??

I am not going down the "Measurement" path - Bill Alek a qualified EE has been ridiculed without any evidence to the contrary. My measurements are not up for debate here.

I am giving people the How's, Why's and the Secrets to build their own Devices. Its up to them to make their own decisions.

I encourage people to use their Common Sense and decide for themselves if this device makes sense and is worth the 1hr and $20:00 to Build and Learn.

Chris,

I hope I can set the record straight regarding my measurement issues on my PM3 series of devices.

The scope I have been using a Tektronix MDO 3034 with TPP0500B probes and I have experienced measurement errors due to ground loops between the circuits and scope. Simply moving the probe lead that measured the input voltage to the transformer primary affected the amplitude and phase of the probe used to measure the current sense resistor voltage. This greatly affected the scope's Math calculations and would even result in false negative energy results. Tektronix has been very cooperative and has acknowledged that there is a valid problem with my measurements.

At present, the problem has been greatly reduced by the use of only one ground lead connection from the scope placed at the ground side of the current sense resistor from the channel used to measure the voltage across said resistor. All other probe ground leads are removed. This provides the most stable and accurate measurements to date and the bottom line is that the high COP values I reported on OUR are invalid. This discovery was extremely disappointing to me and forces me to re-check other circuitry I had developed that indicated COPs >1.

pm

In my research into the recent problems, I have found some imposters, some users going under several different names. Some that you would never believe me if I told you who they were. One is a Moderator here!!!


These people must be unbelievably desperate!!! Paid by who?


The extent of this is unbelievable!!!


People that can speak perfect English, starting with posts:  “Sorry for my English”... Posting videos from totally different people!!!


I warn you, the reader - "Trust NO ONE" !!!


Some here are very much not who they would make you believe!!! I had suspected and expected much deception, most of the reason I have shown nothing of value to you, now seeing it, and seeing some of the people involved, I now know, this will never see the light of day, far too many crooks and thieves out there!!!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is: I = + da⁺/dt + da^-/dt.

Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

Sign for power measurement

The sign of the active power P and of the power factor cos f  provide information about the direction of the energy flow. A positive sign indicates the motor mode, a negative sign indicates generator mode.

In addition, the sign of the reactive power Q indicates the direction of the phase shift between current and voltage. In Figure 4 this is illustrated in the four-quadrant diagram. In motor mode (quadrant I & IV) a positive reactive power indicates an inductive load, a negative reactive power indicates a capacitive load. In generator mode (quadrant II & III), an inductive acting generator is indicated by a positive reactive power, a capacitive acting generator by a negative reactive power.

Hi EMjunkie

Do you take leave  from OU forum ? Maybe plan some exciting gold prospecting in bush with Minelab GPX ? 

If not i have some proposal in rearanging MR.PREVA experiment - of course using only Partnered coils and small piece of cooper tube.

To continue or not ? Maybe is not interesting ??