Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3501558 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #390 on: January 27, 2015, 11:22:38 PM »
@MileHigh,

You "Cocksuckers' nuke chickenshit! TinselKoala ran me ragged because I mistakingly called a relay a switch once. Technically relays are in the switch group. I resented the fucking "Trash Hound" belittling me that greatly me over something so small.

You have a long history of ... shall we say... inaccurate misrepresentation of the work of others, and you yourself have made many claims for which you cannot provide evidence. If you don't want to be belittled... stop belittling YOURSELF with your childish, pottymouth insults and start being rational and ACCURATE in what you claim.

But I know that will never happen, because you have had ample opportunity to demonstrate the truth already, and you have never yet done so.


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #391 on: January 27, 2015, 11:47:49 PM »
Quote from: propellanttech
Not sure what I'm looking for if I build Chris' design.

Yes, that is rather the problem isn't it. But it's not your fault, because he has not provided the measurements that support his overunity claims.

EMJunkie has presented in this thread and the pdf: Claims without measurements in support of the claims. Misunderstanding of simple principles of electronics and measurement. Nonsensical schematics without clarification. An attitude of  non-cooperation and false superiority, even when demonstrably wrong.

So you tell me then. What ARE you looking for when you build something according to Chris's design?

Will you duplicate the nonsensical mosfet and current-monitoring arrangement in the "Exp1 and 2" schematics, as I did? What measurements will you accept as indications of 1.7x OU? How will you know that you aren't just wasting your time, spinning your wheels? Do you have the necessary experience to use an oscilloscope properly, to avoid instrument groundloops, to interpret waveforms without relying on "numbers in boxes" from DSOs.... or do you just push the "Auto" button and display scope measurements that have nothing to do with the real issues at hand?

And by the way... there certainly ARE transformers with one loop of wire as primary and/or secondary... even autotransformers with just a single loop and a tap. For just one example, my wireless power transmitter/receiver system is essentially an aircore transformer with a single loop as primary and another, distant, single loop as secondary. For another, the shaded-pole motors that are all around us use one-turn high current loops as "secondary" : the shading coil. If one doesn't understand a single loop's electromagnetic interactions, one won't be able to understand what happens when many loops are stacked, as in bucking or aiding inductor windings.  For a good example of this, see EMJunkie's pdf for Experiments 1 and 2, where he demonstrates that heavy inductances respond at lower frequencies than lighter inductances, and seems to completely  misunderstand why.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #392 on: January 27, 2015, 11:54:20 PM »
Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #393 on: January 27, 2015, 11:58:54 PM »
Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

Many are wondering if this guy has an off button...and if so, where the hell is it ?

Regards...


synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #394 on: January 28, 2015, 12:25:21 AM »
You have a long history of ... shall we say... inaccurate misrepresentation of the work of others, and you yourself have made many claims for which you cannot provide evidence. If you don't want to be belittled... stop belittling YOURSELF with your childish, pottymouth insults and start being rational and ACCURATE in what you claim.

But I know that will never happen, because you have had ample opportunity to demonstrate the truth already, and you have never yet done so.

I never misrepresented anything you asshole. Give me one example where I misrepresented something. Nor have I ever claimed anything without accurate evidence. You're just completly full of shit. You excoriated me because I claimed your bifilar pancake coil threw a larger spark in your dumb comparison video, and you denied that when its plain for anybody to see. Now your ignoring the Shumman resonance frequency once again pretending Jerry Bayles needs a crib pacifier.

propellanttech

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #395 on: January 28, 2015, 12:29:28 AM »
Yes, that is rather the problem isn't it. But it's not your fault, because he has not provided the measurements that support his overunity claims.

EMJunkie has presented in this thread and the pdf: Claims without measurements in support of the claims. Misunderstanding of simple principles of electronics and measurement. Nonsensical schematics without clarification. An attitude of  non-cooperation and false superiority, even when demonstrably wrong.

So you tell me then. What ARE you looking for when you build something according to Chris's design?

Will you duplicate the nonsensical mosfet and current-monitoring arrangement in the "Exp1 and 2" schematics? What measurements will you accept as indications of 1.7x OU? How will you know that you aren't just wasting your time, spinning your wheels? Do you have the necessary experience to use an oscilloscope properly, to avoid instrument groundloops, to interpret waveforms without relying on "numbers in boxes" from DSOs.... or do you just push the "Auto" button and display scope measurements that have nothing to do with the real issues at hand?

And by the way... there certainly ARE transformers with one loop of wire as primary and/or secondary... even autotransformers with just a single loop and a tap. For just one example, my wireless power transmitter/receiver system is essentially an aircore transformer with a single loop as primary and another, distant, single loop as secondary. For another, the shaded-pole motors that are all around us use one-turn high current loops as "secondary" : the shading coil. If one doesn't understand a single loop's electromagnetic interactions, one won't be able to understand what happens when many loops are stacked, as in bucking or aiding inductor windings.  For a good example of this, see EMJunkie's pdf for Experiments 1 and 2, where he demonstrates that heavy inductances respond at lower frequencies than lighter inductances, and seems to completely  misunderstand why.

TK

I'll find what I find, and whatever it is, it will be wisdom. That is what I'm looking for.

As for experience....I have plenty, and I'm not going to spell that out for you. It's really not important to this discussion. If I waste my time building the circuit, it is mine to waste. If you want to get into a penile  measuring contest about who has the most usable experience......you may find I'm a good competitor.

Will you show me a manufactured transformer with one loop? I didn't say winding. I said loop. Don't confuse what I said, with what you think I said. When you start winding, things get perplexing about loop configuration. Don't go with the book method.....that doesn't work with someone who knows not everything is in a book. Also, anything made by you doesn't necessarily fit theory, and an antenna is not a transformer. Their purpose is different, you even stated as much with "transmitter/receiver"....so......... Loops in motors are not in a transformer.  A flyback could possibly use one single loop, but that is a different beast than we are talking about, even then.....it would be rare, but I guess I'll state I may be wrong on that one transformer, which has nothing to do with the current debate.

I also noticed your coils are not wound orthocyclic .....may I ask why?

As for EMJ's items, I can't really defend or accuse him of what he did, or didn't do. The point is moot, for he is no longer here.

James

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #396 on: January 28, 2015, 12:36:44 AM »
Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

@MileHigh,

Conrad's just one of your boot Licking stooges. He scored a 5 to 1 input to output COP on his wireless transmitter, probably because he forgot to wind serial bifilar coils.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #397 on: January 28, 2015, 12:41:59 AM »
I never misrepresented anything you asshole. Give me one example where I misrepresented something. Nor have I ever claimed anything without accurate evidence. You're just completly full of shit.

Your whole "delayed Lenz effect hyper-velocity super-duper Lenz propulsion" threads are gross misrepresentations of reality.  If the EEVblog guy ever read them and made a response video you would not be happy.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #398 on: January 28, 2015, 12:42:49 AM »
Conrad's one of your boot Licking stooges.

No he isn't.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #399 on: January 28, 2015, 12:44:42 AM »
Your whole "delayed Lenz effect hyper-velocity super-duper Lenz propulsion" threads are gross misrepresentations of reality.  If the EEVblog guy ever read them and made a response video you would not be happy.

You have your head buried one MileHigh up your ass.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #400 on: January 28, 2015, 12:52:39 AM »
Can you just stop that nonsense talk?  Everybody knows your super-super spinner threads are not real just like they know Mickey Mouse is not real.  Your brazen posting about yourself was simply not true.

With two or possibly three or more replications, the truth will come out and knowing you you will have nothing to say when the results are in.

orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #401 on: January 28, 2015, 12:53:25 AM »
I believe it is time to censor and suppress the opinions of the dissenters.
They are not able to keep their mouths shut when adults talk.
This is a forum for open-minded overunity research and those paid underunity/NWO shills/trolls should go away and discuss their beliefs elsewhere. Imagine if this forum were a Mosque and a bunch of orthodox Jews would turn up everyday and interrupt the Imam everytime and spread their unbeliever bullshit and filth and insult the prophet.
 

propellanttech

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #402 on: January 28, 2015, 12:57:19 AM »
I believe it is time to censor and suppress the opinions of the dissenters.
They are not able to keep their mouths shut when adults talk.
This is a forum for open-minded overunity research and those paid underunity/NWO shills/trolls should go away and discuss their beliefs elsewhere. Imagine if this forum were a Mosque and a bunch of orthodox Jews would turn up everyday and interrupt the Imam everytime and spread their unbeliever bullshit and filth and insult the prophet.

There are no prophets or gods....it's just a bunch of non-sense and or hooie.  ;)

I have this book, and it says........

I just tune them out. With every avenue of experimentation, you will have a percentage of "nay-sayers". Those are the ones that "believe" all knowledge has been found and proven.

If I do the experiment and find (with Chris' help) that he is not truly representing the output, I will then call him on it. Till then, I keep my opinions to myself. But if I ever do an experiment that does output what the author claims....I will also call out the "nay-sayers", but they will not be around.

James

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #403 on: January 28, 2015, 01:11:18 AM »
Can you just stop that nonsense talk?  Everybody knows your super-super spinner threads are not real just like they know Mickey Mouse is not real.  Your brazen posting about yourself was simply not true.

With two or possibly three or more replications, the truth will come out and knowing you you will have nothing to say when the results are in.

Everybody knows you have your head up your ass.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #404 on: January 28, 2015, 01:14:24 AM »
Floyd Sweet was down in a low Shumman 7.83 multiple =432 Hertz range, not up in the mega-hertz like Itsuable.

Quote from Sparky Sweet:

"Output 24.2 volts by 4.6 amps =111watts frequency 388 and 402 Hz"

Try 7.83 Hertz and see what happens. Take a good look at Jerry Bayles video with "bucking disks" spinning at that frequency.