Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514835
  • *Total Topics: 15357
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.  (Read 51910 times)

Offline DrStiffler

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 610
    • Stiffler Scientific
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #75 on: August 11, 2015, 09:20:05 PM »
I just lost a very good post for some reason, I'll try again.

The magnets are required. The 'Reach Out and Touch Someone' holds true here. A small field is only coupled to very close or NF fields or those that are very strong.

Remember this is a Receiver as stated in the very first video. This is NOT a Generator.

WiFi, Cell, Mains etc will only be of value if they have created a magnetic field in a close mass, although the Earths Field also contributes as a Conduit for other fields. Remember above I asked, Can a Magnetic Field be Modulated and in addition when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

A small field depends on stronger field to couple with it and the stronger the detector the farther it reaches out for coupling, therein is the reason for the magnets. The cap, plates, cored coil or whatever is used only to FEEL the field difference (AC) and apply it to the bridge.

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.

I do not intend to get back into INET rhetoric and only am offering some advice to save a lot of false direction and effort.  If I can solve some issues I will fully explain and illustrate what is going on here. If not, maybe some work by others will get it and then the cat will be out of the box by someone else.

I will jump in only if I see something totally left field or a big waste of time, hang in for a few weeks if you still do not see a direction or the whole point of it all.

Oh! Charging 3F, that is nothing with the right scale setup.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline xee2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #76 on: August 11, 2015, 09:57:10 PM »
when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

Normal physics says they stay the same. The reason they pull harder when close is that each has more field lines going though each perpendicular surface area when close. This is a result of the fact that the field lines spread out (and thus become less dense) as the distance from magnet increases.

Offline xee2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #77 on: August 11, 2015, 10:25:04 PM »
However, in "soft" iron the magnetic strength of the iron does increase when a magnet is brought close. This is because the magnet causes the magnetic domains in the iron to line up in one direction thus increasing the strength of the magnetic field in that direction.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #77 on: August 11, 2015, 10:25:04 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #78 on: August 11, 2015, 10:30:11 PM »

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.


Dr. Stiffler,

Have you used a hand held battery meter with short probe / clip leads?

Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2373
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #79 on: August 11, 2015, 10:44:37 PM »
Hi Dr. Stiffler. To conduct a more convincing demonstration, you should at the very least bring your setup out to
your back patio or back yard, or to a park or similar and use a battery powered DVM, and show that when you are at least 10 or 20 feet away
or so from any mains connected equipment and the mains power lines and wiring that you are still seeing the same cap charging rates.
With your setup right on your work bench with what appears to be various mains connected bench equipment nearby, there
is no way to tell if you are not picking up a strong EM field from some mains connected equipment or mains wiring. Normally it wouldn't
be expected that just the field from some transformers or whatever in your nearby bench equipment could cause the cap to charge up
that high and that fast without at least having a virtual or real ground or short antenna wire connection as well, but for all we know
one or more of your pieces of mains connected bench equipment may have a very strong EM field around it. As mentioned previously, it
would also be very helpful if you showed the cap charge rate with and without the magnets in place for comparison. This should demonstrate
that the magnets are an important part of the setup as you are claiming. In my own replication attempt described a few posts back, the
permanent magnets I used had no noticeable impact on the output cap charging rate at all. Using a microwave oven as a faraday shield
out in your back yard or maybe even just in the center of your living room would be very helpful as well. :)
All the best...
« Last Edit: August 12, 2015, 01:44:45 AM by Void »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #79 on: August 11, 2015, 10:44:37 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #80 on: August 12, 2015, 12:36:32 AM »
Look at these 4" neo disks and the copper disks above and below the coil. A simple plastic magnet seperator disk, sandwiched between the copper disks and disk magnets turns the unit into a large cap charging power plant. These are the largest and most powerful magnets in the consumer market place. The bifilar coil generates a spontaneous charge between the magnets too.

I didn't record the self charging, through the diode and capacitor because I couldn't believe the very healthy readings were accurate at that point. These are the kinds of magnets and capacitor plates it takes to succeed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgcZMojb_-I&list=FLGj-eKaG5_tMGNr_yuLePkA&index=2

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #81 on: August 12, 2015, 01:00:01 AM »
@MarkE,

You haven't been paying attention. We can drill two holes in the side of a plastic pill bottle cap for the electrodes, remove the top and seat the capacitor inside the rim. A thousand pounds of pressure would go unfelt by the capacitor. Ceramic magnets just won't make the cut.
Are you speculating, or have you done this and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #81 on: August 12, 2015, 01:00:01 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #82 on: August 12, 2015, 01:05:31 AM »
@ Dr. Stiffler,

Quote:
                           " The center mass between the magnet chain is ONLY a pickup".

 That puts the "Tesla Bifilar Pancake Coil" high on the list of good potential pickups, right? That's the one I hit "Paydirt" with!
Why?  You already know the construction of the capacitor:  on each side there is a wire lead bonded to a metal disc and between the two metal disks is a larger diameter dielectric disk.  The mutual inductance between the leads is tiny.

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #83 on: August 12, 2015, 01:15:21 AM »
Are you speculating, or have you done this and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results?

That last video's over 5 years old. You just showed up. This is all "Old Hat" for the rest of us pal! We can see the "Cook Battery" componants here and in the Stiffler set ups.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #83 on: August 12, 2015, 01:15:21 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #84 on: August 12, 2015, 01:28:50 AM »
That last video's over 5 years old. You just showed up. This is all "Old Hat" for the rest of us pal!
Then you shouldn't have any difficulty answering the question of whether you used the arrangement you proposed and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results.

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #85 on: August 12, 2015, 01:34:44 AM »
Then you shouldn't have any difficulty answering the question of whether you used the arrangement you proposed and reproduced Dr. Stiffler's results.

My first "Cook battery" attempt produced his results. The Magnet Pump is third atage. All my magnet coils perform the same way. Dr. Stiffler emphasized the importance of "Powerful Magnets" as an essential necessity.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #85 on: August 12, 2015, 01:34:44 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #86 on: August 12, 2015, 01:48:22 AM »
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #87 on: August 12, 2015, 02:44:26 AM »
My first "Cook battery" attempt produced his results. The Magnet Pump is third atage. All my magnet coils perform the same way. Dr. Stiffler emphasized the importance of "Powerful Magnets" as an essential necessity.
So would you please provide links to your experiments where you developed voltages in the range of 3V - >6V as Dr. Stiffler has shown?

Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2373
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #88 on: August 12, 2015, 03:27:23 AM »
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.

Good point, but don't forget that Dr. Stiffler has stated that we do not know all the details of his setup.
We may still be missing some important considerations here yet. Dr. Stiffler says he will expand more on this
setup in a couple of weeks or so however.
All the best...

Offline xee2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #89 on: August 12, 2015, 03:36:28 AM »
The .01uF cap at  has already an Xc of 16 ohms at 1Mhz. It makes the source of power unlikely be from a high frequency transmitter, especially when many volts are developed.

Xc decreases as frequency increases, so will have smaller value at higher frequencies.

 

OneLink