Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy
Gravity powered devices => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: The Eskimo Quinn on November 17, 2014, 10:58:27 AM
-
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
-
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
I am the might Mark and I say BS. your calculations are based on a false assumption. The energy used to pump up does not take into account losses and does not translate into stored energy.
Kind regards
Mark
-
...and without loss you have unity - and then what's the point? When you load it, unity will turn into "under unity".
-
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
250W applied for 20 hours = 5kWh =18E6J
20k liters of water = 20m3 = 20E3 kg at an average height of 5.5m = 1.078 MJ.
You've got a dismal efficiency of 1.078E6 JOUT/18E6 JIN ~= 6% before you ever get to your turbines.
-
Some quotes from the document:
"when I say I have perfected a machine that will put out 20 megawatts an hour..."
"The 250watt per hour pump..."
"you see Newtonians get stuck on the watts per hour math. It took 20 hours to get the energy correct, so now some idiot Newtonian will say well you have to divide that by twenty to get watts per hour."
"But for the diehard fuckwit Newtonians let’s do the math anyway. 32700 Divided 20 hours = 1635 watts per hour, the input was how much per hour?"
What "diehard fuckwit Newtonian" ever talked about "watts per hour" ? The fuckwits that designed the hydroelectric generator systems that provide Quinn with his electricity, perhaps? I don't think so.
The only fuckwit around here is the author of that document, who cannot seem to grasp the difference between a Watt (a rate of energy use) and a Joule (a quantity of energy). The term "watts per hour" that he uses constantly in his silly document means something different than what he thinks it means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt_hour#Misuse_of_watts_per_hour (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt_hour#Misuse_of_watts_per_hour)
But we are used to that kind of foolishness around here. Fuckwits, indeed! I laugh at you, Quinn. You are another blowhard false claimant who can't even use the proper units, you just multiply everything together, and if that doesn't work to give you numbers you like ... you divide!
VALIDATED? By whom? How validated? How is a document containing such "fuckwittery" validated by any professional? Watts per hour..... over and over in the "validated" document. The claim of "validation" is just another blowhard lie.
-
250W applied for 20 hours = 5kWh =18E6J
20k liters of water = 20m3 = 20E3 kg at an average height of 5.5m = 1.078 MJ.
You've got a dismal efficiency of 1.078E6 JOUT/18E6 JIN ~= 6% before you ever get to your turbines.
You don't seriously believe that the author of the "watts per hour" "fuckwit Newtonians" document can understand exponential notation, do you?
-
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
Attache doc is the data on the better pump noted