Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.  (Read 75505 times)

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #105 on: September 08, 2014, 05:49:47 AM »
Im happy that you have unsubscribed to my channel,as a deluded fool is one that thinks all the answers come by way of the gun-a true blue war monger is what you are,your nic says it all PIRATE

Spoken like someone who is deluded and will need the USA to bail them out yet again.  War mongers, in your words, saved your ass in WWII so, what is your problem then?  Should we not have done that?  Just read some history before making your opinions is all I ask.  You would be dead if not for the USA.  Do we do everything right?  Of course not.  But, we did save the world, including you, in WWII so I think we have done more right than wrong.

I have many Aussie friends that wish they could still own weapons.  They get robbed by guys with guns but yet, they are not allowed to have any.  How is that working for you?

Bill

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #106 on: September 09, 2014, 03:17:11 AM »
Spoken like someone who is deluded and will need the USA to bail them out yet again.  War mongers, in your words, saved your ass in WWII so, what is your problem then?  Should we not have done that?  Just read some history before making your opinions is all I ask.  You would be dead if not for the USA.  Do we do everything right?  Of course not.  But, we did save the world, including you, in WWII so I think we have done more right than wrong.

I have many Aussie friends that wish they could still own weapons.  They get robbed by guys with guns but yet, they are not allowed to have any.  How is that working for you?

Bill

Yes we seen how well the US bailed everyone out with the GFC-thanks a treat. Fortunately we were smart enough to come out of that relatively unscathed. As far as the guns go,well i answered that else where,and like i said,if you think you must own a gun,then you just go and get a licence to have one. You are mistaken by saying that our guns were taken off us-only semi automatic guns were taken from us. But join a gun club,and you can keep them too. I still have my gun's,including my high powerd rifles. In fact,it only takes 24 hours to get a gun licence over here,so the gun ban
as you call it,was just a political stunt that really did nothing at all- but it got the government voted in for a second term.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #107 on: September 10, 2014, 03:02:26 PM »
Well on the mend now,so hope to get the setup and test done this weekend.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #108 on: September 11, 2014, 03:43:33 AM »
Before i go any further with posting my finding's(along with video's),what would be the implications of proving some of set physics wrong?

Also,if a reactionless drive was actually proven beyond doubt to work,what laws of physics would it violate?

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #109 on: September 11, 2014, 06:56:41 AM »
Before i go any further with posting my finding's(along with video's),what would be the implications of proving some of set physics wrong?

Also,if a reactionless drive was actually proven beyond doubt to work,what laws of physics would it violate?
A true working reactionless drive would violate Conservation of Momentum.  It is one of the First Principles.  Violating it would have profound implications for the way that we think the world around us works.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #110 on: September 11, 2014, 10:08:38 AM »
A true working reactionless drive would violate Conservation of Momentum.  It is one of the First Principles.  Violating it would have profound implications for the way that we think the world around us works.
Thanks Mark for the reply.

I am in the process of joining all the test video's together-i think your going to like the result's.
I have also completed the first test of second stage test,where as the pressure cleaner wand is now mounted on the pendulum. I think your going to like that test even more.

The first test video result's(as depicted a few post ago) should be up within 1 to1 1/2 hours. Once we discus those test,and eliminate any faults with the test i may have made,then i will post the second video showing the result's of the completed unit so far.

I also believe there is a better way than using the high pressure water jet,and would give a much better result. This would eliminate the need for the high pressure cleaner,and use only an electric motor. This new system could also be driven off the back side of the pump motor,thus meaning we need only the one motor to do the job. I will start the build on the new part of the device tomorrow.

CANGAS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #111 on: September 11, 2014, 10:17:33 AM »
A true working reactionless drive would violate Conservation of Momentum.  It is one of the First Principles.  Violating it would have profound implications for the way that we think the world around us works.

Could you be so generous as to write out some specific examples of how it would be violation of COM? You know, quote "one of the First Principles", and then, explain in exact detail how and why the "one of the First Principles" is being violated?

Sweeping general statements are so easy to make.....

LOL! I just did it myself! :)


CANGAS 71

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #112 on: September 11, 2014, 02:23:23 PM »

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #113 on: September 12, 2014, 06:30:32 AM »
Could you be so generous as to write out some specific examples of how it would be violation of COM? You know, quote "one of the First Principles", and then, explain in exact detail how and why the "one of the First Principles" is being violated?

Sweeping general statements are so easy to make.....

LOL! I just did it myself! :)


CANGAS 71
Momentum is the product of mass and its velocity.     

Conservation of momentum is a First Principle. 

CoM means that momentum within a system is some constant value. Therefore if within some system, change of momentum in one thing requires a matching sum change of momentum  of other items in the system.

A reactionless drive alters the velocity of the driven object in isolation.

CANGAS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #114 on: September 12, 2014, 07:41:53 AM »
Momentum is the product of mass and its velocity.     

Conservation of momentum is a First Principle. 

CoM means that momentum within a system is some constant value. Therefore if within some system, change of momentum in one thing requires a matching sum change of momentum  of other items in the system.

A reactionless drive alters the velocity of the driven object in isolation.


I will generously assume that you made your very best effort to explain your discontent re reactionless drive in SPECIFIC TERMS and examples.

Thank you for doing your best.

I suggest that you immediately investigate the meaning of "specific" in your nearest dictionary.


CANGAS 74


MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #116 on: September 12, 2014, 11:14:03 AM »

I will generously assume that you made your very best effort to explain your discontent re reactionless drive in SPECIFIC TERMS and examples.

Thank you for doing your best.

I suggest that you immediately investigate the meaning of "specific" in your nearest dictionary.


CANGAS 74
LOL

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #117 on: October 12, 2014, 05:13:07 PM »
There used to be these toys back in the 80s, basically a top, with a gyro in it. They would start on the ground,  pullstring to make it spin. The gyro would then fly upwards in a very uncontrolled wabbly fashion, then land when it slowed down and end its journey like a normal spinning top.

Momentum is always conserved. Change the angular momentum, and you change the directional force.

pinobot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #118 on: October 19, 2014, 10:37:45 PM »
Funny, i've also had this idea that it's about changing the rotational speed of a gyroscope for some time now.




tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Inertia Drive project. RFDD.
« Reply #119 on: October 20, 2014, 12:58:57 PM »
There used to be these toys back in the 80s, basically a top, with a gyro in it. They would start on the ground,  pullstring to make it spin. The gyro would then fly upwards in a very uncontrolled wabbly fashion, then land when it slowed down and end its journey like a normal spinning top.

Momentum is always conserved. Change the angular momentum, and you change the directional force.
Are you sure they wernt the one's that had the fan blades,as i had those.