Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: OverUnity Does Not Exist!  (Read 32956 times)

#### Nink

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 393
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #30 on: December 05, 2014, 03:57:22 AM »
The bases of overunity is 1+1=3   I can prove this is incorrect.  If anyone believes the whole is greater than the sum of the parts they are sadly mistaken.

#### Pirate88179

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 8366
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #31 on: December 05, 2014, 04:25:35 AM »

You cannot prove something DOES NOT EXIST , like you cannot prove a theory is right, because a SINGLE contradition makes it wrong. I see many many devices pop up every day whih can be put into Overunity class

OK, name just one that has been independently tested and certified to be O.U. or at least replicated. Please do not post links to youtube faked videos that have already been proven to be faked.

Just one is all I ask.  If all of these devices are popping up every day then one should be easy to show us.

Bill

#### Tito L. Oracion

• Hero Member
• Posts: 2203
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #32 on: December 05, 2014, 04:47:14 AM »
The bases of overunity is 1+1=3   I can prove this is incorrect.  If anyone believes the whole is greater than the sum of the parts they are sadly mistaken.

Sorry bro but math cannot prove overunity, there are certain mysterious things that are very hard to explain but they are existing.

#### Tito L. Oracion

• Hero Member
• Posts: 2203
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #33 on: December 05, 2014, 04:49:12 AM »
OK, name just one that has been independently tested and certified to be O.U. or at least replicated. Please do not post links to youtube faked videos that have already been proven to be faked.

Just one is all I ask.  If all of these devices are popping up every day then one should be easy to show us.

Bill

Sir how about tesla switch is it still not an evidence?.

#### Pirate88179

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 8366
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #34 on: December 05, 2014, 04:50:19 AM »

Sir how about tesla switch is it still not an evidence?.

No.  Where is the proof?

Bill

#### Tito L. Oracion

• Hero Member
• Posts: 2203
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #35 on: December 05, 2014, 05:05:33 AM »
No.  Where is the proof?

Bill

well, i thought that was obviously proven already.

#### Pirate88179

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 8366
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #36 on: December 05, 2014, 05:07:17 AM »

well, i thought that was obviously proven already.

Think again.

Bill

#### forest

• Hero Member
• Posts: 4076
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #37 on: December 05, 2014, 07:40:18 AM »
You can dispute overunity here, but anyway soon scientists will find it....they are catching up right now..

#### rods

• Newbie
• Posts: 5
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #38 on: December 05, 2014, 12:08:01 PM »
I'm not really too concerned about the many detractors here, many of them come off like minions of the big energy companies who stand to lose there positions if anybody does actually come up with a true alternative energy source.
For those who are asking for videos and pics of my lever powered machine. I will try to post some over the next month or so.Meantime here is a complete descerption.
The frame is built from 1"x 2" mild steel tubing and is 34" x 34" x 60", there is a cross tie top and bottom 10 " from one end. 4 angle iron uprights are welded to the cross ties, 2 are 12 " apart, 2 are 2" apart. On the 2 that are 2" apart I have 2 3/4" pillow block bearings, this is where the
fulcrum resides. The fulcrum is 3/4" round rod and runs through a hole in the lever 2" from the end.At the end of the lever is another piece of 3/4  round rod which serves as the upper axle for the connector rod. The connector rod has a 3/4x 2" sealed ball bearing attached to each end and is simply a piece of flatbar with a 2" pipe welded to each end which serves a the bearing holders. The other uprights have 2 2" pillow block bearings bolted on 8" lower than the 3/4" pillow blocks, this is where the crankshaft resides. The crank is built from 2" round rod 19" long, there is a 2" x 3/4" flatbar welded to one end of it with a 3/4" hole positioned 1.5" from dead center of the crank drilled through the 3/4" flatbar to contain the lower axle of the connector rod. Between the 2 large pillowblocks there is a 14"diameter by 1" thick flywheel mounted on the crankshaft. The total length of the lever is 52". One complete movement of the lever, top to bottom and return = one revolution on the crank with a ma of 25 to 1.

#### Nink

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 393
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #39 on: December 05, 2014, 06:38:10 PM »
You can dispute overunity here, but anyway soon scientists will find it....they are catching up right now..

I am certainly open to the concept we live in an electric universe . I am also open to harvesting the energy from an EU. We harvest and use energy all around us every day (Wind Solar ....) . but I do not believe we can create energy from nothing.

I can build a graphene SWAG collector or an osmotic membrane bu I am just collecting a small amount of voltage from the potential difference in salt water versus fresh water and not actually creating energy.  At some point we will get better at developing new types of membranes to harvest this energy but for now it is not economically viable.

#### Nink

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 393
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #40 on: December 05, 2014, 06:41:26 PM »
For those who are asking for videos and pics of my lever powered machine. I will try to post some over the next month or so.

Picture would be good, difficult to visualize from your description I tried to draw based on what you wrote but..... I am sure someone could build a small scale version and test if they had some photos..

#### DaS Energy

• Full Member
• Posts: 132
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #41 on: December 12, 2014, 06:26:09 PM »

As yet untested in its final design, it appears OverUnity is possible.

The basis for this any turbine that is 82% efficient will convert one litre per second of 9 bar force flow into 720 watts, such known turbines being the Francis and Pelton. Either turbine receiving one litre per second at 9,000 bar force shall produce 720KW.

It is also known that Carbon Dioxide-CO2 rising in temperature from +30*C to +100*C has a pressure force exceeding 9,000 bar.

Carbon Dioxide- CO2 at temperatures becomes a Supercritical fluid, IE a gas behaving as if its liquid.

It is known that Carbon Dioxide-CO2 passaging through water shall take on the waters temperature.

To heat one litre of water by +100C in one second requires 456KW, or 0.076KW to heat the one litre of water by +1*C in one minute, or 4.56KW to heat the one litre of water by +1*C in one second.

By passaging the CO2 through the +100*C water so the CO2 heats up from +30*C to +100*C in one second, the 9,000 bar for per litre per second is achieved.

What is not known is will the turbines produce the same conversion rates running on CO2 as they do on water.

However should they not be able to convert the 9,000 bar one litre per second to 720KW then the conversion method needs to use the open technology DaS Valve which 100% converts gas pressure to water pressure.

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #42 on: December 12, 2014, 08:01:10 PM »
I'm not really too concerned about the many detractors here, many of them come off like minions of the big energy companies who stand to lose there positions if anybody does actually come up with a true alternative energy source.
This almost deserves a topic in and of itself.  So do people really believe that there are people here who are paid by energy companies to post?  Seriously?

#### Vinyasi

• Newbie
• Posts: 41
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #43 on: November 25, 2022, 11:04:09 PM »
Overunity is impossible , that's a fact . However this doesn't mean free energy is impossible, and it even doesn't mean free energy with amplification is impossible. You can test it yourself, but it's not recommended.... for example solar panel can be have rised power output if you use a lens to focus more sun rays on it.

And Joseph Newman's device got a kick in the pants, so to speak, when Byron Brubaker advised him to replace his rotary permanent magnets with plastic canisters of helium wrapped with an open coil to take advantage of the voltage doubling occurring within Newman's humungous coil. The open coil transferred the electrostatic field of Newman's massive coil into the helium gas. This excited this noble gas and caused it to emit a very high frequency -- much higher than the low frequency of the rotating canisters.

This higher frequency blended with the lower frequency. The result was a quickening of electrical reactance sufficient enough to reverse current and return it to its source, his dry cell batteries, with an amperage of a few hundred milliamperes. Yet, it was the humungous torque provided by the massive coil which was the true overunity of his device since it could easily rotate a sump pump and, against the inertial friction of the water, pump massive gallons per minute with the added advantage of never depleting his battery source! Unfortunately, he did wear them out since they were not designed to be recharged. So, Byron suggested to Newman to replace those dry cell batteries with a solar panel, but Newman refused to take Byron's advice. Oh, well ...

and ...

http://

#### Vinyasi

• Newbie
• Posts: 41
##### Re: OverUnity Does Not Exist!
« Reply #44 on: November 25, 2022, 11:05:20 PM »
The bases of overunity is 1+1=3   I can prove this is incorrect.  If anyone believes the whole is greater than the sum of the parts they are sadly mistaken.

Consider the following example in which the whole is less than the absolute value of one of its parts ...

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Free_Energy_does_not_Exist#Anomalous_Kirchhoff_Behavior