Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Vaccinations; recent developments  (Read 492545 times)

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #585 on: January 13, 2015, 06:54:10 AM »
I'm sure 99% of the population knows you don't quote responses to others and responds for them! You only respond when you are being spoken too period. You never respond to others when they are talking to someone else. That is life/forum etiquette sir and I thought you knew this based on your 'maturity'.

Did you just make this up?  This must be in your head...right?

So, you make up a rule and then claim that 99% of everyone on forums knows this?

Total BS.

I have been on forums longer than you have been alive most likely.  Well over 30 years anyway.  100% of the folks I have interacted with never mentioned a rule like this.

Please try again, and this time, maybe be a little more realistic?

So, you come on to a forum and say something about a topic.

Another person responds to you.

You respond back and then you say something stupid (not really a stretch for you) like: "Gravity does not exist."

Under your rule, are you telling me that no other person on that forum can respond to your idiocy because you were not talking to them?

Horse feathers.

Bill

joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #586 on: January 13, 2015, 07:09:51 AM »
I was responding to sarkeizen and you decided to respond to me while quoting my responses to sarkeizen! What more proof do you need that you abused forum etiquette?

Now you are trying to tell me that you have a right to respond to others when they are not even talking to you.

I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you. Lol

But I guess you have been on the internet for so long that you already forgot what etiquette means?

I'm 100% sure you would not like it if someone else answers for you and this can be proven 100% so I don't really know what you are arguing about unless you have an over inflated head that you seem to believe that you are “untouchable”!


sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #587 on: January 13, 2015, 01:09:16 PM »
While on the subject of Trolls the terms used by the Chinese (and Taiwanese) to define (describe) them are brilliantly fascinating:
The real interesting part is how all the definitions focus on reaction.  What would be the opposite of just wanting people to react to a post? I'd suggest that discussing a post is the opposite of merely reacting, talking to a person instead of around them or addressing a hypothetical audience.

I wonder who that describes. :)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #588 on: January 13, 2015, 01:18:50 PM »
I was responding to sarkeizen and you decided to respond to me while quoting my responses to sarkeizen! What more proof do you need that you abused forum etiquette?
Actually you will see most people doing that here.  If you open your eyes and look.  Not even counting trolls like SM, Cap-mo-ron who indirectly respond to someone. :)
Quote
I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you.
"Forum" is latin for "public outdoor place".  In a public discussion it is entirely normal for someone you did not directly address to respond to you. If you want to respond to me privately then use a private message.
Quote
I'm 100%
...and you keep saying that you spend time criticizing your own opinions.  I'll give you a hint,  people who really think about things almost never say things like that. :)
Quote
his can be proven 100%
or this...
Quote
so I don't really know what you are arguing about unless you have an over inflated head that you seem to believe that you are “untouchable”!
I'm not sure if you are trolling or if you are simply too young to be talking here. :)

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #589 on: January 13, 2015, 03:01:22 PM »
trolls like SM, Cap-mo-ron  :)

Oh, the humanity...to be called a troll by a paid shill.

*is crest fallen*

Regards...


SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #590 on: January 13, 2015, 09:17:52 PM »
Quote from: Cap-Z-ro
Oh, the humanity...to be called a troll by a paid shill.

*is crest fallen*

Regards...

'Tis naught more than classic diversion.  The
'perps' nearly always accuse their 'targets' of
being what they positively are. 8)

This too shall pass.

Their addiction for intercourse is extreme. :o

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #591 on: January 14, 2015, 12:56:05 AM »
'Tis naught more than classic diversion.  The
'perps' nearly always accuse their 'targets' of
being what they positively are. 8)

This too shall pass.

Their addiction for intercourse is extreme. :o

The challenges are many multiples of three,

when you are paid by the stroke of key.

Regards...


sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #592 on: January 14, 2015, 01:29:02 AM »
what they positively are.
I have a theory about people who use words like '100%' or 'positively' in a context where you can't really be sure.  I tend to think that people like this are actually revealing their insecurity in their position and are compensating by "papering over" their doubts with extreme terms. 8)  What do you think?

SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #593 on: January 14, 2015, 03:50:18 AM »
Quote from: Sark-Eizen
I have a theory about people who use words like '100%' or 'positively' in a context where you can't really be sure.  I tend to think that people like this are actually revealing their insecurity in their position and are compensating by "papering over" their doubts with extreme terms. 8)  What do you think?

If the shoe fits, wear it.

A tree is known by the fruit it bears.

Failure is a detour, not a dead-end street.

And:

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #594 on: January 14, 2015, 04:05:18 AM »
I was responding to sarkeizen and you decided to respond to me while quoting my responses to sarkeizen! What more proof do you need that you abused forum etiquette?

Now you are trying to tell me that you have a right to respond to others when they are not even talking to you.

I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you. Lol

But I guess you have been on the internet for so long that you already forgot what etiquette means?

I'm 100% sure you would not like it if someone else answers for you and this can be proven 100% so I don't really know what you are arguing about unless you have an over inflated head that you seem to believe that you are “untouchable”!

You are kidding...right?  I mean, you come on a public forum, and want to hold a private conversation...is that it?

There is a device called a p.m. (private message) built into this software that allows for that.

You claimed that 99% of all people on all forums agree with your new rule.  I would sure like to see the study that proves that correct.  Everyone on this forum, and all of the others I have been on for years, act like they are all together in a room speaking.  Have you never been to a cocktail party?

If you are at a cocktail party, and want to have a private conversation, you go outside, or into another room. (PM)

Surely you can not be this ignorant can you?

Also, what the hell does  "I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you" mean?
I am not going to abide by this new rule that you just made up.  I doubt that anyone else here will do so either.

Try the p.m.

Bill

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #595 on: January 14, 2015, 04:09:29 AM »

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #596 on: January 14, 2015, 04:17:30 AM »
I rather doubt anyone else went past the first letter of that piece of spam.


SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #597 on: January 14, 2015, 05:53:49 AM »
Ah, well... ;)

The things children will do to act out
their frustrations. ::)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #598 on: January 14, 2015, 05:58:09 AM »
The things children will do to act out their frustrations.
I've heard that some nurse their wounds through vacuous dime-store affirmations.  Perhaps you have some insight there? :)

joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #599 on: January 14, 2015, 11:13:00 AM »
Quote
You are kidding...right?  I mean, you come on a public forum, and want to hold a private conversation...is that it?

OMG! Are you really that ill in the mind?

Quote
There is a device called a p.m. (private message) built into this software that allows for that.

What does that have to do with anything? I really find you corrupted in the brain!

Quote
You claimed that 99% of all people on all forums agree with your new rule.  I would sure like to see the study that proves that correct.  Everyone on this forum, and all of the others I have been on for years, act like they are all together in a room speaking.  Have you never been to a cocktail party?

OMG! Lol i'm talking to a mental person! Now I want to treat you special treatments. You have zero knowledge about anything what so ever! 30 year moderating has done a nice gone to your brain!

Quote
If you are at a cocktail party, and want to have a private conversation, you go outside, or into another room. (PM)

Ohhh OK! Lol, well i'm sure you will be there talking for the other person in the “private conversation”...you have no brain matter man!

Quote
Surely you can not be this ignorant can you?

hey JB weld BOY! Lol you are too cocky to speak knowledge!

Quote
Also, what the hell does  "I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you" mean?
I am not going to abide by this new rule that you just made up.  I doubt that anyone else here will do so either.

Holly crap on a pedestal! You are so sick in the brain that you have no cure! Lol i'lll always remember as a JB weld boy! Nothing that comes out of your mouth is even SMART! The only solution for you is to give you a taste of your onw medicine dodo bird!

I seriously see this guy half brain dead! Lol