Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.  (Read 210166 times)

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #240 on: April 30, 2015, 07:27:32 PM »
Well MH,he is a physics professor,not an EE-->there is a big difference.

I started life as a motor cycle mechanic,then moved onto HD mechanics,and then onto mechanical engineering. I now have my degree in all three. Just to throw a spanner in the work's,i also did my four year degree in green keeping lol-that was different,but it has come in handy. I now drive trucks for a living. I have all these skill's,but my grade with electronics and useing the scope is junior-->my spelling is also crap.

So just because we know our way around one thing,dosnt mean we are gun at another.
There is something really wrong when a tenured physics professor doesn't know material required to get through second semester freshman physics.  His experimental technique purely from a:  hypothesis, null experiment, falsification standpoint was total crap.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #241 on: April 30, 2015, 07:33:08 PM »
It's been running continuously since Saturday, April 18, not just 5 days.

Regarding my quest to sup, I've been updating that daily as I go along, and will continue to do so. I've been very transparent in its unfolding.

Also, regarding the "power outage" See my recent blog posting, which I'll copy here
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA%27s_AuKW_Demo#Power_Outage_Coincided_with_AuKW_Outage.3F

I just sent this to Roberto by Skype:
[14:20 GMT] "Hi Roberto, That email I sent ~8 hours ago asks a very important question that needs to be addressed. It points out that the emergency lighting only comes on during power outages; and that that power outage to the building coincided with the outage of the AuKW, which is supposed to be independent of mains power. This needs to be addressed, as people are using it as the smoking gun evidence that there is trickery going on."
Dansie had said, for example: "Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines."
Here is Roberto's reply to my email:

 
  From: "Verein GAIA | Roberto Reuter"  To: "Sterling Allan"  Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 13:36 [GMT]  Subject: Re: safety lighting 
 
  Dear Sterling,   The so called "safety light" is the emitted light from the IR diodes of both cameras.   I attached a link to a pic from the cam - so its maybe more easy to understand..   (http://gaia-energy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/150430-aukw-besichtigung-halbzeit-2.jpg)   P.S: We use a TRENDNET TV-IP310PI   with best Regards from Roberto  Just now, he explained by Skype that their website is presently "offline - as we move our webspace to a more powerful server ;)"
I suggested "You might also take a photo of that portion of the ceiling in relation to the demo to show there is no safety light situated there."
He said he would.
/END OF BLOG EXCERPT

So, those of you who jumped to the conclusion that this was absolute evidence of fraud, how do you feel now, being shown wrong on this point? Are you going to apologize?
See the light coming down from just above the frame?  See it spread out and the equipment that it strikes cast shadows?  Is Roberto offering the preposterous claim that the flood light like pattern of light is from the IP cameras?  Is he also offering waterfront land in Florida?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #242 on: April 30, 2015, 07:58:21 PM »
TinMan
Don't you know that 200 years is a long time...?
it really really means something...
>>>>REALLY<<<<<.

maybe Roger Shawyer didn't listen either..
and now he's gonna rewrite the Book .

here
http://www.overunity.com/15741/april-29-2015-nasa-conforms-roger-shawyers-space-drive-works/msg448608/#new

Oh yes I forgot Mark E says Roger Shawyer and NASA are full of Garbage too..

yeah, its pot luck all the Garbage they fire into space across squillions of miles
and land on a Fleas Buttocks .
all Garbage pot luck ..
their Clueless ...

Just ask Mark E he'll tell you all about it.

probably right now......


sterlinga

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
    • Pure Energy Systems
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #243 on: April 30, 2015, 08:02:04 PM »
Hmm.  Waiting for response from Roberto. I asked him:

"In this photo, could you tell me what the circled item is? It looks like a light that you installed, either as part of this demonstration in particular, for showcasing, or for emergency lighting compliance. It appears to be in the right location to provide what appears to be emergency light in the attached image. Maybe it had some kind of LED on it?"

At 17:36 GMT, Roberto wrote: "Sterling, hi, this is the Second Webcam, we can access locally only to show a video of the generator & compressor. This Cam also has IR LEDs."

That makes sense. The livestream camera was on infrared, so any light would be amplified, so a little light from this second camera, poised above the AuKW would be exaggerated. Consistent with LED as described.

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #244 on: April 30, 2015, 08:24:24 PM »
9/11 - ALWAYS REMEMBER


Whatever your reason's; don't let it be forgotten.


------
Meanwhile - ABS pipes have a density that's only 1.04 - very close to water.  (PVC is 1.3-1.45) 30-45% heavier than water

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #246 on: April 30, 2015, 08:35:21 PM »
At 17:36 GMT, Roberto wrote: "Sterling, hi, this is the Second Webcam, we can access locally only to show a video of the generator & compressor. This Cam also has IR LEDs."

That makes sense. The livestream camera was on infrared, so any light would be amplified, so a little light from this second camera, poised above the AuKW would be exaggerated. Consistent with LED as described.

This is at least plausible. Thanks for running this down.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #247 on: April 30, 2015, 08:47:33 PM »
TinMan
Don't you know that 200 years is a long time...?
it really really means something...
>>>>REALLY<<<<<.

maybe Roger Shawyer didn't listen either..
and now he's gonna rewrite the Book .
He has been trying for over a decade and his math is still crap.
Quote

here
http://www.overunity.com/15741/april-29-2015-nasa-conforms-roger-shawyers-space-drive-works/msg448608/#new
Except that they didn't.  In order to actually test that the device generates its own tiny accelerating force, all other forces have to be reduced to a much lower level so that they do not blind what the device does or does not do.  That requires testing in a very low pressure environment so that charged gas molecules don't push the thing around.  They were not equipped to do that and did not test in a vacuum.  So basically, it was a waste of time and resources. They set up plans to test in a vacuum.  I don't know when those tests will be complete. But never let facts get in your way.  When the Kool-Aid's running, something has to give.
Quote

Oh yes I forgot Mark E says Roger Shawyer and NASA are full of Garbage too..

yeah, its pot luck all the Garbage they fire into space across squillions of miles
and land on a Fleas Buttocks .
all Garbage pot luck ..
their Clueless ...

Just ask Mark E he'll tell you all about it.

probably right now......
Hey what's a little misquoting, and mischaracterization huh Chet? Because if you had an actual argument you wouldn't have to resort to such techniques.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #248 on: April 30, 2015, 08:57:02 PM »
http://www.flywestwind.com/hangar/aircraft_files/foms/B763ERFOM.pdf
So flaps need to be fully retracted at 260mph.  The plane obviously is not coming apart with the flaps retracted at 220mph.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #249 on: April 30, 2015, 08:58:37 PM »
This is at least plausible. Thanks for running this down.
There is definitely a light source up there.  The picture isn't clear enough for me to see if that is a camera head or not.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #250 on: April 30, 2015, 09:01:56 PM »
From the IBT link:
Quote
The researchers explain that the reason why Shawyer's EmDrive models and EmDrive experiments carried out by Chinese researchers had been criticised in the past was because none of the tests had been carried out in a vacuum.
Physics says particles in the quantum vacuum cannot be ionised, so therefore you cannot push against it, but Nasa says Shawyer's theory does indeed work.
"Nasa has successfully tested their EmDrive in a hard vacuum – the first time any organisation has reported such a successful test. To this end, Nasa Eagleworks has now nullified the prevailing hypothesis that thrust measurements were due to thermal convection," the researchers wrote.
Nasa says its researchers joined forces with a large community of enthusiasts, engineers, and scientists on several continents to discuss EmDrive theories on the NasaSpaceflight.com EmDrive forum, and "despite considerable effort within the NasaSpaceflight.com forum to dismiss the reported thrust as an artefact, the EmDrive results have yet to be falsified".


But... from the NASA blog forum:


Quote
A bit of clarification:  The Eagleworks crew hope to have the 1.2kW magnetron teeter-totter test-rig up and running by the END of June or perhaps now the first couple of weeks of July 2015.  At the moment we are in the middle component procurement & fabrication, and that task is taking longer than expected due to mill breakdowns in the NASA fabrication shop and the usual supply vendor's taking their time to fill and ship orders.

Best, Paul M.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #251 on: April 30, 2015, 09:11:12 PM »
Mark E
GIGO you use it like aftershave...Garbage in Garbage out...
your denying this GIGO reference to NASA ??

Monday morning quarterbacks .. a Dime a ton.

Guys that experiment outside the Box

PRICELESS.


MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #252 on: April 30, 2015, 09:14:14 PM »
Mark E
GIGO you use it like aftershave...Garbage in Garbage out...
your denying this GIGO reference to NASA ??

Monday morning quarter backs .. a Dime a ton.
Got actual data taken in a vacuum there Chet?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #253 on: April 30, 2015, 09:19:06 PM »
why don't you put your NASA Jersey on and go show those GIGO boys at NASA
How its Done MarkiE....??

so to be clear your previous statement was disingenuous .
where you said I was fetching and making stuff up??

that is... your GIGO reference to NASA??

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.
« Reply #254 on: April 30, 2015, 09:27:08 PM »
why don't you put your NASA Jersey on and go show those GIGO boys at NASA
How its Done Marky....??

so to be clear your previous statement was disingenuous .
where you said I was fetching and making stuff up??
NASA alreaady acknowledged that the tests they did without pumping down a vacuum were worthless. 

No you are the person who is making up things I have not said.  It's pretty sad.