John:

Thank you for that link.  It all made sense and was a kind of mini refresher course for me.  The stuff about the gap energy was interesting and it never occurred to me.

However, like is often the case, there is still a huge problem:  If you are going to use an air gap then you need to explain your valid reason for doing it.  You need to back up your reason with measurements and numbers.  When is the last time you saw a free energy researcher determine what the saturation level was in his core for his chosen winding configuration and expected current and power levels and then make an intelligent design decision to add a gap of a certain thickness?  For me the answer is never and I am willing to bet for you the answer is never.

The main reason for the gap is to keep the saturating of the core at bay so that you don't run the risk of getting a huge current surge and meltdown based on your expected power throughput.  How many free energy researchers actually know that?

So my take on this is that people will but a gap in "because they can do it" without making any true design decisions.  They are just doing it by rote because they think they should be doing it.

That is simply no good.  It's just mindless paint-by-numbers copying from somebody else or mindless execution and they don't even know why.  In the real world we call that BS.

I know that these are sobering comments.  For this "bucking coils" project, I seriously doubt that anybody can intelligently articulate why they are "playing with the gap."  Playing with the gap certainly has nothing whatsoever to to with accessing any alleged extra power to achieve COP > 1.  Anybody is welcome to prove me wrong on this.

MileHigh

@TinselKoala,

Jerry Bayles has two block magnets magnetized through their thickness placed fields opposite to one another at the ends of a rotor strut pivoting on a central axle. How do you explain the frenzied twirling at the same 7.83 frequency of his spinning Chiral disks as Marco's toroid speaker magnets at the same orbo attraction neutralizing pulse frequency with the vast differences in magnet configuration?

It is a mechanical resonance caused by the geometry. Change the mass of the magnets or the length of the strut and watch the resonance occur at a different frequency. Watch the video and note that the magnets engage in "frenzied twirling" at many different readings of the... what?

Also, for the second time, where in the video is an actual measurement of frequency to hundredths of a Hz precision?

Magnetic standing wave around two variable speed disk magnets resonates with two small 'balance' magnets at the Schumann frequency (7.834 Hz) on the right side.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcVg_K3U-uk

Neither Jerrry nor Marco increase input to achieve the increased magnet reaction. The action's a cosequence of the frequency. The "bucking coils" behave the same way. You guys can fail at your attempts as you so often choose to do, but eveyone's already hip to your stinking "Gansdorf Sting".

Keep it up, your ignorance is slightly amusing. You don't even seem to know what a "standing wave" actually is. The action is a consequence of "the frequency" and the mechanical geometry of the parts. It has _nothing_ to do with Schumann resonances. Change the geometry and you will see the resonant frequency change as well.

It is a mechanical resonance caused by the geometry. Change the mass of the magnets or the length of the strut and watch the resonance occur at a different frequency. Watch the video and note that the magnets engage in "frenzied twirling" at many different readings of the... what?

Also, for the second time, where in the video is an actual measurement of frequency to hundredths of a Hz precision?

Keep it up, your ignorance is slightly amusing. You don't even seem to know what a "standing wave" actually is. The action is a consequence of "the frequency" and the mechanical geometry of the parts. It has _nothing_ to do with Schumann resonances. Change the geometry and you will see the resonant frequency change as well.

@TinselKoala,

You've got a lot of nerve calling me ignorant when you're just shooting it out your ass.

 Aim for around 25 - 40 Hz

What's Itzu have to say toward the end of his second video?

Koala, you start to piss me off. Take the F diode, put the wire as an anntena on one end, put the ground on the other end and put small speaker across the diode. And you will get your F speaker to work - F free work. F free lunch.

somebody say antennae ?
this man is convinced we can harvest much more from the spin fields inside ferrite

very very simple


http://bovan.net/gmweb2/The%20FS%20Loop.htm

Hi Ramset.  Did anybody actually experimented with that design?  A bit too long for quick reading Can you just describe it in two sentences what's happening in the cores and what it benefits from? it looks interesting anyway.

Hi Ramset. I'll take a look at it later.  I absolutely agree there is some potential in the ferrite rods. Especially ferromagnetic resonance - Akula is one who plays with this domain.  Also magnetic delay can be handful for our devices.