To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Who wants to repeat my experiment?  (Read 5225 times)

Offline dump

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Who wants to repeat my experiment?
« on: May 10, 2014, 09:24:31 AM »
Recently, I had the idea of ​​making a very simple and reliable CE device , which also is a reactionless engine . The device is a rotating cylinder placed in a container with water. The cylinder has a radius slightly smaller than the radius of the semicircular bottom so between the bottom and the cylinder there is a gap of about 1 mm. Between the rotating cylinder and the sides of the container is sufficiently large distance . During rotation of the cylinder is formed around the boundary layer , wherein the pressure is less than atmospheric pressure. Pressure reduction due to the Bernoulli law . Under the container pressure is atmospheric. I.e greater than the gap. Due to this, and there is the thrust direction is indicated by an arrow . -  an illustration of this device.

Summary , we have over-unity propulsion unsupported because the rotation of the cylinder energy consumed very little. Here are the calculations for a cylinder of radius 0.1 meters , 0.3 meters in length and speed of 20 per second : dynamic pressure in the boundary layer of the cylinder (1000 * (2 * 3.14 * 0.1 * 20) ^ 2) / 2 = 78876.8 Pa static pressure will be equal to the difference of atmospheric and dynamic : 101325-78876,8 = 22448.2 Pa then lift is equal to the product of the dynamic pressure on the cylinder diameter and its length (obviously without integration) : 78876.8 * 0.2 * 0.3 = 4732.608 Newtons , which is very good for a device with these dimensions . What do you think about this? Are the calculations right? Would you repeat this device ?