PART1:
Tinman and others -
have you seen this?
isn't it strange what you can do with just some sound-waves and water?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWO93G-zLZ0
people can do this pretty easily i think
in fact i think amazon sold a kit but searching it on google (don't be evil) it seem to be a 'blocked' search now ha ha
anyhow i wonder if anyone calculated the heat inside the bubble with the energy to produce the sound waves?
Thank you for the video https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence in this article it is important to analyze Quote:
In SBSL, a single bubble trapped in an acoustic standing wave emits a pulse of light with each compression of the bubble within the standing wave.This technique allowed a more systematic study of the phenomenon, because it isolated the complex effects into one stable, predictable bubble. It was realized that the temperature inside the bubble was hot enough to melt steel.[citation needed] Interest in sonoluminescence was renewed when an inner temperature of such a bubble well above one millionkelvins was postulated.[citation needed] This temperature is thus far not conclusively proven; rather, recent experiments conducted by theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign indicate temperatures around 20000 K.
it would be 19726.85 Celsius or 35540.33 Fahrenheit.!!! Also important is to note:
Single-bubble sonoluminescence pulses can have very stable periods and positions.!!!
the power of released and indicated by flashes energy, is no more than 10mW per flash (* multiply by number of flashes), and will "never" be more than total power of sound source.However it can be used as a trigger.
Who said that we have to pay for sound, or the sound conversion.
Think about ten $1 bills.... .... equals 10 when added, in one particular pocket.
Think about then people singing at the same time to the same tube .
Think about thermal conductivity
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/thrcn.htmlI have some ideas how to convert that energy to usable form of energy to us.
However It is not substantiated in my head well enough to be published, and by that once published it must be immune from many human elements of poor judgement and no class -
these scumbags from you guys who would like to take advantage and patent it. I'll make sure that whatever I publish is in the form well enough to become public property once and forever.
I'm not communist, Free Energy is communistic.Yes I might also think about patenting something to my own pleasure of making crowd a licensed beneficiary and reach wealthy industry the losers.
But that is my dream for big guys paying hundreds times more than simple Joe, just because I like it this way.
AND NOW LOOK AT PICTURE FROM THE BOTTOM AND START THINKING about what is said above and relation to the thermal conductivity.
================================================================================================PART 2:
Everything said below is not related to upper part
Quote from: tinman on December 05, 2015, 05:12:53 PMNo. When an arc forms across the spark gap,it shorts the secondary/capacitor circuit. this creates a very strong magnetic field in and around the transformer core,and thus gives the primary a big kick in the ass so to speak.
Have you ever played around with coil shorting circuit's?,if so,then you should know how this is working. The ark(spark) is nothing more than a path for the current to flow through.
ah yeah i understand now i'm just not using the correct words in this case.
that is correct you are not using correct words in this case.
ah so the freq is derived from the cap, you 'tune' the spark gap for prime efficiency.
i understand now, it's a great design, your own idea?
Frequency is not delivered to the capacitor.
The signal
-of given shape
and
- at certain potential ( voltage)
described by
- power in given time frame
gives you conditions to understand it as burst, continuous or impulse.
By that when such signal is delivered to capacitor it is altered by
- inductive reactance
and
- capacitive reactance that this capacitor represents to that signal, at that given frequency of that signal.
Simply the capacitor is no longer capacitor and it is analyzed, also as resonance circuit alone, or component of another resonance circuit the capacitor is part of.
So say, this capacitor is calculated in any other resonance circuit,
having:-Parallel Resonance and the Parallel RLC Resonant Circuit with Resistance, Inductance and Capacitance connected together
or series Resonance and the Series RLC Resonant Circuit with Resistance, Inductance and Capacitance connected together
or mix of Series and Parallel. (-known and measured as equivalent circuit)
By that capacitor alone will have three the most significant resonance frequencies:
-series
- parallel
- equivalent circuit ( mix)
measured with spectrum analyzer it will show response in 3 different resonance frequencies
the resonance circuit the capacitor is part of will have also the most significant resonance frequencies::
-series
- parallel
- equivalent circuit ( mix)
and again when measured with spectrum analyzer it will show response in set of another three main but
significantly different resonance frequencies comparing to capacitor alone measurement.
Plasma will than be a conductor characterized by its impedance
All other parameters taken to consideration most likely will depend on impedance of that spark.
Impedance " is made"(- terminology used for simplicity) from
-resistance,
- inductive reactance
- capacitive reactance
http://rfic.eecs.berkeley.edu/142/pdf/book_chap7.pdfEven if reactances could be equal to (zero) 0 ohm- the
resistance will still be present in the circuit unless in cryogenic temperatures ( superconductivity)
At resonance the impedance takes on a minimal value. It’s worthwhile to investigate the cause of resonance, or the cancellation of the reactive components due to the inductor and capacitor. Since the inductor and capacitor voltages are always 180◦ out of phase, and one reactance is dropping while the other is increasing, there is clearly always a frequency when the magnitudes are equal RESONACE is close to no impedance.
in our case please do not think about inductors and capacitors but inductive and capacitive reactive response - reactance of conductor ( it is exactly the same as talking about L and C)
Every piece of conductor( wire) is a resonance circuit by itself even if not connected anywhere .
Every piece of conductor( wire) has inductance, capacitance, resistance even if not connected anywhere .
Impedance is property of AC
NOT DC!!!
However any variation of DC creates impedance in the time frame (- in given time frame= time of change)
Plasma is a conductor and resonance circuit with very much unstable parameters.
Plasma will also be resonance circuit that being unstable has 3 main resonances series, parallel and equivalent circuit but per fraction for the second( microsecond) of steady or close to steady state.
In reality Plasma will be showing on Spectrum Analyzer sort of very wide envelope of the most significant resonances getting low in amplitude starting from very high frequencies going up (the hill) and sloping very low at low frequency of the spectrum.
Picture it as the hill with slopes but high frequency and low frequency slopes are not symmetric.
As the time goes you will observe "the top of the hill" fluctuating more to the right (LF) or to the left(HF)
Usually the longer the gap distance , the lower is resonance frequency (of "top of the hill") of maximum resonance of plasma.
That mechanism is precisely identical to length of piece of wire acting as antenna or resonace circuit- the longer the wire the lower is its resonace frequency.
Wesley
The picture from below belongs to part #1
