Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Vaccinations; recent developments  (Read 485925 times)

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #90 on: December 13, 2014, 03:01:42 AM »
A cuppla forum dingos have been observed circling and sniffing scat around the perimeter.

Having watched this show over the years, the readers know why they haven't moved in for the kill.

They can also use google and are just waiting for this to occur to the shill.

Regards...


sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #91 on: December 13, 2014, 03:19:58 AM »
<nonsense deleted>
Anytime you want to bring an actual argument.  I'd love to hear it.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #92 on: December 13, 2014, 03:49:35 AM »
Its minutes away from the doobie hour...anything could happen then.

Regards...


Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #93 on: December 13, 2014, 03:54:43 AM »
I guess we can't delete the part about the people putting poison in my drinking water chemtrails in the sky and poison in my food products.


But lts move on, its a much easier task to try to dismiss this lone whistle blower...but not so easy when you hit double digits, like in the examples cited above...just ask Bill Cosby.

I mean why hide data in the first place, if everything is on the up and up ?

That reminds me, I better go hide yesterdays newspaper.

Regards...

My suggestion to you is...purify you own water, grow your own food, don't take vaccinations, and quit breathing.

See?  Very simple.  Problems solved.

Next?

Bill

PS  I have not had any vaccinations since 1976. (swine flu)  This is my choice.  We can all make our own choices.  Of course, if you can't afford them, then the choice is already made for you.  I have not missed a day of work due to illness in over 30 years.  (crossing fingers)  Just let folks decide for themselves is all I am saying.  What is wrong with that?  Now, if our brilliant government "Orders" us to be vaccinated then, we can talk.  Oh, I am also not paying my fine for not having health insurance under Obamacare (what a joke)  I told the IRS this and they can try to hunt me down if they wish.  I had health insurance until this stupid law was rammed upon us.  Now I can't afford it nor the fines.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #94 on: December 13, 2014, 04:04:54 AM »
Ah...but there is always one brainless bum sniffing dingo that thinks the king lion moving in for the kill, and moves in to howl like an adolescent coyote.

So, king has a new bum sniffer...as it were.

Back in merry ol' england his official title wood be 'Groom of the Stool'.

There may be some king sh!t to wipe from the kingly back rim before the nights out.

Regards...


Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #95 on: December 13, 2014, 04:07:37 AM »
Ah...but there is always one brainless bum sniffing dingo that thinks the king lion moving in for the kill, and moves in to howl like an adolescent coyote.

So, king has a new bum sniffer...as it were.

Back in merry ol' england his official title wood be 'Groom of the Stool'.

There may be some king sh!t to wipe from the kingly back rim before the nights out.

Regards...

Damn Cap, what is with your fixation on men's asses?  I mean really.  Did you not read my post?

Bill

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #96 on: December 13, 2014, 04:13:36 AM »
*watching Corner Gas...will attempt to extract stool 'Groom' from kings rim when its over*


Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #97 on: December 13, 2014, 04:34:53 AM »
I do hope the readership will pardon the interruption from the the brainless fudge scrubber.

Whenever he sees the word 'ass' he thinks that sh!t will shurley follow...so, he's right there to wipe the slot clean.

This may require a modification to the 'tar baby'.

Regards...


SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #98 on: December 13, 2014, 05:28:21 AM »
Quote from: sarkeizen
...
I'm happy to have my mind changed.  However you (and just about everyone else) does EVERYTHING BUT that.
...

Most who come into the various discussions here
simply wish to provide food for thought in order to
encourage research with an open mind in pursuit
of Truth.

If any 'mind changing' is to take place it should only
occur as a result of extensive research which considers
all sides of the various controversies.

We do in our conversational exchanges indicate
how our own personal experiences have helped
to shape our individual mindsets to illustrate that
such experiences can be very powerful motivators.

In the final analysis a well grounded, well informed
person would take a position in any controversy only
after they'd found certain facts to be True according
to their own ability to objectively arrive at conclusions.

Unfortunately, in today's World the People are functioning
at less than ideal capability and are too easily swayed by
emotional appeals and too easily influenced by propaganda
which originates from sources they've been 'programmed'
to accept as authoritative.

Hence, our need to constantly evaluate food for thought in
an effort to acquire wisdom and understanding.

Then there are those 'others' who join in the conversations
just to push buttons and stir the pot.  They do enjoy some
success in acquiring sympathizers who eagerly adopt their
point of view thinking it is the prevailing popular belief.
Many are very fearful of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist'
and remain firmly imprisoned within their box of conformity.

Mind Control techniques are very effective with certain 'individuals'
which explains why governments and their controlled media
outlets make such extensive use of them.  Much capital is invested
annually in programs designed to sway public opinion favorably
towards government folly.  Deception is a very large part of those
programs.

So the question is:  Will anyone change their mind about anything
as a result of objective research or will their minds be changed for
them by means of manipulative techniques?

Any who come across as being deeply entrenched in establishment
thinking or who defend the 'official story' with seemingly blind
obedience are always viewed with suspicion.

SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #99 on: December 13, 2014, 05:46:23 AM »
My suggestion to you is...purify you own water, grow your own food, don't take vaccinations, and quit breathing.

See?  Very simple.  Problems solved.

Except for the 'quit breathing part' not a bad plan.

Quote
PS  I have not had any vaccinations since 1976. (swine flu)  This is my choice.  We can all make our own choices.  Of course, if you can't afford them, then the choice is already made for you.  I have not missed a day of work due to illness in over 30 years.  (crossing fingers)  Just let folks decide for themselves is all I am saying.  What is wrong with that?  Now, if our brilliant government "Orders" us to be vaccinated then, we can talk.  Oh, I am also not paying my fine for not having health insurance under Obamacare (what a joke)  I told the IRS this and they can try to hunt me down if they wish.  I had health insurance until this stupid law was rammed upon us.  Now I can't afford it nor the fines.

Aye, declining most vaccinations is a good
way to go.  If one is knowledgeable in the ways
of strengthening the immune system and living
a low stress life good health will follow.

Yup, Obongo-Care has had a very significant
impact on health insurance costs.  But, being
without may be a blessing in disguise - thus
enabling full control over your health care decisions
and curbing excessive reliance on doctor visits.

In the old days out on the farm we only consulted
a doctor when the pain and discomfort couldn't be
otherwise managed.  Something like maybe four or
five doctor visits each ten years.  And, in those days,
the doc came to the house!  The Vet did too and we
saw him (or her) a lot more often than the Doc.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #100 on: December 13, 2014, 06:35:42 AM »
Ok, where are they...where'd they go ?

Where is king shill and his witt/Groom of the Stool ?

First, I will eliminate the Groom from the issue...I will do that by breaking into words of 3 or more  syllables.


Constantinople copacetic cunnilinguistic...


There while he's working on those words we can get down to it.

Here's how it looked from my vantage point atop the roof of Commissioner Gordon's building.

The king enters the thread demanding evidence to counter all his various purported study's supporting vaccinations from vested interests.

He goes on to offhandedly dismiss THE whistleblower as a a lab janitor or something who's unable to distinguish a graph from a crossword puzzle...when according to what I've heard, there were apparently many whistleblowers who came forward.

I guess he thought that little detail to be insignificant to bring up...maybe inconvenient wood be a more suitable term ?

Regards...



and follows up with more demands for evidence that vaccines are not toxic.



Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #101 on: December 13, 2014, 08:33:59 AM »
Cap - 1:

If you can distract your fascination with men's butts for a moment,  oh wait, you can't?

Oh,OK.

Never mind.

Bill

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #102 on: December 13, 2014, 05:21:30 PM »
He goes on to offhandedly dismiss THE whistleblower as a a lab janitor or something who's unable to distinguish a graph from a crossword puzzle...
This would all be easier if a) You actually make a clear argument - with names and cites and b) you just READ the actual study and associated information.  You are conflating a lot of stuff this is probably because of statement like this:
Quote
when according to what I've heard,
See I don't base my understanding one what the cousin to the dishwasher said they heard in passing from the garbageman.

The person who is getting the label "CDC whistleblower" is Thompson a co-author of the study in question.  He claims that statistically significant data was omitted.  This was after talking with one Brian Hooker.  Hooker is not a statistician which is why he muffed his analysis and got a false positive.  A mistake I wouldn't expect from a grad student let alone a professional.

Also if you really want to believe Thompson - then you also have to believe Hooker which means you believe that MMR is unrelated to autism for everyone except afro-americans.  If you disagree and believe that MMR is a significant risk factor for all people.  Then you have to believe that Hooker's reanalysis is wrong and that Thompson is confused.

Let me know when you, or anyone can make an actual argument.  I won't hold my breath.


sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #103 on: December 13, 2014, 05:37:35 PM »
Most who come into the various discussions here simply wish to provide food for thought
Probably not, at least not in this thread.  "food for thought" describes something that can be "intellectually chewed over".  There is almost no examples of that here.  Case in point "allcanadian" says that he and his friends OBSERVED PEOPLE WITH LOW IQs getting vaccinated.  I argue that only complete morons would think this is something that actually promotes thinking.  It's a) Not something that can be validated unless we know allcanadian and his/her friends.  b) it's not something that can be validated through some other group because there's probably nobody who would have that data. c) it's bigoted nonsense as you in all likelihood can't OBSERVE IQ.

All you can do with allcanadian's statement is accept it or not.  This is pretty much what most people in this thread provide.  This isn't making people think deeply at all.  If anything it's teaching people to accept facile arguments the exact opposite of "food for thought".

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Vaccinations; recent developments
« Reply #104 on: December 13, 2014, 06:38:15 PM »
This would all be easier if a) You actually make a clear argument - with names and cites and b) you just READ the actual study and associated information.
 

Its always good for a laugh when morons tell everybody how unedgumacated they are and then use the word "cites" as if its a noun.


You are conflating a lot of stuff this is probably because of statement like this:See I don't base my understanding one what the cousin to the dishwasher said they heard in passing from the garbageman.

Except in this case, here is where the shill has taken the bait, and has both feet buried in the tar baby.

Anyone with google knows there were many whistleblowers who came forward...and not just the one guy he keeps referencing.

Now, I suppose he will expect you to believe ALL of them are either stupid or lying.


Quote
The person who is getting the label "CDC whistleblower" is Thompson a co-author of the study in question.  He claims that statistically significant data was omitted.  This was after talking with one Brian Hooker.  Hooker is not a statistician which is why he muffed his analysis and got a false positive.  A mistake I wouldn't expect from a grad student let alone a professional.

Lets all look at this bozo's logic a little closer shall we...his words - "...statistically significant data was omitted." and - " Hooker is not a statistician which is why he muffed his analysis..."

Maybe he can explain how someone can ' muffed his analysis ' when " statistically significant data was omitted " ???

The Marines have a term for this...its called this being hung on your own petard.

Shill Shoots Self in Foot...nooz @ eleben.


Quote
Also if you really want to believe Thompson - then you also have to believe Hooker which means you believe that MMR is unrelated to autism for everyone except afro-americans.  If you disagree and believe that MMR is a significant risk factor for all people.  Then you have to believe that Hooker's reanalysis is wrong and that Thompson is confused.

Blah blah blah...also addressed above


Quote
Let me know when you, or anyone can make an actual argument.  I won't hold my breath.

If I were him I wood be holding my breath...at least while in the presence of his 'Groom of the Stool'.
i can only imaging the smell of stale stool...and thats just his breath.

And speaking of stupid, the 'Groom' is not eligible for further acknowledgement in this thread, as he has yet to discern the meaning of the multi-syllable three word code provided for him recently above.

Besides, he can only find relevance whenever a male body part is referenced in context...if not, he will interject his gay references whenever he feels the urge.

Regards...