Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct  (Read 5896 times)

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2014, 11:24:51 AM »
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
I am the might Mark and I say BS. your calculations are based on a false assumption. The energy used to pump up does not take into account losses and does not translate into stored energy.
Kind regards
Mark

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2014, 03:51:13 PM »
...and without loss you have unity - and then what's the point? When you load it, unity will turn into "under unity".

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2014, 04:45:33 PM »
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy
250W applied for 20 hours = 5kWh =18E6J
20k liters of water = 20m3 = 20E3 kg at an average height of 5.5m = 1.078 MJ.
You've got a dismal efficiency of 1.078E6 JOUT/18E6 JIN ~= 6% before you ever get to your turbines.


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2014, 05:30:52 PM »
Some quotes from the document:

"when I say I have perfected a machine that will put out 20 megawatts an hour..."
  "The 250watt per hour  pump..."
"you see Newtonians get stuck on the watts per hour math. It took 20 hours to get the energy correct, so now some idiot Newtonian will say well you have to divide that by twenty to get watts per hour."
"But for the diehard fuckwit Newtonians let’s do the math anyway. 32700 Divided 20 hours = 1635 watts per hour, the input was how much per hour?"


What "diehard fuckwit Newtonian" ever talked about "watts per hour" ?  The fuckwits that designed the hydroelectric generator systems that provide Quinn with his electricity, perhaps? I don't think so.

The only fuckwit around here is the author of that document, who cannot seem to grasp the difference between a Watt (a rate of energy use) and a Joule (a quantity of energy).  The term "watts per hour" that he uses constantly in his silly document means something different than what he thinks it means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt_hour#Misuse_of_watts_per_hour
But we are used to that kind of foolishness around here. Fuckwits, indeed! I laugh at you, Quinn. You are another blowhard false claimant who can't even use the proper units, you just multiply everything together, and if that doesn't work to give you numbers you like ... you divide!

VALIDATED? By whom? How validated? How is a document containing such "fuckwittery" validated by any professional? Watts per hour..... over and over in the "validated" document. The claim of "validation" is just another blowhard lie.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2014, 05:37:27 PM »
250W applied for 20 hours = 5kWh =18E6J
20k liters of water = 20m3 = 20E3 kg at an average height of 5.5m = 1.078 MJ.
You've got a dismal efficiency of 1.078E6 JOUT/18E6 JIN ~= 6% before you ever get to your turbines.

You don't seriously believe that the author of the "watts per hour" "fuckwit Newtonians" document can understand exponential notation, do you?

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: New device - Validated by Hydro turbine electrial engineer as correct
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2014, 09:21:34 AM »
No comments from the author, validated so enjoy

Attache doc is the data on the better pump noted