911electronic.com/