Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514835
  • *Total Topics: 15357
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 8
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.  (Read 51912 times)

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1141
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #45 on: August 09, 2015, 03:17:06 AM »
@Hoppy,

Try a Tesla bifilar pancake coil in place of the generator capacitor. Everything else checks out.
I may give that a go today. I tired the copper plates plastic and neos yesterday. Before hooking up the fbr I put the scope on AC and measured the plates directly. Adding the magnets definitely increased the voltage I was measuring. Only a few millivolts though. I left it charging a cap overnight. I'll change the fbr I'm using today for some signal diodes. Nothing too exciting for me though. May try a cap today too. My setup still feels like a smog collector though. My bench is in a converted shipping container with flouro lighting. So it makes a good faraday cage but I did have lighting and electric heating running at the time.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #46 on: August 09, 2015, 12:11:21 PM »
@MarkE,

I'm an experimentor, not an "Ivory Tower Egghead" like Mr. Know-it-all with more of your extra assignment material. Conrad-Electro built a magnet core bifilar for me and concealed his spontaneous charge results for Mile High.

How many worthless, hum drum posts about Faraday's Law did you help upload on this subject along with Mile High? Your obnoxious "No O.U." click failed.

No, ConradElectro did not "conceal his spontaneous charge results" for me.  He built a "series bifilar" coil and I gave him some simple guidance on comparing the magnetic field strength produced by a "series bifilar" coil and a regular coil of the same number of turns using a simple compass setup that was aligned with the magnetic north-south.  Contrary to your claims that the "series bifilar" coil would produce a stronger magnetic field, that in fact did not happen.  What happened was normal and expected - the strength of the magnetic field was related to the number of turns of each coil, irregardless if it was "series bifilar" or not.

You made all sorts of claims about the "series bifilar" coil so when Conrad had his setup and was doing his testing, I posted on at least two separate occasions inviting you to ask Conrad to do some tests for you.  Those could have been tests to check for special high voltage generation or "spontaneous charge" or extra energy storage capabilities because of the increased inter-winding capacitance or whatever other fantastic claims you had been making about a "series bifilar" coil for months.  You did not respond.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2015, 04:35:04 PM by MileHigh »

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #47 on: August 09, 2015, 11:29:25 PM »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #47 on: August 09, 2015, 11:29:25 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2015, 12:38:26 AM »
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #49 on: August 10, 2015, 01:15:51 AM »
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?

@Tinselkoala,

No, I have yet to see one. Stiffler says something in video #4 about his unusual capacitor being designed for "Underwater" use?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #49 on: August 10, 2015, 01:15:51 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1141
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #50 on: August 10, 2015, 02:14:43 AM »
Well my cap doubled over night from 20mv to 40mv using the copper plates. So no flouros. SHipping container is a great faraday cage. I'll be putting this one aside for now, not sure where the 20mv came from but not that exciting compared to other devices . I probably doing something wrong .

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #51 on: August 10, 2015, 03:11:58 AM »
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #51 on: August 10, 2015, 03:11:58 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #52 on: August 10, 2015, 08:08:24 AM »
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.

The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #53 on: August 10, 2015, 08:16:01 AM »
The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .
Well then one should expect more than just fluorescent lights to be big emitters in his home.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #53 on: August 10, 2015, 08:16:01 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #54 on: August 10, 2015, 12:37:25 PM »
Everyone knows I got great results with two powerful 3/4" diametric tubes seated inside the aircore of a 26 gauge Tesla wraped bifilar 1 1/2" spool. I live in the great north woods and tried this miles from nowhere with equal success. There's really something else aside from RF going on here with what I'm calling the (Cook Battery Effect).
« Last Edit: August 10, 2015, 06:10:23 PM by synchro1 »

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #55 on: August 10, 2015, 02:03:39 PM »
Everyone knows I got great results with two powerful 3/4" diametric tubes seated inside the aircore of a 30 gauge Tesla wraped bifilar 1 1/2" spool. I live in the great north woods and tried this miles from nowhere with equal success. There's really something else aside from RF going on here with what I'm calling the (Cook Battery Effect).
Did you use a spectrum analyzer or other tunable receiver to determine what the background RF was at your test location?  Did you alternately place the experiment in a Faraday cage?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #55 on: August 10, 2015, 02:03:39 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #56 on: August 10, 2015, 05:13:27 PM »
Did you use a spectrum analyzer or other tunable receiver to determine what the background RF was at your test location?  Did you alternately place the experiment in a Faraday cage?

@MarkE,

Dr. Stiffler asked for a week to iron some legal issues out. He promised to run those kinds of tests soon, and upload the videos. Stiffler needs to break one of his capacitors open to determine the internal construction. Paper and oil capacitors would react differently to the magnet field's than rolled up foil. What are they really?

It should take only a few minutes to fully charge the capacitor this way. Overnight time spans signal a serious problem!

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #57 on: August 10, 2015, 07:46:08 PM »
@MarkE,

Dr. Stiffler asked for a week to iron some legal issues out. He promised to run those kinds of tests soon, and upload the videos. Stiffler needs to break one of his capacitors open to determine the internal construction. Paper and oil capacitors would react differently to the magnet field's than rolled up foil. What are they really?

It should take only a few minutes to fully charge the capacitor this way. Overnight time spans signal a serious problem!
The construction of his 15kV 2200pF disc capacitor is self evident without removing the insulating cover.  The 15kV rating dictates one dielectric layer sandwiched between two metalization layers each bonded to one of the leads.

Here is an illustration of such construction:  http://electrical4u.com/electrical/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ceramic-capacitor.jpg

For 15kV the diectric type is probably Class 1.

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3927
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #58 on: August 10, 2015, 10:42:05 PM »
The construction of his 15kV 2200pF disc capacitor is self evident without removing the insulating cover.  The 15kV rating dictates one dielectric layer sandwiched between two metalization layers each bonded to one of the leads.

Here is an illustration of such construction:  http://electrical4u.com/electrical/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ceramic-capacitor.jpg

For 15kV the diectric type is probably Class 1.

@MarkE,

Thanks. Two circular metal charge plates the same diameter as the magnet disks, seperated by a di-electric, looks best. Increasing the diameter of the disk magnets along with the charging plates would be the best scale up approach. Hockey pucks!

Lidmotor tried using the wrong kind of capacitor and too few magnets.

Offline xee2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
Re: Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.
« Reply #59 on: August 11, 2015, 02:34:27 AM »
I think he is using a high voltage cap from http://www.amazing1.com/capacitors.html. I have several like it, but that specific capacitor is no longer available. There are several similar cap.

 

OneLink