Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3500364 times)

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6870 on: April 24, 2016, 01:06:16 AM »



Sometimes a piece of Chocolate is enticing:



ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.





Ask yourself, what exactly is Mr Polarisz trying to tell you?



Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor

In physics and engineering the quality factor or Q factor is a dimensionless parameter that describes how under-damped an oscillator or resonator is, and characterizes a resonator's bandwidth relative to its center frequency. Higher Q indicates a lower rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the resonator; the oscillations die out more slowly. A pendulum suspended from a high-quality bearing, oscillating in air, has a high Q, while a pendulum immersed in oil has a low one. Resonators with high quality factors have low damping so that they ring longer.




This is just one of many verifications that you, the people have had on this thread!!!


You need to help yourselves, and not expect special treatment, do it for yourselves!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org



EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6871 on: April 24, 2016, 01:36:49 AM »

As the very slow, intellectually retarded, may not realise, Independant Verification is the Ultimate Verification!



Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verification_and_validation

Verification and validation are independent procedures that are used together for checking that a product, service, or system meets requirements and specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose.[1] These are critical components of a quality management system such as ISO 9000. The words "verification" and "validation" are sometimes preceded with "independent", indicating that the verification and validation is to be performed by a disinterested third party. "Independent verification and validation" can be abbreviated as "IV&V".

In practice, the usage of these terms varies. Sometimes they are even used interchangeably.




Independant Verification is the ultimate proof, it is undisputable and undeniable.

So, the question answered, for those that do not understand, is: "Why do I show others work" - It is independant verification!!! Undisputable and Undeniable

When they tell you the exact same thing I have:

Quote from: Yuri Likhovid (Юрий Лиховид) - Anti Lenz Effect - See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWzZqw8eLDU

My dear friends abroad,

This is my first experiment with a Toroidal Transformer for a power of 1.6 Kilo Watt. My Transformer has one Primary Winding and two secondary windings. Each Winding is wound separately, this means that the end of the first winding is end, and the begin of the of the second winding, is separated by a Gap!

So we have two Gaps!

Here and Here.

According to my telly, one of the secondary winding is connected oppositely with respect to the primary winding, so that the Magnetic Fluxes of the Coils, are facing each other.




It is independant verification!!! Undisputable and Undeniable!!!


That is, unless youre a World Class Oompa Loompa Scientist that deals in Oompa Loompa Logic!!!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6872 on: April 24, 2016, 02:41:54 AM »



One we have looked at before, it was not a topic that came up however!

Another implimentation of the same technology.


Quote from:  Xiaodong Liu 1*, Qichang Liang 2, Yu Liang 3

1. 4050 Tokay Court, Napa, CA 94558, USA
2. Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O.Box 275(10), Beijing 102413, China
3. Pangeo Corporation, 2005 Black Acre Dr., Oldcastle ON, N0R 1L0,Canada

Abstract
In this invented transformer, a compensating coil is series connected with the secondary
coil in opposite polarity. The magnetomotive forces generated by the loading current in
the secondary coil and the compensating coil are cancelled out. The power can be
delivered with zero input current in the primary coil when the turn number of secondary
coil is the same as that of compensating coil. When a boost coil is added to the
compensating coil, the input current in primary coil is phase inverted relative to its input
voltage. A magnetic shunt is added to adjust the flux leakage of this transformer.

Description
This transformer is composed of magnetic core, magnetic shunt, primary coil A,
secondary coil B and compensating coil C. The schematic of the transformer is shown in
Figure 1. The primary coil A and secondary coil B are mounted in-and-out or adjacently
on one side of the magnetic core; the compensating coil C is mounted on the other side of
the magnetic core. There are air gaps between the magnetic core and the magnetic shunt.
If the output terminal is composed by the secondary coil B alone, the transformer
must require input current through primary coil A to cancel out the magnetomotive force
generated by the loading current in coil B. If the output terminal is composed by series
connecting coil B and coil C with opposite polarity and the turn number of coil B is the
same as that of coil C, the inducted voltage on coil B is larger than the inducted voltage
on coil C due to the magnetic flux leakage through the magnetic shunt and air around the
magnetic core. The output voltage is
V output = VB – VC (1)
The loading current through coil B and coil C supply equal but opposite magnetomotive
force in the magnetic core and they cancel out each other so that the transformer doesn't
require input current through primary coil A. The voltage difference between coil B and
coil C can be adjusted by changing the position of the magnetic shunt.
If a boost coil is added to coil C so that the turn number of coil C is more than that
of coil B and the inducted voltage in coil B is still larger than coil C, the primary coil A
must supply a phase inverted current relative to its input voltage to cancel out the extra
magnetomotive force generated by the boost coil. The inducted voltage in coil B must be
larger than that of coil C, otherwise the transformer will require more input power than
the output power.



Is it me, or is it, that only smart people catch on to this?


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6873 on: April 24, 2016, 03:05:10 AM »



Yes I think YOU missed that:


Quote from: Xiaodong Liu 1*, Qichang Liang 2, Yu Liang 3


The inducted voltage in coil B must be larger than that of coil C, otherwise the transformer will require more input power than the output power.




    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6874 on: April 24, 2016, 04:16:57 AM »



I have said before: Many roads lead to Rome

Why, what does this mean?

It means that this technology is board! There are many ways and implementations that can give results! I have shown two ways, Wistiti has invented a third, with his POCoil Toroid.


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org
« Last Edit: April 24, 2016, 09:14:11 AM by EMJunkie »

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6875 on: April 24, 2016, 02:29:16 PM »



  Nobody ever seems to bother about what Einstein and Newton think.
  Lens's law can be derived from Gauss' law and the Lorentz transformation
  without the use of magnetic fields.
  Guess what can be done with a covariant equations!
          John.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2016, 11:13:58 PM by minnie »

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6876 on: April 24, 2016, 10:47:47 PM »



OMG - Erfinder Seriously - Go Away!!!

You are not wanted here!!!

Take your Oompa Loompa Science away and help your Brother Oompa Loompa's

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6877 on: April 24, 2016, 10:51:44 PM »


  Nobody ever seems to bother about what Einstein and Newton think.
  Lens'so law can be derived from Gauss' law and the Lorentz transformatione,
  without the use of magnetic fields.
  Guess what can be done with a covariant equations!
          John.





Oh finally some sensible logical Science!!!

John, please enlighten us! I think I know where youre heading...

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6878 on: April 25, 2016, 07:06:49 AM »
This is the exact response I didn't want but anticipated.  It demonstrates that you are all talk and no action.  It reveals to all that you are as spineless as you are arrogant.  Your best work is that you have a blind following. 

Punked by an oompa lumpa......

COWARD!



Keep kidding yourself Marry Poppins!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6879 on: April 25, 2016, 07:31:12 AM »



John's derivation is something I have been thinking about.

Gauss Law for an even Electric Field Distribution is:

   ϕElectric = E A cos(θ)

Lorentz Transformation, for a moving reference frame is:

   β=v/c 
   γ= 1/sqrt(1 - v2 / c2)

 
I am not sure on how, the derivations can get to Lenz's Law. I am sure some complex math can derive anything we really are smart enough to derive.

My guess is that the covariant equations show that is Lenz's Law, is, infact, invariant.

The fact is, Lenz's Law is Invariant. Most Oompa Loompa Scientists have no clue at all what Lenz's Law actually is! Which is funny.

It is very simple, Lenz's Law is a Electromagnetic Field - Plain and Simple.

The Flow of Current, Invoked by Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction is a Magnetic Field, there will always be an EMF, 180 Degrees, conventionally, to the Source EMF, Changing in Time. There can easily be a Degree of Offset which I have already shown and proven to be true, so the Angle should be seen as just that, an Angle ()

This is an EMF to EMF Angle, not Current to Voltage or any crazy guess that Oompa Loompa Scientists might fanaticise about.

The No Brainer here is, to minimise the Reflected response on the Input to the system that Lenz's Law has come into existance from.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

shylo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6880 on: April 25, 2016, 11:18:52 AM »
Are Lenz and flyback the same thing?
If so then my generator uses this to motor itself.
All those fancy equations just boggle my mind. lol
Just wondering artv

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6881 on: April 25, 2016, 12:47:52 PM »
Are Lenz and flyback the same thing?
If so then my generator uses this to motor itself.
All those fancy equations just boggle my mind. lol
Just wondering artv


Hey Shylo

No, different. If you loaded the Inductive Collapse, the wave would change, from a sharp spike to a not so sharp spike. Lenz is responsible for the change in the wave. As Current in the Coil builds, so does an opposing Magnetic Field to the Collapsing Magnetic Field. Thus the Collapsing Field slows down and the Spike wave form will change.

Actually, the Flyback, or Inductive Collapse is Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction, Its simply the Changing Magnetic Field in Proximity of the Conductor. So this process, "Generates" Electrical Energy! Problem is you had to spend X to get it in the First Place anyway!

Thus: E = 1/2 LI 2

Lenz is the Drag on a Rotor when EMF is Generated and Loaded, its the Restrictive force, its what restricts the motoring forward of your rotor.

Thats why Lenz is Negative (-) its the reflectance of the Prime Mover Action. Limiting the Prime Mover Action's effectiveness.


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org


ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6882 on: April 25, 2016, 03:15:27 PM »
EMJ
You started this thread with an undeniable Zeal ,an" in your face" approach that most here were strongly encouraged by

after it was pointed out to you that you had made some significant errors and assumptions things changed dramatically.

it seems there is nothing simple about even the simplest circuits when in the hands of the Layman ! and it is all too easy
to make claims from the laymans Bench?

Running too an investigation is the true scientific method.


TinMan runs to the investigation ,a wonderful example

 you should try leading from in front  ,...[you started this thread in front]
instead of from Behind .[just posting other peoples  work now]

it got old a long long time ago !

you should Clear the air around here, one way or another !
or keep trying to lead from behind .

just one mans opinion ![probably Not ?]

Chet K


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6883 on: April 25, 2016, 11:10:25 PM »



Chet K

The only Assumptions that have errors in them, are, and always have been, everyone here that jumped in boots and all, building a circuit, that I presented from Stan Meyer! All with no further study of my presented Work.

The only errors ever made on this thread are the incompleteness of your efforts.

Had you investigated PROPERLY, had you LISTENED, had you used an insy bit of Common-sense, but I did expect nothing else... Simply failure by the masses here is exactly what I expected.

Thats why I chose to release a Circuit from someone else: You are telling the world that Stan Meyer was wrong!!!

When we know for sure, he was not!!!

A team of Electrical Engineers / Technicians have just recently, independantly replicated the exact same device. One particular person just recently told you of some of their results:

ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.


Again Ramset, your incompetence is not something I have control of!!!

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org



P.S: I have 53 Videos on my YouTube Channel, most of which are Public Videos, most all are Experiments I have shared, Experiments I have very clearly shown for many years. None of you studied and replicated any of them.

While you use Tinman as an example of stellar, you sit in your Arm Chair and Clap your hands, but really, the only person learning anything is Tinman!!!



« Last Edit: April 26, 2016, 01:28:17 AM by EMJunkie »

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #6884 on: April 25, 2016, 11:57:44 PM »



Most everyone is totally missing the point of all this.

Any and every demonstration of anything that is not understood by the observer will never be anything more than a MAGIC SHOW.

History has proven this many thousands of times! None learnt anything from any of the great Demonstrations ever!!!

Just recently I released a Video, it confirms the Electron Positron Pair work of Ioannis Xydous, his work is now called: E/M Inertial Warp Drive

My video: Inertial Mass Displacement - An amazing effect - What does a Coil really do on the core? - hyiq.org

How many times do you need to be shown something before you pick up the Ball?


The game is Life and you need to participate!!!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org