I'm afraid that the electromagnet is doing all the work here. And if you add a magnet to it, you must supply more energy into it so it can neutralize the field while the rotor magnet escapes.


Vidar

About electromagnets holding force, f.e. :

http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=19706659&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en

2 "D" cell battery example : up to 500 pounds holding force
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19820817&CC=US&NR=4345174A&KC=A#
an electromagnetic wheel concept :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19720623&CC=FR&NR=2112768A5&KC=A5#

Who is ignoring what user?
Vidar

You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.

Ok. I'll let admin know you're littering the forum, or did your computer post the same text over and over?

Hello to all,

I am new to this Forum, even though I have been researching and developing F.E for a while by now.
I have debunked and built a learning model to understand how Luling Motor really works...

1-First, Luling found a way to "Neutralize" Magnetic FORCES, NOT the Magnetic Field...and that is based on an old concept of vectoring forces of opposite directions always cancel to zero.
On this event we will have to separate the two main parts on his motor (rotor-stator) to then apply the zeroing opposite formula.
Magnetic forces are very linearly propagated, based on a bisector, a dividing line that divides magnet in exactly two equal sides, perpendicular to the bloch wall.

So, our magnets must be perfectly aligned by this bisector, all, stator and rotor at a certain momentum of rotation.

Here are some images to understand what I explained before...

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/9159/aS6rIm.jpg

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2976/HEbStE.jpg

Once We achieve a perfect* Neutralization, we could spin our rotor with very little to zero feeling of cogging (repulse) or sticking (attract) ... just like Luling moves with one finger his huge rotor...no stopping, not hard to pass angles...

*A "Perfect Neutralization" is NOT going to be achieved easy,...the setup can NOT be flimsy, with misalignments, have shaft-rotor play, or loose magnets...and there must be a side (either attract or repulse) where we could be able to manually adjust (screw) air gap back and forth to the half millimeter precision...until we feel it is smoothly neutralized.

2-Second, Luling uses Compressed Air (Pneumatics) in order to "brake" this neutralization point before the sticking point, or before the repulse force stops rotor.

The "lines" observed on his only video, are not electrical, nor solenoids or electromagnets of any kind...they are air lines!!

For those who know about Pneumatics, knows that a Linear Actuator is the square box with two lines into it...a linear actuator cylinder piston that pivots the reciprocating bracket attached to a shaft in charge to transfer, back forth movements to the other three "modules...

Observe the picture below from his video...

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8442/OavrFy.png

Then analyze what I wrote...with the help of the circled, checked parts, on img below:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/6887/MM5dcb.jpg

Thanks for reading me...and I will be back...

Regards


Ufopolitics

Sir
It is wonderful to have/read such a diligent experimenter as yourself,
And more wonderful you share your work !


You do amazing work !


With respect and gratitude , and hoping for a better world!!

Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
There are many amazing open source  builders in these forums
And many more learning and watching and experimenting !

EDIT for comment below
👍
I did send you a pm on builders boards here ( Stefan has made areas so it’s easier for presentation
And managing!
Regardless your choice
Thanks for sharing!!

Hello Ufo,


Welcome to a real forum for overunity projects.  Thanks for sharing your work.  Impressive build and clear presentation.  I am looking forward to your future videos and info.


Take care,
Carroll


 

Hi again,


I most certainly DO believe it might be possible to harness the energy of magnets.  I don't have time right now to look up and share the videos I have shown on this forum of my many efforts to understand and harness the energy of magnets.  If you look in the builders section of this forum under "Floor's" area you can find my videos of possible motor magnet ideas as well as videos of my testing of the forces of magnets. 


Take care,
Carroll

It has Been a few years since i did work on this this but  it came to mind again the other day, i had a bit of a brain wave a very simple way to break the magnetic lock [size=78%].[/size]
[size=78%]
[/size]
two small  steel plates mounted on non magnetic material connected to the rotor each side of the magnet at the locking point as per my modeling the two plates will
attract the magnetic field to them and overcome  the lock because the steel blocks are cutting the field from the side they should not lock them selves

Hello dom444,

Sorry, but your idea will not work...and it is simple why...
Magnetic Fields can not be "cut" nor blocked...much less by steel plates...all you are  doing by adding steel plates is to "expand" the field, no matter where you set this plates...it do not work like that.
Have you tried to build this setup?
I do not think so...
You could use steel plates between poles to "shunt" the field...that means to weaken the field by using kind of a "short circuit"...and still, the field would still be there.

Regards


Ufopolitics