Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come  (Read 38233 times)

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #45 on: October 01, 2014, 01:54:51 PM »
Kator01, that is an excellent pdf, thank you.  I expect to see exactly what the document shows when the capacitor discharges.  The only difference is the power involved. The 0.25uF at 7000V carries a charge of 0.5CV^2  or 6 joules.  it discharges in the 1uH inductor . I'm not sure if it discharges in 1/2 or quarter of a cycle, I dont have time to look it up right now, but even in 1/2 a cycle (resonant F =300kHz , we are looking at 6J/1.6x10^-6s.  3.6MW pulse.  Wow, is this correct??

If these alpha particles only act on a few mils, then no problem, since the rf skin effect forces the current more to the surface. 

The coil shown is pure copper and about 3/4 inch tall, so the resistance is very small. The capacitor leads will have the most resistance.


Telecom, your idea of converting to light is awesome, but a patent I have mentions that the efficiency is very, very low. Also I only have uranium which I believe is too weak to make anything fluoresce. The same patent also discusses pn juctions generating voltage from radiation.

More from me tomorrow guys....

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #46 on: October 01, 2014, 02:06:36 PM »
Indeed kator http://www.technologyreview.com/view/427140/graphene-battery-turns-ambient-heat-into-electric-current/  what these guys shouldve done was dissolve uranium chloride into their solution.holy shit..

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #47 on: October 01, 2014, 04:28:54 PM »
Then in 1954 harold colman goes and shoves cadmium,calcium phosphate,cobalt chloride,carbon in a quartz tube,then shoves powder zinc on one end,powder copper on the other end,bombs it with 300mhz rf and gets radio-activity from it and huge electric power? 

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #48 on: October 01, 2014, 05:37:01 PM »
Dear profitis, its all very exiting, but let's take it slow or we will give up prematurely.  I can probably try the Coleman but only with 1kw at 27mhz.  Moray is the most credible of the lot.  Brown has all sorts of configurations in his descriptions.  Strontium 90 and Beryllium in one, Radium thorium and uranium in another. In a more rare 1987 speech I have I thinks he talks just of radium. Gets a bit confusing.  Let's see if uranium helps increase the Q of the coil and move on from there.

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #49 on: October 01, 2014, 05:55:05 PM »
@pomodoro

"we are looking at 6J/1.6x10^-6s.  3.6MW pulse.  Wow, is this correct?? "

calculation is correct. But actually its hard to observe a single puls, better is to watch the decay or damping of the oszillation.

@profitis: thanks to the battery-link. Yeah what if we put that readioactive stuff into the solution.... Holy shit = Holy Grail he he. Lot of possibilities. One thing came to my mind wile reading this is the negative electro-potential of the EZ-Water ( You had a chance to read Dr. Pollack book-preview ? )

This sentence here caught my attention: "
we present a graphene device with asymmetric electrodes configuration to capture such ionic thermal energy and convert it into electricity"

So we need to know more about the setup of this cell.

I will sent this link to Murray Smith, he is the top graphe guy well equipped with ethics and the effort to create cheap graphen-products
( Graphene-ink ) in different variations.

http://www.youtube.com/user/RobertMurraySmith

products:

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/conductive-ink#home


Kator01







profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #50 on: October 01, 2014, 06:55:29 PM »
Ok pomodoro.if you can get a single anomoly going twil be a step,no,leap in the right direction.my head is buzzing with all the zig-zag ways this can go.I can think of about 10 different electrochemical experiments worth trying out but more on that later.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #51 on: October 01, 2014, 07:06:27 PM »
Exellent kator.yes I got pollaks vibes. send the link to mr smith he's experiments are cool.brings awareness to 'the other side' of possibility.ps.those dirac electrons are already half-floating around free,what's a dose of gammas,beta's,alphas going to do?going to cook them ofcors lol,jumping beans

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #52 on: October 02, 2014, 06:14:39 AM »
Back to the drawing board , 9kV discharge and no oscillations.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #53 on: October 02, 2014, 08:25:13 AM »
Take some filter paper,soak with silver nitrate sol,evaporate near the toaster to dry pomodoro.then place a few uranium crystals ontop one piece,nothing on the other.leave in the dark.it will give us an idea of the full power obtainable from natural uranium.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #54 on: October 02, 2014, 08:47:21 AM »
Each and every particle will split 30000 silver nitrate molecules.you will be able to create silver-based electrochemical systems with this.uranium will recharge our silver-based batteries.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #55 on: October 02, 2014, 09:31:50 AM »
Rubidium takes a month to fog a photographic film.uranium takes a few hours.2Ag + I2 >< 2AgI + energy

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #56 on: October 02, 2014, 10:25:52 AM »
When I finish this Moray stuff I might have a look. I need to concentrate on this. Lots do do here first. Here is the next coil /cap combo. Seems a lot better, but still loses too much too quickly. Picture shows 7000v dumped into coil. Switching by hand or by spark gap makes little difference in the decay.

I'd like to get the Q considerably higher before I paint it with uranium.


profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #57 on: October 02, 2014, 10:39:51 AM »
Why wait pomodoro? Let us calculate the ratio of particle loss emitted from uranium vs the faraday gain from split silver iodide in a day on a photographic plate.I'l put my money on it being around 30 000 - 1.realisticly speaking,this is the best way to go.and it falls in line with laws of physics,even the 2nd law

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #58 on: October 02, 2014, 11:40:13 AM »
This type of photogalvanic cell will undoubtedly work if we are to believe in marie curies infamous photographic plate experiment.it will convert maybe 30%(compare to betavoltaics 2%) uranium's natural radioactivity to electricity.

pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come
« Reply #59 on: October 02, 2014, 01:02:03 PM »
I'm no good at multitasking, so profitis, by all means research that cell and keep notes. When I've exhausted the Moray/Brown ideas then I might move on to this cell.  A problem with this cell of yours is that nitrate is consumed and cell will foul up with nitrite. Anyway be useful on the current topic please - what is the best way to plate the copper coil or silver plated coil with uranium. I want to plate the outside of it with a thin uranium plate.

I need to improve the Q of the LC combo and make it a very reproducible setup. a Q or 100+ is what I'm after.  I could silver plate the coil but I need to make sure it is the coil that is being inefficient. It could well be the spark that occurs as the coil and capacitor leads are brought together.
The LC circuit will be tested both with high voltage/huge current  (as Brown used) and also with Kator's Q measuring system as in the  pdf.  If the alpha particles do increase the Q with uranium, then there is a strong chance that radium could have not only increased the Q but also allowed continuous oscillation. 
This is the first time I've heard of anyone actually trying this and not just regurgitating theories.