Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3175944 times)

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6900 on: April 27, 2016, 01:34:35 AM »



Hey R,

Quote from: Floyd Sweet Nothing is Something

Work in high speed logic conducted by Ivor Catt has shown that the model of lumped capacitance is faulty and displacement current is an artefact of the faulty model


Again, is this another Missunderstanding? See: Ivor Catt And Displacement Current

Quote

The way this problem is avoided according to the textbooks is that there is a displacement current inside the capacitor that allows the circuit to be closed with respect to the flow of current. In other words the textbooks maintain that the conduction current and displacement current amount to the same thing as far as the magnetic effects and the continuity of circuit current are concerned.

...


This can be excused when we take into consideration that the purpose is not to give an accurate historical account, but to contrast the textbook accounts, against the revised conception of EM theory that was developed by the writers. Hence, what the article actually does is give an account as if the textbook accounts were historically accurate. We know they are not, and so this particular issue is not a mark against Catt and his coauthors, but an example of bad science history perpetuated by the textbook writers.

...

Here we see why the invention of the Catt theory is an important innovation. It is obvious that significant and important innovations in scientific concepts are going to be resisted, but we need to realize that there is more involved than just a clarification of the displacement current. Catt and his coauthors argue that displacement current is unnecessary and can be dispensed with. The solution proposed was to treat the capacitor as an open ended transmission line and treat the problem using the theory of transmission lines. In this theory the open circuit transmission line builds up a charge in the capacitor as a result of reflections and the result is a standing wave of electric field that appears to be a static charge. The inflow of current during the energy accumulation or charging process being what textbooks call the displacement current.



This, which, I have just shown in this Video: Inertial Mass Displacement - An amazing effect - What does a Coil really do on the core? - hyiq.org

Thus, this is a Moving Standing Wave!


Quote

So what is displacement current? It is really nothing more than what we already call current, but that concept implies that there is a movement of electric charge in the form of charged particles called electrons. We can be pretty sure that the current that is assumed to be electrons is actually the displacement current of the electric field and that this current is actually what is measured by current meters.




    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6901 on: April 27, 2016, 01:42:18 AM »
And it is this very kind of bullshit we are taught that stop's most moving forward beyond the point at which we are now.
How in hell do you orbit an object in a circular orbit,when that object is moving?. Even those with just a basic understanding of motion between two objects could work out that that is crap-->the earth dose not move around the sun in a circular orbit--not even close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHsq36_NTU


Brad



Brad,

I am talking about Velocity, not Orbits! Nothing to do at all with Orbits. I gave a generalised description of Our Planet with Velocity Only. Velocity is Distance x Time - NOT Orbit.

Edit: You are clearly refering to the Quote I posted, and interpreting that.

The link you posted is also only partly correct: The helical model - our solar system is a vortex - Why?

Because our Sun has its own Perturbations!!! Perturbations caused by an Orbit that is not an Orbit around the Sun's own Center of Mass, but the Center of Mass of the entire Solar System. Which we have only found part of!!!

Some of what I describe can be found here: star orbit simulation

Some more here: Gravitational Perturbations

So, to correct the Video you posted, the Sun has its own Heliocentric Orbital around the Centre of Mass of the Solar System, which in turn then orbits around the Milky Way, of course Heliocentrically.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


P.S: Yes I did initially take this the wrong way and then had to correct myself. Thus the edit. Sorry Brad...

PPS: Induction heating is the reason for Volcanoes/Lava Flows on the Outer Planets and Moons! - Jupiter’s moon Io:
 
« Last Edit: April 27, 2016, 04:30:00 AM by EMJunkie »

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6902 on: April 27, 2016, 02:51:50 AM »



I built a simple Induction Heater, very simple:


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6903 on: April 27, 2016, 03:45:55 AM »
And it is this very kind of bullshit we are taught that stop's most moving forward beyond the point at which we are now.
How in hell do you orbit an object in a circular orbit,when that object is moving?. Even those with just a basic understanding of motion between two objects could work out that that is crap-->the earth dose not move around the sun in a circular orbit--not even close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHsq36_NTU


Brad

The tips of a spinning airplane propeller, in concert with the airplane's forward motion, also trace out two helices, yet the tips of the propellers always orbit the same central point, and in the same geometric plane relative to the engine/spinner...

But it is good to know that there are some really smart scientists out there that are able to detect, measure and map out our solar system's motion through space.  Were it not for those very intelligent scientists, using their very well engineered and advanced technology and optics, we would not be aware of any of it.

If you were you to read some "real" science related publications, I believe you would find that science, in general, is very far advanced beyond the cynical portrait you tend to paint.

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6904 on: April 27, 2016, 04:20:59 AM »
The tips of a spinning airplane propeller, in concert with the airplane's forward motion, also trace out two helices, yet the tips of the propellers always orbit the same central point, and in the same geometric plane relative to the engine/spinner...

But it is good to know that there are some really smart scientists out there that are able to detect, measure and map out our solar system's motion through space.  Were it not for those very intelligent scientists, using their very well engineered and advanced technology and optics, we would not be aware of any of it.

If you were you to read some "real" science related publications, I believe you would find that science, in general, is very far advanced beyond the cynical portrait you tend to paint.


Most of Humanity's greatest discovery’s came from the mind and were proven later.

Dirac himself is good example of this. His math, also a complex piece of artwork, helped us to discover, perhaps the most exciting field of Science yet. QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics)

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics

Dirac described the quantization of the electromagnetic field as an ensemble of harmonic oscillators with the introduction of the concept of creation and annihilation operators of particles. In the following years, with contributions from Wolfgang Pauli, Eugene Wigner, Pascual Jordan, Werner Heisenberg and an elegant formulation of quantum electrodynamics due to Enrico Fermi, physicists came to believe that, in principle, it would be possible to perform any computation for any physical process involving photons and charged particles.


But, I agree, many amazing feats of Technological achievement have been made through bright People, with Technology on their side.

At the end of the day, we are all Children in the Classroom of Life and Science is only one Subject!

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org



Offline wistiti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6905 on: April 27, 2016, 05:26:54 AM »

At the end of the day, we are all Children in the Classroom of Life and Science is only one Subject!

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

I really love this sentence!!!...   :)

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6906 on: April 27, 2016, 06:14:44 AM »
The tips of a spinning airplane propeller, in concert with the airplane's forward motion, also trace out two helices, yet the tips of the propellers always orbit the same central point, and in the same geometric plane relative to the engine/spinner...

But it is good to know that there are some really smart scientists out there that are able to detect, measure and map out our solar system's motion through space.  Were it not for those very intelligent scientists, using their very well engineered and advanced technology and optics, we would not be aware of any of it.

If you were you to read some "real" science related publications, I believe you would find that science, in general, is very far advanced beyond the cynical portrait you tend to paint.

Perhaps  some of these very smart scientists with there advanced technologies could answer a couple of simple questions then
1-what is gravity
2-what is the magnetic force?.

Science has a long way to go before it is smart.

Brad

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6907 on: April 27, 2016, 07:44:48 AM »



Thanks Wistiti :)



@Brad - What do you think they are?

I will have a stab:

   Magnetic Field is an Aetherial Vortex, created by Current Flow. The Aether is all the fundamental particles, all bought into NON Ramdom Order by the Order of the Spins of the Atoms in Alignment.


   Gravity is a Wave, formed in the Aether. This wave is the standing wave formed by Matter and the Fundamental Electromagnetic Fields that can minipulate Matter which is in turn Compressed Energy: E = MC2.


   The Aether, almost like a Fluid, to be submerged in the Aether, seen as Force that knocks us to the ground when our feet are sweped out from under us, like the Wind we feel on our Faces, nothing is there that is seen, but we feel it, as if it was Ghost like.


Hows that, does this satisfy your question? Not sure its complete or correct, but this is how I see them as of today.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6908 on: April 27, 2016, 11:05:31 AM »


Thanks Wistiti :)



@Brad -

I will have a stab:

   





    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

Well first problem is--an aether is yet to be proven,and all tests have shown negative results of the existance of an aether. Einstein removed the aether theory,and it no longer played any role in his theory of special relativity.

Quote
Magnetic Field is an Aetherial Vortex, created by Current Flow.

As the flow of current generates heat,where is the heat generated by this current flow?--we are talking PMs here.

Quote
The Aether is all the fundamental particles, all bought into NON Ramdom Order by the Order of the Spins of the Atoms in Alignment.

Once again,the existance of this !aether! is yet to be proven--can you prove it's existance?.

Quote
Gravity is a Wave, formed in the Aether.

A theory base on the !theorized,yet to be proven! existence of this aether.

Quote
Hows that, does this satisfy your question? Not sure its complete or correct, but this is how I see them as of today.

It dose not satisfy my question in any way.
Your theories are based around this !aether!,which so far dose not seem to exist.

Quote
What do you think they are?

Gravity.
Why dose the gravitational force have to be something complicated?.
Why not something simple?. Everything that has mass has a gravitational force/pull,where it is attracted to another mass. What dose all mass have?-or what is all mass made of?.

The magnetic force/field.
Even though i have answered this question many times already here on this forum,why not use the power of deduction as i did.
1-What do all Ferromagnetic materials have that diamagnetic materials do not?
2-Why is a PM attracted to a Ferromagnetic material,and repelled away from a diamagnetic material.?

Answer question 1,and you will start to see where it can lead.

The biggest problem with the magnetic field is this--> There are very few who wish to know what the magnetic field/force actually is,as there more interested in how they can use it.
But consider this-->what if we could construct a material that could be switched from being Ferromagnetic to paramagnetic by using an extremely small amount of electrical current,say like with the human muscle,where a very small electrical impulse can lead to a huge change between being relaxed,to being able to lift a weight of say 20KGs 1 meter in 1 second.

You may think that some crackpot on an OU forum will never discover what scientist cannot. Well history says that it is very possible. You need only to look at and answer question 1,and then you will stand back,and begin to piece it altogether-question 2 ;)


Brad

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 927
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6909 on: April 27, 2016, 02:15:06 PM »
All these fields magnetic gravitation radio frequency and the rest of it is just the different way ETHER IS MODULATED ..ETHER IS THE FLUID STUFF IN ANOTHER DIMENSION THAT HOLD THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER..HOW DOES SUCH MASS AS THE SUN JUST FLOAT WHERE IT IS AND SPIN AND TRAVEL AT A MASSIVE SPEED. SO IS THE WHOLE GALAXY ALL FLOATING AND TRAVELING IN ETHER..

 

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 927
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6910 on: April 27, 2016, 02:25:40 PM »
FOR example when an electromagnet is electrically powered up it spin pushed ether outwards in one direction and when the power is switched of ether spring back in the opposite spin hence bemf. a permanent magnet is pushing ether out wards constantly because  of it structural spin resonance..gravity is the brother of magnetism in a different format each atom has has the protons and electrons spinning at TWICE the speed of light AND THE ADDITIONS OF EACH ATOMS DOING THEIR STUFF ADDS UP TO GRAVITY MORE ATOMS MORE GRAVITY.. WHY IS THE ELECTRONS AND PROTONS TRAVELLING TWICE FASTER THAT SPEED OF LIGHT E=MC^2.


Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6911 on: April 27, 2016, 04:14:28 PM »
FOR example when an electromagnet is electrically powered up it spin pushed ether outwards in one direction and when the power is switched of ether spring back in the opposite spin hence bemf. a permanent magnet is pushing ether out wards constantly because  of it structural spin resonance..gravity is the brother of magnetism in a different format each atom has has the protons and electrons spinning at TWICE the speed of light AND THE ADDITIONS OF EACH ATOMS DOING THEIR STUFF ADDS UP TO GRAVITY MORE ATOMS MORE GRAVITY.. WHY IS THE ELECTRONS AND PROTONS TRAVELLING TWICE FASTER THAT SPEED OF LIGHT E=MC^2.

All you have to do now,is provide scientific evidence that this aether exist,and at this point in time,it has not been detected by any science experiment.


Brad

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 927
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6912 on: April 27, 2016, 05:12:29 PM »
Ether have a tensile strength just like any thing in the universe and a BLACK HOLE is the proof of existence of ether. ether is punctured through because of the mass density of that dead star or stars.. and a black hole is a recycle of the universe and it ARSED end is that what power all the stars of the known galaxies. Because what ever travel in and through a black hole travel faster than the speed of light you do not perceive it until it reaches it different stars destination. that is why in the middle of every known galaxies there is a black hole RECYCLING ALL THAT ENTERS IT POT HOLE. THE FABRIC OF SPACE AND TIME IS ETHER.
 

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6913 on: April 28, 2016, 01:06:34 AM »



Brad, interesting...

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)

According to ancient and medieval science, aether (Greek: αἰθήρ aithēr), also spelled æther or ether, also called quintessence, is the material that fills the region of the universe above the terrestrial sphere.


The Famous Michelson Morley Experiment was supposed to have disproven the Aether, it was a flawed Experiment and has been shown to have been doomed for failure before they began.  Michelson-Morley: The Great Failure:

Quote from: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/8805/title/Michelson-Morley--The-Great-Failure/

He wished the dogged little Dutchman would drop the matter and accept the fact that both of Michelson's ether-drift experiments had been miserable failures. The ether was out there, but at present his instruments were unable to detect its presence. Lorentz, however, was not in a mood to let go of such a lively issue.


Even though it was a failed experiment, it did no good for the Aether. Scientists picked up this NON-Observation as a Non-Existance.

Neil deGrasse Tyson explains the Michelson-Morley experiment excerpt from UNDAUNTED
Michelson Morley Interferometer Experiment. Special Relativity vs Aether


However, the Aether is not dead, even though many would like it this way. Science will do full circle soon enough. The study of Neutrino Science will open these doors.

The best documentary’s
    NOVA - THE GHOST PARTICLE - Discovery Science Universe
    4850 Feet Below: The Hunt for Dark Matter
   Faster than the Speed of Light?
   Neutrino - Measuring the Unexpected
   Hunting for Neutrinos
   
   

I think it is a fair comment to say what we call Dark Matter, is the equivalent of the Aether. Considering all the descriptions are similar anyway. The Aether is certainly a much better name than Dark Matter.

Looking in the wrong place for evidence is a fundamental floor of Science. Light is not the Speed limit of the Universe. This is only just now starting to be accepted.

   Gravitational-wave rumours in overdrive

Quote from: https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/what-are-gw

Gravitational waves are 'ripples' in the fabric of space-time caused by some of the most violent and energetic processes in the Universe. Albert Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves in 1916 in his general theory of relativity.


And have we found them?

Quote from: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/02/gravitational-waves-einsteins-ripples-spacetime-spotted-first-time

On 14 September 2015, at 9:50:45 universal time—4:50 a.m. in Louisiana and 2:50 a.m. in Washington—LIGO’s automated systems detected just such a signal. The oscillation emerged at a frequency of 35 cycles per second, or Hertz, and sped up to 250 Hz before disappearing 0.25 seconds later. The increasing frequency, or chirp, jibes with two massive bodies spiraling into each other. The 0.007-second delay between the signals in Louisiana and Washington is the right timing for a light-speed wave zipping across both detectors.


How? Yes, with a very large Interferometer, just like the Michelson Morley one, but much bigger and much more accurate!

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens

A gravitational lens refers to a distribution of matter (such as a cluster of galaxies) between a distant source and an observer, that is capable of bending the light from the source, as it travels towards the observer. This effect is known as gravitational lensing and the amount of bending is one of the predictions of Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity


It is well known that Gravity and Light interact together. Gravity Bends Light.

Quote from: http://www.juliantrubin.com/bigten/michelsonmorley.html

Now, if there is an ether wind blowing through the Earth, someone looking through the telescope should see the halves of the two half-pulses arrive at slightly different times, since both light beams travel the same distance from the beamsplitter to the two mirrors, and the one that would have gone the ether wind upstream and back is more inhibited than the one gone across the stream and back. It is the same case as with a swimmer that swims at a constant speed the same distance upstream a river and back and across the river and back - upstream and back time will be longer that the across and back time. It is possible to demonstrate by simple calculations why this difference occurs.


The failure of the experiment, the Michelson Morley Experiment to find what was expected, is not an indication that the Aether does not exist, it is only an example of how, looking in the wrong place for evidence is a common problem in Science.

The Aether is not like Swimming Upstream or Downstream, the Neutrino Videos clearly proves this. There is no Resistance to the Aether, looking for Resistance when there is none is a failure of Understanding, not an indication of Non Existence. So why does Light have a speed limit, what is resisting the speed at which Light Travels?

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurements_of_neutrino_speed

Measurements of neutrino speed have been conducted as tests of special relativity and for the determination of the mass of neutrinos. Astronomical searches investigate whether light and neutrinos emitted simultaneously from a distant source are arriving simultaneously on Earth.


Hmm, Instantaneous Speed?

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave

The concept that matter behaves like a wave is also referred to as the de Broglie hypothesis (/dəˈbrɔɪ/) due to having been proposed by Louis de Broglie in 1924. Matter waves are often referred to as de Broglie waves.



Why is the phase velocity of de Broglie waves greater than the speed of light?


The very fact that Neutrinos passing right through the Earth, is enough to say that the Resistance of Light being made to Travel Upstream is an insufficient argument to disprove the Luminiferous Aether:

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

A major breakthrough was the theory of relativity, which could explain why the experiment failed to see aether, but was more broadly interpreted to suggest that it wasn't needed.


So, why do we have the need for Dark Matter, what’s still missing from Science? Why the need?

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

Dark matter is a hypothetical substance that is thought by most astronomers to account for approximately 85% of the matter in the universe. Although it has not been directly observed, its existence and properties are inferred from its various gravitational effects such as the motions of visible matter, via gravitational lensing, its influence on the universe's large-scale structure, and its effects in the cosmic microwave background. Dark matter is transparent to electromagnetic radiation and/or is so dense and small that it fails to absorb or emit enough radiation to be detectable with current imaging technology.


This sounds eerily familiar, do we get some sense of Parallelism with these Theories that cannot be proven either way?

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org
« Last Edit: April 28, 2016, 03:38:26 AM by EMJunkie »

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6914 on: April 28, 2016, 01:11:11 AM »



Einstein was not for the Aether, but at the same time, he used an idea that is parallel to the Aether:

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org