Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW  (Read 84404 times)

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #75 on: June 24, 2015, 02:25:54 PM »
What part of this site is being shut down by Rosch ?




Berto3

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #76 on: June 24, 2015, 05:40:00 PM »
Strange, the german site has also a flat line.

Spilled Fluids

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #77 on: June 24, 2015, 06:01:39 PM »
Strange, the german site has also a flat line.

Which one?

Berto3

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #78 on: June 24, 2015, 07:12:39 PM »
“Scientists may have sophisticated laboratories,
But never forget 'eureka' was inspired in a bathtub.”

Toba Beta about the Rosch invention

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #79 on: June 24, 2015, 07:14:53 PM »
And your point is?

Berto3

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #80 on: June 24, 2015, 07:58:09 PM »
@Spilled Fluids @memoryman

Sorry, that I was not clear about my reply. What I mean is a confusedness at this threat, and also the German 'fake' Rosch KPP threat, to response to what happened last months by Rosh Germany.
Do we have to be proud that Germany takes a leading role in marketing an overunity system?
Do we have to be ashamed that we cannot be happy, that an OU machine exists now?
Or ashamed because a next fraud in the OU field?
It can happen every moment that a system is discovered where more comes out than goes in…
But that seems a shock to the OU community. Maybe we cannot believe it, because our state of mind says that this cannot be. In other words we expose ourselves as believers but in the core we want only the confirmation of the second law. So this forum is confused when the good news arrives.
And even when it is a fraud, this tells a lot about people visiting this forum, incl. me.
This I mean with a flat threat. We don't know how to react at this kind of inventions. We look out for an OU machine for 50 years now, and when the moment is there we are all blasé. 

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #81 on: June 24, 2015, 07:59:35 PM »



   The point is, ask Wayne Travis!
                  John.

Spilled Fluids

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #82 on: June 24, 2015, 08:19:11 PM »
@Spilled Fluids @memoryman

Sorry, that I was not clear about my reply. What I mean is a confusedness at this threat, and also the German 'fake' Rosch KPP threat, to response to what happened last months by Rosh Germany.
Do we have to be proud that Germany takes a leading role in marketing an overunity system?
Do we have to be ashamed that we cannot be happy, that an OU machine exists now?
Or ashamed because a next fraud in the OU field?
It can happen every moment that a system is discovered where more comes out than goes in…
But that seems a shock to the OU community. Maybe we cannot believe it, because our state of mind says that this cannot be. In other words we expose ourselves as believers but in the core we want only the confirmation of the second law. So this forum is confused when the good news arrives.
And even when it is a fraud, this tells a lot about people visiting this forum, incl. me.
This I mean with a flat threat. We don't know how to react at this kind of inventions. We look out for an OU machine for 50 years now, and when the moment is there we are all blasé.

Over Unity will not come from a contraption built on 2300 year old technology. This one is a fraud and will be proven so if it goes to court.

Maybe, one day some OU device or process will be invented or discovered but this one is definitely not it!

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #83 on: June 24, 2015, 08:35:52 PM »
OU in terms of ENERGY is extremely unlikely to ever become a reality; the probability is so low that I can't be bothered spending much time on it.
However, OU in terms of WORK is possible imho, and I am quietly working on that.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #84 on: June 24, 2015, 08:53:42 PM »
@Spilled Fluids @memoryman

Sorry, that I was not clear about my reply. What I mean is a confusedness at this threat, and also the German 'fake' Rosch KPP threat, to response to what happened last months by Rosh Germany.
Some people think that intimidating their critics is a good strategy towards meeting their goals.
Quote
Do we have to be proud that Germany takes a leading role in marketing an overunity system?
If it were true: Yes.  But it is not.
Quote
Do we have to be ashamed that we cannot be happy, that an OU machine exists now?
No such machine is known to exist now.  And certainly a rusty bucket of water and some mechanical bits is certainly not OU.
Quote
Or ashamed because a next fraud in the OU field?
There you go.  There is always someone willing to make false claims.  This is yet another one.
Quote
It can happen every moment that a system is discovered where more comes out than goes in…
Aliens might come and teleport us all to a nirvana at any second.  In the meantime we deal with reality.
Quote
But that seems a shock to the OU community. Maybe we cannot believe it, because our state of mind says that this cannot be. In other words we expose ourselves as believers but in the core we want only the confirmation of the second law. So this forum is confused when the good news arrives.
It is unevidenced.  Stare at a bucket of water and some mechanical bits all you want.  The collection is passive.  It generates no energy.
Quote
And even when it is a fraud, this tells a lot about people visiting this forum, incl. me.
This I mean with a flat threat. We don't know how to react at this kind of inventions. We look out for an OU machine for 50 years now, and when the moment is there we are all blasé.
People have been chasing OU machines for millenia.  There is no evidence that the "moment is there".

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #85 on: June 24, 2015, 08:58:15 PM »
Strange, the german site has also a flat line.
It works fine for me.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #86 on: June 24, 2015, 10:21:26 PM »
I read up a bit today on this and it looks like it might be the old "generator is actually a powered motor" scam.

I see that Sterling and Stewart are falling chain, line, and sinker all the way to the bottom on this one.  So what else is new?

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #87 on: June 24, 2015, 10:34:32 PM »
I read up a bit today on this and it looks like it might be the old "generator is actually a powered motor" scam.

I see that Sterling and Stewart are falling chain, line, and sinker all the way to the bottom on this one.  So what else is new?
Would an AC power analyzer properly connected to the "generator" determine whether the "generator" was supplying power to or drawing power from the black power cable?  Yes it would.

Did anyone connect a power analyzer?  No they did not.

For added fun watch the video that shows the paternoster start-up.  Pay attention!

Not only have Sterling and Stuart fallen hook line and sinker, PESN is busy continuing their slander of herr Michael Adolph.  Now, Sterling has dedicated an article to attacking his person alleging partiality without challenging any method used by herr Adolph.  This in an article where Sterling admits his commercial interests that conflict with herr Adolph's findings.  Sterling expresses the strange idea that oen should just set established First Principles aside.  God knows Sterling has no trouble setting First Principles or any principles aside if it suits him.  The attacks on herr Adolph are disgusting slime.

Berto3

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #88 on: June 24, 2015, 10:41:41 PM »
@MarkE
Thanks for the exegesis of my latest observation. I wonder if you were the best in the bible class. You are so resolute that Rosch KPP is a fake; no room for doubt. That's exactly whats going on. It's yes or no. No room in this 'fake KPP threat' for…maybe.
Maybe gives an opening to explore and that is not happening here. b.t.w. A good critic is an observator and not a dictator.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW
« Reply #89 on: June 25, 2015, 02:20:01 AM »
Why is doubt always a 'good' thing?
There are times when there is no doubt and it's clear: this is one of them.
A dictator forces his will onto others; where is that happening here?