Everything you guys say is just vapid meaningless bullcrap.

When something is delayed,that dosnt just mean how long it takes to get from one point to another. It can also mean we delay the time at which point the magnetic field in the generating coil is allowed to be produced. An open coil will not produce current,and thus no CEMF will be created-but a voltage still exist across that coil.If we delay the time a load is placed on the coil,we also delay the lenz force relative to that of the position of the rotor magnet. What has happened here is that you(and others) asume that it is the prpagation speed of the magnetic field that is said to be delayed,when in actual fact it can be the delay in time of an allowed current flow through the generating coil. This is nothing new,and i really do not understand as to how any one can say that a CEMF cannot be delayed relative to that of the inducing magnetic field. PM fields can be flipped or miss aligned to that of the CEMF produced from the generating coil. I want to see some one show !speed up under load) with an air core coil.

When something is delayed,that dosnt just mean how long it takes to get from one point to another. It can also mean we delay the time at which point the magnetic field in the generating coil is allowed to be produced. An open coil will not produce current,and thus no CEMF will be created-but a voltage still exist across that coil.If we delay the time a load is placed on the coil,we also delay the lenz force relative to that of the position of the rotor magnet. What has happened here is that you(and others) asume that it is the prpagation speed of the magnetic field that is said to be delayed,when in actual fact it can be the delay in time of an allowed current flow through the generating coil. This is nothing new,and i really do not understand as to how any one can say that a CEMF cannot be delayed relative to that of the inducing magnetic field. PM fields can be flipped or miss aligned to that of the CEMF produced from the generating coil. I want to see some one show !speed up under load) with an air core coil.

A number of years ago I telephoned Canada and spoke to some students who had claimed replication of the Heins
toroid device. They were extremely nervous and denied their own video, saying it was not cop >1.
Some time later I communicated with R over His Muller replication.  He was terrified. He had received a visit from the CIA.
He came to an agreement which essentially was, "Never show a device self running".
 
We will never probably  see a self running device until the powers that be get out of oil.
I have come across documents which I believe to be authentic which order patent offices to send apparent free energy device patent requests to head office.
 
Certain posters on this forum know what I am talking about.

The experiment shows that the magnetic field sensor sees field intensity versus left right position that goes to zero and then inverts polarity.  What that implies is that from the sensor's point of observation there are two sources 180 degrees out of phase along the length of the laminations.

There was no measurement of induced voltage anywhere.  Lenz' Law is a statement of the orientation of a current that results from Faraday induction.  The experiment fails to measure either induced voltage or current.