Getting in a pissing match with an ass kisser is an endless undertaking...I showed the ass kisser ol Cap wasn't as stupid as he hoped.

And he still doesn't realize his troll's ass has bailed.

Regards...

Still showing your ass fixation I see.  No one here is surprised.

Oh, I was the Design Engineer on those and many other projects, not the janitor.  I can see if that is what you do for a living you would make that assumption.  No shame in being a janitor, you should be proud of it.

Bill

Another new 'vaccine scam' whistleblower has now come forward.

This time its the lead developer.


" Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines.  She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines.  Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia.  "

http://universalmindradio.com/2014/12/13/lead-developer-of-hpv-vaccines-comes-clean-warns-parents-young-girls-its-all-a-giant-deadly-scam/


Regards...

Your post is at least close to what you were talking about so I'll respond until you won't answer questions.

Another new 'vaccine scam' whistleblower has now come forward.

Nope.  This article is primarily copypasta from material as early as 2009.  Sheep like you don't care and don't investigate.

This time its the lead developer.

Nope.  Diane Harper was not the "lead developer" there is probably no such person in a research team.  Nor is she a leading expert.  She was a site investigator one of many.  Strike #2.

"Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia."

...in 2009.

However if you think so much of her opinion you might consider this quote she made shortly after one of the earlier articles:

I did not say that Cervarix was as deadly as cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix could be riskier or more deadly than cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix was controversial, I stated that Cervarix is not a ‘controversial drug’. I did not ‘hit out’ – I was contacted by the press for facts. And this was not an exclusive interview.”

This was even quoted in a linked article (although it was framed as if she was being attacked but there is no evidence of this alleged attack). Also 

Professor Harper has complained to the PCC. “I fully support the HPV vaccines,” she says. “I believe that in general they are safe in most women. I told the Express all of this.

I don't know Dr. Harper but I've now listened to excerpts from the conference and from other anti-vaccine propaganda.  Her concern appears to be twofold one being that cervical carcinomas are slow developing and that only 5% of infected women have invasive carcinomas.  The problem with her reasoning is by the time you reach that detection level your 5 year survival is at best around 1 in 2.   So 2% of HPV infected women will die needlessly.   According to the article she has a concern about the length of time the vaccine remains active but I haven't been able to find a place where her quote isn't broken up into tiny pieces.    The idea that a vaccine would last for 15 years is far from impossible in a similar way that aquired immunity does.  If the data starts to show a drop in seroposivity you can easily add a booster to the cycle.

I think this is about the time you pick some other nugget from the article and pretend that your argument was all about that.   Perhaps you want to start with the VAERS bit - which as far as I can see she didn't actually say.  Since now that we're straight on efficacy you probably want to pretend you know something about harm.

How do we block other members posts again?, I can't find it in settings... does anyone know where to find it?

AC

In true CDC style, this CDC troll has already been caught altering my text for his own purposes.

What other text from others is he altering is now the question ?

If...the whistleblower really has recanted, I can think of 2 good reasons for the about face.

1. money
2. threats

I can only think of 1 good reason for her initial words...guilty remorse.

Allcanadian, you correctly identified greed as a prime motive for the CDC altering their test results to further their sick agenda.

Greed will get them in the door, the ghoulish goal in this processes is depopulation

There are no shortage of psychopaths like the nazi Mengala in the cabal...and there are endless ghoulish methods used along the way.

Greed is a great motivating factor to attract participants no doubt though.

Regards...

I think this about sums it up....
http://time.com/3634443/cards-against-humanity-poop-black-friday/#3634443/cards-against-humanity-poop-black-friday/

And so Cards Against Humanity decided to create a media spectacle of its own
by pulling all of its products off its site and only selling “Bullshit” — which
Temkin says sold out in less than two hours

Now one has to ask why 30,000 people would buy a box of BS at $6 a pop which was labelled as BS and disclosed as BS?. I think this pretty much explains everything doesn't it?, I mean we really don't have to debate this any futher. Why we could tell people something was killing them, we could offer proof it was and I bet there would still be a line up of people willing to pay for it, lol, priceless.

AC
 

Please, please don't characterize what you do as "debate".  You devalue the word.

Yeah AC...if you want to score points in a debate you must alter your opponents text like the CDC troll does.

Regards...

@Cap

Yeah AC...if you want to score points in a debate you must alter your opponents
text like the CDC troll does.
Regards...

You know I use to enjoy the banter with spam posters but after a while it's just seems lame because it is pointless. There is no debate in it nor is it informitive in any way its just ridiculous so I generally opt out of the conversation. I liked your last link by the way and facebooked it, thanks again.

AC