# Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

## Gravity powered devices => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: iacob alex on August 16, 2014, 09:29:43 PM

Title: A "merry go round" test...
Post by: iacob alex on August 16, 2014, 09:29:43 PM
Their purpose is to play an asymmetric couple of "merry go round"s , so to obtain a tractive/transport vector ( inertial propulsion).
If we minimize this arrangement ( three masses,only) , and play the gravity accelerated unbalance , we can use a single continuous variable/oscillatory arm...so to test self-motion ?
Al_ex
Title: Re: A "merry go round" test...
Post by: MarkE on August 16, 2014, 11:05:44 PM
Various attempts to build reactionless drives have all relied on stiction.  CoM is a stubborn thing.
Title: Re: A "merry go round" test...
Post by: iacob alex on August 17, 2014, 12:24:05 AM
Hi !
In my opinion , there is a difference about how we play the rezultant vector of the couple (paired ) spinning eccentered masses.
Some people play it "to & fro"+striction , as :
www.inertialpropulsion.com/the_dean_drive.htm (http://www.inertialpropulsion.com/the_dean_drive.htm)      ...and others
...vis-a-vis the up here movie ("to",only...the idea is to play the rezultant tractive vector , on the same side of the fulcrum).
A lot of "old" experiments , at : www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex
Maybe, if I "speed up" some of them...
Anyway,it seems that the inertial propulsion and gravity motor have a common "starting" symbol :pendulum / eccentered mass.
This can "cover" the variable/oscillatory leverage method , for a possible gravity self-powered device/motor.
Al_ex
Title: Re: A "merry go round" test...
Post by: ARMCORTEX on August 17, 2014, 04:18:31 PM
hmmm....
Title: Re: A "merry go round" test...
Post by: iacob alex on August 20, 2014, 03:18:49 PM
.....as a simplified asymmetric "merry-go-round", with two masses ,only :