Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5  (Read 7996 times)

Mancha

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« on: October 14, 2014, 01:00:17 PM »
Hi all,
It is maybe  last video about Radiant energy which I made.
This one is about Radiant energy on atomic and molecular level, which open  new horison about charging the batteries or producing hydrogen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq9AvKU26A4&list=UUpiJQKHA_4sZUhJj1CdfhWg
All The Best,
Milan

freethisone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2014, 01:58:05 PM »
good work.

dont give up on this yet, i have made many advancements.

here is my link..

http://www.overunity.com/14898/air-charge-tesla-like-devise/

i want you to show me how to charge a batter, or simply scoop off energy that is all around us..


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2014, 08:56:17 AM »
How can it be a "free energy" circuit when it is powered by a power supply? This is using the negative ion generator to produce an ion current that transfers power from the _mains_ to the little capacitors, right?

In order to catch fish, you have to go fishing in waters that contain fish. If you put the fish in the water yourself, all the better... for you.

freethisone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2014, 01:49:26 AM »
How can it be a "free energy" circuit when it is powered by a power supply? This is using the negative ion generator to produce an ion current that transfers power from the _mains_ to the little capacitors, right?

In order to catch fish, you have to go fishing in waters that contain fish. If you put the fish in the water yourself, all the better... for you.

Hi there is a secret Tesla had discovered. So did I.   here is a link that made it all possible..  http://www.archive.org/stream/electricalresear00caveuoft#page/48/mode/2up

by adding the ion charge yes i can charge a capacitor, but this works on the basis of over charged air. there is available additional energy then what i put in, on top of that a second increase in free charge can be made with UV lights, or even Ozone.

when  I re -discovered this it made me have goose bumps.

this is a fact, i had set up the ion gen on a stainless steel bowl, i added a rod of brass that would sit at 90 degrees from the bowl, and close enough to get a spark to draw a free charge, or at least what was available on the conductor. Now the cool part.

i increased the gap far enough that no spark would be drawn to the rod. it was a gap that exceed the 7.5 kv  available.  so i had thought with no change and enough time the spark would cross the gap. this was false, but when i opened the door, and window ozone was abundant in the air, it was raining. all of a sudden, i mean immediately it started sparking crossing a much larger gap  than was possible with the amount of charge on the bowl.

so free energy is in the air. its called ions. also as a spark crosses a gap, the electron potential is increased, again adding free energy to the mix..

any questions. there is much much more i can share..


cheers..

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2014, 04:15:39 AM »
I'm sure there is. But you have already demonstrated with your posts, especially this last one, that you do not understand the phenomena with which you are working.

Let me see you demonstrate something _unusual_ or that cannot be accounted for by our present actual understanding of electrical phenomena, but is predicted by your understanding of what you have seen and cited. Please. Your sparking bowl example is not such a thing.

Quote
as a spark crosses a gap, the electron potential is increased, again adding free energy to the mix

Please provide some reference or unequivocal demonstration that supports this statement.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2014, 11:53:43 PM »
Hi all,
It is maybe  last video about Radiant energy which I made.
This one is about Radiant energy on atomic and molecular level, which open  new horison about charging the batteries or producing hydrogen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq9AvKU26A4&list=UUpiJQKHA_4sZUhJj1CdfhWg
All The Best,
Milan


Hi Milan. I watched all five of your videos on Tesla Radiant energy.
Lots of interesting info. Lots to think about. Thanks for the videos.
All the best...

freethisone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2014, 11:54:29 PM »
hi void, i was hoping to get your post. i have been watching your movies more a long time.


these are my movies here you can find them  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M6uI9uZARA


but i have one other that i want you to see.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w60SIHwOztk
you can skip to the end. it is showing a self oscillating circuit with a high charge potential..
at the end i simply touch it. i do get a bigger shock. it don't like me compared to a small conductor.




freethisone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2014, 11:58:39 PM »
I'm sure there is. But you have already demonstrated with your posts, especially this last one, that you do not understand the phenomena with which you are working.

Let me see you demonstrate something _unusual_ or that cannot be accounted for by our present actual understanding of electrical phenomena, but is predicted by your understanding of what you have seen and cited. Please. Your sparking bowl example is not such a thing.


hello, this is a very derogatory response to my post.  why would you say i don't know what i am talking about in reference to my posts.

if you would like to give me a reason why the sparking bowl is no such thing?

keep it civil.  i have done these experiments, so i assure you i know what i am doing..

here is enough of my work with a complete explanation  and results..    I can take this much further if needed.

if you need help understanding this phenomena refer to Mit lecturer Walter Lewin..

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1566.0

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2014, 12:40:26 AM »
hello, this is a very derogatory response to my post.  why would you say i don't know what i am talking about in reference to my posts.

if you would like to give me a reason why the sparking bowl is no such thing?

keep it civil.  i have done these experiments, so i assure you i know what i am doing..

here is enough of my work with a complete explanation  and results..    I can take this much further if needed.

if you need help understanding this phenomena refer to Mit lecturer Walter Lewin..

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1566.0

I have asked you to provide support for this statement:
Quote
so free energy is in the air. its called ions. also as a spark crosses a gap, the electron potential is increased, again adding free energy to the mix..
And you have not done so. The fact that you think "free energy is in the air. its called ions" (sic) indicates to me very solidly that you do not understand what you are doing. You can refer to as many of Lewin's lectures as you like but since you don't understand what he is talking about, every time you do it drives home my point even more. The videos do not demonstrate what you  claim that they do and that other website is just another statement of the wrong things you have claimed in this thread.

If you want anyone to take you seriously you should be able to _demonstrate_ the validity of your claims, or cite references that actually do support you, rather than contradict you as Lewin's _entire course_ does.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2014, 01:07:44 AM »
hello, this is a very derogatory response to my post.  why would you say i don't know what i am talking about in reference to my posts.

if you would like to give me a reason why the sparking bowl is no such thing?

keep it civil.  i have done these experiments, so i assure you i know what i am doing..

here is enough of my work with a complete explanation  and results..    I can take this much further if needed.

if you need help understanding this phenomena refer to Mit lecturer Walter Lewin..

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1566.0

I have watched Dr. Walter Lewin's videos, all of them.  (there are like 50 of them)  Some of them I have watched several times, and no where, in any of his videos, does he speak of radiant energy, of free energy, or anything like that.  He is pretty much a "Laws of Physics" kind of guy, and I love his classes.  How you can extrapolate something else out of his lectures is beyond me.  Best of luck to you.

Bill

freethisone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Tesla's Radiant Energy part 5
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2014, 02:39:20 PM »
I think you need to look again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQvmJjiM124  at 9 min 21 sec..

   if you dont understand i cant help you.   i said extra energy is available in the air. this is true, see the entire movie, but i did outline the key feature for you. if u still don't understand that's fine. .

i am not going to hold your hand, i provided explanation, and experiments.

i am going to ask the moderators to remove your post, you should not post on this forum .

you may be smart, but your just blowing wind. because you dont understand the concepts.

here is a link watch it, listen for the word ion, listen to the words electron, and then say your sorry for being a shill.


i have a whole thread dedicated to these experiments, just because you dont understand something does not give you the right to call me a lire :-*.

you wanted proof right? ok here it is, and watch closely to what i say. go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89o8rx-jHRE&list=UUW-aecm5xvksB-Pk8Xyb_Nw
At  1 min 27 sec I show you this is the case. see the small spark?  ok now do you see the larger spark? go back now to 55 sec.

that means that there is a increase just as i stated.

ion   noun \ˈī-ən, ˈī-ˌän\   (Medical Dictionary)
Medical Definition of ION

1
: an atom or group of atoms that carries a positive or negative electric charge as a result of having lost or gained one or more electrons—see anion, cation
2
: a charged subatomic particle (as a free electron)


ionizing radiation is a potential electrical power source easy as that. so yes there is an abundance of free charges all around us.

the ionizing detector if you want too make it, only needs a heavy brass rod. no ground wire is needed in this case.

you set the gap, and wait for ionizing radiation to enter the electric field.. :D :D.

are you still gonna call me a lire? the sparking bowl is just that, a detector of ionizing radiation, but you should already realize you were quick to discredit my findings.
if a spark is increased then it is a detection devise of ionizing radiation. so when the spark is increased all on its own, then you know to put on your gas mask. :D
saves lives.


if that is not enough Walter lewin also describes the same phenomenon, by a gain in kinetic energy, electron, and ion additions, as provided for you in the links above. :'(.