https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9YRgaVomZ4

 

No way.  I posted the diagram thinking that it would be self-explanatory.  I even said that when I made the posting.  You came up clueless when you were asked the question.  So you are just lying and bluffing right now.  Sorry!

but it was NOT Consistent with the Linear Graph shown

Thanks for showing yourself up again for how dumb and ignorant you can be for a person that claimed that he knew his stuff.  We never even saw AC's setup.  There is no reason that the picture I plucked off of Google Images would have the same response as AC's magnet.  Nor was there even a response curve shown, I just showed a picture.  So how can you "compare response curves" when there wasn't even two response curves to compare?  On top of that, we have no clue how consistently AC moved the Hall sensor along the magnet and the data he posted showed a time base.

So, you made a comparison when it was not legitimate from the get-go and there was no comparable graph to compare anyways!

I said on another thread that the average experimenter around here is barely functioning at a high school level and you demonstrate it.

Yes - the reason I call these two Oil Company Trolls! Where they get paid to ignorantly debate no matter what the topic! They cant even agree to disagree!

It's a funny rationalization you use to knowingly lie.

It's a funny rationalization you use to knowingly lie.

This might be why you "Prefer" the Grid over all other independent Power Disto Networks? Oh my, its Consolidated Edison that you work for isn't it!

Hahaha - seriously gotta laugh at the obvious! 

@ALL;

The fact that a Magnetic Mono Pole has been predicted for some 83 Years and today created in a Lab proves the debate that MarkE and MileHigh are LYING to people about, shows that they argue ignorantly!

These two guys must be supporting the Other Side!!! Oil Company Trolls!!!

Again I reference: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jan/30/magnetic-monopoles-seen-in-the-lab

Kind Regards

  Chris

Did you even bother to read the article in your reference, or the original article in Nature? Of course you did not, or you wouldn't be posting the link here... SINCE IT REFUTES YOUR CLAIM and more especially ... the original article was written by people who fully endorse the conventional picture of _magnetic field lines_ .
Why don't you sent the authors an email, asking whether the conventional picture or the "peanut waist" picture is correct.  I know why not, and so does everyone else reading here.

Here's a little quote from the article you linked:

An ordinary bar magnet consists of both a north and a south pole; if the magnet is cut in two, then each of the resulting halves will also be bipolar. In fact, no matter how many times the magnet is divided, the north and south poles remain coupled – even as far down as individual atoms, which themselves act like tiny magnets. This is reflected in Maxwell's equations, which say that isolated positive and negative electric charges exist but isolated magnetic charges do not.
------------
 Peter Holdsworth, a condensed-matter physicist at the Ecole Normale Supérieure in Lyon, praises the work as "an exquisite application of nanotechnology, cold atoms, high-powered computing and clever theory". He points out that the US–Finnish team has not proved the existence of magnetic monopoles, but he thinks the researchers have provided experimental confirmation of Dirac's mathematics. "It is an important result and could lead to many other analogous results," he says. "Will it help particle physicists to find real monopoles? Probably not, but it should encourage them to keep looking."

So, we can see very clearly that you have MISREPRESENTED what is contained in the PhysicsWorld article and the actual paper in Nature to which it refers.

You are caving and clutching at straws.  You are even copying what I am saying about you and trying to say it about me.

Chris, I said "v = L di/dt" to you and got a virtual blank stare back from you.  The jig is up.

@MH

We never even saw AC's setup.  There is no reason that the picture I plucked off of Google Images would have the same response as AC's magnet.  Nor was there even a response curve shown, I just showed a picture.  So how can you "compare response curves" when there wasn't even two response curves to compare?  On top of that, we have no clue how consistently AC moved the Hall sensor along the magnet and the data he posted showed a time base.

Good point, I used a plastic straight edge and moved my probe at as uniform a speed as possible. In the other plot I held the probe in a clamp then used two pieces of plastic around the center to spin it perpendicular to the NS axis.


I'm still working on the new setup which I will run by you guys now. I built a new probe with two linear ratiometric hall sensors 90 deg apart to capture the probe x,y axis (vertical,horizontal sensors). The probe output goes to my Arduino/Labview interface where I then plot two separate xy intensity graphs(vertical/horizontal probe) with a third xy intensity graph representing the difference between the two.


The xy intensity graph simply uses the probe position, xy coordinates, and the probe output y to plot a 2D picture with the probe value y determining the color of each point. I'm using a linear servo arrangement my interface controls to scan line by line within a 3" x 3" area with a resolution of 1023 x 1023 points. So we should have a pretty solid picture of both the x and y axis of the probe output as well as the difference between the two.


This is just speculation but I'm hoping to see a line where the probe xy values sum to zero which should be obvious in the third graph. If probe rotation was showing this then this arrangement should prove it in my opinion. All this debate about what people think is wonderful however I want to know for myself.


AC

MarkE - Is It? Is it Really? Who do you work for, BP is British Petroleum you know! Or is it BP BS Inc?

EMJ it really reflects poorly on you that you deliberately spread disparging lies.  Is that something exclusive to your internet behavior or do you go around doing that to:  your coworkers, your neighbors, and your family as well?