Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 896232
  • *Total Topics: 15781
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 2630345 times)

Offline John.K1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7560 on: December 31, 2016, 11:47:29 AM »
Happy new year Chris. All the best.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7560 on: December 31, 2016, 11:47:29 AM »

Offline nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 665
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7561 on: December 31, 2016, 12:25:32 PM »



Nelson, well done my friend!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLC7684829E98CAD74&v=_u81edIeqIY

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org
Hi Chris thanks , by cumpliments . Wish you a great new year !

Offline Jeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7562 on: December 31, 2016, 01:22:01 PM »

Walt Rosenthal shared a similar diagram:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Just great example showing  the interaction between magnetic flux, and juice that flows inside conductors. Which at the end, shows that both consist of the same ''material''.
Also, in this circuit case, it would be like a dielectric explosion when switch turns off. Constructive interference between the 90 degrees coils, enhancing more the intensity of the explosion which already takes place even without the horizontal coils.

Hi Chris, thanks for your endless contribution. I wish you and all a happy new year. ;)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7562 on: December 31, 2016, 01:22:01 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7563 on: January 01, 2017, 01:04:05 AM »



I have met so many good people here and in my time before ou.com. I really enjoy what I do, sharing Concepts, ideas and try to stimulate progress!

Being able to see the progress of others is my reward! Those that are focused, have direction and know where they are looking.

It is true, today we are seeing more progress by individuals than ever before! My problem is that it is not as much as I would like to see. Many have no will to investigate "Where Electrical Energy is Manifested"



Back to our Wire Concept:

If we were to take an analogy, one where we have a single Wire, one that is completely Insulated, with no conductive opening to a Load. A completely Insulated piece of Wire.

This piece of Wire happens to be wound around a Pole Piece of the Stator in a "Generator" with a Rotor at full RPM's.

None of the EMF that is "Generated" in the "Generator", inside the Copper Wire, the Conductor, can escape, all EMF is contained, like Water is contained in a Bucket!


Like the Bucket, if we were to make a hole, in the Insulation/Plastic, then we have an Exit Point for the Electrons/Water to flow.


So, the medium is completely contained Inside the Insulator/Plastic - The Medium being Electrons or Charged Particles inside the Wire, or Water inside the Bucket.

The Magnetic Field is a direct result of the Flow of Electrons, Current (I). A flow of Water is also termed as a Current.


Lenz's Law is Directly a Result of the Magnetic, the Current, switch off the Current, there is no more Magnetic, no more Lenz's Drag, also no Output.

Another way to do this is, Induce another Magnetic, Current then becomes: I = da+ + da- : which is approximately 2x the Current that was initially Induced as Floyd Sweet told us, then the Drag on our Input is reduced, and we keep an Output - Simply by Inducing a third Action. Not normally thought of or even considered. This is Partnered Output Coils.

Picture this Illustration:

The Magnetic Field is increasing with the applied current over time, we have a 3D structure: Electric Field - A Vector Potential.png

There is a Curl, I sometimes refer to this as a Spin, that is directly associated with this Structure: A Vector Potential.png

On top of this structure there is another Symmetrical Structure (Partnered Output Coils), split into two parts, separated by the Bloch Wall: A Vector Potential.png

The Partnered Output Coils are two Coils, with Current (I) that is each traveling in opposite Directions. The initial Structure has Current that is traveling in a Single Direction, so Mathematically: 1 + -1 = 0

If the Current in both Partnered Output Coils is sufficient to keep the Magnetic Field high enough, we have induced a NEW point of Equilibrium. We have manipulated Nature's Yin Yang:


Quote from: Nikola Tesla

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe.

Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.



What is Kinetic Energy: Energy which a body possesses by virtue of being in motion.


Quote from: https://www.brightstorm.com/science/physics/heat-and-thermodynamics/kinetic-and-potential-energy-of-atoms/

Kinetic and potential energy of atoms result from the motion of electrons. When electrons are excited they move to a higher energy orbital farther away from the atom. The further the orbital is from the nucleus, the higher the potential energy of an electron at that energy level. When the electron returns to a low energy state, it releases the potential energy in the form of kinetic energy.



So, any and all Charged Particles that are in motion, including Electrons in motion, are Kinetic... Obtainable at any point in the Universe, yes this is Mass Energy!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



Offline partzman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7564 on: January 01, 2017, 01:24:59 AM »


Partzman - No, you're not "one of those dummies", you led many for a long time! Did all the hard work for others.

Then took your work to a private bench because others persuaded you to, so there was no benefit to the community, just to those that have private access to your private bench.

I believe we are seeing some sort of pattern here now...

I most certainly do not expect anyone to "Fall into Line"! I expect people to use common sense, to make educated decisions. Logical decisions.

The world was shown the best demonstration, with the top of the line "Measurement Equipment" by a skilled and experienced Electrical Engineer - Yes, Graham Gunderson - Yet you of all people ask for proof?

I cannot show you proof of this level, I have budget equipment, my Electrical Engineering Skills are not at Gunderson's Level, I have, however shown for many years proof of concepts, using the exact same configurations, yet you still ask for proof?

YOU are all letting these technologies slip away from you - YOU need to study this with all you have, never let this get away from you like you starting to.

THIS IS SO IMPORTANT!!!

It is the Time Rate of Change between the Coils, which is Electromagnetic Induction that Pumps the Energy we are looking for! It is the Third Coil and the Magnetic Field from it that reduces the direct effect of Lenz's Law back on the Primary Coil which opens the door to increase in Output to Input.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: I am very happy to see that this post has stirred up the Pot and got some attention!!! Like I said, this is very important! Our technology is slowly moving away from Transformers and Coils as we see today, moving into solid-state switching and so on, much change we have seen already!!!

The next generation will know very little, and have nearly no experience with Transformers and so on, just like we today have little experience with Magnetic Amplifiers and Saturable Reactors!!!

It is NOW or never!!!

Chris,

I'm not sure what you are referring to when you comment that I have gone "silent".  I continue to post my work on OUR and if there are periods of time with no postings from me, it is because I have hit a wall in my research.  I'm also a little confused by what I am missing technically as you state above.  So, as an example to perhaps remedy your opinions above, I've attached a paper below which discloses one version of my MEI (Magneto Electric Induction) research efforts.  This was openly posted on the OUR forum under my MEI bench for all to see plus all the up to date results of this work as well.

As can be seen, this device has a negative input power of -21.17w or -33.24w referenced to the sinewave on CH1 depending on the source of current measurement.  The output power is a real 33.2w rms.  This is the type of POC that I referred to in my post.  This is fully documented and replicable by those knowledgeable in the art.  Is this device capable of self running?  At this point in time no, but that is the goal of course once certain technical difficulties are overcome.

In regards to Graham G, I openly provided all my work in attempting to replicate his device both on the bench and via simulation.  I personally concluded that no positive results were going to be seen by my efforts unless he were to provide additional info so I quit on the project. 

pm

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7564 on: January 01, 2017, 01:24:59 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7565 on: January 01, 2017, 02:15:58 AM »
Chris,

I'm not sure what you are referring to when you comment that I have gone "silent".  I continue to post my work on OUR and if there are periods of time with no postings from me, it is because I have hit a wall in my research.  I'm also a little confused by what I am missing technically as you state above.  So, as an example to perhaps remedy your opinions above, I've attached a paper below which discloses one version of my MEI (Magneto Electric Induction) research efforts.  This was openly posted on the OUR forum under my MEI bench for all to see plus all the up to date results of this work as well.

As can be seen, this device has a negative input power of -21.17w or -33.24w referenced to the sinewave on CH1 depending on the source of current measurement.  The output power is a real 33.2w rms.  This is the type of POC that I referred to in my post.  This is fully documented and replicable by those knowledgeable in the art.  Is this device capable of self running?  At this point in time no, but that is the goal of course once certain technical difficulties are overcome.

In regards to Graham G, I openly provided all my work in attempting to replicate his device both on the bench and via simulation.  I personally concluded that no positive results were going to be seen by my efforts unless he were to provide additional info so I quit on the project. 

pm




Hi PartzMan - You need not defend your work, I am not criticising anyone's work, I was appealing to the lack of direction that was very apparent.

The thing is, you reported good results, and also were heading in the right direction, you either had it working or were very close to it!

You see, Graham G's scope shots tell an odd storey, there is a lot going on in there, much is not apparent because of the lack of Probes on both Output Coils - But, I can tell you this, GG's device works the same, he uses a big Spike to do what we have looked at for a long time. You have, and others have already stated this over at OUR.com:

Quote

In other words, an "EMJunkie" type arrangement. Am I thinking about this secondary winding arrangement correctly?



Quote

I'm somewhat familiar with EMJ's work but tend to think more towards the energy shuttling in these circuits myself.



Quote

Lets hope this doesn't stick, I would hate to see EMJ get credit for an age old non-inductive winding technique.


Logically, what is a Spike in Current?

Yes, its the Time Rate of Change of Fluxes, between two Coils. This is the "Synchronous Rectification" he was talking about. The "Synchronous Rectification" holds both Coils at the same state until TDC, he then drops the state of one coil, causing the Spike, the Time Rate of Change, and we see a massive change in Current on that Coil, it completely reverses its Sine!

Induction occurs all the way through the Cycle, but the Output Coils are in Reverse, Magnetic Fields Opposing for only part of the Cycle. The Field opposition only occurs at the Spike (Black Arrow) - It is at this point where the Magnetic Fields from the Two Output Coils Oppose, is where the excess Energy "Generation" occurs. This ends at the Red Arrow See below.

Please remember, many roads lead to Rome, this is not the only way!

I promise you, if you stay on track, you will succeed!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: Of course, Time is increasing in the X Axis and Amplitude in the Y Axis as we would expect to see in the typical Cartesian Coordinate System.

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7566 on: January 01, 2017, 02:51:53 AM »



@PartzMan - Why is it that these two Output Coils Oppose?

How is it that the Sine of one of these Coils can change at Peak Magnetic Field? And change so quickly?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7566 on: January 01, 2017, 02:51:53 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7567 on: January 01, 2017, 03:55:51 AM »


We must admit, Graham Gunderson has shown a device that Does Tick All The Boxes!!!

It cant be denied, no matter how much people may try to deny it.

Thing is, GG's device supports every single device that has been shown throughout History that has a similar Configuration!

So, what are we looking for? Yes that's right! A Method Of Turbo Charging Electromagnetic Induction Well Beyond What We Would Normally See In An Electric "Generator"

Reducing the total Reflected Lenz's Law Effects back on the Input -0 But we still Need Lenz's Law it is Kinetic Energy!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org
« Last Edit: January 01, 2017, 06:07:55 AM by EMJunkie »

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7568 on: January 01, 2017, 06:17:07 AM »



I want to answer for PartzMan, but do not want to miss his answer!

I hope the above picture will stimulate some interesting responses!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: You can see the Current wave form here. Look at the Voltage also. Also look at the input, no change, a nearly perfect 90 Degrees is maintained. Why?



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7568 on: January 01, 2017, 06:17:07 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7569 on: January 01, 2017, 07:00:49 AM »



"Very soon, the intelligence we create, will surpass the Intelligence we possess, on that day we will become slaves forever! I hope that Intelligence has a Soul!"

"Not that we have not already enslaved Ourselves!"

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Offline partzman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7570 on: January 01, 2017, 06:40:28 PM »


@PartzMan - Why is it that these two Output Coils Oppose?

How is it that the Sine of one of these Coils can change at Peak Magnetic Field? And change so quickly?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Chris,

The answer to your above question IMO is not a simple one.  It involves a complete analysis of Graham's device and I will give my opinions in the following which is a result of my tests and simulations and may or may not be correct.

Graham's MIT design yields poor coupling between the primary and secondaries resulting in a substantial leakage inductance in which energy can be stored and manipulated.  Events may therefore occur in the secondaries without affecting the primary depending on circuit conditions.  My analysis suggests that the secondaries are not in a bucking mode for most of the complete cycle of operation but only during a short period when the output mosfets are switching out of phase with each other producing the quick reversal in the output current.  This reversal is the result of a combination of factors including stored energy in the leakage inductance, PM flux bias in the cores, gap energy, complex power flows EXH, etc.  With the secondaries in a buck mode during this short interval, their influence on the cores is mostly not seen by the primary due to the cancelling flux flow directions with reference to the primary.

The following is taken from one of my posts on OUR.

"Below are three sim variations using different means to create a bucking condition between the secondaries L2 and L4 while using the H bridge as the front end.  The primary current I(L1) is shown reversed with a minus sign for comparison to Graham's scope trace. The secondaries are connected in parallel to the load with L2 being switched identical in all three versions and L4 controlled to produce the bucking conditions during the short "off" period pulse interval.

In the first version "A", M6 that switches L4 has zero volts on the gate and therefore acts as a diode using the substrate for conduction. Although not shown for clarity, this results in L4 conducting current to the load during the time the field in L2 is collapsing thus creating bucking mmfs between L2 and L4.  The result is seen as a reversal of current in L2 with less change seen in L1. L4 does collapse immediately following the collapse of L2.

In the next version "B", M5 and M6 alternately switch L2 and L4 respectively for each cycle. IOW, when one secondary is switched off for a brief period and allowed to collapse, the other secondary remains conducting and vice versa. This action creates the bucking mmf fields with the alternating current reversals in each secondary more pronounced with less affect on the primary.

In version "C", M5 and M6 are switched with the same timing on their gates. The collapse of L4 is delayed by the addition of C3 which effectively spreads the collapse over ~10us. IOW, L2 collapses rapidly while L4 slowly collapses which again creates bucking fields between L2 and L4. The other result of this design is that I(L2) recovers more slowly in an upward ramp which most resembles Graham's wave forms. IMO however, it is the presence of the PM bias in the cores that create Graham's output wave forms.

So, my conclusion is that Graham's device has bucking fields existing between the secondaries during the brief "off" period. Oddly enough, if the gate drive voltage to M6 is the inverse of the gate drive to M5, the results will be identical to version "A".

pm"

The sims referred to are attached and are self explanatory for the most part.  One must keep in mind that these particular sims use linear inductors with no PM bias and yet GG1_2SecC comes close to replicating Graham's waveforms.

I must say that having worked with Graham, Cyril Smith, Fred Epps, and others at MPI for a period, I have the utmost respect for the man and his accomplishments but until he releases more info, it is like shooting ducks in the dark to replicate his device. 

The problem with reactive to real OU converters like Graham's MIT and my MEI is that at some point one must be able to feed the negative energy portions of the cycle back to the dc supply feeding the sine generating means.  Otherwise they are only conceptual OU devices and not actual OU devices.  If the operating frequencies are low enough to allow efficient sine wave synthesis, then by using mosfets in both forward and reverse conduction modes, an actual OU device can be realized.  Current sine wave inverter designs that can handle reactive loads use such techniques.

pm


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7570 on: January 01, 2017, 06:40:28 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7571 on: January 01, 2017, 10:10:37 PM »
Chris,

The answer to your above question IMO is not a simple one.  It involves a complete analysis of Graham's device and I will give my opinions in the following which is a result of my tests and simulations and may or may not be correct.

Graham's MIT design yields poor coupling between the primary and secondaries resulting in a substantial leakage inductance in which energy can be stored and manipulated.  Events may therefore occur in the secondaries without affecting the primary depending on circuit conditions.  My analysis suggests that the secondaries are not in a bucking mode for most of the complete cycle of operation but only during a short period when the output mosfets are switching out of phase with each other producing the quick reversal in the output current.  This reversal is the result of a combination of factors including stored energy in the leakage inductance, PM flux bias in the cores, gap energy, complex power flows EXH, etc.  With the secondaries in a buck mode during this short interval, their influence on the cores is mostly not seen by the primary due to the cancelling flux flow directions with reference to the primary.

The following is taken from one of my posts on OUR.

"Below are three sim variations using different means to create a bucking condition between the secondaries L2 and L4 while using the H bridge as the front end.  The primary current I(L1) is shown reversed with a minus sign for comparison to Graham's scope trace. The secondaries are connected in parallel to the load with L2 being switched identical in all three versions and L4 controlled to produce the bucking conditions during the short "off" period pulse interval.

In the first version "A", M6 that switches L4 has zero volts on the gate and therefore acts as a diode using the substrate for conduction. Although not shown for clarity, this results in L4 conducting current to the load during the time the field in L2 is collapsing thus creating bucking mmfs between L2 and L4.  The result is seen as a reversal of current in L2 with less change seen in L1. L4 does collapse immediately following the collapse of L2.

In the next version "B", M5 and M6 alternately switch L2 and L4 respectively for each cycle. IOW, when one secondary is switched off for a brief period and allowed to collapse, the other secondary remains conducting and vice versa. This action creates the bucking mmf fields with the alternating current reversals in each secondary more pronounced with less affect on the primary.

In version "C", M5 and M6 are switched with the same timing on their gates. The collapse of L4 is delayed by the addition of C3 which effectively spreads the collapse over ~10us. IOW, L2 collapses rapidly while L4 slowly collapses which again creates bucking fields between L2 and L4. The other result of this design is that I(L2) recovers more slowly in an upward ramp which most resembles Graham's wave forms. IMO however, it is the presence of the PM bias in the cores that create Graham's output wave forms.

So, my conclusion is that Graham's device has bucking fields existing between the secondaries during the brief "off" period. Oddly enough, if the gate drive voltage to M6 is the inverse of the gate drive to M5, the results will be identical to version "A".

pm"

The sims referred to are attached and are self explanatory for the most part.  One must keep in mind that these particular sims use linear inductors with no PM bias and yet GG1_2SecC comes close to replicating Graham's waveforms.

I must say that having worked with Graham, Cyril Smith, Fred Epps, and others at MPI for a period, I have the utmost respect for the man and his accomplishments but until he releases more info, it is like shooting ducks in the dark to replicate his device. 

The problem with reactive to real OU converters like Graham's MIT and my MEI is that at some point one must be able to feed the negative energy portions of the cycle back to the dc supply feeding the sine generating means.  Otherwise they are only conceptual OU devices and not actual OU devices.  If the operating frequencies are low enough to allow efficient sine wave synthesis, then by using mosfets in both forward and reverse conduction modes, an actual OU device can be realized.  Current sine wave inverter designs that can handle reactive loads use such techniques.

pm



Hi PartzMan - I think much of your post re-iterates what I had posted here:




Hi PartzMan - You need not defend your work, I am not criticising anyone's work, I was appealing to the lack of direction that was very apparent.

The thing is, you reported good results, and also were heading in the right direction, you either had it working or were very close to it!

You see, Graham G's scope shots tell an odd storey, there is a lot going on in there, much is not apparent because of the lack of Probes on both Output Coils - But, I can tell you this, GG's device works the same, he uses a big Spike to do what we have looked at for a long time. You have, and others have already stated this over at OUR.com:



Logically, what is a Spike in Current?

Yes, its the Time Rate of Change of Fluxes, between two Coils. This is the "Synchronous Rectification" he was talking about. The "Synchronous Rectification" holds both Coils at the same state until TDC, he then drops the state of one coil, causing the Spike, the Time Rate of Change, and we see a massive change in Current on that Coil, it completely reverses its Sine!

Induction occurs all the way through the Cycle, but the Output Coils are in Reverse, Magnetic Fields Opposing for only part of the Cycle. The Field opposition only occurs at the Spike (Black Arrow) - It is at this point where the Magnetic Fields from the Two Output Coils Oppose, is where the excess Energy "Generation" occurs. This ends at the Red Arrow See below.

Please remember, many roads lead to Rome, this is not the only way!

I promise you, if you stay on track, you will succeed!

P.S: Of course, Time is increasing in the X Axis and Amplitude in the Y Axis as we would expect to see in the typical Cartesian Coordinate System.



I agree with much of what you say, and again your work is very good, but I don't agree with all of it. It is true that documentation of Energy "Generating" devices such as these is poor, it will be poor for sometime to come.

Lets face it, the smartest minds on the Planet have not solved this Conundrum simply because much is still not understood! Thus the reason we do not see these devices redily available to the greater portion of the Marketplace.



MPI  and all the other companies that Mark Goldes has had, seem to have never "Produced" anything, all brilliant minds that worked for him, including Graham Gunderson, but no Visible progress.


Mark Goldes Funded Floyd Sweet, and Mark openly tells people that Floyd Sweets Device was a fraud.


There Is so much I could say but will not here, there is no need to go off topic.



Floyd Sweet was 100% Genuine!!! - The problem was, Floyd Sweet was not using Original Proprietary Technology! He had learnt this technology as I have, as many here have, this is super old Technology! It has been Re-Discovered, Learnt from age old  hand me downs...

Yes, many, many have used this same tech, 1871 Daniel McFarland Cook, EXACTLY the same schematic as Floyd Sweet!!! Some 146 Years ago.

Anyway, this is neither here nor there, the point is, today we know 90% of this tech, there is 10% guess work, which is better than ever before!

Of course, I agree, Grahams Output Coils do buck, the Fields oppose each other. I have shown where they oppose on the Image attached to the above Post, and also again below.

The Spike we see is, where the Sine of the Current flips, is indicative of the Impedance of the Coils at the time of switching, we see such a large Spike simply because the Coils are put into a VERY Low Impedance value because of the Configuration! The Magnetic Field that is at peak when this switch occurs actually reduces the Impedance Value even further.

Much of the Circuitry on GG's Output is redundant, 90% or so is not needed. I like the idea of the Magneto-Isolators (IL710's), but I think you should look up the Response Times on them, in combination with the Response Times on the Fets (not sure of the partnumber), see if that gives you any clues.

Yes the Coupling is very poor on GG's device. This is not important as the way the output Coils work, or can work, will reduce the total reflection back on the Input anyway. A Loose Coupling is a requirement, these devices are typically loosely coupled, simply because of the ideas behind them.

Like I said: 1 + -1 = 0

Partnered Output Coil One Magnetic Field = 1 = O1
Partnered Output Coil Two Magnetic Field = -1 = O2

Input Primary Magnetic Field = 1 = IP

So:

   IP - (O1 - O2) = 1


Which is what we started with: 1

We use Magnetic Fields, the Magnetic Fields can be used as a Pump, they Pump Electrons, Inside the Copper Wire, which inturn Pump more Electrons Inside the Wire. The Hydraulic Ram Pump works EXACTLY the same way, some 300 years old. 

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7572 on: January 01, 2017, 11:30:41 PM »
Electrical Energy IS the Electrons inside the Copper Conductor, the Copper Wire IS our Battery, the Source of Energy, we ONLY have to make this Energy Move Efficiently, this is our Job as Engineers, Engineering Lenz's Law, to Free Electrons and get them Flowing, Current (I), which is done by the Change of the Magnetic Field: Electromagnetic Induction.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

_____________________________________________________

You're a bit off here.

Electrical Energy IS the Electrons inside the Copper Conductor-

There are no electrons INSIDE a copper wire so no spiraling "flow", just the mass (of the wire), which is highly compressed space.


the Copper Wire IS our Battery, the Source of Energy-

The copper wire is NOT our source, it is a means to transmit negative electrons by way of the Hole Theory, from the source to the load.

The/A battery in a circuit is NOT the source. Bearden says a battery is a dipole (two poles obviously) and is merely a collector/antenna between the source and the load. He says the battery in his circuit connects his 3D symmetric system, to the open, 4D, assymmetric system of open space. Open 4D space IS the source.

Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7573 on: January 01, 2017, 11:49:24 PM »



@PartzMan - Going further...

Quote from: Smudge

I have to admit to being completely baffled by this waveform since it is showing current outside the load connected region. Without having access to the circuit and exactly what was measured I cannot take this any further.


Smudge was talking directly about the Output Current Wave Form. Like I said:


You see, Graham G's scope shots tell an odd storey, there is a lot going on in there, much is not apparent because of the lack of Probes on both Output Coils - But, I can tell you this, GG's device works the same, he uses a big Spike to do what we have looked at for a long time. You have, and others have already stated this over at OUR.com:


When a Diver, Dives under a Large Volume of Water, his body takes time to adjust to the Water Pressure, this is more evident on the way back up, The Bends, or Decompression Sickness (DCS).

Magnetic Fields, when the Source is a Current Flow in a Wire, also take Time to adjust to each Other. We know this as the Impedance, the AC Resistance, the Resistance to change of the Magnetic Field. We both know all this already!

When two Magnetic Fields are in such a fashion as to Oppose like this, like I have shown for Years now, things are not as we would expect! What we might expect to see as an Impedance (Z), that can be completely different to what we would expect to see, when we have Magnetic Fields under Stress! The Coils Impedance can be nearly Zero, or even further.

So, amazingly, and no one has touched on this, even though I have bought this up many times, there can be No Resistance to the Change In Magnetic Field!!! This is massively Important!

We can see Magnetic Field Changes in a VERY much shorter Time than we would normally expect! We can see on GG's Scope Shot that the Current, which is also the Magnetic Field, changes, from one Sine to the Other, in a very short time! About 400ns if my Math is correct.

Below, the distance between the two Yellow lines, is the time it takes for the Magnetic Fields to Balance, we have next to no DCS. Simply because the Pressure between the Coils remain High all at the same time as the Magnetic Field is High.

Now, this is Super Important to see: Like in ALL "Generators" the Magnetic Field is going to Change in Time, but the Partnered Output Coils are Now the "Generator" - This means one of the Coils is still in the same state that is was a split second before the switching, this coil can not change its state, it is now the Source of the Magnetic Field in the "Generator"!

As Time increments, the Magnetic Field will slowly decrease, which we see on the scope. The Magnetic Fields between each one of the Partnered Output Coils is Opposite, one + and one -

IMPORTANT: This means One Coil is IN PHASE with the Input, meaning the Magnetic Fields are in the Same Direction, the Flow of Current is in the same direction, one Coil Assists in the Self Oscillation characteristics!!!

Of course GG switched off his input part Cycle, which he must, because the Time for the Magnetic Fields to do work in "Generating" Excess Electrical Energy would overlap on the Input other wise because of his Devices Geometry.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


Offline EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #7574 on: January 02, 2017, 12:04:36 AM »
Electrical Energy IS the Electrons inside the Copper Conductor, the Copper Wire IS our Battery, the Source of Energy, we ONLY have to make this Energy Move Efficiently, this is our Job as Engineers, Engineering Lenz's Law, to Free Electrons and get them Flowing, Current (I), which is done by the Change of the Magnetic Field: Electromagnetic Induction.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

_____________________________________________________

You're a bit off here.

Electrical Energy IS the Electrons inside the Copper Conductor-

There are no electrons INSIDE a copper wire so no spiraling "flow", just the mass (of the wire), which is highly compressed space.


the Copper Wire IS our Battery, the Source of Energy-

The copper wire is NOT our source, it is a means to transmit negative electrons by way of the Hole Theory, from the source to the load.

The/A battery in a circuit is NOT the source. Bearden says a battery is a dipole (two poles obviously) and is merely a collector/antenna between the source and the load. He says the battery in his circuit connects his 3D symmetric system, to the open, 4D, assymmetric system of open space. Open 4D space IS the source.



@Meta - I am sorry, I disagree here.

To induce a Flow of Electrons in a Wire, all one needs is a Permanent Magnet and a piece of Copper Wire.

Copper Atoms consist of 29 Protons, 35 Neutrons and 29 Electrons - The Proton's Equivalent number.

Copper has 4 States of Energy Levels.

So, the Magnetic Field moving in accordance to the Lorentz Force Criteria Frees Electrons from the outer Orbitals, Electron Orbital Hopping and as a Result they move in the Wire, the insulation being the Wave Guide for the Electrons to move in.

See: https://www.myodesie.com/wiki/index/returnEntry/id/3071
 http://learn.sparklelabs.com/electronics/2010/10/22/lesson-1-electrical-pressure/

So, I am sorry, I don't agree with what you wrote.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 04:17:59 AM by EMJunkie »

 

OneLink