Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.  (Read 78015 times)

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #105 on: August 12, 2015, 04:18:29 PM »
Replicators, assume that the powerful magnetic field is being modulated by some unknown force, the plates of the capacitor pick up this modulation and the diode bridge rectifies the AC into DC.

Obviously, an oscilloscope attached to the wires before the bridge will see some kind of alternating voltage not of high frequency (the 0.01uF will short out high frequencies).
This is where one of Professor Lewin's lectures at MIT is instructive.  We can induce voltage across a wire that at DC would have zero or very little voltage drop.  If we interrupt that wire with a capacitor we can induce voltage across the wire in one direction until the capacitor charges and then we can do the same in the opposite direction.  The assumption that has not been established is what is the voltage potential versus time seen right across the capacitor as this could be quite different as what is seen across the FWB input about a foot away.
Quote
Without the electrolytic,  this voltage will be quite large.  In fact, the rate of charging was quite high on the Doc's videos, so either this voltage is huge and the impedance of the source high, or it a voltage of a few volts with a modest impedance. There has to be a peak voltage of at least what the electrolytic levels out to.
Agreed.
Quote
The oscilloscope earth clip should not be attached directly, but use a high value resistor in between, to avoid unbalancing the 'generator' and turning the other half into a pickup antenna for low frequency noise. If you do this, at least you can see if the modulation is the 6oHz in your house, or something unexplainable.
The impedances could be high enough that any ordinary oscilloscope probe will load the circuit under test excessively.
Quote
I guess I'm getting too carried away here, first we need a working replication. Hopefully the Doc will provide us with some oscillograms soon.
I would like to see a spectrum analyzer sweep using a loop antenna oriented in the same plane as the disc capacitor to FWB wire loop.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #106 on: August 12, 2015, 05:35:18 PM »
Here's another "Magnet Reciever" video from the archives:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGOFNrlVm1Q

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #107 on: August 13, 2015, 12:28:43 AM »
This video looks legitimate. He generates power in the coil positioning the magnet field on the perpendicular. Nothing in line with the axis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoRLuhdZnEs

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #108 on: August 13, 2015, 01:08:14 AM »
This video looks legitimate. He generates power in the coil positioning the magnet field on the perpendicular. Nothing in line with the axis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoRLuhdZnEs
At about 20 seconds in the oscilloscope displays a high amplitude distorted sine wave.  The caption and DMM read 25V.  You are not going to get that from typical electro-smog.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #109 on: August 13, 2015, 01:52:42 AM »
At about 20 seconds in the oscilloscope displays a high amplitude distorted sine wave.  The caption and DMM read 25V.  You are not going to get that from typical electro-smog.

The video shows a little magnet being spun by a small motor, and the resulting voltage outputs from a couple of coils in various orientations wrt the spinning magnet. There isn't anything unusual being demonstrated in that video, nor anything relevant to the Stiffler claims.  Unless somebody wants to postulate that Stiffler has some huge magnet spinning off-camera at some high rate of rotation.

But Stiffler's secret is much simpler than that.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #110 on: August 13, 2015, 12:08:42 PM »
The video shows a little magnet being spun by a small motor, and the resulting voltage outputs from a couple of coils in various orientations wrt the spinning magnet. There isn't anything unusual being demonstrated in that video, nor anything relevant to the Stiffler claims.  Unless somebody wants to postulate that Stiffler has some huge magnet spinning off-camera at some high rate of rotation.

But Stiffler's secret is much simpler than that.

@Tinselkoala,

An axially polarized magnet is inert in line with the coil while stationary or spinning. The capacitor receiver will not charge if magnets are positioned on the wrong sides, along with all the wound coils. Placing a magnet polarized end to end in the bore hole of a solenoid bifilar coil will yield zero, while a powerful diametric will generate current, just sitting there.

Pushing the end of a bifilar output coil with diametric magnets lodged snugly in the coil core, towards a diametric spinning tube magnet, will speed the rotor up and generate OU output. The coil needs to wire to a HV capacitor through a FWBR just like Dr. Stifflers. The magnets increase the impedence of the coil and lower critical minimum frequency for Lenz propulsion of the A.C. rotor.

I discovered this effect by accident with my cook battery on the same test bench with a large diametric tube rotor bearingless Bedini. I just ran some clips from the output coil storage capacitor to the source battery and it accepted the charge and stored power while running. Let's say we attached a neutralizing electro-magnet to the inside of each end of Stiffler's magnet stacks and pulsed them. What effect would that have on the HV capacitor charge? How would a bifilar pancake coil react to the fluctuating magnet field as a receiver?




conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #111 on: August 13, 2015, 02:37:39 PM »
I did a few tests. The circuit was built as demonstrated by Siffler and Lidmotor.

I used a 10 µF capacitor (not an electrolytic capacitor) after the full bridge rectifier (4 Diodes 1N4148) and three different capacitors with two different sets of Neodymium magnets.

Unfortunately my tests showed no charging of the 10 µF capacitor.

If a lamp (even a incandescent lamp) is moved very close to the capacitor with the magnets some charging (up to 100 mV) can be observed. This also works without magnets. It seems to be heat which cause a chemical reaction in the capacitor charging it a bit.

I hope other experimenters have more luck.

Greetings, Conrad

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #112 on: August 13, 2015, 02:45:49 PM »
I did a few tests. The circuit was built as demonstrated by Siffler and Lidmotor.

I used a 10 µF capacitor (not an electrolytic capacitor) after the full bridge rectifier (4 Diodes 1N4148) and three different capacitors with two different sets of Neodymium magnets.

Unfortunately my tests showed no charging of the 10 µF capacitor.

If a lamp (even a incandescent lamp) is moved very close to the capacitor with the magnets some charging (up to 100 mV) can be observed. This also works without magnets. It seems to be heat which cause a chemical reaction in the capacitor charging it a bit.

I hope other experimenters have more luck.

Greetings, Conrad

@Conradelectro,

Too few magnets! Stiffler uses 18. Connect the FWBR and capacitor to the magnet core bifilar coil you helped construct for me, and check for spontaneous charging of the capacitor. The HV capacitor and fast switching diodes are what I asked you to please use to test with all along. This combination is bound to deliver good results.

A direct short across the coil leads would equal infinite capacitance. A saturated magnet, infinite resistance. What good would it do to wire resistors to Dr. Stiffler's disk capacitor electodes, to measure ouput, like you and Milehigh did to the Tesla magnet core bifilar? You failed to rectify, and measure the charge on the capacitor. Retry the test now that you've assembled the correct componants.

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #113 on: August 13, 2015, 04:33:42 PM »
Nice, Conradelectro, thanks for sharing the results with us. Yes Stiffler has more magnets, so one could say that there might be a threshold that needs to be crossed, however, Stiffler's capacitor is way thicker, so one could argue that yours experiences a stronger field differential anyway.



synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #114 on: August 15, 2015, 10:31:11 AM »
Nice, Conradelectro, thanks for sharing the results with us. Yes Stiffler has more magnets, so one could say that there might be a threshold that needs to be crossed, however, Stiffler's capacitor is way thicker, so one could argue that yours experiences a stronger field differential anyway.

@Pomodoro,

Reducing the capacitor size by around five times is not going to help increase anything. I wouldn't waste time uploading a "failed" experiment video. All that monkey business does is shed poor light on Stiffler's original.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #115 on: August 15, 2015, 07:34:37 PM »
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h89IrTvceqc

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #116 on: August 17, 2015, 01:17:20 AM »
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h89IrTvceqc

It's preposterous to alledge Dr. Stiffler is a cheap hoaxter. He's fully credentialed and above reproach. Anyone who's experimented with the Flynn magnet amplifier knows a field can stay hidden until magnified by a tiny coil.

Rfacts

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #117 on: August 17, 2015, 01:38:28 AM »
To me it looks like the most likely scenario is that there was an off-camera RF generator, just like Lidmotor demonstrated in his clip.  Adding more magnets or changing capacitors is just a vain search for 'secret sauce.'  Especially when it comes to adding more magnets, which a few people have mentioned.  There is no 'magnetic field intensity threshold' above which something different will happen.  There is no rational reason to suspect that that would happen.  However, with a strong enough magnetic field gradient, you can make a live frog float freely suspended in the air.  That might leave you thinking that there just might be some kind of 'magic threshold' but that is not the case.  It's simply a case of the magnetic repulsion being in balance with the force of gravity.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."  At end of video #4 DrStiffler states that if he can get some
issues resolved in a couple of weeks he will do a couple of videos showing what can be seen with oscilloscope and
spectrum analyzer.  We'll have to wait and see if these technical details are provided along with the charging of a 3F cap.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #118 on: August 26, 2015, 04:45:31 PM »
At 20 minutes into this "Tinman video" Stiffler's "Quantum Energy Receiver's" results are successfully replicated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLO6FJVqlxatfTY0QlElqDZNK4yE4jU3z8&t=1221&v=SHfdgbo8FTA

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #119 on: August 26, 2015, 04:46:23 PM »
Tinman demonstrates the super fast charging power of his "Quantum Energy Receiver along with his native building skills and uncanny savy. Two reciprocating Tinman "Super Capacitors" could run the D.C. motor "In Perpetuity"!

Two sensitive shape transforming electrode reeds could run the reciprocating circuit cost free, like two heat switches.