That depends on the secondary field due to loading. The secondary produces an opposing field to the primary.

If we wound a 1 to 1 ratio primary and secondary windings, say on opposite sides of the core. pri on the left and secondary on the right, with space between the ends of the windings at the top and bottom, and we simply short out the secondary, when we apply the ac input to the primary, you will be able to detect N at the top of the core and S at the bottom of the core, and opposite in the other phase. So loading the sec opposing the primary field heavily completely disrupts the cores ability to have max flux loops through the circle of the core. If it were an 'ideal' situation, AC input to the primary with the secondary shorted, the core should basically act like an AC electro magnet, alternating N and S at the top and bottom open areas of the core.  And also that N and S leakage can happen in the hole of the core from the top open area between the windings and the bottom. Probably more likely the preferred path as it is the shortest distance.

Now wind the sec first all the way around 1 layer. Then wind the primary around 1 layer on top of the sec.  When we add input to the primary there will be continuous loops of flux in the core. But when we say short the secondary, we have an opposing field developed. Will that not reduce the amount of flux in the core as a whole?? So the max flux in that core is when the sec is not loaded. Loading the secondary makes the core less visible to the primary.

Thats why reducing the inductance of the primary and increased current flows through it, happens when we load the secondary. Loading the secondary reduces the amount of core attraction available to the primary. No core, higher inductance.

Didnt understand that till yesterday, and been thinking about it for a long time. 



Mags

Hi Mags,


Core permeability is something that is often dismissed or not thought about. Say we have an average Core with a permeability of 1000. That means the Magnetic Flux will find it 1000 times easier to travel, than it does in Free Space.

Of course, as the primary see's a higher and higher reluctance due to the restriction of the path, lower permeability, then we will see some leakage. This will have to be very large magnetic fields however!



One of the Core Design characteristics when designing Transformers is selecting a Core Material and Size, thus, that it will not allow the fore mentioned effects to occur!


Why? Because this drastically lowers the Efficiency! Thats why the guys here and else where say that "Leakage Inductance" or "Leakage Flux" is bad!

And for the most part, it does, and is a bad thing. Not always however!

Core permeabilitys can range drastically: 1 (Free Space) up to 600,000 (Magnetic Alloy) - I dont know of anything higher than this as yet.

This is really a massive number, massive magnetic Fields would be required for this material, to create issues that we are talking about. It is very easy to see in practice, that a very low Leakage Flux is present on the outside of an operating Conventional Transformer! An Electric Field can however be detected!

Most Transformers are going to have 1% or less Leakage Flux, on the big expensive ones, maybe 0.05%. This is the whole idea of Transformers!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

We know for sure that one Magnetic Field does effect another, there are interactions between them!


Lenz Law tells us this!


So, if Lenz's Law is the negative effect of Electromagnetic Induction, then it only makes sense to introduce another Magnetic Field to offset the Negative effects of Lenz's Law!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Having some trouble uploading the above video to YouTube - Please be patient... Keep trying...


Also:

Note: Importantly, for this device to work, Current must be flowing in the Partnered Output Coils!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Sometimes a Sentance can say more than the entire Book:

"On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers"



Ref: Jeane Manning - http://merlib.org/node/5282

"Sweet was also a transformer designer and expert, and he remarked that he had also observed specialized self-oscillation in certain transformers."



Ref: Energy From The Vacuum by Tom Bearden

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

I suspect that the ground on the two above FS setups does not have to be an actual earth ground connection.  The ground ensures a window of potential difference with reference to the positive input. However, I wonder if a heavy gauge wire antenna would work just as well. If so, this could be a key as to how Moray got his system working without an earth ground (substituting a virtual ground).
Bob

Hi Bob - The Setup I show in the videos,

here; Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation
and here: Partnered Output Coils - Why it's Important to have Current Flowing!,

are the same as Floyd Sweets Setup, its simply a common ground, in my case, it was the Audio Amplifier, with no ground return on coils, 2, 3 and 4. I have replicated and have shared the experiments of Floyd Sweet! It works as we have been told for some 21 Years!

I think its really important for all of us to keep it simple. Like Richard Feynmann said, we have a terrible tendancy to over think and over complicate the most simple things!

Important: There is not a single glimpse of any of the rubbish that some have reported; Cold Current, Negative Energy, Radiant Energy... etc

Its very important that we stay grounded here and look at this for what it really is!!! This is Solid State Electromagnetic Induction!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: There are many many ways this works! As long as the basic principles are followed! Circuit 1 or circuit 10 will all work as long as we have Two Output Coils, Partnered Output Coils, working together to Invoke Electromagnetic Induction!

I hear you bro! 

@Bob - I hope my posts are not too over the top, I appologise if they come accross this way!

I am trying to generalise the responses so everyone at all levels can use information in the posts.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Yes John, it seems so. Seems it is a one man show. Just me posting what I have found...


Life is amazing. The 21 Grams we all loose when we die gives me hope that we humans can be so much more than we are right now!


Part of us, goes somewhere when we die!


A skeptical mind can be a good thing, but when a skeptical mind reaches for straws to explain the unexplained, it really becomes funny from an observational point of view:

People have believed that the "soul" has a definite physical presence for hundreds, and possibly thousands, of years. But it was only as recently as 1907, that a certain Dr. Duncan MacDougall of Haverhill in Massachusetts actually tried to weigh this soul. In his office, he had a special bed "arranged on a light framework built upon very delicately balanced platform beam scales" that he claimed were accurate to two-tenths of an ounce (around 5.6 grams). Knowing that a dying person might thrash around and upset such delicate scales, he decided to "select a patient dying with a disease that produces great exhaustion, the death occurring with little or no muscular movement, because in such a case, the beam could be kept more perfectly at balance and any loss occurring readily noted".


...



But when you look more closely at his scientific work, you see large problems.

Firstly, six (as in the six dying patients) is not a large enough sample size. When I studied statistics, my lecturer convinced me that, concerning people preferring one cola to another, "8 out of 10 is not statistically significant, but 16 out of 20 is".

Second, he got "good" results (ie, the patient irreversibly lost weight at the moment of death) from just one of the six patients, not all six! Two of the results had to be excluded because of "technical difficulties". One patient's death did show a drop in weight of about three-eighths of an ounce - but this later reversed itself! Two of the other patients registered an immediate loss of weight at the moment of death, but then their weight dropped again a few minutes later. (Does this mean that they died twice!?) Only one of the six patients showed a sudden and non-reversible loss of weight of three-fourths of an ounce (21 grams).

The third problem is a little more subtle. Even today, with all of our sophisticated technology, it is still sometimes very difficult to determine the precise moment of death. And which death did he mean - cellular death, brain death, physical death, heart death, legal death, etc? How could Dr. Duncan MacDougall be so precise back in 1907? And anyhow, how accurate and precise were his scales back in 1907?

From such slender beginnings as a single non-reproducible result, enduring myths are born. There may be lightness after death - but this experiment didn't prove it. We do leave something behind us when we die - the enduring impact that we have had on others. We would probably have as much success in measuring the impression of that mental impact, as we would of measuring the weight of the soul.


ref: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2004/05/13/1105956.htm

What is the logic here?

Why is it that some people will do their utmost to explain things away, even when they have not a single shread of evidence to the contrary?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: John, do you feel like you have a presence about you, do you think Dreams and Visions come from abroard, from a life force?

As to those who are nearer the spiritual realm, their visions, dreams, and the like, are more often - and are more often retained by the individual;

Ref: Reading No#5754 The Sleeping Prophet: Edgar Cayce.

The physical birth and spiritual birth here were different. As we find, 8:05 was the physical birth.

Ref: Reading No# 8267 The Sleeping Prophet: Edgar Cayce.

Dont worry Chris my freind. Im sure many quiet reader enjoy what you share.... 😉
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!