Hey tinman

I don't see much sense in trying to debate this with the critics because there is no real debate in it. However others might be interested in finding creative solutions that work. Your venturi nozzle is an interesting idea because if the pressure is converted to kinetic energy then it may absorb heat from ambient and add it when this kinetic energy is converted back to pressure inside the tank. In effect a heat pump and some early refrigeration systems used compressed air.


I have done a great deal of R&D and over the years found most all Free Energy relates to a single statement. Action A is transformed into another form having no direct relation to reaction B allowing it to interact with C (the external environment) thus A-C upon conversion may increase B. The reaction B is not dictated by action A alone but the extent of interaction with C.


So simple and yet the critics must in every case deny the external environment even exists. It is a fools game played out by senile old men stuck in the past in my opinion. It's the same old story and if were not part of the solution then we are the problem.


AC

Fantasy offers diversion.  Fantasy does not solve problems.

As I stated at http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA%27s_AuKW_Demo#Official:_Club_GAIA_on_Outage

From my limited perspective, what is seen in that video is consistent with GAIA's description.

Prior to the outage (of the 5 kW system), the power for the lighting was coming from the lamps around the system. Then the AuKW went down, so the lights went out. The other lights in the hall were already off.

The darkness triggered the light-sensing safety lighting, which then turned on.

Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines. This really shows how you often jump to false assumptions or just plain wrong. If they were light sensitive they would come on every night. LOL
You should go check things out before embarrassing yourself.
Kind Regards

Yes Mark,, it surely does, and it surely can.

What a fantasy it was then to think about harnessing electricity,, or going to the moon,, or many other "breakthroughs".

Fantasy, or creative thinking, is the spark that drives innovation.

You know what is getting really fatiguing in the world in general?  It's the redefining of words on the fly just because.

"Fantasy" means that it's not true.  Whereas going to the moon and a pistol shrimp are not fantasy, they are real.

Yes, I did have some interesting conversations with a certain celebrity.

Sterling, sorry to break this to you, but I am the Peter Hughes who commented on your youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA9WSRDwUiI - Seeking some kind of reply from Lindsey Stirling -- Day 54 of Sup Quest

Myself and John Doe chatted a bit, and well, we have been messing with you.

You have never had a conversation with Lindsey or anyone  who has relayed your "stuff" to her.

Sorry.

Pete


BTW, I don't feel bad about this due to your 911 ravings.

Sterling, sorry to break this to you, but I am the Peter Hughes who commented on your youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA9WSRDwUiI - Seeking some kind of reply from Lindsey Stirling -- Day 54 of Sup Quest

Myself and John Doe chatted a bit, and well, we have been messing with you.

You have never had a conversation with Lindsey or anyone  who has relayed your "stuff" to her.

Sorry.

Pete


BTW, I don't feel bad about this due to your 911 ravings.

That is astounding. One single comment from "John Doe" reaching to 8036 words. Talk about TLDR ! That's not a comment, that's a novelette !

That is astounding. One single comment from "John Doe" reaching to 8036 words. Talk about TLDR ! That's not a comment, that's a novelette !

And by some freak coincidence, when put through ASCII.com, that post added up to exactly 84627 (Sterlings Zipcode)
(when divided by 23.468 of course).

I really think he is onto something here.

Maybe I am HMITF, sans perky boobies.

Hey tinman


So simple and yet the critics must in every case deny the external environment even exists. It is a fools game played out by senile old men stuck in the past in my opinion. It's the same old story and if were not part of the solution then we are the problem.


AC

I don't see much sense in trying to debate this with the critics because there is no real debate in it.

In the past couple of week's,i have found this to be very true.

I have done a great deal of R&D and over the years found most all Free Energy relates to a single statement. Action A is transformed into another form having no direct relation to reaction B allowing it to interact with C (the external environment) thus A-C upon conversion may increase B. The reaction B is not dictated by action A alone but the extent of interaction with C.

This is exactly what i did. I had two tanks-1 x 10ltr volume and 1 x 20ltr volume. The 10ltr tank was tank A. This was the tank that stored the energy in the form of compressed gas. Tank B was the receiver. When the venturi was added to the system,this became what you call C.

Now,a series of 5 test were carried out,where the gas in tank A was aloud to flow into tank B via way of a ball valve. MarkE done the calculations,and we were getting an efficiency of 98% in the transfer when the gas temperature was aloud to settle to ambiant temperature. At this time,all was good. Then i fitted the venturi between tanks A and B,so as external gas(ambiant air) was drawn into tank B when the ball valve was opened between tank's A&B. I then gave MarkE the results in way of pressure and temperature when the gas was once again aloud to settle to ambiant temperature-->both test carried out in identical circumstances and conditions,only one could draw in gas from the enviroment. I got back--this makes no sense,as the result was 110%.

From there on in,it just went down hill from there. I continued to implement the ram into the system,and once again obtained the results over 5 test runs. As in the last two test,the results were averaged out over the 5 test runs. I once again gave the figures to MarkE to calculate. From there on in,everything went pear shaped. I was told that no results would be given until i disclose the units working as a whole. I was told they were nonsense figures,and mean nothing until i disclose the system as a whole,and exactly how it work's. This can be read by all those that are interested in the open systems thread.

I had some one else crunch the number's,and we ended up with around 133% efficiency.
We now see comments like-wait until you try to do useful work with your stored energy -->What kind of an idiotic comment is that?. I think we can be quite confident that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 18psi over the two tank's is going to do more work that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 12psi over the two tanks-->when both temperatures are the same.

It is funny to see how the guru's bail out when things dont make sense to them,and when things start looking better than they should,they demand to see the system as a whole before helping out any further.

The truth is that-the energy stored in tank A was able to create a situation where it could draw energy in from the enviroment without loosing any energy itself. I dont know why the guru's find it so hard to understand that when you allow gas from the enviroment to flow into the tank's,and no gas can escape the tank's,that the end result wont be a higher gas mass amount in the two tanks when the cycle has finished.

MarkE was confused as to why i would use the small tank as the energy storage tank,and not the large one,as i would loose less energy during the transfer if i used the large tank as tank A,and the small tank(the receiver)as tank B. Well im sure there are those that will understand now as to why i did it that way,and the results speak for them self.

I think some guru's have a diode like mind,where there physics(or known physics)may leave,but if results dont agree with there physics,then that cannot enter-and everything comes to a holt for them-->as it did in my case.

So there you go AC,we started with 100% energy in tank A,and when the cycle was complete,we ended up with 133% of stored energy in tanks A&B. The extra 33% came from the enviroment,and that is exactly where it will be returned when put to work. No laws broken here,as when the energy stored in the tanks is returned to the enviroment,energy has been conserved.

Newest findings:

Gaia admitted, that they use 2 IPCameras with Infrared Nightvison InfraredLEDs
with Power over Ethernet.
So there was no Emergency light from the hall, but this was the second IP Camera switching on its
Infrared LEDs and both cams were powered by Power over Ethernet cables
and IMHO probably the router was on an USV, so no power outage for the cams and router,
but the AuKW shut down, because the hall had a power outage..-> SCAM...


Also Gaia just posted 2 new videos themself here:

http://gaia-energy.org/liveticker-aukw-besichtigungen-30-04-2015/

Stefan:

Bingo.  Their device can not operate without power supplied to the hall.  What does this tell us about this FREE energy device?

They are busted, and so is Sterling if he continues to try to defend, deflect, make excuses (using false facts about emergency lighting) and offer other ridiculous explanations.

Remember this and do not forget:  "Believe Or Leave!"

Sterling should have T-shirts made with this slogan printed on them.  The sales of which can help him pay his electric bill to the power company since none of his Qmogens appear to be doing the job.

Bill