Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)  (Read 13607 times)

vineet_kiran

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2014, 06:09:14 AM »
Quote from: burnit0017 on September 25, 2014, 02:30:52 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxIRaJlTD4Y

Hi, this is similar.


Fantastic!!!  But why "still engineers are skeptic"?   Did anybody try to verify it?

It clearly implies that  the lever principle of  'Force X distance'  can lead to overunity by adjusting in time using horizontal (eccentric) and rotational movement with a lengthy vertical axis.

 




Logged

AlanA

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2014, 09:34:12 AM »
@ burnit007

Yes it might be similar but nevertheless different to. The John Device is much simpler. But both are based on the same principle. On Youtube you can wath quite a lot of videos about the John Device. As he wants to have a patent for his inventions there are not so many information. It would be quite interesting if this inventions is really overunity. The inventor claims ;) but that is not enough.
I personally think that the skinner device is the most promising invention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTWwp5qUY3U
Logged

burnit0017

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2014, 12:16:38 PM »
Hi, when they did their calculations they only used the input to output values. They did not include all the power that was added at the input by the mechanical advantage and gravity. If they measured the torque at the output and tried to generate electricity then the story  would be different. They were playing math word games to grab headlines.

Thanks for the info.
Logged

burnit0017

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2014, 12:46:26 PM »
Hi, I wonder if two solenoids was used to drive a scotch yoke to convert the reciprocating action to a circular motion would work to drive the device?
Logged

burnit0017

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2014, 03:12:38 PM »
Hi, on the Skinner device, what is the reason for the top weight? Is it needed?
Logged

burnit0017

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2014, 03:34:53 PM »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »