Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3501164 times)

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5145 on: September 16, 2015, 02:39:47 AM »
Now sir, you are choosing to believe that I made a choice when I did not,  as I chose neither neither Helen's nor Graeme's perceptions as reality and said they were both a "point of view" of events.

Perhaps your preconceived notions got in the way of a clear headed response. I never implied Helen's version was a delusion, you read that into it from those notions while  the sentence that followed was referring to something quite different.

"The easiest person to fool is yourself" RPF

Maybe that makes the sentence I wrote about "delusion" clearer.


Vortex, maybe your choice of words in character with the context was a distraction of meaning?

We now see how easy it is to perceive the unintended? I too saw your response as a little "Cup half Empty" rather than "Cup half Full" response. Apologies, I misunderstood what you wrote ;D

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5146 on: September 16, 2015, 04:21:17 AM »
well
I found out why Minnie cuts down all his trees

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEaAmUDEiGo

Ha ha!  Chet, that was excellent Sir.

Bill

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5147 on: September 16, 2015, 06:05:20 AM »
Now sir, you are choosing to believe that I made a choice when I did not,  as I chose neither neither Helen's nor Graeme's perceptions as reality and said they were both a "point of view" of events. I never even mentioned Helen's or Graeme's name nor implied that either one was delusional. The second sentence was a non sequitur, a different idea stated for a different purpose,  unrelated to the story.

Perhaps your preconceived notions got in the way of an accurate assessment. I never implied Helen's version was a delusion, nor Graeme's. You read that into it from those notions while  the sentence that followed was referring to something quite different. Go back and read it and show me where I said Helen was delusional.

Isn't that interesting!

"The easiest person to fool is yourself" RPF

Maybe that makes the sentence I wrote about "delusion" clearer.

Maybe different paragraphs would help when talking about two different things-as you did in your post before the last.

The point is this-there are now lies or delusions within that event as your single paragraph represents. Many here laugh at, and mok EMJ, but the fact is , he is basically right in what he is trying to put forward.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5149 on: September 16, 2015, 12:46:13 PM »

Many here laugh at, and mok EMJ, but the fact is , he is basically right in what he is trying to put forward.


@Tinman - Thank You!

I have thick Skin! ;D

It is sad that so many are so complacent in their realities that abound their daily lives! Engineers that could not engineer their way to the top of a Ladder, Genius's that could not logically think their way out of a Paper Bag, EE's that do not even know how the Circuits they build are Powered, Scientists that have not an idea on how Energy is Invoked, Physicist's that have no way of explaining how Induction is satisfied in any rational way.

You, my friend, are a Giant, thinking Practically and Sensibly, Experiments at the absolute highest level of understanding - Outstanding work Tinman.

My Posts are slow because Stefan still has me on Moderation! I am ok with this, because it appears that My Fellow Rival is at bay, so this the price we pay for some peace and rational on topic chat.

Congratulations!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org




tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5150 on: September 16, 2015, 12:47:20 PM »
So, did anyone have a look at Gunderson's transformer ?

Yes.
Also (even though hosted by Arron the rookie) watched the video of the interview with Graham.
This guy actually seems like a straight shooter,and careful measurements are very important to him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwbnMSIBTi8

He has a couple of patents it seem's,and the one listed below i have seen around the traps before.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20060163971

I have not been able to find a direct build schematic for his latest(apparent OU transformer) yet though.
What are your thoughts on this Verpies?.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5151 on: September 16, 2015, 01:53:35 PM »
He has a couple of patents it seem's,and the one listed below i have seen around the traps before.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20060163971
I know, I even drew a nice diagram of his first patent.
Itsu did some magnetoacoustic experiments based on the second patent.


I have not been able to find a direct build schematic for his latest(apparent OU transformer) yet though.
What are your thoughts on this Verpies?.
I think we need to see that instructional video about it that he sells for $35.
Smudge knows Gunderson personally and my father and I have corresponded with him 20 years ago but he probably does not rememeber me.

Vortex1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5152 on: September 16, 2015, 03:50:16 PM »
Graham Gunderson has a website where he claims he will be posting build info on his overunity transformer (COP slightly>1

http://grahamgunderson.com/

I wouldn't hold your breath waiting. There are $$$$ to be made selling a pamphlet with the "secret".

Timan:

Correct, the second sentence should have been in a new paragraph.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5153 on: September 16, 2015, 04:02:18 PM »
  I tried to build that same set up some years ago.  It did not work for me. 
I still have the wound core around. But, I used a 3 full turns of a 3/8 in thick stranded iron cable for the core, inside of the plastic core former. 
   I connected it up to a JT circuit. It worked like a normal JT would work, but that was all, no extra output in my case, only normal JT type of action and output noticed.
  Here's a pic of that core I made about 4 years ago.  I still have it,  it's bit dusty and rusty, the magnets are not on it any more.
It became my big JT project, instead. Another wasted effort...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2015, 08:55:19 PM by NickZ »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5154 on: September 16, 2015, 04:52:24 PM »
I tried to build that same set up some years ago.  It did not work for me.
Did you close the external flux paths with a potcore or something else ?  (look at my diagram)


Are you registered at overunityresearch.com ?  - I'd like you to show your build to Smudge who knows Graham Gunderson personally and probably has his own take on this device.
 

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5155 on: September 16, 2015, 09:15:41 PM »
  By all means, do so.  I would love to see this device working properly.
It's been so long ago that I don't remember what I did, then. Other that to try to run it as a JT circuit, to kick start it into operation, to get going on it's own. I had 3/4 by 1/8 inch round ceramic disk magnets on it then.
  I used the small pot on the transistor base to control any overheating of the transistor, and adjust voltages, and possibly the frequency, somewhat.
  It looked kind of like a TPU when I had it running. I wish that I had the old pictures of it when it was fully assembled with the magnets, drive circuit, and all. 
  I'd be interested in seeing any more current info, videos, on it, as I just saw this thread, but, I have not looked through it yet.
  Has someone got this running right? Over 100% OU? Or even self running, as yet?

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5156 on: September 16, 2015, 09:35:53 PM »



   I think a "Koala Test" ie. make two indentical devices and power one
off of the other. I feel this would show if there is something really there.
I consider that trying to "self loop" would be a step too far.
  If someone could pull this off there's good chance that they're on to
a winner.
             John.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5157 on: September 16, 2015, 11:19:01 PM »
Why would somebody who knows how to make an overunity device need to sell "instructional videos" for 35 dollars?




minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5158 on: September 16, 2015, 11:40:18 PM »



   The fellow on the video seemed to say that he was being paid to
work on a project.
     Seems a bit odd to me.
                 John.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #5159 on: September 17, 2015, 12:24:45 AM »
Did you close the external flux paths with a potcore or something else ?  (look at my diagram)


Are you registered at overunityresearch.com ?  - I'd like you to show your build to Smudge who knows Graham Gunderson personally and probably has his own take on this device.

  Verpies: I was register at OUR at one time, but not presently, although I never left that forum by my own choice. 
If someone would like to invite me there, again, I'll be glad to oblige. However, I do monitor it daily, in any case.
   I watched 1/2 of the presentation video, and got bored of it.  Nothing new, just talk, and more talk. I may have missed something, but I doubt it.  Seams like it's all about making some money from it, instead of disclosing any real useful information. 
   If that device is only slightly over unity, and does not self run, I don't see much use for it, for my intended purposes.
As it's been years since it was patented, and I haven't seen any actual proof of concept, nor any 3rd party replications of it.
 I hope that I can be proved wrong. But, slightly OU, is still a long ways away from being a self running magnetic current free energy type of device.
  It might be a good idea to start new thread on this particular device, if there is some interest in pursuing it further.