Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3501607 times)

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7650 on: February 03, 2017, 09:34:45 PM »



I was speaking with a friend, they made the comment: "Chris, it is easy. It is only hard if the fundamental Principles are not understood."

Now, I cant stress this part enough, "understood" this is the KEY word and why I am here. To try to help those that don't understand and want to understand, to understand. Thus my recent post:

Quote from: Albert Einstein


       Any fool can know. The point is to understand




   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7651 on: February 04, 2017, 10:35:59 AM »



Classically funny - You know you've hit some nails on the head when this happens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPgnKpScGDA


ÉDIT:
Hahahaha its MileHigh, I thought you died from old age and Gout!!!


Quote from: User27182182


User27182182 hours ago Highlighted reply

Sorry Marc, but just the other day Chris was pitching your clip as "proof" that "partnered coils" really work.  I looked at your clip and you are clearly a long way off from having the knowledge and skill set to know what you are doing on the bench.  Seeing your ammeter reading drop when you connect the LED means absolutely nothing without doing a proper investigation.  The truth is you have no clue what the power flow in the circuit is like with and without the LED connected and you have proven nothing.  Sorry, but I have to be blunt with the truth.  About two years ago on overunity dot com myself and a few others challenged Chris to show his circuit and his measurements.  Chris delayed doing it for a few months until he finally caved in and provided the requested information.  It was a miserable fail because Chris wasn't even making the proper measurements on his circuit and the circuit was under unity.  He licked his wounds and then soldiered on with the same pitch and he has been doing this for two years now on overunity dot com.  The blunt realty about Chris is that he is in the same boat as you, and he does not have the knowledge and the skill set to do proper experiments on his bench, he does not know what he is doing.  So the whole "partnered output coils" pitch is not true and at its worst it is a complete farce.





My reply to User27182182:



Quote


@User2718218 - Children, hahaha.- Clearly User2718218 you're hiding for a very good reason! No Videos, no account data...


P.S: An Independent Replication is common practice to reference, so it is you, you fool, that is showing your total lack of knowledge and skill. Another Internet Disso,... Just out of interest, what's the Pay like, is Hillary ok to work for. I heard she's real hard work?




Now, I find this classically funny, very clearly, a paid Disso of Hillary Clinton...

Now, anyone and everyone can go back and see the truth - I have never ever shown any measurement data, ever, I released a circuit, some tried to replicate it. Blatant LIES have been told by MileHigh again, it is what he was best at!!


Try telling Stan Meyer his famous VIC Circuit was a Fake!!!


Hahahaha - EPIC FAIL!!!!


Blatant LIES you Looser!!!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



P.S: Please disconnect your webcam, Eeeuwh yuk!!!

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7652 on: February 04, 2017, 12:58:20 PM »


Classically funny - You know you've hit some nails on the head when this happens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPgnKpScGDA


ÉDIT:





My reply to User27182182:










Hahahaha - EPIC FAIL!!!!


Blatant LIES you Looser!!!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



P.S: Please disconnect your webcam, Eeeuwh yuk!!!

Quote
Hahahaha its MileHigh, I thought you died from old age and Gout!!!

Thats not very nice Chris.

Quote
Now, I find this classically funny, very clearly, a paid Disso of Hillary Clinton...

Now, anyone and everyone can go back and see the truth - I have never ever shown any measurement data, ever, I released a circuit, some tried to replicate it. Blatant LIES have been told by MileHigh again, it is what he was best at!!

Forgive me if im wrong here Chris,but did you not show some form of data by way of a scope,only to be informed that you had the scope set to AC coupling,when it should have been set to DC coupling?.

Quote
Try telling Stan Meyer his famous VIC Circuit was a Fake!!!

Try finding one (of the many that have tried),that have managed to replicate Stan's claimed results.

All's fair in love and war Chris,and so lets be fair here--MH knows his stuff,and neither you,i or anyone else can say otherwise.

You know that he and i are far from best mate's,but i give credit where credit is due--and it's due to MH.

Neither of us thus far,have been able to prove him wrong-thats a fact-apart from a few small things outside his field of expertise.

Brad

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7653 on: February 04, 2017, 12:58:23 PM »



Its easy to see why we have been "In the Dark" for so long! Stupid Old Two-Bit Losers that can only manage a thought experiment in their rocking chairs, in old peoples homes...

Hey MileHigh, try telling Clarke Hess they don't know what they are doing you stupid old FOOL!!!

Here is two more INDEPENDANT REPLICATIONS that only you could try to dispute, and true to your nature look stupid doing so:



Quote from: Graham Gunderson link=http://emediapress.com/grahamgunderson/mit/

 
3 Coils, Load, DC Switching(H-Bridge LC Tank) - Overunity: 5.7
 
 
Measured on Tektronix Scope X1 and X2 Clarke Hess Watt Metre (Try telling Clark Hess they have bad equipment, they will serve you!!!)
 
 
2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference
 
 

 
 
 
Quote from: Graham Gunderson link=http://grahamgunderson.com/ou/

 
3 Coils, Load, DC Switching - Overunity: 1.01
 
 
Measured on Tektronix Scope X2
 
 
2015 Energy Science & Technology Conference
 
 




Oh look I missed one, good work Proteus!!!




Thanks Chris
Works exactly as you say. I am shocked at how simple this is.
P




What a complete joke, there are some completely stupid in the head morons around!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7654 on: February 04, 2017, 01:11:48 PM »

Thats not very nice Chris.

Forgive me if im wrong here Chris,but did you not show some form of data by way of a scope,only to be informed that you had the scope set to AC coupling,when it should have been set to DC coupling?.

Try finding one (of the many that have tried),that have managed to replicate Stan's claimed results.

All's fair in love and war Chris,and so lets be fair here--MH knows his stuff,and neither you,i or anyone else can say otherwise.

You know that he and i are far from best mate's,but i give credit where credit is due--and it's due to MH.

Neither of us thus far,have been able to prove him wrong-thats a fact-apart from a few small things outside his field of expertise.

Brad




Brad, no, no In/Out measurements were given, a single scope shot was provided, but I gave no data on measurements. There is no way that any correct In/Out measurements could have been devised!!!


Yes, DC and AC Coupling has been shown many times on my scope shots, posted here and else where. Tinselkoala admitted it was ok in the end of that big deal made over nothing!


I told him I had checked for DC Offset and there was none. So, although the Metrologists will like you to provide AC Coupled Shots, it is only to eliminate a few issues that they should ask to see separately anyway.


So, all in all a big deal was made over nothing, like is always done!




   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org




tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7655 on: February 04, 2017, 01:17:07 PM »



Its easy to see why we have been "In the Dark" for so long! Stupid Old Two-Bit Losers that can only manage a thought experiment in their rocking chairs, in old peoples homes...

Hey MileHigh, try telling Clarke Hess they don't know what they are doing you stupid old FOOL!!!

Here is two more INDEPENDANT REPLICATIONS that only you could try to dispute, and true to your natur look stupid doing so:



 
 







 



What a complete joke, there are some completely stupid in the head morons around!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

 Quote GG
3 Coils, Load, DC Switching(H-Bridge LC Tank) - Overunity: 5.7
 Measured on Tektronix Scope X1 and X2 Clarke Hess Watt Metre (Try telling Clark Hess they have bad equipment, they will serve you!!!)
 2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference


Is this the same test where GG bypassed the current input to the Clarke Hess Watt meter?.

Where is GG now
What has happened to his wonderful OU transformer?
 Did you read my previous comment?

Brad
 

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7656 on: February 04, 2017, 01:20:10 PM »



Brad, no, no In/Out measurements were given, a single scope shot was provided, but I gave no data on measurements. There is no way that any correct In/Out measurements could have been devised!!!


Yes, DC and AC Coupling has been shown many times on my scope shots, posted here and else where. Tinselkoala admitted it was ok in the end of that big deal made over nothing!


I told him I had checked for DC Offset and there was none. So, although the Metrologists will like you to provide AC Coupled Shots, it is only to eliminate a few issues that they should ask to see separately anyway.


So, all in all a big deal was made over nothing, like is always done!




   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Well this is good Chris.

Maybe it is time for you to put up some accurate P/in P/out test measurements ?.

If i had a clear description of your best OU transformer,i would be happy to put one together,and provide my finding's,as the new workshop is a hoot  ;D


Brad

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7657 on: February 04, 2017, 01:26:25 PM »
Quote GG
3 Coils, Load, DC Switching(H-Bridge LC Tank) - Overunity: 5.7
 Measured on Tektronix Scope X1 and X2 Clarke Hess Watt Metre (Try telling Clark Hess they have bad equipment, they will serve you!!!)
 2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference


Is this the same test where GG bypassed the current input to the Clarke Hess Watt meter?.

Where is GG now
What has happened to his wonderful OU transformer?
 Did you read my previous comment?

Brad






Brad - I can see that you have not watched the video? I thought you did? We did pass words on this sometime back...


What by-pass???


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7658 on: February 04, 2017, 01:37:32 PM »
Well this is good Chris.

Maybe it is time for you to put up some accurate P/in P/out test measurements ?.

If i had a clear description of your best OU transformer,i would be happy to put one together,and provide my finding's,as the new workshop is a hoot  ;D


Brad



...



Odd, yes I got defensive. Your tone, the statements you're making even when you know better...


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7659 on: February 04, 2017, 02:06:10 PM »







Ok, so an updated list of Achievers: Independent Replications all of varying levels and stages, some by Independent Researchers.









Chris is right. Bucking coil when properly connected have no lenz at all and still gives output.


You can all see that my set-up is fucking Crude or rough. But still I get the effect. I loaded the secondaries and still there is no increment at all in the input wattage.


The whole P.O.Cs is covered by the primary.


You need to separate the charge by applying Vladimir Utkin Circuit which he stated in his PDF document under the title "Switchable Iinductance"


I am now moving away from that circuit to test full bridge and earthing circuit to see if I will able to draw current from the Earth Crust with or without Avramenko Plug.


Frequency to the primary from my mechanical switch was under 30hz


Input voltage to my primary was 90 volt DC.


The output wattage I crease as I increase the frequency. But MY LOAD WHICH IS A DC MOTOR DID NOT AFFECT THE INPUT WATTAGE AT ALL. I REAPEAT AT ALL.


Now time to test Bucking  primary and one secondary as come.


I will also test single strand primary coil over the bucking secondary to see if the output watt will drop or not as I notice using neodymium magnet that current flowing in Multifillar wire mimicks AC zig zag or push pull even if the current is DC.



Thank you Chris, Vladimir Utkin, Marathonman, Hanon, Though and all you other people on over unity.com for your selflessness and sincerity








Quote from: Graham Gunderson link=http://emediapress.com/grahamgunderson/mit/



3 Coils, Load, DC Switching(H-Bridge LC Tank) - Overunity: 5.7



Measured on Tektronix Scope X1 and X2 Clarke Hess Watt Metre (Try telling Clark Hess they have bad equipment, they will serve you!!!)



2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference










Quote from: Graham Gunderson link=http://grahamgunderson.com/ou/



3 Coils, Load, DC Switching - Overunity: 1.01



Measured on Tektronix Scope X2



2015 Energy Science & Technology Conference











Hey all, I have build a simple joule thief using bucking coil arrangement that I wound my self.. It looks very productive and I wanted to ask you if this it is "something"! or if its a common result.


Output from secondary coils are passed through a bridge rectifier to have dc for taking measures. (direct from battery VS through the circuit)
The load is 3 leds on a pcb with a BR, few resistors and a mini electr. cap. (Its the head from a hand crank flashlight)
Batery is a 18650


I made some measures..


Direct the load to the battery: 3.70V --- 0.58mA  ---> 0.2146 Watt
Through the circuit:                4.90V --- 93.2mA  ---> 4.5668 Watt


That's 2028% difference..


The loal direct to battery is very very dimmed..
Through the circuit is so bright that you can't see it directly.. near to burn I guess.








Quote from: Mark Balanger Advanced Electronic


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPgnKpScGDA


Published on Dec 4, 2015
This difficult to tune circuit really does work. Once folks try to utilize my method of building and tuning, it will make life a lot easier to get one functioning. A magnet is used to change the flux path of the device once it is powered up, and, it seems that once used in a few different areas, the longer it remains powered and the frequency is found per size of the load, a device will need to be used for eacdh large device we utilize without the danger of being charged for that amount. Since this device uses from the uA to the mA range of idle current it is vital to know it can be used for very large loads such as continuous water or fuel pumps, and, many other devices.  Why aren't we building them for power in our homes ?? The coils use minimal idle amperage like wall wort power supplies, but at a much lower amperage. When we add load, the amperage dropped.  The more we add. The lower it goes. This cost me $2.25 worth of ferrite and copper to make.








Quote from: Wistiti


www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKfr8bwVhkc


Published on Feb 25, 2015
There is my second video on youtube!
In this one i tried the partnered bucking coil presented by Chris Sykes "EMJunky" on an already made toroidal transformer...
The only thing i would like to add is Thank you Chris!!!



Quote from:  Юрий Лиховид


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWzZqw8eLDU


Published on Sep 4, 2015
A little-known "Aharonov-Bohm effect" (1959) is working against the old and known "Lenz's-Law" (1833). The result is an "anti-Lenz" effect.
Soon will be a video: "Anti-Lenz effect - the final version".







Yuri did what I did, and got the same results. It baffels you to see it.
Even worse, is when you try to prove yourself wrong and the results
hold rigid.



Now lets see how bad the pack tears this one up.








   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org






tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7660 on: February 04, 2017, 02:30:39 PM »





Brad - I can see that you have not watched the video? I thought you did? We did pass words on this sometime back...


What by-pass???


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org
I was thinking about the conference test video,where you can see the input was left disconnected.


Brad

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7661 on: February 04, 2017, 02:44:24 PM »
I was thinking about the conference test video,where you can see the input was left disconnected.


Brad




Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I told everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, Measurements also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7662 on: February 04, 2017, 02:59:24 PM »



Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I tole everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?

When doing accurate P/in and P/out measurement's,all P/in must be measured and accounted for.



Brad

hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7663 on: February 04, 2017, 03:04:07 PM »

you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?

When doing accurate P/in and P/out measurement's,all P/in must be measured and accounted for.



Brad



No it wasn't, what are you talking about?

"you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?"

This is rubbish, two nodes were measured and both nodes were the same, what a bunch of Marlarchy!





Oh hang on, there was a fly on the wall in the next room, its all fake!!!.... What a bunch of BS!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org






tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7664 on: February 04, 2017, 03:14:12 PM »



Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I told everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, Measurements also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

I see a very big mistake in the image Chris,and would more than likely explain the large difference in P/in and P/out.
You pride your self in induction Chris,so where do you see the big NO NO in the picture below-the one you posted.
Where has GG made a big error ?.

Many people have looked at this picture,and the video's,but no one yet see's the error  :o

Brad