Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy (Read 3530529 times)

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7125 on:** July 31, 2016, 10:22:35 PM »

Quote from: steadyfield on July 31, 2016, 04:08:18 PM

Hi Chris,
I wonder how the input current is measured. Did you use a current sensing resistor (CSR) ? If you did, what was your configuration? A or B?

Thanks.

steadyfield

Hi SteadyField - I used a Clamp on Current Meter: Hantek CC-65

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7126 on:** July 31, 2016, 11:34:33 PM »

I want to appologise to the readers/followers of this thread.

Been a tough few weeks , I've been really sick, its just been a "World on your sholders" sort of period.

I should have shown my work better, It wasnt very professional to include errors to see if any were paying attention. But thats how I get a feel if what I am doing makes a difference, is helping, others.

An Inductor is mostly seen purely as a Resistive Component when the Core is Saturated. This means the Current and Voltage will be inphase, or very close to it. It depends on the degree of Saturation.

Partnered Output Coils, actually Self-Assist in the Operation of a Device. They create a Forward Driving Action.

I have shown you many times in my Videos. Partnered Output Coils are almost like an Oscillator in their own right. Start them off, tune them to the best frequency, and the output can be greater than the Input. It does require a little work. A little Intuition, and mostly some direction is very much more easy to keep that goal right infront of you.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

steadyfield · « **Reply #7127 on:** August 01, 2016, 01:23:35 AM »

Quote from: EMJunkie on July 31, 2016, 10:22:35 PM

Hi SteadyField - I used a Clamp on Current Meter: Hantek CC-65

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your reply. When measuring power, the sign convention is important. I wonder if you were measuring the voltage and current with active sign convention or passive sign convention ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_sign_convention ) ? They could give different results.

Steadyfield

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7128 on:** August 01, 2016, 02:19:08 AM »

Quote from: steadyfield on August 01, 2016, 01:23:35 AM

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your reply. When measuring power, the sign convention is important. I wonder if you were measuring the voltage and current with active sign convention or passive sign convention ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_sign_convention ) ? They could give different results.

Steadyfield

Hi Steadyfield,

Thank You! Active participation!

The only point to the experiment was to show that Permanent Magnets can Add Energy to a System, all my measurements were irrelevant. Incorrect, or a test to see who was watching, who was paying attention, to see if what I was typing was being properly read. Views does not mean reads.

Yes, showing the Sign of the Power was also part of the point, it is something that is first, Important, and second: must be seen as something that can change. (Not by Inverted Probe)

An Active Component is what Partnered Output Coils become after tunning, getting the frequency, turns and the Magnetic Flux right. For those that don’t know, an Active Component is a Battery or a "Generator" which is exactly what is happening.

Partnered Output Coils are a Passive Component if they are not tunned, not at the right Frequency, not with the right Magnetic Flux, and not the right Turns. But this is not hard, Pick a Core with a good Frequency Range, 3 - 7 small Ferrites are normally a good start. 50 - 200 Turns is normally ok to start. Then fiddle, play until you find the best spot of Operation.

What I have just shown, is meant to show others that Energy can be added to a System, See: Flux Gate Magnetometer or Solid state Generator?

The end Goal is to Watch for, and Improve on the Self-Assisted Action: Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation

I can see you already know much if not all this stuff, Steadyfield, but for all, think of this device as a Bistable Oscillator, or a Magnetic Oscillator.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7129 on:** August 02, 2016, 06:31:32 AM »

Seems there is a ton of uncertainty over at the GG Thread on How and Where to measure Power and what the System is actually defined as...

I know there are a lot of very smart people here, some lurkers and some talkers.

I disagree with the debate they are saying about where to measure the Input Power. Before the H-Bridge.

The H-Bridge is not part of the System It prepares power for the System. The H- Bridge is not the System Under Test, it is preparing power for the System Under Test.

The H-Bridge will have its own efficiency and Loss, but this is not dependant on the System Under Test.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7130 on:** August 02, 2016, 12:27:23 PM »

Some may remember, a few years back, the Lantern device, it was a self runner, lit a few LED's: GLED 2 - This device uses the same wiring for the Coils as the Image I keep showing.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7131 on:** August 02, 2016, 10:19:27 PM »

I should explain my behaviour as of late.

Person X admitted to me 3 years ago of having no knowledge whatsoever of the Coils of the VTA, now person X is using my Designs from my research, claiming them as their own and trying to patent them.

I am still upset, I have been showing these Coils, Partnered Output Coils for some 5 Years!!! Now they want to patent as their own...

This shouldnt be patentable in the first place, they have been public domain for ever!

Yes, I have an EMail trail for proof!

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7132 on:** August 02, 2016, 11:08:42 PM »

A genuine person gives Credit where Credit is due, I list many names in my pdf.

To take credit for others work is most disingenuous!

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7133 on:** August 02, 2016, 11:11:33 PM »

While we are on topic of the GLED, there is an image that was posted to the one of the early PDF's.

As soon as I saw it I knew this device was genuine: Do you know why?

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7134 on:** August 03, 2016, 12:00:00 AM »

Not three times, but a quick throw together shows the Wave:

Peak: 2.8V
Peak: -3.4V

Thats: 1.21 Times more Wave area in the Bottom than the Top half of the wave.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

darediamond · « **Reply #7135 on:** August 03, 2016, 08:04:48 AM »

Quote from: EMJunkie on July 22, 2016, 12:11:40 AM

Oh, to help a bunch of drowning Rats, because I am no sadist and have a heart that works, I am not limited to posting here...

First, I have seen this before, I cant stress this enough, it is so very important in this field!!!

NEVER CHANGE THE ORIGINAL STOREY!!! EVER!!! NEVER CHANGE THE ORIGINAL DATA, EVER!!!

First Basic Truth: In one AC Cycle, there is 2 Magnetisation Cycles in any Coil. See Below Image: Meaning the Coil flips from North South (Positive Current), to South North (Negative Current) during this Cycle.

Second Truth: The polarity of the Dots on the PM's do match EXACTLY with the original Storey!!! See below image: 2 sets, that's Two Sets of Fields are Present here from the Permanent Magnets, there has to be for this to work in this configuration!!! Why would the dots be aligned this way and the original storey match, EXACTLY, the dots, showing clearly, very clearly, that there is a specific configuration that is being aimed for... Graham told Reiyuki how the Magnets were setup, the dots verify this, and now the storey has been changed...

Third Truth: The Lower C Core is Higher Permeability so as to make an easy path to travel for One of the PM Fields at any one time.

The Very Heavy Duty of the Acrylic and Nylon Threaded Rods indicate a lot of pressure in the Magnetic Fields in this configuration...

Again, the Key concept here is Moving Magnetic Fields!!!

Carefully study this, dont take anything for granted!!!

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

P.S: Sorry, I posted the wrong Poarity, I have correced it now.

Chris, you have just revealed a killer info!!!!!!

But then, how can this be applied alternatively in Figuera Genertor which is the opposite of Partner Output Coils (2 input coils and One outputncoils at the center)??

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7136 on:** August 03, 2016, 09:33:24 AM »

Quote from: darediamond on August 03, 2016, 08:04:48 AM

Chris, you have just revealed a killer info!!!!!!

But then, how can this be applied alternatively in Figuera Genertor which is the opposite of Partner Output Coils (2 input coils and One outputncoils at the center)??

Figurea himself said that he sold the Patents to the Bankers.

My first thought is the existing Patents or what has been given as a patent may not be trustworthy! What Banker do you know that is trustworthy? Yep, none, me too!!

The guys are making excellent progress here on ou.com, but seems there is still a big nut to crack there. News paper Articles are about the only source I would trust.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

EMJunkie · « **Reply #7137 on:** August 03, 2016, 11:14:41 PM »

If there is one important thing that has value, is when Figurea said that his device was based "How and electrical Generator worked"

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

darediamond · « **Reply #7138 on:** August 04, 2016, 04:59:43 AM »

Quote from: EMJunkie on August 03, 2016, 09:33:24 AM

Figurea himself said that he sold the Patents to the Bankers.

My first thought is the existing Patents or what has been given as a patent may not be trustworthy! What Banker do you know that is trustworthy? Yep, none, me too!!

The guys are making excellent progress here on ou.com, but seems there is still a big nut to crack there. News paper Articles are about the only source I would trust.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

Chris, are you a Banker?

darediamond · « **Reply #7139 on:** August 04, 2016, 05:10:53 AM »

Quote from: EMJunkie on August 03, 2016, 11:14:41 PM

If there is one important thing that has value, is when Figurea said that his device was based "How and electrical Generator worked"

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

Chris, what do you think will happen if 2 Primary Windings with one secondary bat the center sharing the same core are connected in such ba way that when the primaries are powered, there Polarity Collide at the center instead of ATTRACT I.e instead of there polarity to be N<+>S or S<+>N it becomes N>-<N or S>-<S

Will the centered Primary generate any output in each of the configuration? If Yes, how intense will it be?

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy (Read 3530529 times)

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

steadyfield

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

darediamond

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

darediamond

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

darediamond

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy