Author Topic: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning ) (Read 612295 times)

Grumage · « **Reply #840 on:** January 28, 2015, 07:50:04 PM »

Quote from: Jimboot on January 28, 2015, 12:48:33 AM

I'm thinking vertical now. Grum said it lowered his input cost

Dear Jim.

I was vertical !! Going horizontal shaved off 40 mA of the primary drive current. I like being horizontal, zzzzzz !!

Cheers Grum.

ooop's I see now tis a matter of perception. Disc or Shaft !!

Jimboot · « **Reply #841 on:** January 29, 2015, 10:00:29 AM »

Quote from: Mister Caribbean Roots on January 29, 2015, 01:41:26 AM

Your vertical is my horizontal and i've decided to go vertical which is your horizontal...get it...
You are going by from the shaft point of view...i'm going by from the plane of rotation point of view...
Cheers

lol - we're on the same page then

prochiro · « **Reply #842 on:** January 30, 2015, 06:39:45 PM »

Hello All

We have seen that the bucking coils can react with produced waves and a disc of magnets. They also react to a small running motor close by and really react to the scalarbeamer. For those that want to see something really strange see the following for magnet details and check out what a scalarbeamer does to this system, POWER.

http://www.gocs1.com/gocs1/Psionics/SCALARBEAMER.htm

Prochiro

Jimboot · « **Reply #843 on:** February 01, 2015, 09:24:33 AM »

Hey MCR BIG decrease in input cost by having my axle vertical[/size]

has halved the power required for same speeds.[/size]

Ed morbus · « **Reply #844 on:** February 01, 2015, 11:59:43 PM »

rong place

Jimboot · « **Reply #845 on:** February 02, 2015, 08:11:30 AM »

Quote from: Ed morbus on February 01, 2015, 11:59:43 PM

watch ruslan new video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNbluR0XBFg

Hi Ed was this meant for the Kapananze thread?

Ed morbus · « **Reply #846 on:** February 02, 2015, 09:07:58 AM »

Sorry rong treed

gotoluc · « **Reply #847 on:** February 04, 2015, 10:42:55 PM »

Hi everyone,

I've been busy with another project for the past 3 weeks and didn't have the time to complete one of my last experiment to confirm if this effect has any value.
So before closing the book on this one, since my previous version was not showing a good results and was also a different design, I wanted to build a single coil version of Dragon's version (Energetic Forum user) since he claimed to have some good results.

Even with these changes, my results are not positive, however, I made a video of it anyways so all can see.

From all the replication attempts that I've seen, researchers are not doing power calculations (watts in and watts out), so as far as I'm concerned they won't see the reality until they do.

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0souZVPKw8

I'm moving on to testing Erfinder's multi strand bucking coils.

Luc

Jimboot · « **Reply #848 on:** February 04, 2015, 11:00:48 PM »

Quote from: gotoluc on February 04, 2015, 10:42:55 PM

Hi everyone,

I've been busy with another project for the past month and did not have the chance to complete one of my last experiment to confirm if this effect has any value.

I had started a build of a user at the Energetic Forum called Dragon who claimed to have some good results with his version of the device. Since my version was not showing any benefit and was different then his I decided to replicate a single coil version of his setup as my last attempt before closing the book on this one.

The results are not positive, however, I made a video anyways so all can see.

From all the replication attempts that I've seen, researchers are not doing power calculations (watts in and watts out), so as far as I'm concerned they won't see the reality until they do.

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0souZVPKw8

I'm moving on to testing Erfinder's multi strand bucking coils.

Luc

Thanks Luc,
Not sure why you'd say you're the only one that has shown measurements though. Grum, mcr and I have measured. Whilst you're using a power hungry prime mover some of us are not and are getting better outputs. So in answer to your question "why?" That is why.

gotoluc · « **Reply #849 on:** February 04, 2015, 11:33:10 PM »

Hi Jimboot,

I will retract what I wrote if you can post one video where we can see power (Watts) to prime mover when a load resistor is connected and disconnected and we can also see a scope shot (with many samples) of the sine wave across the load resistor displaying an RMS value.

Kind regards

Luc

Jimboot · « **Reply #850 on:** February 05, 2015, 03:56:27 AM »

No need to retract. I showed rms over 5ohm load but I don't think power in was on camera. I was just puzzled at your seemingly belligerent tone.

It's costing me around 4watts to get 400mw on a single coil with a two pole rotor. Not 65watts to get the same.

Just because you are not getting good results from your design doesn't mean others aren't.

gotoluc · « **Reply #851 on:** February 05, 2015, 05:50:38 AM »

I use the drill press for convenience. The input power does not matter as long as you can measure it and detect a small change.
If I would of measured no change to the prime mover when the coil was under load I would take the time to build a new efficient prime mover.
However, it has not been the case. All tests are basic generator action.

I have taken the time to share my results to help others who may be sitting on the fence waiting for results instead of just walking away like many do.

Regards

Luc

gotoluc · « **Reply #852 on:** February 05, 2015, 06:02:39 AM »

I will be sharing my replication attempt of Erfinder's multi strand bucking gen coils at this topic: http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2782.0

Jimboot · « **Reply #853 on:** February 05, 2015, 11:14:30 AM »

Quote from: gotoluc on February 05, 2015, 05:50:38 AM

I use the drill press for convenience. The input power does not matter as long as you can measure it and detect a small change.
If I would of measured no change to the prime mover when the coil was under load I would take the time to build a new efficient prime mover.
However, it has not been the case. All tests are basic generator action.

I have taken the time to share my results to help others who may be sitting on the fence waiting for results instead of just walking away like many do.

Regards

Luc

No worries. In my tests I have found that to get 400mw in a traditional gen setup requires close to 8 watt off the same rotor coil and core which is one reason why Im still pursuing it. All the best

thngr · « **Reply #854 on:** February 06, 2015, 11:55:42 AM »

Quote from: Mister Caribbean Roots on February 01, 2015, 04:08:36 AM

Hi all,

Here's an update on the T1000 flux gate design...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtWMullF4O0

More info in the video section and this is my last post here but i will continue on O.U.R forum...
I don't have the time for more than 1 forum and this here...
------
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.
------
really drive me nuts here...lol
Took me a few try outs just to mod this post...

Cheers

you have promissing results MC. but don't you think rator had to be upgraded? Find some ferrite core peaces or rusty iron dust with a little bit resin molded(better cores we must have). and iron washers are not ferrite cores

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning ) (Read 612295 times)

Grumage

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

prochiro

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Ed morbus

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Ed morbus

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

gotoluc

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

gotoluc

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

gotoluc

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

gotoluc

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Jimboot

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

thngr

Re: The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )