Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER  (Read 24860 times)

Philip Hardcastle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« on: August 21, 2014, 01:13:01 AM »

This is a verified new technology that is free to use.

www.habtec.com


3 Chinese factories have been asked to produce proof of physics devices for general sale so that entrepreneurs can do due diligence ahead of becoming HABTEC builders. I had hoped the Chinese companies would have already (by 20th August) provided their price, but alas I am still waiting for a final quote.


It is easy for anyone to build a HABTEC from scratch at home, the materials are tungsten and molybdenum foil, mica and emitter paint, the only difficulty is getting access to a high vacuum pump and emitter coatings (other than standard Ba/Sr Carbonate Transene Co. paint).


My wish, in giving this technology to the World for free, is to have as many people as possible get involved in a grass roots amateur driven revolution that will abate the use of coal.


I have turned down offers from a chief scientist of an Australian tech company (who carried out independent proof of concept test), and a leading University to discuss forming a JV, I am not interested in making a penny from HABTEC, but I will from IMP.....for phones.............soon.


Cheers

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2014, 03:34:21 AM »
Who has verified the technology?  When did they verify it?  What procedure did they use to verify it?  Where is the data from the experiments?

orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2014, 04:02:12 AM »
This should be great news for operators of e-cat power plants. They have lots of waist heat to spare that could be converted with the habtech.


Is there a good reference design and list of equipment/materials to be published? What kind of vacuum pump is needed? Is a normal household phallus pump sufficient or is a special make/spec required? It would also help if you post detailed instructions for hobbyists to replicate the reference design.


Thanks and good luck.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2014, 04:57:07 AM »
This is a verified new technology that is...
...likely neither new nor verified.
Quote
It is easy for anyone to build a HABTEC from scratch at home
doubtful.
Quote
My wish, in giving this technology to the World for free
What exactly have you given?  A vague set of instructions with no reason to believe that they work.

Quote
I have turned down offers from a chief scientist of an Australian tech company
A title which frequently sounds more impressive than it is.
Quote
(who carried out independent proof of concept test)
Which we will never get to see.
Quote
and a leading University to discuss forming a JV
You turned down a "discussion".  Is that supposed to be impressive?
Quote
, I am not interested in making a penny from HABTEC
Since you haven't made any money off any of your other crackpot ideas I'd say this is called "going with your strengths".

celsus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2014, 12:31:42 PM »
I suspect some people somewhere else are expecting an act of kapellophagy.

Quote
Posted By: PJH on Jun 4th 2014 I will feel obligated to consume said Akubra if I cannot provide to you verifiable proof of a working device in contradiction to 2LOT, please state what excuse you will use on the 20th August not to eat your yet to be nominated hat?

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2014, 12:49:54 PM »
Maybe in his mind he thinks he can provide the proof.  He may think that the plans on his web site are enough.

Philip Hardcastle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2014, 12:24:00 AM »
Maybe in his mind he thinks he can provide the proof.  He may think that the plans on his web site are enough.


Mark I am not going to engage in your pointless posts, or those of that weirdo Sarcastic, other than to say I have posted a $10,000 dollar reward if my claims are not met with the device that you can buy for a few hundred dollars (no money comes to me).


I see no point in posting the names of professors who wish their names to be held in confidence to prove to you that I am not delusional.


Nor do I see any point in posting proof of operation on YT, as you and others will ignore it or otherwise claim it invalid / rigged.


The only way to get a physics breakthrough widely accepted is for anyone to be able to make one and see it work.


It is an exceptional claim and it requires exceptional proof to be accepted by scientists, only you doing the test will convince you, and the same for others until such time as the number of people that know that it works is sufficient to get the more sceptical to stop their incessant chant that laws cannot be broken.


ALL BREAKTHROUGH DISCOVERIES OVERTURN THE POSITIONS OF SCEPTICS, AND ALL REQUIRE A MASSIVE PUSH TO BE RECOGNISED.


However noting that people are too complacent to bother to build a small device, as described, I decided to get a mass produced device made.


Please feel free to buy a device from the Chinese, and make the claim for the $10,000 if it does not work.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2014, 12:56:43 AM »

Mark I am not going to engage in your pointless posts, or those of that weirdo Sarcastic, other than to say I have posted a $10,000 dollar reward if my claims are not met with the device that you can buy for a few hundred dollars (no money comes to me).
Mr. Hardcastle, I offered a speculation as to why you have not "eaten your hat" as you promised to do back in June if by Aug. 20 you had failed to disprove the Second Law.
Quote


I see no point in posting the names of professors who wish their names to be held in confidence to prove to you that I am not delusional.
That reads as though you confirm my speculation:  You believe you have proof, and so feel you have no obligation to "eat your hat".  Am I wrong?
Quote


Nor do I see any point in posting proof of operation on YT, as you and others will ignore it or otherwise claim it invalid / rigged.


The only way to get a physics breakthrough widely accepted is for anyone to be able to make one and see it work.
Is this a new idea for you?  If you held that view in June, then surely you recognized that you would need a working demonstration by Aug. 20th in order for others to believe that you had delivered proof.
Quote


It is an exceptional claim and it requires exceptional proof to be accepted by scientists, only you doing the test will convince you, and the same for others until such time as the number of people that know that it works is sufficient to get the more sceptical to stop their incessant chant that laws cannot be broken.


ALL BREAKTHROUGH DISCOVERIES OVERTURN THE POSITIONS OF SCEPTICS, AND ALL REQUIRE A MASSIVE PUSH TO BE RECOGNISED.
That may be true.  However, you came up with the bet holding that belief.  You knew what you needed to deliver in order to convince skeptics. What have you delivered that you feel satisfies the bet?
Quote


However noting that people are too complacent to bother to build a small device, as described, I decided to get a mass produced device made.


Please feel free to buy a device from the Chinese, and make the claim for the $10,000 if it does not work.
Quote
    Posted By: PJH on Jun 4th 2014 I will feel obligated to consume said Akubra if I cannot provide to you verifiable proof of a working device in contradiction to 2LOT, please state what excuse you will use on the 20th August not to eat your yet to be nominated hat?


According to the quote, when you made your bet, you said:  "if I cannot provide to you verifiable proof of a working devices in contradiction to 2LOT".   

Who do you think you have provided the verifiable  proof to?  Who has received these working devices?  If it was not the skeptics you challenged, then surely you can understand why your word has been challenged. 

To put it another way:  What evidence have you provided of your claims since you made the bet in June?


sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2014, 01:03:04 AM »
Mark I am not going to engage in your pointless posts, or those of that weirdo Sarcastic
Apparently I still bother you enough for you to earn a namecall.  Must be doing something right.
Quote
I have posted a $10,000 dollar reward if my claims are not met with the device that you can buy for a few hundred dollars (no money comes to me).
So let me get this straight.  You've never really come through on anything you've claimed and you have a reputation of reneging on bets on some parts of the internet.  The $10K isn't in escrow, there is no well defined criteria and you have a way of interpreting things which borders on delusional. 
Quote
I see no point in posting the names of professors who wish their names to be held in confidence to prove to you that I am not delusional.
Quote
Nor do I see any point in posting proof of operation on YT, as you and others will ignore it or otherwise claim it invalid / rigged.
You could take that $10K and pay for a third-party tester chosen by the skeptics.
Quote
The only way to get a physics breakthrough widely accepted is for anyone to be able to make one and see it work.
This is completely untrue and stupid. 
Quote
It is an exceptional claim and it requires exceptional proof to be accepted by scientists, only you doing the test will convince you
Absolutely wrong, and probably wrong about MarkE as well.  I regularly evaluate things in peer reviewed journals and consider them to be well supported.  Relativity had some critics one of them being Einstein himself this is why you fail at science.  You have no capacity to consider yourself wrong.  Every failure of yours gives you the choice: "Believe I've been a total moron for years" ooooor "It's almost working".  It's not hard to see why you keep choosing the later.

Quote
and the same for others until such time as the number of people that know that it works is sufficient to get the more sceptical to stop their incessant chant that laws cannot be broken.
Why are you treating science like a popularity contest.  If a million morons all say it works.  They're still a million morons.  If a billion people do the utterly crappy error-prone and IQ lowering $10 experiment of yours and get a positive result.   Then that still doesn't mean anything in objective terms.   You expect people who are not trained to do experiments performing an experiment with little value to be wrong more than right.
Quote
ALL BREAKTHROUGH DISCOVERIES OVERTURN THE POSITIONS OF SCEPTICS, AND ALL REQUIRE A MASSIVE PUSH TO BE RECOGNISED.
I think this counts as raving nonsense.  How was relativity accepted?  Not through a "massive push" or having every moron in a garage build a "relativity device".   It was first through the adoption of the mathematical model, then experimental results and then meeting large scale predictions.  Some might call the discovery of helicobacter pylori as a cause of cancer would be a "breakthrough discovery".  How did it get accepted.  Again, it was a case of research building up.

Quote
Please feel free to buy a device from the Chinese, and make the claim for the $10,000 if it does not work.
...and amuse me greatly by watching the $10K never appear.

Madebymonkeys

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 164
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2014, 01:22:53 AM »
This is a verified new technology that is free to use.

www.habtec.com

3 Chinese factories have been asked to produce proof of physics devices for general sale so that entrepreneurs can do due diligence ahead of becoming HABTEC builders. I had hoped the Chinese companies would have already (by 20th August) provided their price, but alas I am still waiting for a final quote.

Given that it's all open source, can you name the China fabs - could be useful for people to contact them, it might spur them on a little?
I can't see a reason why this info can't be shared?

Quote
My wish, in giving this technology to the World for free, is to have as many people as possible get involved in a grass roots amateur driven revolution that will abate the use of coal.

Surely, if a self confessed expert can't show the world a working unit, amateurs aren't going to drive this forward!
Post a picture or the actual construction diagrams - these must have been supplied to the 3 China fabs for assy, right?

Quote
I have turned down offers from a chief scientist of an Australian tech company (who carried out independent proof of concept test), and a leading University to discuss forming a JV, I am not interested in making a penny from HABTEC, but I will from IMP.....for phones.............soon.

Why not make money from it, you can then choose where it goes - 3rd world, Ferrari's, bigger home etc.
You hold the patent (if it's granted) so you can choose.
Letting, ultimately, big business sell the device means that, in the end, a few big companies will get all the Ferrari's!
Open sourcing so the little man can make it himself won't work, a big company has the buying power, skills and distribution channels to make it a worthless exercise to make it yourself.  They will also guarantee its operation, sell the mirrors etc.

Quote
Cheers

Thanks.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2014, 01:47:05 AM »
People who welsh on bets, redefine terms on the fly, and fail time and time again to produce evidence of their claims, and then blame their failures on others... are snivelling weasels, good only for amusement and as examples for small children of how not to behave in public.

Madebymonkeys

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 164
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2014, 01:56:32 AM »
People who welsh on bets, redefine terms on the fly, and fail time and time again to produce evidence of their claims, and then blame their failures on others... are snivelling weasels, good only for amusement and as examples for small children of how not to behave in public.

You should setup a competition - ask the readers to try and disprove your comment above, if they can they win $10k. You can fund the prize-pot from that Habtec you'll be sending back  ;D

orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #12 on: August 22, 2014, 02:30:17 AM »
Shouldn't Philip Hardcastle be the one who has to back up his claims? Renaming the Quackco/Semithankyou is not enough to seed confidence. He promised a working device and verifiable proof but came up with another round of fluffy postulations. He should at least eat his 'Akubra Cattlefriend' hat, as promised.

Philip Hardcastle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #13 on: August 22, 2014, 06:09:27 AM »
I did not fail to provide proof, did fail to get the Chinese to build devices by 20th, agreed, but who would have thought they would be so slow?


I do however accept the hat eating challenge needs to be put on firmer ground, so I have added that as a condition of the $10,000 challenge.


Also added an offer to pay a fee to any USA university that is prepared to issues a test certificate.


Now that is the end of my generosity, if you guys want to call me names rather than taking the challenge, so be it.


I will not post here again, anyone wanting to talk to me can do so through the habtec.com contact page.


In time every detail people can want will be posted to the site, soooon


Details of uploaded vids to YT will eventually be linked on a page, including me eating hat, not.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER
« Reply #14 on: August 22, 2014, 06:25:44 AM »
I did not fail to provide proof, did fail to get the Chinese to build devices by 20th, agreed, but who would have thought they would be so slow?
Then where is the proof that you have provided?
Quote


I do however accept the hat eating challenge needs to be put on firmer ground, so I have added that as a condition of the $10,000 challenge.
The time for the bet you created in June is done.  If you have the proof you said that you would you had best show it or it will seem that you are welching on the bet.  If you make yourself look untrustworthy on the one bet, it isn't likely people are going to trust you on this new $10,000. bet that you propose.
Quote


Also added an offer to pay a fee to any USA university that is prepared to issues a test certificate.
Is that something on your web site?  What are the details or your offer?
Quote


Now that is the end of my generosity, if you guys want to call me names rather than taking the challenge, so be it.
You made a bet with a time limit that you selected.  The time limit is up.  By all appearances you have lost that bet and are unwilling to cover your end.  There are two honorable outs here:  Deliver proof that you won the bet, or live up to your end of the bet that you made.  If you take an out that is not honorable you do that to yourself.
Quote


I will not post here again, anyone wanting to talk to me can do so through the habtec.com contact page.


In time every detail people can want will be posted to the site, soooon


Details of uploaded vids to YT will eventually be linked on a page, including me eating hat, not.
This sounds an awful lot like you are welching on your bet.